The Effect of Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Placement on Intracuff Pressure of an Endotracheal Tube in Infants and Children

Effect of transesophageal echocardiography probe on tracheal perfusion pressure and ventilatory parameters in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac surgery using cardiopulmonary bypass: A prospective observational study

Background

Overinflation of cuffed endotracheal tubes and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe causes increased intracuff pressure (CP) compromising tracheal perfusion pressure (TPP). Primary objective of the study was to assess CP, TPP on TEE probe insertion and examination during pediatric cardiac surgeries. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the effect of the probe on peak airway pressures (Ppeak), mean airway pressures (Pmean) and to monitor CP, TPP on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Materials and Methods

This prospective observational study included fifty patients, aged 1-5 years undergoing cardiac surgeries using CPB. Following induction, TEE probe was introduced. CP, TPP, Ppeak, Pmean were measured before insertion of TEE probe (T1), during probe insertion (T2) and examination at mid-esophageal (T3), transgastric level (T4), and on removing probe (T6). CP, TPP were monitored on CPB (T5). Statistical analysis was done using paired t-test.

Results

CP, Ppeak and Pmean increased significantly, while TPP decreased significantly from T1 to T2, T3, T4 (P < 0.001). CP, TPP decreased significantly at T5 in comparison to T6 (P < 0.001). In 48% of the patients CP increased above 30 cm H2O at T2.

Conclusion

TEE probe causes an increase in CP and decreases TPP. Constant monitoring and maintaining CP, TPP in optimum range is recommended.

The impact of esophageal device insertion on cuff pressure of endotracheal tube: a literature review and meta-analysis

The impact of intraoperative esophageal device insertion (EDI) on endotracheal tube (ET) cuff inflation pressure remains unclear. Electronic databases including Medline, Embase, Google scholar, Web of Science™ and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies involving EDI after placement of ETs from inception to July 7, 2022. The primary outcome was risk of high cuff pressure, while the secondary outcomes were increases in cuff pressure following EDI. Difference between adults and children was investigated with subgroup analysis. There were ten eligible studies (observation study, n = 9, randomized controlled study, n = 1) involving a total of 468 participants. EDI notably increased the risk of high cuff pressure (n = 7, risk ratio: 12.82, 95% confidence interval: 4.9 to 33.52, subgroup analysis: p = 0.008). There were significant elevations in cuff pressure in adults and children both during (13.42 and 7.88 cmH₂O, respectively, subgroup analysis: p = 0.15) and after (10.09 and 3.99 cmH₂O, respectively, subgroup analysis: p = 0.0003) EDI. Our results revealed an over 12-fold increase in the risk of high endotracheal tube cuff pressure in patients, especially adults, receiving EDI under endotracheal anesthesia. There were significant increases in both adults and children despite a higher increase in the former after device insertion.

The Effect of Intraoperative Transesophageal Echocardiography Probe Placement on the Endotracheal Tube Cuff Pressure in Adult Patients Undergoing On-Pump Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

The study was directed toward documentation of the effect of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe insertion on the endotracheal tube cuff pressure (CP) in adult patients undergoing on-pump coronary bypass surgery. The primary objective of this study was to assess whether CP reaches supranormal pressures during the different stages of intraoperative TEE examination. The secondary objective was to observe the effect of TEE probe placement on the ventilation parameters.

DESIGN

A prospective observational study.

SETTING

At a tertiary care cardiac center.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-four cardiac surgical patients older than 18 years of age who required intraoperative TEE examination.

INTERVENTIONS

TEE probe insertion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Following the induction of general anesthesia and tracheal intubation, a TEE probe was introduced. The endotracheal tube CP was recorded at 5 time zones: Before TEE probe insertion, during the insertion of the probe, during probe manipulation, probe in the transgastric position, and during removal of the probe. A nonparametric test was used for comparing intracuff pressure between pairs of time zones. There was a statistically significant difference in CP values between the baseline and those during different time zones (chi-square test = 134.77, degrees of freedom = 4, p = 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference in the peak pressure between different time points compared to baseline (p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

TEE probe placement in patients with tracheal intubation may be associated with a significant increase in CP well above the baseline pressure. With the possibility of the mean arterial pressures during cardiopulmonary bypass being substantially lower than expected, the findings of the current study raised the concern of predisposing the tracheal mucosa to hypoperfusion, with subsequent temporary or permanent tracheal damage. Hence, at least a baseline estimation of the endotracheal tube CP at the time of tracheal intubation, with the help of a pressure gauge in the operating room, may be considered as a safe practice.

