1
|
Murray AW, Boisen ML, Fritz A, Renew JR, Martin AK. Anesthetic considerations in lung transplantation: past, present and future. J Thorac Dis 2022; 13:6550-6563. [PMID: 34992834 PMCID: PMC8662503 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2021-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplantation is a very complex surgical procedure with many implications for the anesthetic care of these patients. Comprehensive preoperative evaluation is an important component of the transplant evaluation as it informs many of the decisions made perioperatively to manage these complex patients effectively and appropriately. These decisions may involve pre-emptive actions like pre-habilitation and nutrition optimization of these patients before they arrive for their transplant procedure. Appropriate airway and ventilation management of these patients needs to be performed in a manner that provides an optimal operating conditions and protection from ventilatory injury of these fragile post-transplant lungs. Pain management can be challenging and should be managed in a multi-modal fashion with or without the use of an epidural catheter while recognizing the risk of neuraxial technique in patients who will possibly be systemically anticoagulated. Complex monitoring is required for these patients involving both invasive and non-invasive including the use of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and continuous cardiac output monitoring. Management of the patient's hemodynamics can be challenging and involves managing the systemic and pulmonary vascular systems. Some patients may require extra-corporeal lung support as a planned part of the procedure or as a rescue technique and centers need to be proficient in instituting and managing this sophisticated method of hemodynamic support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew W Murray
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Michael L Boisen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ashley Fritz
- Division of Cardiothoracic and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - J Ross Renew
- Department of Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic Graduate School of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fritz AV, Martin AK, Ramakrishna H. Practical considerations for developing a lung transplantation anesthesiology program. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2021; 37:445-453. [PMID: 34493911 PMCID: PMC8412970 DOI: 10.1007/s12055-021-01217-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The advancement in lung transplantation outcomes has been secondary to ongoing improvements within multiple medical specialties. The recent emergence of literature describing the impact of anesthetic management on perioperative outcomes has led to the beginnings of formalized training fellowships within lung transplantation anesthesiology. Practical considerations for the development of a lung transplantation anesthesiology program, both clinical and educational, are herein described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Virginia Fritz
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| | - Archer Kilbourne Martin
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fessler J, Davignon M, Sage E, Roux A, Cerf C, Feliot E, Gayat E, Parquin F, Fischler M, Guen ML. Intraoperative Implications of the Recipients' Disease for Double-Lung Transplantation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2020; 35:530-538. [PMID: 32741611 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.07.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare intraoperative patterns among patients based on their primary pulmonary disease (cystic fibrosis [CF], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD]/emphysema [CE], and pulmonary fibrosis [PF]) during double- lung transplantation. The following 3 major outcomes were reported: blood transfusion, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) management, and the possibility of immediate extubation at the end of surgery. DESIGN Retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database, including donor and recipient characteristics and intraoperative variables. SETTING Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France (academic center performing 60-80 lung transplantations per year). PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent double- lung transplantation from 2012-2019. Patients with retransplantation, multiorgan transplantation, or surgery performed with cardiopulmonary bypass were excluded. INTERVENTIONS None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS Two hundred forty-six patients had CF, 117 had CE, and 66 had PF. No patient had primary pulmonary arterial hypertension. Blood transfusion was higher in the CF group than in the other 2 groups (red blood cells [p < 0.001], fresh frozen plasma [p = 0.004]). The CF and CE groups were characterized by a lower intraoperative requirement of ECMO (p = 0.002), and the PF group more frequently required postoperative ECMO (p < 0.001). CF and CE patients were more frequently extubated in the operating room than were PF patients (37.4%, 50.4%, and 13.6%, respectively; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Intraoperative outcomes differed depending on the initial pathology. Such differences should be taken into account in specific clinical studies and in intraoperative management protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Fessler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France
| | - Maxime Davignon
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France
| | - Edouard Sage
- Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France
| | - Antoine Roux
- Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France; Department of Pneumology, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France
| | - Charles Cerf
- Department of Intensive Care, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France
| | - Elodie Feliot
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis - Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 75654 Paris, France
| | - Etienne Gayat
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis - Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, 75654 Paris, France
| | - Francois Parquin
- Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France
| | - Marc Fischler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France.
| | - Morgan Le Guen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Hôpital Foch, 9250 Suresnes, France; Université Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 78646 Versailles, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scaravilli V, Morlacchi LC, Merrino A, Piacentino E, Marasco D, Zanella A, Nosotti M, Rosso L, Polli F, Blasi F, Pesenti A, Grasselli G. Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients: Predictors and impact on outcome. J Cyst Fibros 2019; 19:659-665. [PMID: 31676344 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2019.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2019] [Revised: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Predictors and outcomes of intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during lung transplantation (LUTX) for cystic fibrosis (CF) are unknown. METHODS We retrospectively collected the clinical data at enlistment of the CF patients who underwent double LUTX from January 2013 to December 2018 at an Italian tertiary referral center. We compared blood transfusions, incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS and survival of ECMO and non-ECMO patients. Chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, and log-rank tests were used. RESULTS Twenty-eight (40%) of the 70 included patients needed intraoperative central veno-arterial ECMO with postoperative veno-venous prolongation in 6 subjects. Lower right ventricle ejection fraction (p = 0.013, OR 0.92(0.86-0.98)), higher oxygen requirement (p = 0.026, OR 1.39(1.01-1.90)), lower body surface area (p = 0.044, OR 0.05(0.00-1.03)), and CF-related diabetes (p = 0.044, OR 2.81(1.03-7.66)) were associated with intraoperative ECMO. Compared to non-ECMO patients, ECMO patients needed almost fivefold intraoperative transfusion (2227 mL vs. 570 mL, p<0.001) and had PGD grade > 0 at 72 h more frequently (16/57% vs. 12/28%, p = 0.017, OR 3.33(1.22-9.09)). Mechanical ventilation, ICU LOS and hospital LOS were significantly longer in ECMO patients. Survival at follow-up (651(326-1277) days) of ECMO and non-ECMO patients was 78% vs. 83%, respectively (OR 0.73 (0.21-2.46), p = 0.616, log-rank test p = 0.498). CONCLUSION Pre-operative risk assessment and clinical planning should be done according to the predictors above. While undeniably useful as a life-saving procedure, ECMO during LUTX for CF is associated with worsened short-term outcomes. ECMO should be implemented weighing its risk and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vittorio Scaravilli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, (MI) Italy.
| | - Letizia Corinna Morlacchi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Alessandra Merrino
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Edoardo Piacentino
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Davide Marasco
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Alberto Zanella
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, (MI) Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Mario Nosotti
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy; Thoracic Syrgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Lorenzo Rosso
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy; Thoracic Syrgery and Lung Transplant Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Federico Polli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, (MI) Italy
| | - Francesco Blasi
- Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy; Department of Internal Medicine, Respiratory Unit and Cystic Fibrosis Center, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Antonio Pesenti
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, (MI) Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| | - Giacomo Grasselli
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Emergency, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda - Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via F. Sforza 35, 20122 Milano, (MI) Italy; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation, University of Milan, Milan (MI), Italy
| |
Collapse
|