Early Extubation After Cardiac Surgery: A Better Predictor of Outcome than Metric of Quality?

Rapid-recovery protocol for minimally invasive mitral valve repair

Background

Minimally invasive mitral valve repair (MIMVR), often performed within specialized care pathways, has been shown to reduce hospital length of stay and improve patient recovery. The relative value of rapid-recovery protocols as a component of care pathways, including enhanced recovery programs (ERPs), has not been well described. This study compared clinical outcomes following implementation of a new, comprehensive rapid-recovery protocol within a previously established, mature ERP for patients undergoing MIMVR.

Methods

The rapid-recovery protocol was developed and implemented by a multidisciplinary team to further optimize patient recovery within an existing ERP. The protocol was applied to 75 consecutive patients undergoing MIMVR between September 2022 and December 2023. Outcomes were compared retrospectively to 75 ERP control patients who did not receive the rapid-recovery protocol but experienced the ERP. The primary outcome was a composite of discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU) by postoperative day (POD) 1, discharge to home by POD 4, and no all-cause hospital readmission by 30 days.

Results

Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Patients in the rapid-recovery group achieved the primary composite outcome significantly more often compared to the control group (60% vs 40%, respectively). There was no between-group difference in postoperative complications. Multivariable logistic regression showed that age ≤60 years was significantly associated with rapid-recovery protocol success. Clinical barriers to achieving individual components of the primary outcome were described.

Conclusions

A rapid-recovery protocol for MIMVR was associated with early ICU and hospital discharge. These benefits were safely achieved without any increase in hospital readmission, morbidity, or mortality up to 30 days postoperatively.

Minimally invasive technique facilitates early extubation after cardiac surgery: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Postoperative time to extubation plays a role in prognosis after heart valve surgery; however, its exact impact has not been clarified. This study compared the postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive surgery and conventional sternotomy, focusing on early extubation and factors influencing prolonged mechanical ventilation.

METHODS

Data from 744 patients who underwent heart valve surgery at the Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital between August 2019 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The outcomes in patients who underwent conventional median sternotomy (MS) and minimally invasive (MI) video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery were compared using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Kaplan-Meier curves. Clinical data, including surgical data, postoperative cardiac function, postoperative complications, and intensive care monitoring data, were analyzed.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching and IPTW, 196 cases of conventional MS were compared with 196 cases of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Compared to patients in the conventional MS group, those in the MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery group in the matched cohort had a higher early postoperative extubation rate (P < 0.01), reduced incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (P < 0.05), significantly shorter length of stay in the intensive care unit (P < 0.01), shorter overall length of hospital stay (P < 0.01), and lower total cost of hospitalization (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Successful early tracheal extubation is important for the intensive care management of patients after heart valve surgery. The advantages of MI video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery over conventional MS include significant reductions in the duration of use of mechanical ventilation support, reduced length of intensive care unit stay, reduced total length of hospitalization, and a favorable patient recovery rate.

Continuous Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Catheters for Poststernotomy Pain Control: A Case Series

This case series describes the safety and effectiveness of superficial parasternal intercostal plane catheters for poststernotomy pain control in 4 patients who underwent multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients had reduced sternal pain and opioid consumption while the catheters ran continuously for 72 hours without complications. Our experience suggests the effectiveness of parasternal blocks can be safely prolonged with catheters, and they can be a useful addition to pain management strategies for this patient population.

Perioperative care in infective endocarditis

Patients undergoing surgery for acute infective endocarditis are among those with the highest risk. Their preoperative condition has significant impact on outcomes. There are specific issues related with the preoperative situation, intraoperative findings, and postoperative management. In this narrative review, focus is placed on the most critical aspects in the perioperative period including the management and weaning from mechanical ventilation, the management of vasoplegia, the management of the chest open, antithrombotic therapy, transfusion, coagulopathy, management of atrial fibrillation, the duration of antibiotic therapy, and pacemaker implantation.

