Extravascular Lung Water and Tissue Perfusion Biomarkers After Lung Resection Surgery Under a Normovolemic Fluid Protocol

Perioperative fluid management: evidence-based consensus recommendations from the international multidisciplinary PeriOperative Quality Initiative

Fluid therapy is an integral component of perioperative management. In light of emerging evidence in this area, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) convened an international multiprofessional expert meeting to generate evidence-based consensus recommendations for fluid management in patients undergoing surgery. This article provides a summary of the recommendations for perioperative fluid management of surgical patients from the preoperative period until hospital discharge and for all types of elective and emergency surgery, apart from burn injuries and head and neck surgery. Where evidence was lacking, recommendations for future research were generated. Specific recommendations are made for fluid management in elective major noncardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, thoracic surgery, neurosurgery, minor noncardiac surgery under general anaesthesia, and critical illness. There are ongoing gaps in knowledge resulting in variation in practice and some disagreement with our consensus recommendations. Perioperative fluid management should be individualised, taking into account the type of surgery and important patient factors, including intravascular volume status and acute and chronic comorbidities. Recommendations are made for further research in perioperative fluid management to address important gaps.

Incidence and Associations of Acute Kidney Injury after General Thoracic Surgery: A System Review and Meta-Analysis

(1) Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is related to adverse outcomes in critical illness and cardiovascular surgery. In this study, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis was carried out to evaluate the incidence and associations of AKI as a postoperative complication of thoracic (including lung resection and esophageal) surgical procedures. (2) Methods: Adopting a systematic strategy, the electronic reference databases (PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library) were searched for articles researching postoperative renal outcomes that were diagnosed using RIFLE, AKIN or KDIGO consensus criteria in the context of a thoracic operation. A random-effects model was applied to estimate the incidence of AKI and, where reported, the pooled relative risk of mortality and non-renal complications after AKI. The meta-analysis is registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42021274166. (3) Results: In total, 20 studies with information gathered from 34,826 patients after thoracic surgery were covered. Comprehensively, the incidence of AKI was estimated to be 8.8% (95% CI: 6.7−10.8%). A significant difference was found in the mortality of patients with and without AKI (RR = 2.93, 95% CI: 1.79−4.79, p < 0.001). Additionally, in patients experiencing AKI, cardiovascular and respiratory complications were more common (p = 0.01 and p < 0.001, respectively). (4) Conclusions: AKI is a common complication associated with adverse outcomes following general thoracic surgery. An important issue in perioperative care, AKI should be considered as a highly significant prognostic indicator and an attractive target for potential therapeutic interventions, especially in high-risk populations.

Recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Section of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, for patients undergoing lung surgery included in an intensified recovery program

In recent years, multidisciplinary programs have been implemented that include different actions during the pre, intra and postoperative period, aimed at reducing perioperative stress and therefore improving the results of patients undergoing surgical interventions. Initially, these programs were developed for colorectal surgery and from there they have been extended to other surgeries. Thoracic surgery, considered highly complex, like other surgeries with a high postoperative morbidity and mortality rate, may be one of the specialties that most benefit from the implementation of these programs. This review presents the recommendations made by different specialties involved in the perioperative care of patients who require resection of a lung tumor. Meta-analyzes, systematic reviews, randomized and non-randomized controlled studies, and retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing this type of intervention have been taken into account in preparing the recommendations presented in this guide. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the recommendations, assessing on the one hand the level of evidence published on each specific aspect and, on the other hand, the strength of the recommendation with which the authors propose its application. The recommendations considered most important for this type of surgery are those that refer to pre-habilitation, minimization of surgical aggression, excellence in the management of perioperative pain and postoperative care aimed at providing rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