Transesophageal probe placement increases endotracheal tube cuff pressure but is not associated with postoperative extubation failure after congenital cardiac surgery

Context:

The concomitant use of cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETT) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probes increases ETT cuff pressures (CP), which may contribute to mucosal ischemia and perioperative complications such as failed extubation.

Aims:

To assess changes in ETT CP after TEE insertion in patients of different age groups undergoing congenital heart surgery and examine the relationship between ETT CP and postoperative extubation failure.

Settings and Design:

Single-center quality improvement project.

Subjects and Methods:

ETT CP was measured with a manometer following intubation and again after TEE insertion. Tracheal perfusion pressure was then calculated and postoperative extubation failures were recorded.

Statistical Analysis:

Chi-square testing, Fisher’s-exact testing, one-way analysis of variance testing or Kruskal–Wallis testing with Dunn's pairwise, and student's t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum testing were used to analyze the data.

Results:

Median ETT CP increased significantly after TEE insertion in each age group, with infants showing a smaller magnitude of increase (+2 [1-6] cm H₂O, P < 0.001) than adults (+12 [8-14] cm H₂O, P = 0.008) (intergroup comparison P = 0.002). Five patients (9%) failed extubation, all of which were infants. Within the infant subgroup, no significant difference existed between failed vs successful extubation regarding ETT CP during bypass (15 ± 1 vs 16 ± 2 mmHg, P = 0.206) or tracheal perfusion pressure pre-bypass (34 ± 9 vs 38 ± 11 mmHg, P = 0.518), during bypass (20 ± 9 vs 22 ± 6 mmHg, P = 0.697), or post-bypass (42 ± 9 vs 41 ± 9 mmHg, P = 0.923). There was a significant difference in cardiopulmonary bypass duration (151 ± 29 vs 85 ± 32 min, P < 0.001).

Conclusion:

Factors beyond intraoperative ETT CP likely play a larger role in postoperative extubation failure.

Does the endotracheal tube cuff pressure increases with transesophageal probe insertion?

Context:

The cuff pressure (CP) of the endotracheal tube (ETT) exceeding 30 cm of H₂O results in reduced perfusion of lateral mucosa of trachea leading to complications. As the posterior tracheal wall is in contact with the esophagus, there is a possibility that the insertion of transesophageal echo (TEE) probe may compress the tracheal wall and increase CP.

Aims:

This study was aimed to assess the impact of TEE probe insertion on CP in adults undergoing cardiac surgery.

Settings and Design:

Prospective observational study of 65 patients at tertiary care level hospital.

Subjects and Methods:

After balanced general anesthesia, patients were intubated with high volume low-pressure ET.TEE probe was then inserted with gentle jaw thrust. CP was measured by standard invasive pressure monitoring device at four points: T1 at baseline before TEE probe insertion; T2 maximum CP noted at TEE probe insertion; T3 at 5 min post TEE probe insertion; and T4 at post-TEE exam.

Statistical Analysis Used:

CP was compared between pairs of time points (T1 vs. T2; T1 vs. T3; and T1 vs. T4) using Mann-Whitney U test. Factors predicting CP >30 cm of H₂O at T4 were assessed by backward stepwise regression.

Results:

CP (mean ± S.D.) at T1, T2, T3, and T4 was 22 ± 3, 38 ± 10, 30 ± 6, and 30 ± 7, respectively. CP increased significantly from T1 to T2 (P < 0.001), T1 to T3 (P < 0.001), and T1 to T4 (P < 0.001). There were 26 patients (40%) with CP >30 cm of H₂O at end of TEE exam (T4). On multivariate analysis baseline, CP (T1) >20 cm of H₂O was significantly associated with CP >30 cm of H₂O at end of TEE exam with Odd's Ratio (OR) of 8.5 (1.76–41.06, P = 0.008).

Conclusions:

To conclude, the CP increases significantly with TEE probe insertion in 40% of patients exceeding a safe limit of 30 cm of H₂O. The monitoring and optimization of CP is advisable.