Nutritional Status in Hemodialysis Patients: Options for On-Line Convective Treatment

Hemodiafiltration: Technical and Medical Insights

Despite the significant medical and technical improvements in the field of dialytic renal replacement modalities, morbidity and mortality are excessively high among patients with end-stage kidney disease, and most interventional studies yielded disappointing results. Hemodiafiltration, a dialysis method that was implemented in clinics many years ago and that combines the two main principles of hemodialysis and hemofiltration-diffusion and convection-has had a positive impact on mortality rates, especially when delivered in a high-volume mode as a surrogate for a high convective dose. The achievement of high substitution volumes during dialysis treatments does not only depend on patient characteristics but also on the dialyzer (membrane) and the adequately equipped hemodiafiltration machine. The present review article summarizes the technical aspects of online hemodiafiltration and discusses present and ongoing clinical studies with regards to hard clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Differences in Malnutrition Inflammation Score of Hemodialysis Patients Associated With Hemodialysis Factors. A Spanish Multicenter Epidemiologic Study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study are to analyze the prevalence of malnutrition in hemodialysis (HD) patients in Spain, and to assess the association of malnutrition in these patients with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and parameters related to HD.

DESIGN AND METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional study in HD patients from centers all over Spain was conducted. Nutritional status of patients was assessed using Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), and was stratified according to MIS values into 5 categories: ≤2, normal nutrition; >2 to ≤5, mild malnutrition or risk of malnutrition; >5 to ≤7, moderate malnutrition; >7 to ≤10, severe malnutrition, and >10, extreme malnutrition.

RESULTS

A total of 52 Spanish HD Units participated in the study enrolling 2,748 patients. Mean age of patients was 68.20 ± 14.24 years, 1,811 (65.9%) were men. Mean time on HD was 55.63 ± 63.25 months. Using an MIS cut-off point of 2 for malnutrition, 89% of patients were malnourished (MIS > 2). However, with a cut-off point of 5, more commonly described in the literature, the percentage of patients with malnutrition was reduced to 51.7%. Using this cut-off, we observed significant differences between patients with malnutrition and normo-nourished patients in biochemical parameters, age, Charlson Index, HD residual renal function, scheme, and vascular access (permanent catheter vs arteriovenous fistula). A multivariate regression analysis showed that age, sex, HD scheme, vascular access, residual renal function, and comorbidity index were predictive factors for malnutrition. We found that a high percentage of HD patients with malnutrition did not receive oral supplementation.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of malnutrition in HD patients in Spain, assessed using the MIS scale, was high. Higher malnutrition was associated with the use of catheter versus fistula, and standard HD versus online hemodiafiltration, and with the absence of residual renal function, older age, greater comorbidity, and male sex. Malnourished patients had a low rate of oral supplementation.

Convection volume, β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin reduction ratios, and body composition in predilution online haemodiafiltration

AIM

The effect of convection volume (CV) in patients on predilution online haemodiafiltration (Pre-OL-HDF) was evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study in 126 patients on Pre-OL-HDF. Dialysis conditions, laboratory data, and same day post-dialysis body composition measurements using bioimpedance spectroscopy were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their CV: ≥ median value and < median value. Linear regression analyses for reduction ratios (RRs) of β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin, and body composition, were conducted.

RESULTS

Age, dialysis vintage, and CVs of the study patients were 64 ± 12 years, 81 (48-154) months, and 43.2 (38.5-55.9) L/session, respectively. The higher CV (≥ 43 L/session) group (n=66) had significantly higher RRs of β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin, lean tissue index, body cell mass index, total body water (TBW), extracellular water (ECW), and intracellular water (ICW) compared with the lower CV (< 43 L/session) group (n = 60; P < 0.01). Serum albumin and fat tissue index were not significantly different between the groups. CV/ECW, CV/TBW, and CV/ICW but not un-adjusted CV, were significant determinants for β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin RRs (P < 0.05). Lean tissue and body cell mass indexes, but not the fat tissue index, showed significant associations with CV, and RRs of β2-microglobulin and α1-microglobulin (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients on Pre-OL-HDF, higher values in the lean tissue index and body cell mass index were observed in those with higher CV versus lower CV, and CV adjusted to body water may be useful to prescribe individualized conditions for Pre-OL-HDF. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Why and how high volume hemodiafiltration may reduce cardiovascular mortality in stage 5 chronic kidney disease dialysis patients? A comprehensive literature review on mechanisms involved