Enhanced recovery after thoracic anesthesia

In recent years, the concept of “Perioperative Medicine” has been evolved to a more concrete and sophisticated approach called “Enhanced Recovery After Surgery” (ERAS). ERAS has been first introduced in colorectal surgery by a dedicated leading ERAS® society, ERAS-criteria has been subsequently extended into several types of surgery, including thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology has always been one of the most important components of the multidisciplinary perioperative approaches, which is also valid for ERAS. There are several guidelines published on the enhanced recovery after thoracic surgery (ERATS). This article focuses on the “official” ERATS protocols of a joint consensus of two different societies. Regarding thoracic anesthesia, there are some challenges to be dealt with. The first challenge, although there is a large number of studies published on thoracic anesthesia, only a very few of them have studied the overall outcome and quality of recovery; and only few of them were powered enough to provide sufficient evidence. This has led to the fact that some components of the protocol are debatable. The second challenge, the adherence to individual elements and the overall compliance are poorly reported and also hard to apply even in the best organized centers. This article explains and discusses the debatable viewpoints on the elements of the ERATS protocol published in 2019 aiming to achieve a list for the future steps required for a more effective and evidence-based ERATS protocol.

Recommendations of the Society of Thoracic Surgery and the Section of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Therapy, for patients undergoing lung surgery included in an intensified recovery program

In recent years, multidisciplinary programs have been implemented that include different actions during the pre, intra and postoperative period, aimed at reducing perioperative stress and therefore improving the results of patients undergoing surgical interventions. Initially, these programs were developed for colorectal surgery and from there they have been extended to other surgeries. Thoracic surgery, considered highly complex, like other surgeries with a high postoperative morbidity and mortality rate, may be one of the specialties that most benefit from the implementation of these programs. This review presents the recommendations made by different specialties involved in the perioperative care of patients who require resection of a lung tumor. Meta-analyses, systematic reviews, randomized and non-randomized controlled studies, and retrospective studies conducted in patients undergoing this type of intervention have been taken into account in preparing the recommendations presented in this guide. The GRADE scale has been used to classify the recommendations, assessing on the one hand the level of evidence published on each specific aspect and, on the other hand, the strength of the recommendation with which the authors propose its application. The recommendations considered most important for this type of surgery are those that refer to pre-habilitation, minimization of surgical aggression, excellence in the management of perioperative pain and postoperative care aimed at providing rapid postoperative rehabilitation.

Dynamic Indices Fail to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing One-Lung Ventilation for Thoracoscopic Surgery

Thoracic surgery using CO₂ insufflation maintains closed-chest one-lung ventilation (OLV) that may provide the necessary heart–lung interaction for the dynamic indices to predict fluid responsiveness. We studied whether pulse pressure variation (PPV) and stroke volume variation (SVV) can predict fluid responsiveness during thoracoscopic surgery. Forty patients were enrolled in the study. OLV was performed with a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg at a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cm H₂O, while CO₂ was insufflated to the contralateral side at 8 mm Hg. Patients whose stroke volume index (SVI) increased ≥15% after fluid challenge (7 mL/kg) were defined as fluid responders. The predictive ability of PPV and SVV on fluid responsiveness was investigated using the area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUROC), which was also assessed according to the right or left lateral decubitus position considering the intrathoracic location of the right-sided superior vena cava. AUROCs of PPV and SVV for predicting fluid responsiveness were 0.65 (95% confidence interval 0.47–0.83, p = 0.113) and 0.64 (95% confidence interval 0.45–0.82, p = 0.147), respectively. The AUROCs of indices did not exhibit any statistical significance according to position. Dynamic indices of preload cannot predict fluid responsiveness during one-lung ventilation with CO₂ gas insufflation.

