Clinical Impact of Protamine Titration-Based Heparin Neutralization in Patients Undergoing Coronary Bypass Grafting Surgery

Evaluation of Point-of-Care-Directed Coagulation Management in Pediatric Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

 Coagulatory alterations are common after pediatric cardiac surgery and can be addressed with point-of-care (POC) coagulation analysis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate a preventive POC-controlled coagulation algorithm in pediatric cardiac surgery.

METHODS

 This single-center, retrospective data analysis included patients younger than 18 years who underwent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and received a coagulation therapy according to a predefined POC-controlled coagulation algorithm. Patients were divided into two groups (<10 and >10 kg body weight) because of different CPB priming strategies.

RESULTS

 In total, 173 surgeries with the use of the POC-guided hemostatic therapy were analyzed. In 71% of cases, target parameters were achieved and only in one case primary sternal closure was not possible. Children with a body weight ≤10 kg underwent surgical re-evaluation in 13.2% (15/113), and respectively 6.7% (4/60) in patients >10 kg. Hemorrhage in children ≤10 kg was associated with cyanotic heart defects, deeper intraoperative hypothermia, longer duration of CPB, more complex procedures (RACHS-1 score), and with more intraoperative platelets, and respectively red blood cell concentrate transfusions (all p-values < 0.05). In children ≤10 kg, fibrinogen levels were significantly lower over the 12-hour postoperative period (without revision: 3.1 [2.9-3.3] vs. with revision 2.8 [2.3-3.4]). Hemorrhage in children >10 kg was associated with a longer duration of CPB (p = 0.042), lower preoperative platelets (p = 0.026), and over the 12-hour postoperative period lower platelets (p = 0.002) and fibrinogen (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

 The use of a preventive, algorithm-based coagulation therapy with factor concentrates after CPB followed by POC created intraoperative clinical stable coagulation status with a subsequent executable thorax closure, although the presented algorithm in its current form is not superior in the reduction of the re-exploration rate compared to equivalent collectives. Reduced fibrinogen concentrations 12 hours after surgery may be associated with an increased incidence of surgical revisions.

In vitro comparison of spatiotemporal fibrin clot formation dynamics in plasma treated with different protamine-heparin ratios

INTRODUCTION

Our study aim was to explore how different protamine-heparin ratios impacted enzymatic coagulation and acellular fibrin clot growth in plasma using an in vitro model. We hypothesized that a low protamine-heparin ratio would be associated with superior fibrin clot growth dynamics.

METHODS

We performed an in vitro study using 15 plasma samples from a commercial supplier. Different protamine-heparin ratios were added to each donor plasma sample: low ratio (0.7-1), traditional ratio (1-1), and high ratio (1.3-1) and clot formation dynamics were evaluated using a Thrombodynamics analyzer. Study outcomes were initial clot growth velocity and clot size at 30 min.

RESULTS

Plasma samples treated with a one-to-one protamine-heparin ratio had significantly lower mean initial clot growth velocity compared to samples treated with a low protamine-heparin ratio; mean difference -2.3 μm/min (95% CI = -4.0 to -0.7, p = .004). Plasma samples treated with a one-to-one protamine-heparin ratio also had significantly smaller mean clot size at 30 min compared to samples treated with a low protamine-heparin ratio; mean difference -54.0 μm (95% CI = -107.6 to -0.4, p = .048). There were no significant differences in mean initial clot growth velocity or clot size at 30 min between plasma samples treated with a high protamine-heparin ratio and those treated with a one-to-one or low protamine-heparin ratio (all p > .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma samples treated with a low protamine-heparin ratio had superior clot growth velocity and larger clot size at 30 min compared to a one-to-one ratio, supporting the notion that a low protamine-heparin ratio may optimize enzymatic coagulation after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Individualized heparin monitoring and management reduces protamine requirements in cardiac surgery on minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation; A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Individualized heparin and protamine management is increasingly used as a strategy to reduce coagulation activation and bleeding complications. While it is associated with increased heparin requirements during Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB), the impact on protamine administration remains controversial. We aim to investigate the effect of heparin level-guided monitoring on protamine dosing during cardiac surgery where low-anticoagulation protocols are implemented.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 132 patients undergoing elective full-spectrum cardiac surgery with Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC) were recruited. All patients were managed by the same anaesthetic, surgical and perfusion team. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups; the individualized heparin-protamine titration (IHPT) group and the conventional heparinization and reversal group by using ACT (cACT) with a 0.75:1, protamine: heparin ratio. Titration was accomplished with the Hepcon HMS Plus (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) system. The primary outcome of the study was the total protamine dose used. Secondary outcomes comprised of the total heparin dose, the percentage of patients achieving target ACT, 24-h transfusion requirements, postoperative bleeding, duration of mechanical ventilation, major morbidity and length of hospital stay. Patients in each group were divided in two subgroups according to the target ACT; those operated for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using a target ACT >300 s and the rest (non-CABG) patients operated with a target ACT >400 s, respectively.

