Effect of Continuous Paravertebral Dexmedetomidine Administration on Intraoperative Anesthetic Drug Requirement and Post-Thoracotomy Pain Syndrome After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Extrapleural infusion of levobupivacaine versus levobupivacaine-sufentanil-adrenaline after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS): A randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Peripheral blocks are increasingly used for analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS). We hypothesised that addition of sufentanil and adrenaline to levobupivacaine would improve the analgesic effect of a continuous extrapleural block.

METHODS

We randomised 60 patients undergoing VATS to a 5-mL h-1 extrapleural infusion of levobupivacaine at 2.7 mg mL-1 (LB group) or levobupivacaine at 1.25 mg mL-1 , sufentanil at 0.5 μg mL-1 , and adrenaline at 2 μg mL-1 (LBSA group). The primary outcome was the cumulative morphine dose administered as patient-controlled analgesia (PCA-morphine) at 48 and 72 h. The secondary outcomes were pain according to numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest and after two deep breaths twice daily, peak expiratory flow (PEF) daily, quality of recovery (QoR)-15 score at 1 day and 3 weeks postoperatively, serum levobupivacaine concentrations at 1 h after the start and at the end of the intervention, and adverse events.

RESULTS

At 48 h, the median cumulative PCA-morphine dose for the LB group was 6 mg (IQR, 2-10 mg) and for the LBSA group 7 mg (IQR, 3-13.5 mg; p = .378). At 72 h, morphine doses were 10 mg (IQR, 3-22 mg) and 12.5 mg (IQR, 4-21 mg; p = .738), respectively. Median NRS score at rest and after two deep breaths was 3 or lower at all time points for both treatment groups. PEF did not differ between groups. Three weeks postoperatively, only the LB group returned to baseline QoR-15 score. The LB group had higher, but well below toxic, levobupivacaine concentrations at 48 and 72 h. The incidence of nausea, dizziness, pruritus and headache was equally low overall.

CONCLUSION

For a continuous extrapleural block, and compared to plain levobupivacaine at 13.5 mg h-1 , levobupivacaine at 6.25 mg h-1 with addition of sufentanil and adrenaline did not decrease postoperative morphine consumption. The levobupivacaine serum concentrations after 48 and 72 h of infusion were well below toxic levels, therefore our findings support the use of the maximally recommended dose of levobupivacaine for a 2- to 3-day continuous extrapleural block.

The Effect of Epidural Infusion of Dexmedetomidine on Postoperative Analgesia After Thoracotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background

The unique analgesic properties of dexmedetomidine have led anesthesiologists to use it as an alternative to relieve pain after major surgeries.

Objectives

We aimed to evaluate the effect of continuous injection of thoracic epidural dexmedetomidine on analgesia after thoracotomy.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 46 patients (18 to 70 years old) who were candidates for thoracotomy surgery were randomly assigned to receive ropivacaine alone or combined with dexmedetomidine after epidural anesthesia as postoperative epidural anesthesia. The postoperative sedation rate, pain score, and opioid use were assessed within 48 hours after surgery and compared between the 2 groups.

Results

Comparing the mean postoperative sedation scores indicated no difference between the 2 study groups. The pain score assessment showed a lower pain score 6 to 36 hours after surgery in the group receiving concurrent ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine than in the group receiving ropivacaine alone. In the 2 groups receiving ropivacaine with and without dexmedetomidine, the rate of morphine administration after surgery was 43.4% and 65.2%, respectively, indicating no difference. However, the first group received significantly lower doses of morphine after the end of surgery (3.26 ± 0.90 mg vs. 7.04 ± 1.48 mg; P = 0.035).

Conclusions

A combination of ropivacaine and dexmedetomidine as epidural analgesia can lead to lower postoperative pain scores and reduced doses of opioids required.

