Chemotherapy Agents With Known Pulmonary Side Effects and Their Anesthetic and Critical Care Implications

Incidence and Clinical Characteristics of Drug-Induced Lung Disease Among Chemotherapy Recipients

Background Chemotherapeutic agents treat cancer and some inflammatory diseases due to their immunosuppressive effects. While effective, these drugs can cause drug-induced lung disease (DILD), a serious adverse effect with limited data regarding its incidence and clinical presentation. Methods This retrospective study included 20 patients diagnosed with DILD out of 1,231 patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents who presented with symptoms such as cough, fever, dyspnea, and chest pain at an oncology outpatient clinic. Patients underwent assessments including clinical examination, chest radiography, high-resolution computed tomography, and, in some cases, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. A statistical analysis was performed to determine the incidence and evaluate the clinical characteristics of DILD. Results The incidence of DILD among patients treated with chemotherapeutic agents was 0.27%. The female/male ratio was 11/9, with a mean age of 53.2 years. Common symptoms included cough (70%), dyspnea (60%), fever (50%), and sputum production (40%). Imaging revealed pleural effusion, reticular patterns, and consolidation in varying proportions. Common agents causing pulmonary toxicity included bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and methotrexate, among others. Importantly, 95% of patients showed improvement with steroid treatment, although statistical significance was not achieved (p > 0.05). Conclusion The findings highlight the need for heightened awareness and monitoring of DILD in patients receiving chemotherapeutic treatments. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment initiation are crucial to managing this potentially severe complication. This study underscores the importance of considering pulmonary risks when prescribing chemotherapeutic agents and provides foundational data for future research.

Comparison of Anticancer Drug Toxicities: Paradigm Shift in Adverse Effect Profile

The inception of cancer treatment with chemotherapeutics began in the 1940s with nitrogen mustards that were initially employed as weapons in World War II. Since then, treatment options for different malignancies have evolved over the period of last seventy years. Until the late 1990s, all the chemotherapeutic agents were small molecule chemicals with a highly nonspecific and severe toxicity spectrum. With the landmark approval of rituximab in 1997, a new horizon has opened up for numerous therapeutic antibodies in solid and hematological cancers. Although this transition to large molecules improved the survival and quality of life of cancer patients, this has also coincided with the change in adverse effect patterns. Typically, the anticancer agents are fraught with multifarious adverse effects that negatively impact different organs of cancer patients, which ultimately aggravate their sufferings. In contrast to the small molecules, anticancer antibodies are more targeted toward cancer signaling pathways and exhibit fewer side effects than traditional small molecule chemotherapy treatments. Nevertheless, the interference with the immune system triggers serious inflammation- and infection-related adverse effects. The differences in drug disposition and interaction with human basal pathways contribute to this paradigm shift in adverse effect profile. It is critical that healthcare team members gain a thorough insight of the adverse effect differences between the agents discovered during the last twenty-five years and before. In this review, we summarized the general mechanisms and adverse effects of small and large molecule anticancer drugs that would further our understanding on the toxicity patterns of chemotherapeutic regimens.

Curcumin as a preventive or therapeutic measure for chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced adverse reaction: A comprehensive review

Curcumin has attracted much attention for medicinal purposes in wide range of illnesses including cancer. In some studies, its efficacy is evaluated against chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced adverse reaction and also as adjuvant to cancer treatment. Here we have tried to present a comprehensive review on protective and therapeutic effect of curcumin against these side effects. METHOD: The data were collected by searching Scopus, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane database systematic reviews, using key words "nephrotoxicity", "cardiotoxicity", "genotoxicity", "ototoxicity", "hepatotoxicity", "reproductive toxicity", "myelosuppression", "pulmonary toxicity", "radiotherapy induced side effect" with "turmeric" and "curcumin". Although curcumin has low bioavailability, it has shown brilliant profile on prevention and management of chemotherapy and radiotherapy induced adverse reactions, particularly based on in vitro and in vivo studies and limited number of human studies on radiotherapy adverse reactions. Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the curcumin are the main proposed mechanism of action for management and prevention of adverse reactions. One of the major points regarding the protective effect of curcumin is its wide tolerable therapeutic range of dose with minimal side effects. Furthermore, new nano-formulations help to improve the bioavailability, increase in efficacy and lower the adverse effects. In conclusion, based on the present knowledge, curcumin has significant supportive potential in patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy and may be suggested as adjutant with cancer treatments. Further well-designed human studies are recommended.