Restrictive intraoperative fluid management was associated with higher incidence of composite complications compared to less restrictive strategies in open thoracotomy: A retrospective cohort study

Restrictive fluid management has been recommended for thoracic surgery. However, specific guidelines are lacking, and there is always concern regarding impairment of renal perfusion with a restrictive policy. The objective of this study was to find the net intraoperative fluid infusion rate which shows the lowest incidence of composite complications (either pulmonary complications or acute kidney injury) in open thoracotomy. We hypothesized that a certain range of infusion rate would decrease the composite complications within postoperative 30 days. All patients (n = 1,031) who underwent open thoracotomy at a tertiary care university hospital were included in this retrospective study. The time frame of fluid monitoring was from the start of operation to postoperative 24 hours. The cutoff value of the intraoperative net fluid amount was 4–5 ml.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ according to the minimum p-value method, thus, patients were divided into Low (≤3 ml.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹), Cutoff (4–5 ml.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹) and High (≥6 ml.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹) groups. The Cutoff group showed the lowest composite complication rate (19%, 12%, and 13% in the Low, Cutoff, and High groups, respectively, P = 0.0283; Low vs. Cutoff, P = 0.0324, Bonferroni correction). Acute respiratory distress syndrome occurred least frequently in the Cutoff group (7%, 3%, and 6% for the Low, Cutoff, and High groups, respectively, P = 0.0467; Low vs. Cutoff, P = 0.0432, Bonferroni correction). In multivariable analysis, intraoperative net fluid infusion rate was associated with composite complications, and the Cutoff group decreased risk (odds ratio 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.35–0.81, P = 0.0035). In conclusion, maintaining intraoperative net fluid infusion at 4–5 ml.kg⁻¹.h⁻¹ was associated with better results in open thoracotomy, in terms of composite complications, compared to more restrictive fluid management.

Extravascular lung water monitoring for thoracic and lung transplant surgeries

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Excessive accumulation of extravascular lung water (EVLW) resulting in pulmonary edema is the most feared complication following thoracic surgery and lung transplant. ICUs have long relied on chest radiography to monitor pulmonary status postoperatively but the increasing recognition of the limitations of bedside plain films has fueled development of newer technologies, which offer earlier detection, quantitative assessments, and can aide in preoperative screening of surgical candidates. In this review, we focus on the emergence of transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) and lung ultrasound with a focus on the clinical integration of these modalities into current intraoperative and critical care practices.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies demonstrate transpulmonary thermodilution and lung ultrasound provide greater sensitivity and earlier detection of lung water accumulation and are useful to guide clinical management. Assessments from these techniques have predictive value of postoperative outcome. Further, EVLW assessment shows promise as a preoperative screening tool in lung transplant patients.

SUMMARY

Monitoring EVLW in the perioperative period offers clinicians a powerful tool to guide fluid therapy and manage pulmonary edema. Both TPTD and lung ultrasound have unique attributes in the care of thoracic surgery and lung transplant patients.

Enhanced Recovery in Thoracic Surgery: A Review

The main goal of enhanced recovery program after thoracic surgery is to minimize stress response, reduce postoperative pulmonary complications, and improve patient outcome, which will in addition decrease hospital stay and reduce hospital costs. As minimally invasive technique, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery represents an important element of enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. Anesthetic management during preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative period is essential for the enhanced recovery. In the era of enhanced recovery protocols, non-intubated thoracoscopic procedures present a step forward. This article focuses on the key elements of the enhanced recovery program in thoracic surgery. Having reviewed recent literature, the authors highlight potential procedures and techniques that might be incorporated into the program.

Fast track in thoracic surgery and anaesthesia: update of concepts

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Update of key elements on enhanced recovery after thoracic anaesthesia and surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pathways to enhance recovery after thoracic surgery ('fast-track') aim to improve response to lung surgery, reduction of postoperative pulmonary complications, and restore patient's vital function. Uncomplicated recovery after lung surgery reduces morbidity, hospital stay, and costs. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is a major part of enhanced recovery minimizing tissue injury and stress response. Maintaining patient's physiology throughout perioperative processes by optimized anaesthesiological management and effective pain control present a crucial role in improving outcome.

SUMMARY

The concept of enhanced recovery ('fast-track') after thoracic surgery and anaesthesia was developed in recent years making allowance to the increased number of video-assisted parenchymal lung resections in managing primary lung cancer. Current studies promote the benefit in thoracic surgical patients, if an established departmental protocol-based algorithm is implemented.