Regional Versus Global Measurements of Right Ventricular Strain Performed in the Operating Room With Transesophageal Echocardiography

Right ventricular ejection fraction derived from intraoperative three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography versus cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

PURPOSE

Right ventricle (RV) assessment is critical during cardiac surgery. Traditional assessment consists of visual estimation and measurement of validated parameters. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) is the gold standard for RV analysis, and transthoracic three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography is validated against this. We aimed to show that intraoperative 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) RV assessment is feasible and can produce results that correlate with cMRI.

METHODS

We recruited cardiac surgery patients who underwent cMRI within the preceding twelve preoperative months. An anesthetic protocol was followed pre-sternotomy and a 3D RV data set was acquired. We used TOMTEC 4D RV-Function to derive RV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and ejection fraction (EF). We compared these data with the corresponding MRI values.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were included. Transesophageal echocardiography EDV and ESV differed from MRI measurements with a mean bias of -53 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], -80 to 26) and -21 mL (95% CI, -34 to -9). Transesophageal echocardiography EF did not differ significantly, with a mean bias of -4% (95% CI, -8 to 1). Results were unchanged after excluding MRIs older than 180 days. Correlation coefficients for EDV, ESV, and EF were r = 0.85, 0.91, and 0.80, respectively. Interclass correlation coefficients for EDV, ESV, and EF were 0.86, 0.89, and 0.96, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative TEE RV, EDV, and ESV are underestimated relative to cMRI because of analysis, anesthetic, and ventilation factors. The EF showed a low mean difference, and all values showed strong correlation with MRI. Reproducibility and feasibility were excellent and increased use in clinical practice should be considered.

Does types of atrial fibrillation matter in the impairment of global and regional left ventricular mechanics and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony?

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia, which is associated with cardiac dysfunction. This study aimed to compare the impairment severity of left ventricular strain and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony using echocardiography-derived velocity vector imaging in patients with different types of AF without heart failure.

Methods

168 non-valvular AF patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction (98 paroxysmal AF patients and 70 persistent AF patients) and 86 healthy control subjects were included in this study. Regional and global left ventricular longitudinal and circumferential strain were measured. Time to regional peak longitudinal strain was measured and the standard deviation of all 12 segments (SDT-S) was used as a measure of intra-ventricular dyssynchrony.

Results

Significantly lower GLS (−18.71 ± 3.00% in controls vs. −17.10 ± 3.01% in paroxysmal AF vs. −12.23 ± 3.25% in persistent AF, P < 0.05) and GCS (−28.75 ± 6.34% in controls vs. −24.43 ± 6.86% in paroxysmal AF vs. −18.46 ± 6.42% in persistent AF, P < 0.01) were observed in either persistent AF subjects or paroxysmal AF subjects compared with healthy control subjects (P < 0.05). The impairment was much worse in persistent AF subjects compared with paroxysmal AF subjects (P < 0.001). Intraventricular dyssynchrony was found in both persistent AF patients and paroxysmal AF patients, and it’s worse in persistent AF patients (52 ± 18 ms in controls, 61 ± 17 ms in paroxysmal AF, and 70 ± 28 ms in persistent AF, P < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed AF types were independent risk factors of GLS, GCS, and intraventricular dyssynchrony.

Conclusion

AF types were not only associated with impaired longitudinal and circumferential left ventricle mechanics but also intra-ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony. Worse systolic mechanics and intra-ventricular dyssynchrony were found in patients with persistent AF compared with these in patients with paroxysmal AF.

Perioperative Course of Three-Dimensional-Derived Right Ventricular Strain in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Prospective, Observational, Pilot Trial

OBJECTIVES

Few data exist on perioperative three-dimensional-derived right ventricular strain. The authors aimed to describe the perioperative course of three-dimensional-derived right ventricular strain in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery patients.

DESIGN

Prospective, observational, pilot trial.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 40 patients with preserved left ventricular and right ventricular (RV) function undergoing isolated on-pump CABG surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

Three-dimensional strain analysis and standard echocardiographic evaluation of RV function were performed preoperatively (T1) and postoperatively (T4) with transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and intraoperatively before sternotomy (T2) and after sternotomy (T3) with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). All echocardiographic measurements were performed under stable hemodynamic conditions and predefined fluid management without any vasoactive support.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The measurements of three-dimensional-derived RV free-wall strain (3D-RV FWS) and RV ejection fraction were performed using TomTec 4D RV-Function 2.0 software. Philips QLAB 10.8 was used to analyze tissue velocity of the tricuspid annulus, tricuspid annular systolic excursion, and RV fractional area change. There were no significant differences (median [interquartile range {IQR}]) between preoperative TTE and intraoperative TEE measurements for 3D-RV FWS (T1 v T2: -22.35 [IQR -17.70 to -27.22] v -24.35 [IQR -20.63 to -29.88]; not significant). 3D-RV FWS remained unchanged after sternotomy (T2 v T3: -24.35 [IQR -20.63 to -29.88] v -23.75 [IQR -20.25 to -29.28]; not significant) but deteriorated significantly after CABG (T1 v T4: -22.35 [IQR -17.70 to -27.22] v -18.5 [IQR -16.90 to -21.65]; p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

In patients undergoing on-pump CABG, 3D-RV FWS values for awake, spontaneously breathing patients measured with TTE and values assessed in patients under general anesthesia with TEE did not significantly differ. Three-dimensional RV FWS did not change after sternotomy but deteriorated after on-pump CABG.