Con: Mechanical Ventilation During Cardiopulmonary Bypass Does Not Improve Outcomes After Cardiac Surgery

Identifying High-Risk Patients for Severe Pulmonary Complications after Cardiosurgical Procedures as a Target Group for Further Assessment of Lung-Protective Strategies

OBJECTIVES

It remains unclear whether intraoperative lung-protective strategies can reduce the rate of respiratory complications after cardiac surgery, partly because low-risk patients have been studied in the past. The authors established a screening model to easily identify a high-risk group for severe pulmonary complications (ie, pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome) that may be the ideal target population for the assessment of the potential benefits of such measures.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational trial.

SETTING

Departments of cardiac surgery and cardiac anesthesia of a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery on cardiopulmonary bypass and subsequent treatment at a dedicated cardiosurgical intensive care unit between January 2019 and March 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of the 2,572 patients undergoing surgery, 84 (3.3%) developed pneumonia/acute respiratory distress syndrome that significantly affected the outcome (ie, longer ventilatory support [66% vs 11%], higher reintubation rate [39% vs 3%]), prolonged length of intensive care unit [33 ± 36 vs 4 ± 10 days] and hospital stay [10 ± 15 vs 6 ± 7 days], and higher in-hospital [43% vs 9%] as well as 30-day [7% vs 3%] mortality). The screening model for severe pulmonary complications included left ventricular ejection fraction <52%, EuroSCORE II (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II) >5.9, cardiopulmonary bypass time >123 minutes, left ventricular assist device or aortic repair surgery, and bronchodilatory therapy. A cutoff for the predicted risk of 2.5% showed optimal sensitivity and specificity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.82.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors suggest that future research on intraoperative lung-protective measures focuses on this high-risk population, primarily aiming to mitigate severe forms of postoperative pulmonary dysfunction associated with poor outcomes and increased resource consumption.

Efficacy of maintaining low-tidal volume mechanical ventilation as compared to resting lung strategy during coronary artery bypass graft cardiopulmonary bypass surgery: A post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To compare a low-tidal-volume with positive end-expiratory pressure strategy (VENT strategy) to a resting-lung-strategy (i.e., no-ventilation (noV) strategy) during cardiopulmonary bypass for coronary artery bypass graft surgery on the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications.

DESIGN

Post-hoc analysis of the MECANO trial which was a prospective single-center, blind, randomized, parallel-group controlled trial.

SETTING

Tertiary care cardiac surgery center.

PATIENTS

Patients who underwent isolated on-pump coronary bypass surgery were randomized either to VENT or noV group.

INTERVENTION

During the cardiopulmonary bypass phase of the cardiac surgery procedure, mechanical ventilation in the VENT group consisted of a tidal volume of 3 mL/kg, a respiratory rate of 5 per minute and a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmH₂O. Patients in the noV group received no ventilation during this phase.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary composite outcome combining death, early respiratory failure, ventilation support beyond day 2 and reintubation.

MAIN RESULTS

In this post-hoc analysis, we retained 725 patients who underwent isolated CABG surgery, from the 1501 patients included in the original study. There were 352 in the VENT group and 373 patients in the noV group. Post-hoc comparison yielded no differences in baseline characteristics between these two groups. The primary outcome occurred less frequently in the VENT group than in the noV group, with 44 (12.5%) and 76 (20.4%) respectively (odds-ratio (OR) = 0.56 (0.37-0.84), p = 0.004). There were fewer early respiratory dysfunctions and prolonged respiratory support in the VENT group (respectively, OR = 0.34 (0.12-0.96) p = 0.033 and OR = 0.51 (0.27-0.94) p = 0.029). Complications related to mechanical ventilation were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this post-hoc analysis, maintaining low-tidal ventilation compared to a resting-lung strategy was associated with fewer pulmonary postoperative complications in patients who underwent isolated CABG procedures.

Effect of ventilation strategy during cardiopulmonary bypass on postoperative pulmonary complications after cardiac surgery: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

To determine whether maintaining ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) with a different fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO₂) had an impact on the occurrence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs).

METHODS

A total of 413 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with CPB were randomly assigned into three groups: 138 in the NoV group (received no mechanical ventilation during CPB), 138 in the LOV group (received a tidal volume (V_T) of 3-4 ml/kg of ideal body weight with the respiratory rate of 10-12 bpm, and the positive end-expiratory pressure of 5-8 cmH₂O during CPB; the FiO₂ was 30%), and 137 in the HOV group (received the same ventilation parameters settings as the LOV group while the FiO₂ was 80%).

RESULTS

The primary outcomes were the incidence and severity of PPCs during hospitalization. The composite incidence of PPCs did not significantly differ between the NoV (63%), LOV (49%) and HOV (57%) groups (P = 0.069). And there was also no difference regarding the incidence of PPCs between the non-ventilation (NoV) and ventilation (the combination of LOV and HOV) groups. The LOV group was observed a lower proportion of moderate and severe pulmonary complications (grade ≥ 3) than the NoV group (23.1% vs. 44.2%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Maintaining ventilation during CPB did not reduce the incidence of PPCs in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR1800015261. Prospectively registered 19 March 2018. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=25982.

Effect of open-lung vs conventional perioperative ventilation strategies on postoperative pulmonary complications after on-pump cardiac surgery: the PROVECS randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether a perioperative open-lung ventilation strategy prevents postoperative pulmonary complications after elective on-pump cardiac surgery.

METHODS

In a pragmatic, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial, we assigned patients planned for on-pump cardiac surgery to either a conventional ventilation strategy with no ventilation during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and lower perioperative positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels (2 cm H₂O) or an open-lung ventilation strategy that included maintaining ventilation during CPB along with perioperative recruitment maneuvers and higher PEEP levels (8 cm H₂O). All study patients were ventilated with low-tidal volumes before and after CPB (6 to 8 ml/kg of predicted body weight). The primary end point was a composite of pulmonary complications occurring within the first 7 postoperative days.

RESULTS

Among 493 randomized patients, 488 completed the study (mean age, 65.7 years; 360 (73.7%) men; 230 (47.1%) underwent isolated valve surgery). Postoperative pulmonary complications occurred in 133 of 243 patients (54.7%) assigned to open-lung ventilation and in 145 of 245 patients (59.2%) assigned to conventional ventilation (p = 0.32). Open-lung ventilation did not significantly reduce the use of high-flow nasal oxygenotherapy (8.6% vs 9.4%; p = 0.77), non-invasive ventilation (13.2% vs 15.5%; p = 0.46) or new invasive mechanical ventilation (0.8% vs 2.4%, p = 0.28). Mean alive ICU-free days at postoperative day 7 was 4.4 ± 1.3 days in the open-lung group vs 4.3 ± 1.3 days in the conventional group (mean difference, 0.1 ± 0.1 day, p = 0.51). Extra-pulmonary complications and adverse events did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A perioperative open-lung ventilation including ventilation during CPB does not reduce the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications as compared with usual care. This finding does not support the use of such a strategy in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02866578. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02866578.