Online hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an established renal replacement modality for patients with end stage chronic kidney disease that is now gaining rapid clinical acceptance worldwide. Currently, there is a growing body of evidence indicating that treatment with HDF is associated with better outcomes and reduced cardiovascular mortality for dialysis patients. In this comprehensive review, we provide an update on the potential mechanisms which may improve survival in HDF treated patients. The strongest evidence is for better hemodynamic stability and reduced endothelial dysfunction associated with HDF treatments. Clinically, this is marked by a reduced incidence of intradialytic hypotensive episodes, with a better hemodynamic response to ultrafiltration, mediated by an increase in total peripheral vascular resistance and extra-vascular fluid recruitment, most likely driven by the negative thermal balance associated with online HDF therapy. In addition, endothelial function appears to be improved due to a combination of a reduction of the inflammatory and oxidative stress complex syndrome and exposure to circulating cardiovascular uremic toxins. Reports of reversed cardiovascular remodeling effects with HDF may be confounded by volume and blood pressure management, which are strongly linked to center clinical practices. Currently, treatment with HDF appears to improve the survival of dialysis patients predominantly due to a reduction in their cardiovascular burden, and this reduction is linked to the sessional convection volume exchanged.

Updates on hemodialysis techniques with a common denominator: The personalization of the dialytic therapy

Hemodialysis (HD) is a life-saving therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. In dialyzed patients, the prevalence of multi-morbidity is rising driven by various factors, such as the population aging, the incomplete correction of uremia, and the side effects of the dialysis therapy itself. Each dialyzed patient has their own specific clinical and biochemical problems. It is therefore unthinkable that the same dialysis procedure can be able to meet the needs of every patient on chronic dialysis. We have very sophisticated dialysis machines and different dialysis techniques and procedures beyond conventional HD, such as hemodiafiltration (HDF) with pre- and post-dilution, acetate-free biofiltration (AFB), hemofiltration (HF), and expanded HD. Each of these techniques has its own specific characteristics. To solve some intradialytic clinical issues, such as arterial hypotension and arrhythmias, we have biofeedback systems with automatic regulation of the blood volume, body temperature, arterial pressure, as well as potassium profiling techniques in the dialysis bath. New technical innovations, such as citrate-containing dialysate or heparin-coated membranes, could reduce the risk of bleeding. To better address to patient needs, the strengths and weaknesses of each of these systems must be well-known, in order to have a personalized dialysis prescription for each patient.

The effect of high-volume online haemodiafiltration on nutritional status and body composition: the ProtEin Stores prEservaTion (PESET) study

Background

Compared with conventional haemodialysis (HD), online haemodiafiltration (OL-HDF) achieves a more efficient removal of uraemic toxins and reduces inflammation, which could favourably affect nutritional status. We evaluate the effect of OL-HDF on body composition and nutritional status in prevalent high-flux HD (HF-HD) patients.

Methods

In all, 33 adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) Stage 5 undergoing maintenance HF-HD were assigned to post-dilution OL-HDF (n = 17) or to remain on HF-HD (n = 16, control group) for 12 months. The primary outcome was the change in lean tissue mass (LTM), intracellular water (ICW) and body cell mass (BCM) assessed by multifrequency bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) at baseline and 4, 8 and 12 months. The rate of change in these parameters was estimated with linear mixed-effects models.

Results

Compared with OL-HDF, patients assigned to HF-HD experienced a gradual reduction in LTM, ICW and BCM. These differences reached statistical significance at Month 12, with a relative difference of 7.31 kg [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.50-12.11; P = 0.003], 2.32 L (95% CI 0.63-4.01; P = 0.008) and 5.20 kg (95% CI 1.74-8.66; P = 0.004) for LTM, ICW and BCM, respectively. The normalized protein appearance increased in the OL-HDF group compared with the HF-HD group [0.26 g/kg/day (95% CI 0.05-0.47); P = 0.002], with a relative reduction in high-sensitive C-reactive protein [-13.31 mg/dL (95% CI -24.63 to -1.98); P = 0.02] at Month 12.

