Integrating evidence-based medicine into the perioperative care of cardiac surgery patients

Prophylactic Fibrinogen Decreases Postoperative Bleeding but Not Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Heart Transplantation

The present study is the premier clinical attempt to scrutinize the practicability of prophylactic fibrinogen infusion in patients undergoing heart transplantation (HT). A total of 67 consecutive patients who had undergone HT between January 2012 and December 2014 were assessed. After exclusion of some patients, 23 patients were given preoperative 2 g fibrinogen concentrate over a period of 15 minutes after the termination of cardiopulmonary bypass pump and complete reversal of heparin, and 30 patients were not given. Some laboratories were measured before general anesthesia and at 6 and 24 hours after surgery. In addition, major adverse events were also evaluated during hospitalization. The mean age of the patients was 39.5 ± 11.4 years, with a predominance of male sex (77.4%). All laboratories at baseline were comparable between groups. The length of hospital stay was longer in the control group compared to the fibrinogen group (20 [16-22] vs 16 [12-19] days; P = .005). There was a trend for patients in the fibrinogen group to have more acute kidney injury (AKI) after surgery (10% vs 30.4%) and less reoperation for bleeding (20% vs 8.7%). The amount of postoperative bleeding was significantly higher in the control group compared to the fibrinogen group (P < .001). The number of packed red blood cell transfused during 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the fibrinogen group (P < .001). The transfusion of fibrinogen in patients undergoing HT may be associated with reductions in postoperative bleeding, the number of packed red blood cells, and hospital length of stay; however, it may enhance postoperative AKI.

Impact of perioperative glycemic control strategy on patient survival after coronary bypass surgery

BACKGROUND

Glycemic control in the perioperative period decreases mortality and morbidity, but data are scarce with regard to the effects of glucose control approaches on survival. We assessed long-term survival in patients treated with 2 strategies of glucose control after first-time isolated coronary artery bypass graft.

METHODS

In a previously published trial, patients were prospectively randomized to strict (90-120 mg/dL) or liberal (121-180 mg/dL) glucose control protocols. The aim of this study was to assess long-term data on survival and health-related quality of life based on the original prospective randomized study population.

RESULTS

No differences were found in cumulative survival between the strict (95.5%) and liberal (93.5%) target range groups (log-rank = 0.32, p = 0.57) over a mean follow-up of 40.0 ± 4.4 months. Physical health-related quality of life significantly improved in all patients from baseline to 6 months after surgery (F = 17.73, p < 0.001), and there were no differences in improvement of health-related quality of life between the 2 target range groups (F = 0.15, p = 0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

These results support our previous findings and indicate that a liberal glycemic control strategy after coronary artery bypass leads to survival rates and improvements in health-related quality of life that are similar to those achieved with a strict target range. In addition, the liberal strategy is superior in glucose control and target range management.