Association between improved compliance with enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines and postoperative outcomes: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery is a multidisciplinary clinical care pathway that relies on a bundle of interventions, aiming to reduce the stress response to surgery and promote early recovery of organ function. In 2011, our institution introduced an institutional enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery program focusing on 9 central interventions, which have been expanded during the past decade by additional interventions now considered standard of care. After the recent publication of the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines, we evaluated the relation between the compliance with these enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines and postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

All patients enrolled in our enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery program in 2019 were included in this retrospective single-center audit. The primary outcome was compliance with 23 enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of at least 1 postoperative complication and hospital length of stay.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients were included in this study. Compliance with the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines was 64%. Postoperatively, 51% of the patients experienced at least 1 complication and had a median hospital length of stay of 6 days. Multivariable analysis showed that an increased compliance (per 10%) with the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines was associated with a lower risk for any complication (odds ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.79; P = .0003) and a higher probability of earlier hospital discharge (hazard ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.43; P = .0008).

CONCLUSIONS

This audit revealed a correlation between increased compliance with enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines and a reduction of postoperative complications and hospital length of stay. Future trials are needed to establish evidence-based recommendations for each separate intervention of the enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery guidelines and to create a minimum core-set of enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery interventions.

A Retrospective Pilot Comparison Trial Investigating Clinical Outcomes in Cardiac Surgical Patients Who Received Sugammadex Reversal During 2018 to 2021

OBJECTIVES

To compare the number of eligible urgent and elective cardiac surgical patients who could be extubated successfully within 6 hours of surgery and who received sugammadex versus those who did not.

DESIGN

This retrospective pilot study compared outcomes in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass between 2018 to 2021 who received sugammadex versus those who did not.

SETTING

At a tertiary-care hospital in the Northshore of Chicago.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 358 elective or urgent cardiac surgical patients who underwent cardiopulmonary bypass (by 1 cardiac surgeon) and were extubated within 24 hours of the end of surgery at Evanston Hospital in Evanston, IL, were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Data were examined in the following 2 groups of patients: those who were administered sugammadex and those who were not.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After performing propensity matching for age, sex, body mass index, kidney or liver disease, the number of preoperative conditions (defined as the sum of the presence of the following medical conditions: diabetes, immunosuppressive disease, on home oxygen, on inhaled bronchodilator, or sleep apnea), number of patients who underwent elective or urgent surgery in each group, surgery time, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, number of intraoperative blood products, use of intraoperative midazolam and propofol, a statistically significant increase in the percentage of patients in the sugammadex group were extubated within 6 hours of the end of surgery versus those who did not receive sugammadex (96.67% v 81.33%, p = 0.0428). In addition, there was a statistically significant reduction in time to extubation (hours) (4.72 ± 2.92) v (3.57± 1.96 p = 0.0098) in the sugammadex group. All other outcomes did not meet statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study suggested that using sugammadex reversal in cardiac surgical patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass may result in more patients meeting the Society of Thoracic Surgery benchmark extubation criteria within 6 hours of the end of surgery.

Perioperative Optimization of the Cardiac Surgical Patient

Perioperative optimization of cardiac surgical patients is imperative to reduce complications, utilize health care resources efficiently, and improve patient recovery and quality of life. Standardized application of evidence-based best practices can lead to better outcomes. Although many practices should be applied universally to all patients, there are also opportunities along the surgical journey to identify patients who will benefit from additional interventions that will further ameliorate their recovery. Enhanced recovery programs aim to bundle several process elements in a standardized fashion to optimize outcomes after cardiac surgery. A foundational concept of enhanced recovery is attaining a better postsurgical end point for patients, in less time, through achievement and maintenance in their greatest possible physiologic, functional, and psychological state. Perioperative optimization is a broad topic, spanning multiple phases of care and involving a variety of medical specialties and nonphysician health care providers. In this review we highlight a variety of perioperative care topics, in which a comprehensive approach to patient care can lead to improved results for patients, providers, and the health care system. A particular focus on patient-centred care is included. Although existing evidence supports all of the elements reviewed, most require further improvements in implementation, as well as additional research, before their full potential and usefulness can be determined.

Open arch surgery in the redo setting: contemporary outcomes

BACKGROUND

Aortic arch reconstruction after prior cardiac surgery is technically complex, especially after proximal aortic surgery. While multiple surgical adaptations in the redo setting have been described, traditional open reconstruction remains the most common approach with significant variability in outcomes in prior reports. This study describes institutional adaptations to surgical technique and perioperative care and assesses operative and long-term outcomes after redo-aortic arch repair in the modern era.