Evidence basis for using dexmedetomidine to enhance the quality of paravertebral block: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Dexmedetomidine is considered an adjunct to local anaesthesia (LA) to prolong peripheral nerve block time. However, the results from a previous meta-analysis were not sufficient to support its use in paravertebral block (PVB). Therefore, we performed an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of dexmedetomidine combined with LA in PVB.

Methods: We performed an electronic database search from the date of establishment to April 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the combination of dexmedetomidine and LA compared with LA alone for PVB in adult patients were included. Postoperative pain scores, analgesic consumption, and adverse reactions were analyzed.

Results: We identified 12 trials (701 patients) and found that the application of dexmedetomidine as a PVB adjunct reduced the postoperative pain severity of patients 12 and 24 h after surgery compared to a control group. Expressed as mean difference (MD) (95% CI), the results were −1.03 (−1.18, −0.88) (p < 0.00001, I² = 79%) for 12 h and −1.08 (−1.24, −0.92) (p < 0.00001, I² = 72%) for 24 h. Dexmedetomidine prolonged the duration of analgesia by at least 173.27 min (115.61, 230.93) (p < 0.00001, I² = 81%) and reduced postoperative oral morphine consumption by 18.01 mg (−22.10, 13.92) (p < 0.00001, I² = 19%). We also found no statistically significant differences in hemodynamic complications between the two groups. According to the GRADE system, we found that the level of evidence for postoperative pain scores at 12 and 24 h was rated as moderate.

Conclusion: Our study shows that dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to LA improves the postoperative pain severity of patients after surgery and prolongs the duration of analgesia in PVB without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.

Effects of Different Doses of Dexmedetomidine Combined with Thoracic Paravertebral Nerve Block Anesthesia on Agitation and Hemodynamics in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy during Recovery

Objective

To investigate the effect of different doses of dexmedetomidine combined with thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia on agitation and hemodynamics in patients undergoing thoracotomy during recovery.

Methods

One hundred patients who underwent thoracotomy in our hospital from August 2018 to April 2021 were enrolled and assigned (1 : 1 : 1 : 1) into 4 groups via the random number table method. The patients in the control group were treated with double-lumen tube general anesthesia + ropivacaine for thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia; patients in experimental group A received double-lumen general anesthesia +0.5 μg·kg^-1 dexmedetomidine + ropivacaine for thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia; patients in experimental group B received thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia with double-lumen general anesthesia +1.0 μg·kg^-1 dexmedetomidine + ropivacaine; patients in experimental group C received thoracic paravertebral nerve block anesthesia with double-lumen general anesthesia +1.5 μg·kg^-1 dexmedetomidine + ropivacaine. The postoperative recovery time and visual analog scale (VAS), level of hemodynamics (heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP)), agitation during the recovery period, and complications were compared amongst the 4 groups of patients at different time points.

Results

The postoperative VAS scores of patients in groups B2 and B3 were slightly lower than those of patients in groups A and B1, but a one-way analysis of variance revealed no statistical difference in the postoperative recovery time and VAS pain scores of the four groups (P > 0.05), and the recovery time of patients in experimental group C was slightly higher than that of patients in group B2. At T0 and T1, there was no significant difference in the levels of HR and MAP among the four groups (P > 0.05). The levels of HR and MAP of the patients in groups B2 and B3 were significantly different from the patients in the control group and experimental group A at T2 and T3 (P < 0.05). The patients in experimental group B and experimental group C showed better outcomes than those in the control group and experimental group A in the assessment of agitation during the recovery period (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among the four groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

In line with the principle of preference for a small anesthesia dose, 1.0 μg·kg^-1 dose of dexmedetomidine combined with ropivacaine produces a pronounced efficacy in patients undergoing thoracotomy. It effectively controls the occurrence of agitation during the recovery period and maintains the stability of the patient's hemodynamics, with a high clinical safety profile.

Hertling A. Adding Dexmedetomidine to Bupivacaine in Ultrasound-guided Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Pain Management after Upper Abdominal Surgery: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Paravertebral blocks are one of the possible postoperative pain management modalities after laparotomy. Adjuvants to local anesthetics, including alpha agonists, have been shown to lead to better pain relief and increased duration of analgesia.

