Validation of the Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Scoring System in a UK Adult Cardiac Surgery Population

Validation of Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) in Postoperative Cardiac Patients

Introduction. Cardiac Surgery Score (CASUS) was introduced in 2005 as the first postoperative scoring system specific for patients who had cardiac surgery. Prior to this, European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) has been used preoperatively, while Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre Score (ICNARC) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) scores, which are widely used in general intensive care unit population, have been used to score cardiac patients postoperatively. The development of CASUS by Hekmat and colleagues for use in postoperative cardiac patients aims to change this. We wanted to validate CASUS against the well-established preoperative Logistic EuroSCORE, and postoperative APACHE II and ICNARC scores. Method. Institutional approval for this study was granted by the Audit and Clinical Governance Committee. We analyzed prospectively collected data of patients who had cardiac surgery in Castle Hill Hospital between January 2016 and September 2018. All patients who underwent surgery in the unit would have had Logistic EuroSCORE, APACHE, and ICNARC scores calculated as standard. CASUS was then calculated for these patients based on their day 1 postoperative variables. The scoring systems were compared and data presented as area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Result. Our study shows that CASUS is the best predictor of mortality followed by ICNARC, Logistic EuroSCORE, and APACHE II. ICNARC score remains the most accurate predictor of renal and pulmonary complication followed by CASUS. Conclusion. CASUS is a useful scoring system in post-cardiac surgery patients. The accuracy of CASUS and ICNARC scores in predicting mortality, pulmonary, and renal complications are comparable.

Prediction of Postoperative Outcomes and Long-Term Survival in Cardiac Surgical Patients Using the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre Score

OBJECTIVES

Scoring systems used in cardiac surgery, such as the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons scoring systems, do not adjust for events that take place intraoperatively. The authors hypothesized that intensive care unit scoring systems such as the Intensive Care National Audit & Research Centre (ICNARC) could predict accurately not only in-hospital mortality, but also other significant complications, as well as long-term survival after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study using perioperative data from the ICNARC Audit and Dendrite database.

SETTING

Single tertiary referral cardiac surgery center.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 4,446 consecutive cardiac surgical patients who had surgery between January 2011 and April 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Comparison of scoring systems to predict postoperative outcomes.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to evaluate how well the ICNARC scores predicted in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications (renal failure, pulmonary complications, gastrointestinal complications, and multiorgan failure). Cox regression analysis was used to determine factors affecting long-term survival. The C-indices for the ROC graphs for the ICNARC score were 0.840 for in-hospital mortality, 0.858 for renal failure, 0.665 for pulmonary complications, 0.764 for gastrointestinal complications, 0.702 for neurological complications in general and 0.654 for confusion, and 0.885 for multiorgan failure. From Cox regression analysis, the significant (p < 0.05) predictors of midterm mortality (5 years) were a higher ICNARC score, a higher age at surgery, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, preoperative renal failure, preoperative neurological comorbidity, arteriopathy, and non-coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

CONCLUSION

The ICNARC scoring system is simple and can be used as an early warning screening tool to predict which patients are at higher risk for postoperative organ failure.