METHODS

Patients undergoing hemi- or total arch reconstruction after prior cardiac surgery (2005-2022) were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Strategic adaptations in approach over the study interval included a shift towards Type II hybrid arch repair for patients with "mega-aorta," redo-cannulation of the axillary artery when necessary, and adoption of transfusion and early extubation protocols. Outcomes of interest included 30-day/in-hospital adverse events and actuarial long-term overall and aorta-specific survival.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 214 patients undergoing hemi-arch (N.=154, 72%) or total arch (N.=60, 28%) after prior cardiac surgery (50% prior proximal aortic surgery). Surgical indications included degenerative aneurysm (47%, N.=101), residual arch dissection after prior type A repair (29%, N.=61), acute or chronic type A dissection (18%, N.=39) or other (6%, N.=13). 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 6% (5% hemi-arch; 10% total arch) and stroke was 3% (3% hemi-arch; 2% total arch). At median follow-up of 56 months, overall 5- and 10-year survival was 76% and 58% (hemi-arch: 81%, 62%; total arch: 63%, 43%); aorta-specific survival was 91% and 90% (hemi-arch: 96%, 94%; total arch: 79%, 79%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this modern single-institution series, a systematic approach to redo-arch repair yields excellent operative outcomes and late aorta-specific survival. Reduced late overall survival reflects the comorbidity burden of this population. Open reconstruction continues to play an important role in reoperative arch repair in the modern era.

A 3-hour fast-track extubation protocol for early extubation after cardiac surgery

Objectives

Early extubation after cardiac surgery improves outcomes and reduces cost. We investigated the effect of a multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track protocol on extubation, intensive care unit length of stay time, and reintubation rate after a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures.

Methods

We performed an observational study of 472 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a large academic institution. A multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track protocol was applied to a wide range of cardiac procedures. Data were collected 4 months before and 6 months after protocol implementation. Cox regression model assessed factors associated with extubation time and intensive care unit length of stay.

Results

A total of 217 patients preprotocol implementation and 255 patients postprotocol implementation were included. Baseline characteristics were similar except for the median procedure time and dexmedetomidine use. The median extubation time was reduced by 44% (4:43 hours vs 3:08 hours; P < .001) in the postprotocol group. Extubation within 3 hours was achieved in 49.4% of patients in the postprotocol group compared with 25.8% patients in the preprotocol group; P < .001. There was no statistically significant difference in the intensive care unit length of stay after controlling for other factors. Early extubation was associated with only 1 patient requiring reintubation in the postprotocol group.

Conclusions

The multidisciplinary 3-hour fast-track extubation protocol is a safe and effective tool to further reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation after a wide range of cardiac surgical procedures. The protocol implementation did not decrease the intensive care unit length of stay.

Intensivist -Driven Ventilator Management Shortens Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Patients

BACKGROUND

Prolonged mechanical ventilation in post Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery (CABG) is associated with deleterious effects including, increased ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), infectious complications, and mortality. Standardized ventilator weaning protocols and the utilization of critical care physicians in post CABG patient care vary substantially among institutions. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if intensivist consultation in conjunction with a multidisciplinary, standardized ventilator weaning protocol improves outcomes in CABG patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a single-center, retrospective, before-after cohort analysis at Miami Valley Hospital in Dayton, OH, a 970-bed community hospital. Patients were divided into two arms: the before cohort or delayed-consult group (critical care consult after six hours on ventilator) and after cohort or immediate-consult group (immediate critical care consult). All patients were weaned from ventilator using a standardized weaning protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 764 patients were enrolled, 411 in the delayed-consult group and 353 in the immediate-consult group. The immediate-consult group had less time on initial mechanical ventilation than the delayed-consult group (5.86 ± 4.75 h vs. 6.00 ± 6.64 h, P = 0.038). The small advantages to immediate critical care consultation for higher percent of early extubations, fewer re-intubations, shorter ICU LOS, and lower rate of ICU readmission were not statistically significant. The two groups had similar ventilator free days, prolonged mechanical ventilation, hospital LOS, and in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that intensivist-driven ventilator management in conjunction with a multidisciplinary standardized weaning protocol shortens duration of mechanical ventilation in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients.

Does early extubation after cardiac surgery lead to a reduction in intensive care unit length of stay?

