Platelet Count and Function—Can We Kill Two Birds With an Ultrasound Wave?

Excellent hemostatic control during cardiac surgery in a patient with hemophilia B treated with albutrepenonacog alfa (rIX-FP): A case report

Key Clinical Message

In hemophilia patients undergoing cardiac surgery, ROTEM® and Quantra® viscoelastic tests are useful to monitor perioperative hemostatic status and a single dose of rIX-FP is safe and avoids any hemorrhagic or thrombotic complication.

Abstract

Cardiac surgery poses a high hemostatic risk in patients with hemophilia. We present the first case of an adult patient with hemophilia B on treatment with albutrepenonacog alfa (rIX-FP) who underwent surgery for acute coronary syndrome. Treatment with rIX-FP made it possible to perform the surgery safely.

Assessment of a Quantra-Guided Hemostatic Algorithm in High-Bleeding-Risk Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether a Quantra-guided hemostatic algorithm would reduce transfusion requirement and major bleeding compared with laboratory-guided testing in patients facing high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Single-center before-and-after study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients facing high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemostatic algorithm was based on standard laboratory testing during the control period, then on the Quantra during the Quantra period. The primary endpoint was the number of red blood cell (RBC) units transfused on day 1 after surgery.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

After propensity-score matching, 66 patients were included in the Quantra group and 117 in the control group. The Quantra group received fewer RBC units on day 1 than the control group (2 [0-5] v 4 [2-6], p = 0.016, respectively). Intraoperatively, the Quantra group received fewer RBC (2 [0-3] v 3 [1-5], p = 0.005), less fresh frozen plasma (0 [0-3] v 3[2-5], p < 0.0001), and fewer platelet units (7.5 [0-10] v 8.2 [6.3-11.7], p = 0.014). The intraoperative rates of RBC, plasma, and platelet transfusion were reduced (64% v 78%, p = 0.05; 41% v 85%, p < 0.001; 55% v 82%, p = 0.001, respectively). The RBC and plasma transfusions were reduced on days 1, 2, and 7. The incidence of major bleeding on day 1 also was reduced (36% v 56%, p = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, implementation of the Quantra-guided hemostatic algorithm was associated independently with reductions in major bleeding.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of a Quantra-based hemostatic algorithm was associated with a decrease in transfusion requirement and major bleeding after high-bleeding-risk cardiac surgery. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these results.

Point-of-Care Platelet Function Monitoring: Implications for Patients With Platelet Inhibitors in Cardiac Surgery

Although most physicians are comfortable managing the limited anticoagulant effect of aspirin, the recent administration of potent P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors in patients undergoing cardiac surgery remains a dilemma. Guidelines recommend discontinuation of potent P2Y₁₂ inhibitors 5- to- 7 days before surgery to reduce the risk of postoperative hemorrhage. Such a strategy might not be feasible before urgent surgery, due to ongoing myocardial ischemia or in patients at high risk for thromboembolic events. Recently, different point-of-care devices to assess functional platelet quality have become available for clinical use. The aim of this narrative review was to evaluate the implications and potential benefits of platelet function monitoring in guiding perioperative management and therapeutic options in patients treated with antiplatelets, including aspirin or P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors, undergoing cardiac surgery. No objective superiority of one point-of-care device over another was found in a large meta-analysis. Their accuracy and reliability are generally limited in the perioperative period. In particular, preoperative platelet function testing has been used to assess platelet contribution to bleeding after cardiac surgery. However, predictive values for postoperative hemorrhage and transfusion requirements are low, and there is a significant variability between and within these tests. Further, platelet function monitoring has been used to optimize the preoperative waiting period after cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy before urgent cardiac surgery. Furthermore, studies assessing their value in therapeutic decisions in bleeding patients after cardiac surgery are scarce. A general and liberal use of perioperative platelet function testing is not yet recommended.