Intraoperative Assessment of Mitral Valve Area After Mitral Valve Repair: Comparison of Different Methods

Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography following mitral valve repair: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the recent evidence and search for novel assessments on intraoperative TEE following mitral valve repair that can impact short and long-term outcomes.

METHODS

The Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE databases were searched from January 1, 2008, until January 27, 2021, for studies on patients with severe Mitral Valve Regurgitation (MR) undergoing Mitral Valve (MV) repair surgery with intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) performed after the repair. Additional searches were conducted using Google search engine, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library.

RESULTS

After reviewing 302 records, 8 retrospective and 22 prospective studies were included (n = 30). Due to clinical and methodological diversity, these studies are noncomparable and data were not amenable to quantitative synthesis.

CONCLUSION

Although technological advances allowed the objective assessment of geometric and dynamic alterations of the MV, the impact of the use of these technologies on short- or long-term outcomes was not studied. There is uncertainty and conflicting evidence on the ideal method and metrics to evaluate MV patency post-repair. Few isolated studies validated methods to assess coaptation surface and LV function post-repair.

Echocardiographic Assessment of the Mitral Valve for Suitability of Repair: An Intraoperative Approach From a Mitral Center

Intraoperative echocardiography of the mitral valve in the precardiopulmonary bypass period is an integral part of the surgical decision-making process for assessment of suitability for repair. Although there are comprehensive reviews in the literature regarding echocardiographic examination of the mitral valve, the authors present a practical stepwise algorithmic workflow to make objective recommendations. Advances in echocardiography allow for quantitative geometric analyses of the mitral valve, along with precise assessment of the valvular apparatus with three-dimensional echocardiography. In the precardiopulmonary bypass period, echocardiographers are required to diagnose and quantify valvular dysfunction, assess suitability for repair, assist in annuloplasty ring sizing, and determine the success or failure of the surgical procedure. In this manuscript the authors outline an algorithmic approach to intraoperative echocardiography examination using two-dimensional and three-dimensional modalities to objectively analyze mitral valve function and assist in surgical decision-making.

A Novel 3-Dimensional Approach for the Echocardiographic Evaluation of Mitral Valve Area After Repair for Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

Currently available 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiographic methods for accurately assessing the mitral valve orifice area (MVA) after mitral valve repair (MVr) are limited due to its complex 3-dimensional (3D) geometry. We compared repaired MVAs obtained with commonly used 2D and 3D echocardiographic methods to a 3D orifice area (3DOA), which is a novel echocardiographic measurement and independent of geometric assumptions.

METHODS

Intraoperative 2D and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) images from 20 adult cardiac surgery patients who underwent MVr for mitral regurgitation obtained immediately after repair were retrospectively reviewed. MVAs obtained by pressure half-time (PHT), 2D planimetry (2DP), and 3D planimetry (3DP) were compared to those derived by 3DOA.

RESULTS

MVAs (mean value ± standard deviation [SD]) after MVr were obtained by PHT (3 ± 0.6 cm), 2DP (3.58 ± 0.75 cm), 3D planimetry (3DP; 2.78 ± 0.74 cm), and 3DOA (2.32 ± 0.76 cm). MVAs obtained by the 3DOA method were significantly smaller compared to those obtained by PHT (mean difference, 0.68 cm; P = .0003), 2DP (mean difference, 1.26 cm; P < .0001), and 3DP (mean difference, 0.46 cm; P = .003). In addition, MVA defined as an area ≤1.5 cm was identified by 3DOA in 2 patients and by 3DP in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-MVr MVAs obtained using the novel 3DOA method were significantly smaller than those obtained by conventional echocardiographic methods and may be consistent with a higher incidence of MVA reduction when compared to 2D techniques. Further studies are still needed to establish the clinical significance of 3D echocardiographic techniques used to measure MVA after MVr.

Mitral Valve Stenosis after Open Repair Surgery for Non-rheumatic Mitral Valve Regurgitation: A Review

Mitral stenosis (MS) after mitral valve (MV) repair is a slowly progressive condition, usually detected many years after the index MV surgery. It is defined as a mean transmitral pressure gradient (TMPG) >5 mmHg or a mitral valve area (MVA) <1.5 cm(2). Pannus formation around the mitral annulus or extending to the mitral leaflets is suggested as the main mechanism for developing delayed MS after MV repair. On the other hand, early stenosis is thought to be a direct result of an undersized annuloplasty ring. Furthermore, in MS following ischemic mitral regurgitation (MR) repair, subvalvular tethering is the hypothesized pathophysiology. MS after MV repair has an incidence of 9-54%. Several factors have been associated with a higher risk for developing MS after MV repair, including the use of flexible Duran annuloplasty rings versus rigid Carpentier-Edwards rings, complete annuloplasty rings versus partial bands, small versus large anterior leaflet opening angle, and anterior leaflet tip opening length. Intraoperative echocardiography can measure the anterior leaflet opening angle, the anterior leaflet tip opening dimension, the MVA and the mean TMPG, and may help identify patients at risk for developing MS after MV repair.

Ischemic mitral regurgitation: mechanisms, intraoperative echocardiographic evaluation, and surgical considerations

Ischemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is a subcategory of functional rather than organic, mitral valve (MV) disease. Whether reversible or permanent, left ventricular remodeling creates IMR that is complex and multifactorial. A comprehensive TEE examination in patients with IMR may have important implications for perioperative clinical decision making. Several TEE measures predictive of MV repair failure have been identified. Current practice among most surgeons is to typically repair the MV in patients with IMR. MV replacement is usually reserved for situations in which the valve cannot be reasonably repaired, or repair is unlikely to be tolerated clinically.