RESULTS

Protamine requirements were significantly reduced when IHPT was implemented; CABG (118 ± 24 mg vs 163 ± 61 mg; p < 0.001) and non-CABG cases (151 ± 46 mg vs 197 ± 45 mg; p < 0.001). Moreover, heparin requirements were significantly higher in the non-CABG subgroup managed with IHPT (34,539 ± 7658 IU vs 29,893 ± 9037 IU; p = 0.02). In overall, no significant differences were detected with respect to postoperative bleeding, transfusion of RBC or other blood products.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized heparin monitoring and management reduces protamine requirements in cardiac surgery with MiECC implementing reduced anticoagulation strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04215588.

Does heparin rebound lead to postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass?

BACKGROUND

Heparin rebound is a common observed phenomenon after cardiac surgery with CPB and is associated with increased postoperative blood loss. However, the administration of extra protamine may lead to increased blood loss as well. Therefore, we want to investigate the relation between heparin rebound and postoperative blood loss and the necessity to provide extra protamine to reverse heparin rebound.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Web of Science to review the question: "Does heparin rebound lead to postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass." Combination of search words were framed within four major categories: heparin rebound, blood loss, cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. All studies that met our question were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised trials.

RESULTS

4 randomized and 17 non-randomized studies were included. The mean incidence of heparin rebound was 40%. The postoperative heparin levels, due to heparin rebound, were often below or equal to 0.2 IU/mL. We could not demonstrate an association between heparin rebound and postoperative blood loss or transfusion requirements. However the quality of evidence was poor due to a broad variety of definitions of heparin rebound, measured by various coagulation tests and studies with small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

The influence of heparin rebound on postoperative bleeding seems to be negligible, but might get significant in conjunction with incomplete heparin reversal or other coagulopathies. For that reason, it might be useful to get a picture of the entire coagulation spectrum after cardiac surgery, as can be done by the use of a viscoelastic test in conjunction with an aggregometry test.

Evaluation of Activated Clotting Times With a Heparin Reversal Protocol Designed to Conserve Protamine During Drug Shortages: A Retrospective, Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively evaluate a protamine conservation approach to heparin reversal implemented during times of critical shortages. This approach was aimed at maintaining access to cardiac surgical services.

SETTING

In-patient hospital setting.

PARTICIPANTS

Eight hundred-one cardiac surgical patients>18 years old.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery who received >30,000 U of heparin were given a single fixed vial protamine dose of 250 mg or a standard 1 mg of protamine to 100 U of heparin ratio-based dose to reverse heparin.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The primary endpoint was differences in post-reversal activated clotting times between the 2 groups. The secondary endpoint was differences in the number of protamine vials used between the 2 reversal strategies. The first activated clotting times values measured after initial protamine administration were not different between the Low Dose and Conventional Dose groups (122.3 s v 120.6 s, 1.47 s, 99% CI -1.47 to 4.94, p = 0.16). The total amount of protamine administered in the Low Dose group was less than that in the Conventional Dose group (-100.5 mg, 99% CI -110.0 to -91.0, p < 0.0001), as were the number of 250 mg vials used per case (-0.69, 99% CI -0.75 to -0.63, p < 0.0001). The mean initial protamine doses between groups were 250 mg and 352 mg, p < 0.0001. The mean protamine vials used were 1.33 v 2.02, p < 0.0001. When the calculations were based on 50 mg vials, the number of vials used per case in the Low Dose group was even less (-2.16, 99% CI -2.36 to -1.97, p < 0.0001).) CONCLUSIONS: Conservation measures regarding critical medications and supplies during times of shortages can maintain access to important services within a community.

Protamine dose to neutralize heparin at the completion of cardiopulmonary bypass can be reduced significantly without affecting post-operative bleeding

BACKGROUND

Systemic anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) should be neutralized by protamine administration to restore normal hemostasis. Our previous study showed the protamine-to-heparin ratio (P-to-H) of 1:1 (1 mg protamine:100 IU circulating heparin; 1.0 Ratio) is likely an overestimation. Thus, we reduced the P-to-H in the HMS Plus Hemostasis Management System to 0.9:1 (0.9 Ratio) for 5 months and then to 0.8:1 (0.8 Ratio). We monitored post-operative (post-op) bleeding in the setting of reduced protamine dose (PD).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 632 patients (209 for the 1.0 Ratio, 211 for 0.9 Ratio, 212 for 0.8 Ratio group) who underwent cardiac surgery to measure the reduction of PD and how it affects 24-hour (24 h) post-op chest tube output. We also analyzed the entire data set to explore whether further reduction of P-to-H is warranted.