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether early extubation (EE) after cardiac surgery leads to a reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS)? A total of 564 papers were found using the reported search, of which 4 were randomized trials and hence represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes and results of these papers are tabulated. EE was defined as extubation in theatre (n = 2), within 6 h of surgery (n = 1) and within 8 h of surgery (n = 1). EE was associated with significantly reduced ICU LOS in all studies. Despite the Society of Thoracic Surgeons using extubation <6 h after surgery as a measure of quality, this study has demonstrated that no standardized definition for EE currently exists. The body of evidence identified in this work has demonstrated that for appropriately selected patients (avoiding patients with multiple comorbidities, advanced age and undergoing complex non-elective surgery) early tracheal extubation is associated with a reduction in ICU LOS without an increase in the rate of postoperative complications.

Association Between Early Extubation and Postoperative Reintubation After Elective Cardiac Surgery: A Bi-institutional Study

OBJECTIVE

It is unknown if remaining intubated after cardiac surgery is associated with a decreased risk of postoperative reintubation. The primary objective of this study was to investigate whether there was an association between the timing of extubation and the risk of reintubation after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Two university-affiliated tertiary care centers.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 9,517 patients undergoing either isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or aortic valve replacement (AVR).

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 6,609 isolated CABGs and 2,908 isolated AVRs were performed during the study period. Reintubation occurred in 112 patients (1.64%) after CABG and 44 patients (1.5%) after AVR. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, early extubation (within the first 6 postoperative hours) was not associated with a risk of reintubation after CABG (odds ratio [OR] 0.53, 95% CI 0.26-1.06) and AVR (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.22-1.22). Risk factors for reintubation included increased age in both the CABG (OR per 10-year increase, 1.63; 95% CI 1.28-2.08) and AVR (OR per 10-year increase, 1.50; 95% CI 1.12-2.01) cohorts. Total bypass time, race, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class were not associated with reintubation risk.

CONCLUSION

Reintubation after CABGs and AVRs is a rare event, and advanced age is an independent risk factor. Risk is not increased with early extubation. This temporal association and low overall rate of reintubation suggest the strategies for extubation should be modified in this patient population.

Prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery: substudy of the Transfusion Requirements in Cardiac Surgery III trial

PURPOSE

Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is a major complication following cardiac surgery. We conducted a secondary analysis of the Transfusion Requirements in Cardiac Surgery (TRICTS) III trial to describe MV duration, identify factors associated with prolonged MV, and examine associations of prolonged MV with mortality and complications.

METHODS

Four thousand, eight hundred and nine participants undergoing cardiac surgery at 71 hospitals worldwide were included. Prolonged MV was defined based on the Society of Thoracic Surgeons definition as MV lasting 24 hr or longer. Adjusted associations of patient and surgical factors with prolonged MV were examined using multivariable logistic regression. Associations of prolonged MV with complications were assessed using odds ratios, and adjusted associations between prolonged MV and mortality were evaluated using multinomial regression. Associations of shorter durations of MV with survival and complications were explored.

RESULTS

Prolonged MV occurred in 15% (725/4,809) of participants. Prolonged MV was associated with surgical factors indicative of complexity, such as previous cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, and separation attempts; and patient factors such as critical preoperative state, left ventricular impairment, renal failure, and pulmonary hypertension. Prolonged MV was associated with perioperative but not long-term complications. After risk adjustment, prolonged MV was associated with perioperative mortality; its association with long-term mortality among survivors was weaker. Shorter durations of MV were not associated with increased risk of mortality or complications.

CONCLUSION

In this substudy of the TRICS III trial, prolonged MV was common after cardiac surgery and was associated with patient and surgical risk factors. Although prolonged MV showed strong associations with perioperative complications and mortality, it was not associated with long-term complications and had weaker association with long-term mortality among survivors.

STUDY REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov (NCT02042898); registered 23 January 2014. This is a substudy of the Transfusion Requirements in Cardiac Surgery (TRICS) III trial.

Safe and effective protocol for discharge 3 days after cardiac surgery

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol affected traditional cardiac surgery processes and COVID-19 is expected to accelerate its scalability. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of an ERAS-based protocol on the length of hospital stay after cardiac surgery. From January 2019 to June 2020, 664 patients underwent consecutive cardiac surgery at a Latin American center. Here, 46 patients were prepared for a rapid recovery through a multidisciplinary institutional protocol based on the ERAS concept, the "TotalCor protocol". After the propensity score matching, 46 patients from the entire population were adjusted for 12 variables. Patients operated on the TotalCor protocol had reduced intensive care unit time (P < 0.025), postoperative stay (P ≤ 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P ≤ 0.001). In addition, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of complications and death between the two groups. Of the 10-central metrics of TotalCor protocol, 6 had > 70% adherences. In conclusion, the TotalCor protocol was safe and effective for a 3-day discharge after cardiac surgery. Postoperative atrial fibrillation and renal failure were predictors of postoperative stay > 5 days.