Conclusions

OL-HDF for 1 year compared with HF-HD preserved muscle mass, increased protein intake and reduced the inflammatory state related to uraemia and dialysis, supporting the hypothesis that high convection volume can benefit nutritional status and prevent protein-energy wasting in HD patients.

Factors Associated with Albumin Loss in Post-Dilution Hemodiafiltration and Nutritional Consequences

Introduction

Hemodiafiltration is currently one of the most effective techniques of extra-renal purification but results in an increase of albumin loss in dialysate. We aimed to determine the factors associated with albumin loss during post-dilution hemodiafiltration, compare an “automatic” mode of infusate flow control versus a “manual” control, and assess the potential nutritional impact.

Methods

This prospective observational study included all hemodialysis patients in our institution who underwent post-dilution hemodiafiltration 3 times a week on a Fresenius 5008 for at least 2 months. At each session, albumin content was measured in a representative effluent dialysate volume. The automatic mode of the Fresenius 5008 was used for automatic infusate flow control.

Results

In all, 18 patients (mean age 60.7 ± 15 years) underwent 85 post-dilution hemodiafiltration sessions. The mean albumin loss was 3134 ± 2450 mg/session. Albumin loss was significantly affected by infusate flow, infusate volume, transmembrane pressure and ultrafiltration volume. The loss was greater with Toraysulfone and FX 1000 membranes rather than FX 80 or FX 100 membranes. With AutoSub rather than manual control, infusate flow was greater ( P<.001), transmembrane pressure was higher (P = .004), and the albumin loss was greater (P = .010). However, there was no correlation between albumin loss and nutritional variables.

Conclusions

Albumin loss during post-dilution hemodiafiltration was correlated with increased transmembrane pressure and infusate flow, especially AutoSub flow control, and type of membrane. However, this loss, when moderate, did not seem to affect nutritional aspects and should not limit the use of hemodiafiltration.

Body composition monitor assessing malnutrition in the hemodialysis population independently predicts mortality

OBJECTIVE

Malnutrition is a known predictor of mortality in the general and hemodialysis populations. However, diagnosing malnutrition in dialysis patients remains problematic. Body composition monitoring (BCM) is currently used mainly for assessing overhydratation in hemodialysis patients, but it also offers the possibility of evaluating nutrition status. This study explored whether malnutrition diagnosed by BCM predicts mortality at up to 54 months follow-up in prevalent hemodialysis patients.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective epidemiology cohort study. Dialysis patients with baseline BCM measurement between 2008 and 2013 were enrolled. The observation period was up to 54 months follow-up.

SUBJECTS

A total sample consisted of 960 chronic hemodialysis participants.

INTERVENTION

All data were retrieved from medical records. Nutrition status was estimated by BCM; malnutrition was diagnosed as lean tissue index less than 10% of the normal value.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Cox regression was performed to identify whether low LTI predicted mortality in hemodialysis patients.

RESULTS

BCM-diagnosed malnutrition (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1; 2.44), higher age (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03; 1.07), longer dialysis vintage (HR 1.00; 95% CI 1.00; 1.00), central venous catheter use (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.28; 2.99), and low serum albumin (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.87; 0.95) contributed significantly to the Cox regression model on mortality.

CONCLUSION

BCM-diagnosed malnutrition in chronic hemodialysis patients is an independent predictor of mortality at up to 54 months follow-up and is associated with a 1.66-fold higher risk of dying compared with normal nutrition status. Whether intervention (e.g., nutritional supplementation) might improve nutrition and reduce the higher risk of mortality in malnutrition patients on hemodialysis remains a challenge for future research.

Divert to ULTRA: differences in infused volumes and clearance in two on-line hemodiafiltration treatments

BACKGROUND

Mixed diffusive-convective dialysis therapies offer greater removal capabilities than conventional dialysis. The aim of this study was to compare two different on-line, post-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) treatments with regard to achieved convective volume and middle-molecule dialysis efficiency: standard volume control (sOL-HDF) and automated control of the transmembrane pressure (TMP) (UC-HDF).

