Pro: Myocardial Deformation Imaging Should Be Used Perioperatively for Assessment of Cardiac Function

Perioperative Two-Dimensional Left Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Prospective Observational Pilot Study

OBJECTIVES

There are limited data on perioperative left ventricular strain. The authors aimed to describe the entire perioperative course of two-dimensional left ventricular global longitudinal strain in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and compare to common parameters of LV function assessment.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty patients scheduled for isolated on-pump CABG surgery with preserved left and right ventricular function with an unremarkable, complication-free perioperative course.

INTERVENTIONS

Two-dimensional strain analysis and standard echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular function were performed pre- (T1) and postoperatively (T4) by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperatively pre- (T2) and poststernotomy (T3) by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Echocardiography was performed under stable hemodynamics and predefined fluid management, in sinus rhythm without any vasoactive support.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Analysis of two-dimensional LV global longitudinal strain (2D-LV GLS) was performed using Tomtec 2D Cardiac Performance Analysis software. Philips QLAB 10.8 was used to analyze left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) and tissue velocity of the lateral mitral annulus (LV S ́). There were no significant differences (median with interquartile range [IQR]) after induction of anesthesia in values of LV EF and 2D-LV GLS (T1 v T2; 59% [IQR, 52 to 64] v 56% [IQR, 51.75 to 63] and -15.2 [IQR, -18.05 to -13.08] v -15.6 [IQR, -17.65 to -13.88]; both not significant [ns]), while LV S´ declined (T1 v T2, 7 cm/s [IQR, 5.25 to 8] v 5.25 cm/s [IQR, 4.6 to 6.83]; p < 0.001). Bland-Altman analysis for this comparison of 2D-LV GLS (T1 v T2) showed that bias was not significant between both techniques; however, there were limits of agreement. After sternotomy (T2 v T3) neither LV EF nor 2D-LV GLS or LV S´ declined. 2D-LV GLS deteriorated significantly after CABG (T1 v T4; -15.2 [IQR, -18.05 to -13.08] v -11.3 [IQR, -15.8 to -9.78]; p < 0.001). In contrast, LV EF and LV S´ did not change significantly in the perioperative interval (T1 v T4; 59% [IQR, 52 to 64] v 56% [IQR, 51.5 to 64.25] and 7 cm/s [IQR, 5.25 to 8] v 7 cm/s [IQR, 6 to 8]; both ns).

CONCLUSION

Values of 2D-LV GLS did not differ in awake, spontaneously breathing patients assessed by TTE and in anesthetized and ventilated patients with stable hemodynamics measured by TEE. 2D-LV GLS did not change after sternotomy; however, it declined significantly after on-pump CABG, while LV EF and LV S´ remained unchanged.

Role of Echocardiography for the Perioperative Assessment of the Right Ventricle

Purpose of Review

This review aims to highlight the perioperative echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular (RV) function with strengths and limitations of commonly used and evolving techniques. It explains the value of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and describes the perioperative changes of RV function echocardiographers should be aware of.

Recent Findings

RV dysfunction is an entity with strong influence on outcome. However, its definition and assessment in the perioperative interval are not well-defined. Moreover, values assessed by TTE and TEE are not interchangeable; while some parameters seem to correlate well, others do not. Myocardial strain analysis and three-dimensional echocardiography may overcome the limitations of conventional echocardiographic measures and provide further insight into perioperative cardiac mechanics.

Summary

Echocardiography has become an essential part of modern anesthesiology in patients with RV dysfunction. It offers the opportunity to evaluate not only global but also regional RV function and distinguish alterations of RV contraction.