Factors Associated With Early Extubation After Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Single-Center Experience

OBJECTIVES

To identify factors associated with early extubation in cardiac surgery patients.

DESIGN

Single center, retrospective.

SETTING

Tertiary university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 8,872 adult patients who underwent cardiothoracic surgery from 2011-2019.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 8,872 patients, 2,950 (33%) were extubated within six hours after surgery. Early extubated patients were younger, had a higher body mass index (BMI), were more likely to be male, and were fast-track designated. These patients more frequently underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft, isolated valve, or adult congenital surgeries than did late extubated patients. Early extubated patients had a greater incidence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and anxiety and a higher left ventricular ejection fraction. They also were less likely to have difficult intubation or require mechanical circulatory support, reintubation, or readmission. Analysis of the 8,872 patients showed that male sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.222, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.096-1.363), a BMI >30 kg/m² (OR 1.702, 95% CI 1.475-1.965), undergoing isolated valve surgery (OR 1.187, 95% CI 1.060-1.328), and having a fast-track designation (OR 1.455, 95% CI 1.208-1.751) and CAD (OR 1.122, 95% CI 1.005-1.253) were associated with early extubation. Data on intensive care unit (ICU) admission after surgery were available only from 2014-2018. Within this subgroup of 5,977 patients, variables associated with early extubation included male sex (OR 1.356, 95% CI 1.193-1.541), BMI >30 kg/m² (OR 1.267, 95% CI 1.084-1.480), daytime admission to the ICU (OR 1.712, 95% CI 1.527-1.919), and fast-track designation (OR 1.423, 95% CI 1.123-1.802).

CONCLUSIONS

Male sex; a BMI >30 kg/m²; undergoing isolated valve surgery; and having a fast-track designation, CAD, and daytime admission to the ICU are associated with early extubation.

Critical Review and Meta-Analysis of Postoperative Sedation after Adult Cardiac Surgery: Dexmedetomidine Versus Propofol

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate reports from the published literature of all randomized clinical trials (RCT) comparing postoperative sedation with dexmedetomidine versus propofol in adult patients, after open cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A computerized search on Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality databases was completed through June 2020. Meta-analysis of all published RCT comparing dexmedetomidine versus propofol utilization in the postoperative phase, using the standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist.

SETTING

Assemblage and critical discussion of 11 RCTs comparing postoperative sedation from standard published reports from 2003 to 2019.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 1,184 patients and analyzed critical discussion of time-based parameters (time to extubation, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay) and nontime-dependent factors (delirium, bradycardia, and hypotension).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Time to extubation was significantly reduced in the dexmedetomidine group (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.98 to -0.42, p < 0.001); however, no difference in mechanical ventilation time was observed (SMD = -0.72, 95% CI -1.60 to 0.15, N.S.). Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the intensive care unit length of stay (SMD = 0.23, 95% CI -1.06 to -0.16, p = 0.008), but this did not translate into a reduced hospital length of stay (SMD = -1.13, 95% CI -2.43 to 0.16, N.S). For nontime-dependent factors, incidence of delirium was unaffected between groups (odds ratio [OR]: 0.68, 95% CI 0.43-1.06, N.S), and higher rates of bradycardia (OR: 3.39, 95% CI: 1.20-9.55, p = 0.020) and hypotension (OR: 1.68, 95% CI 1.09-2.58, p = 0.017) were reported with propofol.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the ICU time advantages afforded by dexmedetomidine over propofol, the former did not seem to contribute to an overall reduction in hospital length of stay or improvement in postoperative outcomes of heart valve surgery and CABG patients.

The Effects of Escalation of Respiratory Support and Prolonged Invasive Ventilation on Outcomes of Cardiac Surgical Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Objectives

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged postoperative invasive ventilation on patient-centered outcomes, and identify perioperative factors associated with these 2 respiratory complications.