Objectives

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for ultrasound-guided paravertebral blocks in laparotomy.

Methods

In this double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT), we enrolled 42 patients scheduled for T6 to T8 thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for analgesia after laparotomy. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups of BD (bupivacaine 2.5 mg/mL 20 mL plus dexmedetomidine 100 µg) and B (bupivacaine 20 mL alone). Following surgery, intravenous fentanyl patient-controlled analgesia was initiated. The numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain, sedation score, total analgesic consumption, time to first analgesic requirement, side effects (such as nausea and vomiting), respiratory depression, and patients’ satisfaction during the first 48 hours of evaluation were compared in the two groups.

Results

Pain scores and mean total analgesic consumption at the first 48 hours in the BD group were significantly lower than Group B (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively). The time of first analgesic request was significantly longer in BD group (P < 0.001). Sedation scores and side effects did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

Adding dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine for TPVB after laparotomy yielded better postoperative pain management without significant complications.

The Role of Serratus Anterior Plane Block During in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Although thoracoscopy has characteristics such as a small surgical incision and low stress response, post-surgical pain after a thoracoscopic operation is no less than that after a thoracotomy. Moreover, poor post-surgical pain management is likely to cause an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) and chronic post-surgical pain. The serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) is a regional anesthesia method whereby local anesthetics (LAs) are injected into the serratus anterior space to block the lateral cutaneous branch of the intercostal nerve, long thoracic nerve, and dorsal thoracic nerve. The block range of the SAPB covers the incisions of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and the site of the chest tube, which are often located in the antero-lateral chest wall. Therefore, the SAPB can achieve effective analgesia in VATS. For example, 0.125% to 0.25% levobupivacaine (20-25 ml) is widely used for thoracic surgery, which can achieve effective analgesia and avoid adverse reactions. Moreover, it has advantages compared with thoracic segmental epidural block (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB), such as simple operation, increased safety, fewer complications, and hemodynamic stability. In addition, adequate analgesia is helpful for pulmonary function recovery and reduces the incidence of PPCs. This article introduces the anatomical mechanism of the SAPB, diverse operation approaches, how to choose drugs and adjuvants, and the resulting impacted area range. It summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the SAPB compared with other analgesic methods and posits that the SAPB is beneficial to the recovery of postoperative lung function, which provides more options for postoperative analgesia after VATS.

Post-operative pain management modalities employed in clinical trials for adult patients in LMIC; a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Unrelieved postoperative pain afflicts millions each year in low and middle income countries (LMIC). Despite substantial advances in the study of pain, this area remains neglected. Current systematic review was designed to ascertain the types of clinical trials conducted in LMIC on postoperative pain management modalities over the last decade.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in June 2019 on PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Plus, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant trials on the management of postoperative pain in LMIC. Out of 1450 RCTs, 108 studies were reviewed for quality evidence using structured form of critical appraisal skill program. Total of 51 clinical trials were included after applying inclusion/exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Results are charted according to the type of surgery. Eleven trials on laparoscopic cholecystectomy used multimodal analgesia including some form of regional analgesia. Different analgesic modalities were studied in 4 trials on thoracotomy, but none used multimodal approach. In 11 trials on laparotomy, multimodal analgesia was employed along with the studied modalities. In 2 trials on hysterectomy, preemptive pregabalin or gabapentin were used for reduction in rescue analgesia. In 13 trials on breast surgical procedures and 10 on orthopaedic surgery, multimodal analgesia was used with some form of regional analgesia.

CONCLUSION

We found that over the past 10 years, clinical trials for postoperative pain modalities have evolved in LMIC according to the current postoperative pain management guidelines i.e. multi-modal approach with some form of regional analgesia. The current review shows that clinical trials were conducted using multimodal analgesia including but not limited to some form of regional analgesia for postoperative pain in LMIC however this research snapshot (of only three countries) may not exactly reflect the clinical practices in all 47 countries. Post Operative Pain Management Modalities Employed in Clinical Trials for Adult Patients in LMIC; A Systematic Review.