RESULTS

While there was no difference in the indexed heparin dose among the three groups, we achieved a significant reduction in the indexed actual protamine dose (APDi) by 24% (0.9 Ratio) and 31% (0.8 Ratio) reductions compared to the 1.0 Ratio group. On average, APDi was 88 ± 22, 67 ± 18, and 61 ± 15 mg/m2 in the 1.0, 0.9, and 0.8 Ratio groups, respectively. We found no significant difference in 24 h post-op bleeding among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

1.0 Ratio at the completion of CPB is likely an excessive administration of protamine. With the stepwise reduction of PD, we observed no increase in post-op bleeding, which may indicate that no meaningful increase in heparin rebound occurred. In addition, further analysis of the entire data set demonstrates that a 0.75 Ratio is likely sufficient to neutralize the heparin completely.

Accurate protamine:heparin matching (not just smaller protamine doses) decreases postoperative bleeding in cardiac surgery; results from a high-volume academic medical center

BACKGROUND

A multidisciplinary Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement study to identify the incidence of "heparin rebound" in our adult cardiac surgical population instead detected a thromboelastometry pattern suggestive of initial protamine overdose in 34% despite Hepcon-guided anticoagulation management. Analysis of our practice led to an intervention that made an additional lower-range Hepcon cartridge available to the perfusionists.

METHODS

One year later, an IRB-approved retrospective study was conducted in >500 patients to analyze the effects of the intervention, specifically focusing on the impact of the initial protamine dose accuracy and 18-h mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTd).

RESULTS

No differences were observed between group demographics, surgical procedures, duration of CPB or perioperative blood product transfusion. Both groups were managed using the same perfusion and anesthesia equipment, strategies, and protocols. The median initial protamine dose decreased by 19% (p < .001) in the intervention group (170 [IQR 140-220] mg; n = 295) versus the control group (210 [180-250] mg; n = 257). Mean 18-h MCTd decreased by 13% (p < .001) in the intervention group (405.15 ± 231.54 mL; n = 295) versus the control group (466.13 ± 286.73 mL; n = 257). Covariate-adjusted mixed effects model showed a significant reduction of MCTd in the intervention group, starting from hour 11 after surgery (group by time interaction p = .002).

CONCLUSION

Though previous investigators have associated lower protamine doses with less MCTd, this study demonstrates that more accurately matching the initial protamine dose to the remaining circulating heparin concentration reduces postoperative bleeding.

Increasing obesity is associated with lower postoperative bleeding in coronary bypass patients

OBJECTIVE

Despite inherent comorbidities, obese cardiac surgical patients paradoxically had shown lower morbidity and mortality, although the nature of this association is still unclear. Thus, the authors intended in this large registry-based study to investigate the impact of obesity on short- and long-term postoperative outcomes, focusing on bleeding and transfusion requirements.

DESIGN

Retrospective registry study.

SETTING

Three university hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

A cohort of 12,330 prospectively compiled data from coronary bypass grafting patients undergoing surgery between 2007 to 2020 were retrieved from the Western Denmark Heart Registry.

INTERVENTIONS

The parameters were analyzed to assess the association between body mass index (BMI) and the selected outcome parameters.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The crude data showed a clear statistically significant association in postoperative drainage from 637 (418-1108) mL in underweight patients with BMI <18.5 kg/m² to 427 (295-620) mL in severely obese patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m² (p < 0.0001, Kruskal-Wallis). Further, 50.0% of patients with BMI <18.5 received an average of 451 mL/m² in red blood cell transfusions, compared to 16.7% of patients with BMI >40 receiving 84 mL/m². The obese groups were less often submitted to reexploration due to bleeding, and fewer received perioperative hemostatics, inotropes, and vasoconstrictors. The crude data showed increasing 30-day and 6-month mortality with lower BMI, whereas the one-year mortality showed a V-shaped pattern, but BMI had no independent impact on mortality in logistic regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Patients with high BMI may carry protection against postoperative bleeding after cardiac surgery, probably secondary to an inherent hypercoagulable state, whereas underweight patients carry a higher risk of bleeding and worse outcomes.

