Bronchial blocker versus double-lumen tube for lung isolation with massive hemoptysis during cardiac surgery

Clinical Approach to Massive Hemoptysis: Perioperative Focus on Causes and Management

Massive hemoptysis is a time critical airway emergency in the perioperative setting, with an associated mortality exceeding 50%. Causes of hemoptysis in the perioperative setting include procedural complication, coagulopathy, malignancy, chronic lung disease, infection, left-sided cardiac disease, pulmonary vascular disease and autoimmune disease. A rapid and coordinated multidisciplinary response is required to secure the airway, isolate the lung, ensure adequate oxygenation and ventilation, identify the underlying cause and initiate specific systemic, bronchoscopic, endovascular, or surgical treatment. This review examines the etiology, pathophysiology, as well as approach to management and interventions in perioperative massive hemoptysis.

Use of an Endobronchial Blocker Where a Double-Lumen Tube Failed to Ventilate: A Case Report of a Distorted Tracheobronchial Anatomy

One-lung ventilation (OLV) during video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) can be accomplished through several different techniques, including bronchial advancement of an endotracheal tube (ETT), use of a double-lumen tube (DLT), or placement of an endobronchial blocker. In most cases, a DLT is a mainstay of isolating and ventilating a single lung during cardiothoracic procedures. The reasons to deploy a DLT over other techniques include ease of placement, less chance of malposition, quick placement time, and quality of lung deflation. However, this case report highlights the importance of a bronchial blocker in a patient where a double-lumen tube failed to ventilate the lungs. Briefly, this young female patient had a right thoracic mass associated with ipsilateral lung collapse and moderate pleural effusion. CT-guided biopsy was planned but was deferred by the radiologist, as the patient was unable to lie in a prone position. The case was then referred to the cardiothoracic surgeon who planned a right VATS and biopsy of the lesion. In the operation theater, after induction of anesthesia, the patient could not be ventilated through a DLT, and high peak airway pressures were encountered. Initially, a size 37 left-sided DLT was used, and subsequently, sizes 35, 32, and 28 were also tried, but all these attempts to ventilate the patient remained futile. A bronchoscopy was done, which did not show any abnormality in the airway. The surgery was postponed due to an inability to ventilate the patient with a double-lumen tube. After a repeat CT scan and draining of 9.3 liters of pleural effusion over a week, the patient was again scheduled for the same procedure but with a changed anesthetic plan. This time around, the anesthetic plan was implemented successfully using a bronchial blocker to isolate the right lung. The surgery went ahead, and the patient had an uneventful postoperative period. The anesthetic management of this patient presented a unique set of challenges, which are shared in this case report.