Efficacy of Dexmedetomidine vs Morphine as an Adjunct in a Paravertebral Block with Bupivacaine in Postoperative Analgesia Following Modified Radical Mastectomy

Objective

To observe the efficacy of dexmedetomidine vs morphine as an adjunct in a paravertebral block (PVB) with bupivacaine in postoperative analgesia following modified radical mastectomy.

Study design

This was a randomized controlled trial performed from June 2018 to August 2019 in the Department of Anesthesia, Bakhtawar Amin Medical and Dental College, Ch. Pervaiz Ellahi Institute of Cardiology, Multan, Gurki Hospital, Services Institute of Medical Sciences, and Sheikh Zayed Hospital, Lahore.

Methodology

Seventy-eight patients were equally divided into group M, which received morphine (3 mg) and group D, which received dexmedetomidine (1 µg/kg), along with 20 cc 0.25% bupivacaine, for PVB. The primary outcome included morphine requirements in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Secondary outcomes included the quality and duration of analgesia, intraoperative doses of fentanyl and propofol, postoperative doses of diclofenac required, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and the Ramsey sedation score. Data were entered into SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) and analyzed by applying the independent t-test, Mann Whitney U-test, and the chi-square test or Fischer’s exact test, as appropriate. P≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

The mean time for the first analgesic administration was much shorter in group D as compared to group M (p<0.001). The average doses of ephedrine and morphine used were higher in group D (p-value 0.033 and 0.013, respectively). In the PACU, 33.3% of group D patients as compared to 12.8% of group M patients needed morphine (p=0.032). Postoperatively, diclofenac consumption was higher in group D (p<0.001). Postoperative pain was lower and sedation was higher in group M (p<0.05).

Conclusion

As an adjunct to bupivacaine in PVB for MRM, morphine is superior to dexmedetomidine.

The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on the Acute Pain After Cardiothoracic Surgeries: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Acute post-operative pain remains a troublesome complication of cardiothoracic surgeries. Several randomized controlled trials have examined the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as a single or as an adjuvant agent before, during and after surgery. However, no evidence-based conclusion has been reached regarding the advantages of dexmedetomidine over the other analgesics.

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of dexmedetomidine on acute post-thoracotomy/sternotomy pain.

METHODS

Medline, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were used to search for randomized controlled trials that investigated the analgesia effect of dexmedetomidine on post-thoracotomy/sternotomy pain in adults' patients. The outcomes were postoperative pain intensity or incidence, postoperative analgesia duration, and the number of postoperative analgesic requirements.

RESULTS

From 1789 citations, 12 trials including 804 subjects met the inclusion criteria. Most studies showed that pain score was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group up to 24 hours after surgery. Two studies reported the significant lower postoperative analgesia requirements and one study reported the significant lower incidence of acute pain after surgery in dexmedetomidine group. Ten studies found that the total consumption of narcotics was significantly lower in the dexmedetomidine group. The most reported complications of dexmedetomidine were nausea/vomiting, bradycardia and hypotension.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine can be used as a safe and efficient analgesic agent for reducing the postoperative pain and analgesic requirements up to 24 hours after cardiothoracic surgeries. However, further well-designed trials are needed to find the optimal dosage, route, time, and duration of dexmedetomidine administration.

Dexmedetomidine combined with local anesthetics in thoracic paravertebral block: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dexmedetomidine (DEX) improves postoperative pain scores and prolongs the duration of blockage when combined with local anesthetics (LAs) for neuraxial and brachial plexus block; however, there is little information about the effectiveness of DEX as an adjuvant to LAs in paravertebral block (PVB). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DEX combined with LAs in PVB.