METHODS

We enrolled 30 ESRD patients (55.9 ± 14.0 years, 20/10 M/F) in a randomized, prospective, cross-over study. The patients received a 3-month period of sOL-HDF followed by UC-HDF for a further 3 months, or vice versa, using the same dialysis machine. In sOL-HDF, fixed exchange volumes were set according to a filtration fraction greater than or equal to 25%. In UC-HDF therapy, the exchanged volume was driven by a biofeedback system controlling the TMP and its set point in a double loop. Patients maintained their treatment time, dialyzer, blood flow rate, and anticoagulant regimen unchanged throughout the study.

RESULTS

Greater convective volumes were achieved in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (23.8 ± 3.9 vs.19.8 ± 4.8 L; p<0.001) with high pre-dialysis Ht value (sOL-HDF 34.0 ± 4.5% and UC-HDF 34.0 ± 4.4%; p = 0.91). The average clearance values of ß2m and P were higher in UC-HDF than in sOL-HDF (respectively 123 ± 24 vs. 111 ± 22 ml/min, p<0.002 and 158 ± 26 vs. 152 ± 25 ml/min, p<0.05). Moreover, the UC-HDF mode led to a significantly increased rate of call-free sessions from 88% to 97% (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the biofeedback module, applied to the automatic control of TMP in on-line HDF, results in higher convective volumes and correspondingly higher ß2m and P clearances. By making the HDF treatment more automated and less complex to perform, it significantly reduced the staff workload.

Comparison of the effects of predilution and postdilution hemodiafiltration on neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets

Numerous studies have been carried out to investigate the solute removal efficiency of hemodiafiltration (HDF). However, the effect of the dilution mode on blood cell damage during HDF has not yet been examined in detail. Here, we compared predilution and postdilution HDF with respect to their effects on blood cells. Five patients were allocated to one session each of predilution HDF and postdilution HDF. Concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, and platelet-derived microparticles (PDMP), and the phagocytotic and sterilizing functions of neutrophils before and after the HDF sessions were evaluated. Lymphocyte blastoid transformation induced by mitogens was also evaluated by measurement of the [(3)H]-thymidine uptake. The IL-6 and ICAM-1 concentrations decreased after predilution HDF, and increased after postdilution HDF. Lymphocyte blastoid transformation was more pronounced after predilution HDF than after postdilution HDF. There was no significant difference in PDMP between the dilution modes. We conclude that predilution HDF could be more favorable for dialysis patients than postdilution HDF from the point of view of the effects on the blood cells, especially neutrophils and lymphocytes.

Does online hemodiafiltration lead to reduction in trace elements and vitamins?

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been reported to improve nutritional intake, but as it increases convective losses, it could also increase micronutrient loss. We prospectively audited the effect of HDF on vitamin B12, zinc and selenium. Thirty-four patients dialyzing (T/Th/Sa) switched to HDF, and 44 dialyzing (M/W/F) remained on high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and were followed for 12 months. Dialysis adequacy, weight, hemoglobin, and serum albumin did not differ between the groups and did not change over 12 months' follow up. Similarly, vitamin B12 did not differ: HDF, 443 (325-682) ng/mL HD vs. 478 (327-690) ng/mL HDF; 6 months, 513 (351-664) ng/mL vs. 460 (379-647) ng/mL; or 12 months, 444 (317-617) ng/mL vs. 492 (323-644) ng/mL. And no patient had subnormal values. Folate levels, in those not taking supplements, were also stable (start, 6.2 ± 0.7 μg/L HD vs. 7.2 ± 1.0 μg/L HDF; 12 months, 6.5 ± 0.9 μg/L vs. 10.9 ± 2.4 μg/L). Serum zinc was subnormal in 50% prior to switching to HDF, 10.4 ± 0.4 μmol/L, but did not fall with HDF 10.2 ± 0.3 μmol/L; similarly, selenium was low in 49% prior to switching to HDF, 0.77 ± 0.06 μmol/L, but remained stable on HDF, 0.82 ± 0.06 μmol/L. Although HDF adds convective clearance to standard hemodialysis, it does not lead to a reduction in vitamin B12, folate, zinc, or selenium. However, half of this dialysis cohort had low levels of both zinc and selenium.