In vitro effects of emicizumab on activated clotting time in blood samples from cardiac surgical patients

BACKGROUND

Heparin management in hemophilia A (HA) patients with a factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitor can be challenging due to severe activated clotting time (ACT) prolongations. It is important to better understand the impact of emicizumab, a FVIII mimetic on ACT, and tissue factor (TF)-based coagulation assays.

METHODS

Whole blood from 18 patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were mixed in vitro with pooled normal plasma, FVIII-deficient or FVIII-inhibitor plasma to affect functional FVIII levels. ACTs and heparin concentration by protamine titration were measured in whole blood mixture with/without emicizumab (50-100 μg/ml). Thrombin generation and plasmin generation were measured in the patient's plasma mixed with normal plasma or FVIII-inhibitor plasma to assess the impact of emicizumab under low TF activation.

RESULTS

FVIII inhibitors prolonged ACTs by 2.2-fold compared to those in normal plasma mixture at baseline. During CPB, ACTs in normal plasma mixture, and FVIII-deficient mixture were in 400s, but ACTs reached 900s in FVIII-inhibitor mixture. Emicizumab shortened ACTs by up to 100s in normal plasma mixture, and FVIII-deficient mixtures. ACTs remained over 600s in FVIII-inhibitor mixture, despite adding emicizumab at 100 μg/ml. Heparin concentration measured by TF-based protamine titration was unaffected. Emicizumab enhanced thrombin peak in the presence of FVIII inhibitors, whereas plasmin generation was mainly affected by thrombin generation, and systemic use of ɛ-aminocaproic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

FVIII inhibitors extensively prolong ACTs in heparinized whole blood, and clinical levels of emicizumab partially reverse ACT values. Protamine titration should be considered for optimal heparin monitoring in emicizumab-treated patients with FVIII inhibitors.

Can the Minimum Protamine Dose to Neutralize Heparin at the Completion of Cardiopulmonary Bypass be Significantly Lower than the Conventional Practice?

Systemic anticoagulation with heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) should be neutralized by protamine administration to restore normal hemostasis. However, protamine has potentially serious side effects and excessive protamine can cause increased postoperative bleeding. Thus, our goal is to appropriately dose protamine at the completion of CPB to neutralize heparin so that neither residual heparin nor excessive protamine is present. We performed a retrospective study of 216 patients who underwent cardiac surgery to search for a safe minimum protamine dose (PD) when measuring heparin concentration (HC). In addition, we developed a formula to determine PD using total heparin dose (THD) and CPB time without measuring HC. When protamine-to-heparin ratio (P-to-H) is set at 1 mg protamine to 100 international unit (IU) heparin in HMS Plus Hemostasis Management System (HMS), we determined that 75% of the calculated total PD is a safe minimum PD to sufficiently neutralize circulating heparin after CPB. On average, this translates into either .37 mg protamine/100 IU heparin of THD or .54 mg/100 IU of the first heparin bolus. The formula we developed to calculate PD without measuring HC can provide a PD that strongly agrees with the safe minimum PD when measuring HC. The safe minimum PD to neutralize circulating heparin after CPB can be significantly lower than conventional dosing practices. Reduction of PD may decrease the risk of postoperative bleeding and protamine-related adverse events. Based on our data, we decreased P-to-H in HMS to examine whether it is possible to reduce PD further than the safe minimum PD determined in this study.