METHOD

An electronic database search from inception date to February 2018 was performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DEX as an adjuvant to LAs with LAs alone for PVB in adult patients were included. Postoperative pain scores, duration of analgesia, cumulative perioperative analgesic consumption, and adverse events were analyzed.

RESULT

We identified 7 trials enrolling 350 patients and found that DEX reduced pain scores at rest by standardized mean differences (SMD) -0.86 cm (95% confidence interval [CI] [-1.55, -0.17], P = .01) and SMD -0.93 cm (95% CI [-1.41, -0.26], P =.008) at postoperative 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively. DEX reduced pain scores while dynamic by SMD -1.63 cm (95% CI [-2.92, -0.34], P =.01) and SMD -1.78 cm (95% CI [-2.66, -0.90], P =.007) for postoperative 12 hours and 24 hours, respectively. DEX extended the duration of analgesia by weighted mean differences (WMD) 201.53 minutes (95% CI [33.45, 369.61], P =.02); and reduced cumulative postoperative analgesic consumption by WMD -7.71 mg (95% CI [-10.64, -4.78], P <.001) and WMD -45.64 mg (95% CI [-69.76, -21.53], P < .001) for 24 hours morphine and 48 hours tramadol subgroups, respectively. DEX also increased the odds of hypotension by odds ratio (OR) 4.40 (95% CI [1.37, 14.17], P = .01); however, there was no statistically significant difference for intraoperative fentanyl consumption and the incidence of the bradycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

DEX combined with LAs in PVB significantly improved postoperative pain scores, prolonged the duration of analgesia, reduced postoperative analgesic consumption, and increased the odds of hypotension. However, we cannot neglect the heterogeneity of the included RCTs. More large-scale prospective studies are needed to further clarify the above conclusions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42018090251.

Efficacy of perineural dexamethasone with ropivacaine in thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia in elective thoracotomy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of perineural dexamethasone with ropivacaine in multimodal analgesia for thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in patients undergoing elective thoracotomy.

Patients and methods

Ninety-six patients undergoing thoracotomy were enrolled in this trial and randomized to adjuvant therapy for TPVB: group S (saline), group R (0.5% ropivacaine), or group RD (5 mg dexamethasone and 0.5% ropivacaine). Postoperative analgesia, recovery duration, and chronic pain were recorded.

Results

Groups R and RD spent less time in the postanaesthesia care unit, had earlier out-of-bed activity, and had shorter postoperative hospital stays compared with group S. The RD group regained consciousness faster and had lower acute pain scores and used less patient-controlled analgesia during the first 72 h after surgery compared with group S. Postthoracotomy pain was decreased in group RD (19.0%) compared with group S (47.6%) 3 months postoperatively, p = 0.050.

Conclusion

Perineural dexamethasone with ropivacaine for TPVB improves postoperative analgesia quality, reduces recovery time, and may decrease the incidence of chronic pain after thoracotomy with an opioid-based anesthetic regimen.

Paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine protects against independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation: a preliminary randomized clinical trial

Background

To investigate the effect of paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine on independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation.

Methods

In total, 120 patients who underwent elective radical resection of pulmonary carcinoma were randomly assigned to one of six groups (n = 20): normal saline (C group), ropivacaine (R group), intravenous dexmedetomidine (Div group), 0.5 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD0.5 group), 1.0 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD1.0 group), or 2.0 μg/kg paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine (RD2.0 group).

Patients in the R, Div, RD0.5, RD1.0 and RD2.0 groups underwent a thoracic paravertebral block, and normal saline was administered as a control to C group. Small marginal lung samples next to the tumor were harvested immediately after the tumor tissues were excised.

Lung injury was evaluated as follows: an injury score was determined via light microscopy, and cell apoptosis was determined via a TUNEL assay. TNF-α, IL-6, miRNA-210, HIF-1α, Tom20 and ISCU2 were also detected.

