The HAT Score-A Simple Risk Stratification Score for Coagulopathic Bleeding During Adult Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Anticoagulation in adult patients supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committees on Perioperative and Critical Care Haemostasis and Thrombosis of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Anticoagulation of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is challenging because of a high risk of both bleeding and thrombotic complications, and often empirical. Practice in anticoagulation management is therefore highly variable. The scope of this guidance document is to provide clinicians with practical advice on the choice of an anticoagulant agent, dosing, and the optimal anticoagulant monitoring strategy during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support in adult patients.

Mechanical Assist Device-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The Use of Impella Versus Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation as an Emerging Frontier in Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock

The extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) procedure aids in the provision of prolonged cardiopulmonary support, whereas the Impella device (Abiomed, Danvers, MA) is a ventricular assist device that maintains circulation by pumping blood into the aorta from the left ventricle. Blood is circulated in parallel with the heart by Impella. It draws blood straight into the aorta from the left ventricle, hence preserving the physiological flow. ECMO bypasses the left atrium and the left ventricle, and the end consequence is a non-physiological flow. In this article, we conducted a detailed analysis of various publications in the literature and examined various modalities pertaining to the use of ECMO and Impella for cardiogenic shocks, such as efficacy, clinical outcomes, cost-effectiveness, device-related complications, and limitations. The Impella completely unloads the left ventricle, thereby significantly reducing the effort of the heart. Comparatively, ECMO only stabilizes a patient with cardiogenic shock for a short stretch of time and does not lessen the efforts of the left ventricle ("unload" it). In the acute setting, both devices reduced left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and provided adequate hemodynamic support. By comparing patients on Impella to those receiving ECMO, it was found that patients on Impella were associated with better clinical results, quicker recovery, limited complications, and reduced healthcare costs; however, there is a lack of conclusive studies performed demonstrating the reduction in long-term mortality rates. Considering the effectiveness of given modalities and taking into account the various studies described in the literature, Impella has reported better clinical outcomes although more clinical trials are needed for establishing the effectiveness of these interventional approaches in revascularization in cardiogenic shock.

HEROES V-A-HEmoRrhagic cOmplications in veno-arterial Extracorporeal life Support-Development and internal validation of a multivariable prediction model in adult patients

BACKGROUND

Risk factors for bleeding complications during extracorporeal life support (ECLS) indicated for cardiac support remain poorly investigated. The aim is to develop and internally validate a prediction model to calculate the risk for bleeding complications in adult patients receiving veno-arterial (V-A) ECLS.

METHODS

Data of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry of adult patients undergoing V-A ECLS between 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was bleeding complications recorded during V-A ECLS. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise elimination was used to develop the prediction model. Performance of the model was tested by discriminative ability and calibration with receiver operator characteristic, area under the curve, and visual inspection of the calibration plot. Internal validation was performed to detect overfitting of the model.

RESULTS

In total 28 767 adult patients were included, of which 29.0% developed bleeding complications. Sex, body mass index, surgical cannulation, pre-ECLS respiratory and hemodynamic variables, pre-ECLS support and interventions, and different type of diagnosis were included in the prediction model. This prediction model showed a predictive capability with an AUC of 0.66.

CONCLUSION

The model is based on the largest cohort of V-A ECLS patients and is the best available predictive model for bleeding events given the predictors that are available in V-A ECLS compared to current literature. The model can help in identifying patients at high risk for bleeding complications and will help in developing further research and decision-making in terms of anticoagulation management. External validation is warranted to extrapolate this model in the clinical setting.

HEROES V-V-HEmorRhagic cOmplications in Veno-Venous Extracorporeal life Support-Development and internal validation of multivariable prediction model in adult patients

BACKGROUND

During extracorporeal life support (ECLS), bleeding is one of the most frequent complications, associated with high morbidity and increased mortality, despite continuous improvements in devices and patient care. Risk factors for bleeding complications in veno-venous (V-V) ECLS applied for respiratory support have been poorly investigated. We aim to develop and internally validate a prediction model to calculate the risk for bleeding complications in adult patients receiving V-V ECLS support.

METHODS

Data from adult patients reported to the extracorporeal life support organization (ELSO) registry between the years 2010 and 2020 were analyzed. The primary outcome was bleeding complications recorded during V-V ECLS. Multivariable logistic regression with backward stepwise elimination was used to develop the predictive model. The performance of the model was tested by discriminative ability and calibration with receiver operating characteristic curves and visual inspection of the calibration plot.

RESULTS

In total, 18 658 adult patients were included, of which 3 933 (21.1%) developed bleeding complications. The prediction model showed a prediction of bleeding complications with an AUC of 0.63. Pre-ECLS arrest, surgical cannulation, lactate, pO₂ , HCO₃ , ventilation rate, mean airway pressure, pre-ECLS cardiopulmonary bypass or renal replacement therapy, pre-ECLS surgical interventions, and different types of diagnosis were included in the prediction model.

CONCLUSIONS

The model is based on the largest cohort of V-V ECLS patients and reveals the most favorable predictive value addressing bleeding events given the predictors that are feasible and when compared to the current literature. This model will help identify patients at risk of bleeding complications, and decision making in terms of anticoagulation and hemostatic management.