Design

A retrospective cohort analysis of cardiac surgical patients admitted to the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) between August 2015 and January 2018. Escalation of respiratory support was defined as “unplanned continuous positive airway pressure,” “non-invasive ventilation,” or “reintubation” after surgery; prolonged invasive ventilation was defined as “invasive ventilation beyond the first 12 hours following surgery.” The primary endpoint was the composite of escalation of respiratory support and prolonged ventilation.

Setting

Tertiary cardiothoracic ICU.

Participants

A total of 2,098 patients were included and analyzed.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

The composite of escalation of support or prolonged ventilation occurred in 509 patients (24.3%). Patients who met the composite had higher mortality (2.9% v 0.1%; p < 0.001) and longer median [interquartile range] length of ICU (2.1 [1.0-4.9] v 0.9 [0.8-1.0] days; p < 0.0001) and hospital (10.6 [8.0-16.0] v 7.2 [6.2-10.0] days; p < 0.0001) stay. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to ICU were the only 2 factors independently associated with the need for escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation.

Conclusions

Escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation is frequently seen in cardiac surgery patients and is highly associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Hypoxemia and anemia on admission to the ICU are potentially modifiable factors associated with escalation of respiratory support or prolonged invasive ventilation.

Association of Overnight Extubation With Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery in the Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND

The frequency and safety of overnight extubation (OE) after cardiac surgery across intensive care units (ICUs) is unknown.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of adults (≥ 18 years) in US ICUs after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or aortic valve replacement (AVR) or both, using The Society of Thoracic Surgery Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (July 2014 to June 2017); our primary cohort was elective CABGs. We assessed OE (7:00 pm to 6:59 am) frequency and used multilevel regression modelling to identify factors associated with OE. Within mechanical ventilation (MV) duration strata, we used propensity score matching to evaluate associations of OE with reintubations (primary outcome), mortality, and complications.

RESULTS

Among 142,225 patients with elective CABG, 42.2% had OEs. MV duration, cardiopulmonary bypass time, distal anastomosis number, and hospital of admission (median odds ratio [OR] 1.82, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.76 to 1.89) were independently associated with OE. After propensity matching, OE was associated with increased reintubation for patients with MV duration of 6 to 8 hours (2.2% vs 1.7%, OR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.56) and decreased reintubation for patients with MV duration of 15 to 17 hours (3.0% vs 4.2%, OR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.97) and 18 to 20 hours (2.3% vs 5.7%, OR 0.39, 95% CI: 0.21 to 0.72); OE was associated with increased ICU length of stay for patients with MV duration of 6 to 8 hours, but reduced length of stay for patients with MV duration of 9 to 20 hours. OE was not associated with increased mortality (hospital, 30-day). Other groups had similar OE rates (nonelective CABGs, 47.6%; elective AVR, 36.0%; elective CABG + AVRs, 51.0%) and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

OE is prevalent after cardiac surgery. OE is associated with little risk and reduces ICU length of stay for patients who require MV for more than 8 hours.

Ultra-fast-track extubation vs. conventional extubation after cardiac surgery in a cardiovascular reference centre in Colombia. A longitudinal study

INTRODUCTION

The fast track / ultra-fast-track protocols are techniques used to optimise the patient care process and a quick recovery after cardiac surgery. They are one of the mainstays of efficient practice. With their use, the length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stays are reduced, with a direct impact on costs and the quality of the health service.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the length of stay in the ICU, length of hospital stay, and post-operative mortality in ultra-fast-track extubated (uFTE) patients and those with conventional extubation (CE) after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Longitudinal, analytical, retrospective study was conducted, with the period between the time of surgery and discharge being included as the study period.

RESULTS

A total of 396 patients older than 18 years who required cardiac surgery were included, of whom 207 patients had (uFTE) and 189 had CE. Although the groups were not comparable due to the statistical differences found, when performing the multivariate adjustment, uFTE maintained its statistical independence and was associated with lower cardiovascular morbidity, such as myocardial ischaemia (95% CI: 0.37-0.86; P = .01) and lower post-surgical vasopressor requirement (95% CI: 0.18-0.49; P < .01). No significant differences were found in the length of hospital stay, ICU stay, or post-operative mortality in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

Implementing the uFTE strategy, decreases cardiovascular morbidity and vasopressor requirement. The change to uFTE should be accompanied by changes in models and practices in patient recovery to standardised protocols. This study shows that uFTE did not reduce the length of ICU stay, hospital stay, or mortality.