Results

Both intravenous and paravertebral dexmedetomidine attenuated independent lung injury. Downregulation of HIF-1α and miRNA-210 and upregulation of Tom20 and ISCU2 may be the underlying mechanism. No difference was observed between the Div and RD0.5 groups, and no further improvement of lung injury was found in the RD1.0 and RD2.0 groups with increased paravertebral dexmedetomidine doses.

Conclusions

Paravertebral dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to ropivacaine, which is comparable to intravenous dexmedetomidine, could protect against independent lung injury during one-lung ventilation.

Trial registration

ISRCTN, 13000406; retrospectively registered on 22.05.2018.

Late respiratory effects of cancer treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim of this article is to examine significant advances in our understanding of the late respiratory effects of cancer treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, biological therapies and haematopoietic stem cell transplant, and to provide a framework for assessing such patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Oncology therapies have advanced considerably over recent years but pulmonary toxicity remains a concern. Advances have been made in our understanding of the risk factors, including genetic ones that lead to toxicity from radiotherapy and chemotherapy and risk stratification models are being developed to aid treatment planning. Targeted biological treatments are continuously being developed and consequently the Pneumotox database of pulmonary toxicity continues to be an essential resource. Early detection of bronchiolitis obliterans in haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients has been found to be critical, with some positive results from intervention trials.

SUMMARY

Pulmonary toxicity is a common unwanted consequence of life enhancing or saving cancer treatments which remain difficult to treat. Developments in these fields are mainly in the areas of prevention, early detection and monitoring of unwanted side effects. We discuss some of these developments within this review.

Use of Dexmedetomidine in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective α₂-adrenergic agonist with analgesic and sedative properties. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration approved the use of the drug for short-lasting sedation (24 h) in intensive care units (ICUs) in patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and endotracheal intubation. In October 2008, the Food and Drug Administration extended use of the drug for the sedation of nonintubated patients before and during surgical and nonsurgical procedures. In the European Union, the European Medicine Agency approved the use of dexmedetomidine in September 2011 with a single recognized indication: ICU adult patients requiring mild sedation and awakening in response to verbal stimulus. At present, the use of dexmedetomidine for sedation outside the ICU remains an off-label indication. The benefits of dexmedetomidine in critically ill patients and in cardiac, electrophysiology-related, vascular, and thoracic procedures are discussed.

Evaluation of the role of dexmedetomidine in improvement of the analgesic profile of thoracic paravertebral block in thoracic surgeries: A randomised prospective clinical trial

Background and Aims:

Thoracic paravertebral block (TPB) is one of the effective methods for management of post-operative pain in thoracic surgeries. The aim of the study was to evaluate effectiveness of addition of dexmedetomidine to paravertebral block with bupivacaine in improving the postoperative pain relief and pulmonary functions in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries.

Methods:

A prospective randomized double-blinded study was performed on forty patients scheduled for thoracic surgery. A paravertebral catheter was secured under ultrasound guidance preoperatively for all patients. Group B (n = 20) received a bolus dose of 0.25% bupivacaine at 0.3 mL/kg followed by continuous infusion of 0.125% bupivacaine 0.1 mL/kg/h. Group (BD) received a bolus dose of 0.25% bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg at 0.3 mL/kg followed by continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.2 μg/kg/h + 0.125% bupivacaine 0.1 mL/kg/h. Anaesthesia technique was standardized for all patients. Postoperatively, all patients were assessed during first 24 hours for intraoperative fentanyl and post-operative morphine requirements, Visual Analogue Scores (VAS) scores at rest and during cough, and postoperative pulmonary functions.

Results:

Post-operative morphine consumption in the first 24 hours and intraoperative fentanyl requirement were significantly less in group BD (2.95 ± 1.986 mg, 80.75 ± 31.551μg respectively) compared to group B (9.85 ± 3.468 mg, 186 ± 39.683 μg respectively). Group BD showed less VAS scores during cough and better postoperative pulmonary functions (P < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Addition of dexmedetomidine to paravertebral bupivacaine in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries provides more effective analgesia with improvement in post-operative pulmonary functions.