Novel Strategy of Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation Under Regional Anesthesia

PECS II block for cardiac implantable electronic device insertion: A pilot study

AIM

Some truncal blocks could provide adequate surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) insertion. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the pectoral nerves (PECS) II block for CIED insertion.

METHODS

PECS II blocks were performed on the left side using the ultrasound-guided single injection technique in all patients. The primary outcome for feasibility was the percentage of the cases completed without intraoperative additional local anesthesia. Secondary outcomes were the amount of intraoperative additional local anesthetic, intraoperative opioid requirement, postoperative pain scores, first requirement for postoperative analgesia, postoperative analgesic consumption, patient satisfaction, and block-related complications.

RESULTS

Of the total 30 patients, 19 (63.3%) required intraoperative additional local anesthetic. The median (IQR [range]) volume of the additional local anesthetic used was 7 (4-10 [2.5-12]) mL. Two patients needed additional IV analgesics in the first 24 h postoperatively. No statistically significant differences were determined between the patients requiring and not requiring intraoperative additional local anesthetic in respect of age, gender, duration of surgery, block performance time, and hospital stay. A total of 26 (86.6%) patients reported a high level of satisfaction with the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

PECS II block for cardiac electronic implantable device insertion provides effective postoperative analgesia for at least 24 h. Although PECS II block alone could not provide complete surgical anesthesia in the majority of the patients, when combined with supplementary local anesthetic, contributes to a smooth intraoperative course for patients.

Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Children Receiving Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Case Series

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement may cause significant postoperative pain. Limited research exists on regional anesthesia for pediatric S-ICD placement. This case series examined transversus thoracic plane blocks (TTPBs), pectointercostal fascial plane blocks (PIFBs), pectoralis nerve I and II blocks, paravertebral, serratus anterior plane, and erector spinae plane blocks (ESPBs) in 10 children receiving S-ICDs. Parasternal nerve blocks consisting of TTPB or PIFB and left ESPB appeared to provide adequate pain control. These children had reduced opioid consumption, lower mean pain scores, longer delay in first postoperative analgesic, and no complications. Regional anesthesia may reduce pain after pediatric S-ICD implantation.

Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Pain Management in Children Receiving a Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Case Series

Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) placement causes significant postoperative pain. Limited research exists on nerve blocks for treating pediatric S-ICD pain. This case series presents pain outcomes in 10 children receiving nerve blocks for S-ICD placement. Nerve blocks performed include bilateral parasternal with left erector spinae plane (ESP), pectoralis with left ESP, fascial plane, and paravertebral blocks. The predominant combination of bilateral parasternal blocks with a left ESP block seemed to contribute toward adequate pain control. These children appeared to have low pain scores, low opioid consumption, and no block complications. Nerve blocks may benefit pediatric patients after S-ICD implantation.

Ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block for subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique

PURPOSE

Operative anaesthetic requirements and perioperative discomfort are barriers to wide adoption of the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) system, especially when the intermuscular technique is used because of the greater amount of tissue dissection. The procedure is most commonly performed under general anaesthesia (GA). There is growing interest in transitioning away from the routine use of GA and towards several alternative anaesthesia modalities for the S-ICD implant procedure without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist. We assessed the feasibility of ultrasound-guided serratus anterior plane block (US-SAPB) in patients undergoing S-ICD implantation with the intermuscular two-incision technique.

METHODS

The study population included 38 consecutive patients (84% male; median, 53 [46-62] years) who received S-ICD implantation using the intermuscular two-incision technique. All procedures were performed under US-SAPB and conscious sedation without the involvement of an anaesthesiologist.

RESULTS

The average procedure time was 67 ± 14 min. No patient experienced significant haemodynamic changes or oxygen desaturation during the period of the US-SAPB procedure and sedation; there was no need for pharmacological interventions. The entire procedure was well tolerated without discomfort or complications and with no need for GA, except in one (2.6%) patient who received GA with a laryngeal mask airway. Patients always remained able to respond appropriately to neurological monitoring during the S-ICD implantation procedure. There were no procedure-related complications.

CONCLUSIONS

US-SAPB and the intermuscular two-incision technique may be a promising safe and feasible combination for S-ICD implantation, overcoming the potential barrier to wider S-ICD adoption in clinical practice.