Validation study of Doppler-derived transmitral valve gradients compared to near simultaneously obtained directly measured catheter gradients immediately after mitral valve repair surgery

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of Doppler-derived transmitral valve gradients immediately after mitral valve repair by comparing them with near simultaneously obtained direct catheter gradients.

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

A tertiary care medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty elective adult surgical patients presenting for mitral valve repair surgery.

METHODS

Mitral valve surgery proceeded in standard fashion except for the use of a smaller than usual left ventricular vent catheter (Medtronic DLP 10 French left heart vent catheter). After completion of the mitral valve repair and subsequent cardiac de-airing, the patient was weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. Immediately after separation, the study period began. Near simultaneous transmitral Doppler gradients were obtained with directly measured catheter gradients via the vent catheter.

RESULTS

While the mean peak gradient difference of 1.1 mmHg was small (p-value 0.18, 95% CI: -0.54 to 2.73 mmHg), the correlation between Doppler and catheter gradient measurements (Pearson correlation coefficient r = 0.54, p = 0.055) only approached statistical significance due to the large variance associated with the small sample size. In all patients with a peak gradient greater than 10 mmHg (4 of the 20 patients), overestimation of catheter gradients by Doppler occurred, with two showing a 62% to 73% discrepancy. In these two cases, there was also evidence for elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) along with high transmitral blood flow velocities.

CONCLUSION

Doppler-derived transmitral gradients provide a simple, safe, and reliable measure of the true physiologic transmitral valve gradient. At the same time, it is important to recognize that significant Doppler over-estimation of catheter gradients may occur in patients with elevated Doppler transmitral velocities. The causes of these overestimations are unknown. They may be related to technical recording errors. They may also be related to an inherent weakness in Doppler technology--its inability to account for any distal recovery of pressure, which in a select group of patients could be significant.

Determination of mitral valve area with echocardiography, using intra-operative 3-dimensional versus intra- & post-operative pressure half-time technique in mitral valve repair surgery

Background

We hypothesized that mitral valve areas (MVAs) with echocardiography, using 3D planimetry technique (measured at one point at maximal opening of mitral valve) versus pressure half-time technique (PHT, measured during entire diastolic phase) in mitral valve repair surgery (MVR) would be different.

Methods

Patients who had undergone MVR were retrospectively reviewed, and two different observers measured the MVAs using PHT and 3D planimetry technique. The MVAs derived from recorded medical data, using PHT and 3D planimetry technique were abbreviated to MVA-PHT1 and MVA-3D1, and data from the PHT and 3D planimetry techniques by observer A and observer B were determined as MVA-PHT2 and MVA-3D2, and MVA-PHT3 and MVA-3D3, respectively. The MVA derived by post-operative transthoracic echocardiography using the PHT technique was determined as MVA-TTE.

Results

Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.90 for the intra-operative PHT technique and 0.78 for the intra-operative 3D planimetry technique. MVA-3D1 (2.91 ± 0.65 cm²), MVA-3D2 (3.00 ± 0.63 cm2) and MVA-3D3 (2.97 ± 0.88 cm²) were significantly larger than MVA-TTE (2.40 ± 0.59 cm²), but intra-operative MVAs-PHT were not. The biases and precisions were larger, and the correlation coefficients were lower in 3D planimetry technique compared with PHT technique.

Conclusions

MVA measured by 3D planimetry technique with TEE at the intra-operative post-MVR period was seemed to be larger than that measured by the PHT technique with TTE at the post-operative period. However, it did not mean that the 3D planimetry technique was inaccurate but needs cautions at determination of MVA using different techniques.

Evaluation of transmitral pressure gradients in the intraoperative echocardiographic diagnosis of mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair

Objective

Acute mitral stenosis (MS) following mitral valve (MV) repair is a rare but severe complication. We hypothesize that intraoperative echocardiography can be utilized to diagnose iatrogenic MS immediately after MV repair.

Methods

The medical records of 552 consecutive patients undergoing MV repair at a single institution were reviewed. Post-cardiopulmonary bypass peak and mean transmitral pressure gradients (TMPG), and pressure half time (PHT) were obtained from intraoperative transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) examinations in each patient.

Results

Nine patients (9/552 = 1.6%) received a reoperation for primary MS, prior to hospital discharge. Interestingly, all of these patients already showed intraoperative post-CPB mean and peak TMPGs that were significantly higher compared to values for those who did not: 10.7±4.8 mmHg vs 2.9±1.6 mmHg; p<0.0001 and 22.9±7.9 mmHg vs 7.6±3.7 mmHg; p<0.0001, respectively. However, PHT varied considerably (87±37 ms; range: 20–439 ms) within the entire population, and only weakly predicted the requirement for reoperation (113±56 vs. 87±37 ms, p = 0.034). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed strong discriminating ability for mean gradients (AUC = 0.993) and peak gradients (area under the curve, AUC = 0.996), but poor performance for PHT (AUC = 0.640). A value of ≥7 mmHg for mean, and ≥17 mmHg for peak TMPG, best separated patients who required reoperation for MS from those who did not.

Conclusions

Intraoperative TEE diagnosis of a peak TMPG ≥17 mmHg or mean TMPG ≥7 mmHg immediately following CPB are suggestive of clinically relevant MS after MV repair.