Different Scores Predict the Value of Hemorrhagic Transformation after Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objective

To evaluate the value of the Alberta stroke project early CT score (ASPECTS), DRAGON score, SEDAN score, and HAT score in predicting hemorrhagic transformation (HT) after intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Methods

The clinical data of 248 AIS patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis in our hospital from December 2017 to December 2019 were analyzed. According to the prognosis, all patients were divided into the non-HT group (n = 200) and the HT group (n = 48). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze clinical data to determine the influencing factors of HT after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the ASPECTS, DRAGON, SEDAN, and HAT scores to the value of predicting HT after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients.

Results

The lower the ASPECTS score and the higher the DRAGON, SEDAN, and HAT scores, the higher the incidence of HT after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients (P < 0.05). The results of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the patient's age, atrial fibrillation, baseline NIHSS score, early signs of infarction on admission with head CT, time from onset to thrombolytic therapy, and thrombolytic drugs were all independent factors affecting intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients (P < 0.05). The area under the curve (AUC) of the predictive value of ASPECTS for HT is 0.895 (95% CI 0.813–0.977). When the optimal cutoff value is 0.607, the sensitivity is 100% and the specificity is 60.7%. The AUC of the predictive value of DRAGON for HT is 0.877 (95% CI 0.790–0.964). When the optimal cutoff value is 0.665, the sensitivity is 84.4% and the specificity is 82.1%. The AUC of the predictive value of SEDAN for HT is 0.764 (95% CI 0.638–0.890). When the optimal cutoff value is 0.474, the sensitivity is 78.6% and the specificity is 68.8%. The AUC of the predictive value of HAT for HT is 0.777 (95% CI 0.651–0.903). When the optimal cutoff value is 0.509, the sensitivity is 68.8% and the specificity is 82.1%.

Conclusion

The lower the ASPECTS score and the higher the DRAGON, SEDAN, and HAT scores, the higher the incidence of HT in AIS patients. The patient's age, atrial fibrillation, baseline NIHSS score, early signs of infarction on admission with head CT, time from onset to thrombolytic therapy, and thrombolytic drugs are all independent factors affecting HT in AIS patients. The scores of ASPECTS, DRAGON, SEDAN and HAT have certain value in predicting HT after intravenous thrombolysis in AIS patients, and the predicted value of ASPECTS score is the best.

Extracorporeal Life Support in Hemorrhagic Conditions: A Systematic Review

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is indicated in refractory acute respiratory or cardiac failure. According to the need for anticoagulation, bleeding conditions (e.g., in trauma, pulmonary bleeding) have been considered a contraindication for the use of ECLS. However, there is increasing evidence for improved outcomes after ECLS support in hemorrhagic patients based on the benefits of hemodynamic support outweighing the increased risk of bleeding. We conducted a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines and reviewed publications describing ECLS support in hemorrhagic conditions. Seventy-four case reports, four case series, seven retrospective database observational studies, and one preliminary result of an ongoing study were reviewed. In total, 181 patients were identified in total of 86 manuscripts. The reports included patients suffering from bleeding caused by pulmonary hemorrhage (n = 53), trauma (n = 96), postpulmonary endarterectomy (n = 13), tracheal bleeding (n = 1), postpartum or cesarean delivery (n = 11), and intracranial hemorrhage (n = 7). Lower targeted titration of heparin infusion, heparin-free ECLS until coagulation is normalized, clamping of the endotracheal tube, and other ad hoc possibilities represent potential beneficial maneuvers in such conditions. Once the patient is cannulated and circulation restored, bleeding control surgery is performed for stabilization if indicated. The use of ECLS for temporary circulatory or respiratory support in critical patients with refractory hemorrhagic shock appears feasible considering tailored ECMO management strategies. Further investigation is needed to better elucidate the patient selection and ECLS management approaches.

Bleeding during veno-venous ECMO cannot reliably be predicted by rotational thrombelastometry (ROTEM™)

Introduction:

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) used for respiratory support is associated with clinical bleeding in at least one third of patients. Mechanisms promoting bleeding, like acquired von Willebrand syndrome, cannot be identified by routine coagulation tests. This study was performed to evaluate rotational Thrombelastography (ROTEM™) for specific results predicting bleeding events during vvECMO.

Methods:

Five hundred and thirty-four ROTEM™ analyses of 57 patients over 574 days have been evaluated. Patients were graded into three groups according to the severity of bleeding, following the Freiburg ECMO bleeding assessment. ROTEM™ results and basic as well as comprehensive laboratory coagulation tests have been compared among the three groups and overall between defined time points.

Results:

Fourteen patients (25 %) presented without bleeding, 22 patients (39 %) showed mild bleeding and 21 patients (36 %) became evident with relevant clinical bleeding. No bleeding shock and no fatal bleeding event occurred. No case of hyperfibrinolysis was observed. Neither a statistical difference for ECMO blood flow nor duration of therapy among the groups could be shown. The only significant difference was clotting time (CT) in the InTEM analysis, with a median (IQR) of 175 (37.5) seconds in Group 1, 190 (54.5) seconds in Group 2 and 204 (90) seconds in Group 3. When comparing overall ROTEM™ analyses between defined time points, continuous worsening of CT can be found in ExTEM, FibTEM and ApTEM. Reduced A10, A20 and congruently maximum clot firmness, especially, developed in ExTEM and ApTEM and with a minor characteristic in InTEM, but not in FibTEM. ROTEM™ and coagulation-parameter results before 19 clinical relevant bleeding episodes compared to all other results only showed differences in FibTEM.

Conclusion:

ROTEM™ as a functional viscoelastic analysis does not provide additional information to basic and comprehensive laboratory tests during vvECMO. Bleeding events cannot be predicted by the means of specific ROTEM™ results.