Right Ventricular Assessment: Are Regional Longitudinal Measurements of Value?

High Versus Normal Blood Pressure Targets in Relation to Right Ventricular Dysfunction After Cardiac Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Management of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction is challenging. Current practice predominantly is based on data from experimental and small uncontrolled studies and includes augmentation of blood pressure. However, whether such intervention is effective in the clinical setting of cardiac surgery is unknown.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Single-center study in a tertiary teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 78 patients equipped with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), classified according to PAC-derived RV ejection fraction (RVEF); 44 patients had an RVEF of <20%, and 34 patients had an RVEF between ≥20% and <30%.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients randomly were assigned to either a normal target group (mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg) or a high target group [mean arterial pressure 85 mmHg]). The primary end- point was the change in RVEF over a one-hour study period.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

There was no significant between-group difference in change of RVEF <20% (-1% [-3.3 to 1.8] in the normal-target group v 0.5% [-1 to 4] in the high-target group; p = 0.159). There was no significant between-group difference in change in RVEF 20%-to-30% (-1% [-3 to 0] in the normal-target group v 1% [-1 to 3] in the high-target group; p = 0.074). These results were in line with the simultaneous observation that echocardiographic variables of RV and left ventricular function also remained unaltered over time, irrespective of either baseline RVEF or treatment protocol.

CONCLUSION

In a mixed cardiac surgery population with RV dysfunction, norepinephrine-mediated high blood pressure targets did not result in an increase in PAC-derived RVEF compared with normal blood pressure targets.