Optimal protamine dosing after cardiopulmonary bypass: The PRODOSE adaptive randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The dose of protamine required following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is often determined by the dose of heparin required pre-CPB, expressed as a fixed ratio. Dosing based on mathematical models of heparin clearance is postulated to improve protamine dosing precision and coagulation. We hypothesised that protamine dosing based on a 2-compartment model would improve thromboelastography (TEG) parameters and reduce the dose of protamine administered, relative to a fixed ratio.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We undertook a 2-stage, adaptive randomised controlled trial, allocating 228 participants to receive protamine dosed according to a mathematical model of heparin clearance or a fixed ratio of 1 mg of protamine for every 100 IU of heparin required to establish anticoagulation pre-CPB. A planned, blinded interim analysis was undertaken after the recruitment of 50% of the study cohort. Following this, the randomisation ratio was adapted from 1:1 to 1:1.33 to increase recruitment to the superior arm while maintaining study power. At the conclusion of trial recruitment, we had randomised 121 patients to the intervention arm and 107 patients to the control arm. The primary endpoint was kaolin TEG r-time measured 3 minutes after protamine administration at the end of CPB. Secondary endpoints included ratio of kaolin TEG r-time pre-CPB to the same metric following protamine administration, requirement for allogeneic red cell transfusion, intercostal catheter drainage at 4 hours postoperatively, and the requirement for reoperation due to bleeding. The trial was listed on a clinical trial registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03532594). Participants were recruited between April 2018 and August 2019. Those in the intervention/model group had a shorter mean kaolin r-time (6.58 [SD 2.50] vs. 8.08 [SD 3.98] minutes; p = 0.0016) post-CPB. The post-protamine thromboelastogram of the model group was closer to pre-CPB parameters (median pre-CPB to post-protamine kaolin r-time ratio 0.96 [IQR 0.78-1.14] vs. 0.75 [IQR 0.57-0.99]; p < 0.001). We found no evidence of a difference in median mediastinal/pleural drainage at 4 hours postoperatively (140 [IQR 75-245] vs. 135 [IQR 94-222] mL; p = 0.85) or requirement (as a binary outcome) for packed red blood cell transfusion at 24 hours postoperatively (19 [15.8%] vs. 14 [13.1%] p = 0.69). Those in the model group had a lower median protamine dose (180 [IQR 160-210] vs. 280 [IQR 250-300] mg; p < 0.001). Important limitations of this study include an unblinded design and lack of generalisability to certain populations deliberately excluded from the study (specifically children, patients with a total body weight >120 kg, and patients requiring therapeutic hypothermia to <28°C).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a mathematical model to guide protamine dosing in patients following CPB improved TEG r-time and reduced the dose administered relative to a fixed ratio. No differences were detected in postoperative mediastinal/pleural drainage or red blood cell transfusion requirement in our cohort of low-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Unique identifier NCT03532594.

Managing the coagulopathy associated with cardiopulmonary bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has allowed for significant surgical advancements, but accompanying risks can be significant and must be expertly managed. One of the foremost risks is coagulopathic bleeding. Increasing levels of bleeding in cardiac surgical patients at the time of separation from CPB are associated with poor outcomes and mortality. CPB-associated coagulopathy is typically multifactorial and rarely due to inadequate reversal of systemic heparin alone. The components of the bypass circuit induce systemic inflammation and multiple disturbances of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems. Anticipating coagulopathy is the first step in managing it, and specific patient and procedural risk factors have been identified as predictors of excessive bleeding. Medication management pre-procedure is critical, as patients undergoing cardiac surgery are commonly on anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents. Important adjuncts to avoid transfusion include antifibrinolytics, and perfusion practices such as red cell salvage, sequestration, and retrograde autologous priming of the bypass circuit have varying degrees of evidence supporting their use. Understanding the patient's coagulation status helps target product replacement and avoid larger volume transfusion. There is increasing recognition of the role of point-of-care viscoelastic and functional platelet testing. Common pitfalls in the management of post-CPB coagulopathy include overdosing protamine for heparin reversal, imperfect laboratory measures of thrombin generation that result in normal or near-normal laboratory results in the presence of continued bleeding, and delayed recognition of surgical bleeding. While challenging, the effective management of CPB-associated coagulopathy can significantly improve patient outcomes.

A narrative review of antithrombin use during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults: rationale, current use, effects on anticoagulation, and outcomes

BACKGROUND

During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the large contact surface between the blood and the extracorporeal circuit causes a continuous activation of coagulation and inflammation. Unfractionated heparin, a glycosaminoglycan that must bind to antithrombin as a cofactor, is currently the standard anticoagulant adopted during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Antithrombin, beyond being a potent natural anticoagulant, acts in the cross-talk between coagulation and inflammatory system through anticoagulation and coagulation-independent effects.

OBJECTIVES

In this review, we describe, in the adult setting of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, the pathophysiological rationale for antithrombin use, the current practice of administration, and the effects of antithrombin on anticoagulation, bleeding, and outcomes.

DATA SOURCES

Studies on adults (18 years or older) on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation published from 1995 to 2018 in order to evaluate the use of antithrombin.

RESULTS

In adults on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, antithrombin supplementation has a highly pathophysiological rationale since coagulation factor consumption, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, and endothelial activation are triggered by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Eleven articles are focused on the topic but among the authors there is no consensus on the threshold for supplementation (ranging from 70% to 80%) as well as on the dose (rarely standardized) and time of administration (bolus vs continuous infusion). Consistently, antithrombin is considered able to achieve better anticoagulation targets in or not in the presence of heparin resistance. The impact of antithrombin administration on bleeding still shows contrasting results.

CONCLUSION

Antithrombin use in veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be investigated on the threshold for supplementation, dose, and time of administration.