1
|
Dong J, Lei Y, Wan Y, Dong P, Wang Y, Liu K, Zhang X. Enhanced recovery after surgery from 1997 to 2022: a bibliometric and visual analysis. Updates Surg 2024; 76:1131-1150. [PMID: 38446378 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01764-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal perioperative management concept, but there is no article to comprehensively review the collaboration and impact of countries, institutions, authors, journals, references, and keywords on ERAS from a bibliometric perspective. This study assessed the evolution of clustering of knowledge structures and identified hot trends and emerging topics. Articles and reviews related to ERAS were retrieved through subject search from the Web of Science Core Collection. We used the following strategy: "TS = Enhanced recovery after surgery" OR "Enhanced Postsurgical Recovery" OR "Postsurgical Recoveries, Enhanced" OR "Postsurgical Recovery, Enhanced" OR "Recovery, Enhanced Postsurgical" OR "Fast track surgery" OR "improve surgical outcome". Bibliometric analyses were conducted on Excel 365, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrics (R-Tool of R-Studio). Totally 3242 articles and reviews from 1997 to 2022 were included. These publications were mainly from 684 journals in 78 countries, led by the United States and China. Kehlet H published the most papers and had the largest number of co-citations. Analysis of the journals with the most outputs showed that most journals mainly cover Surgery and Oncology. The hottest keyword is "enhanced recovery after surgery". Later appearing topics and keywords indicate that the hotspots and future research trends include ERAS protocols for other types of surgery and improving perioperative status, including "bariatric surgery", "thoracic surgery", and "prehabilitation". This study reviewed the research on ERAS using bibliometric and visualization methods, which can help scholars better understand the dynamic evolution of ERAS and provide directions for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Anaesthesia and Perioperative Organ Protection, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
| | - Yuqiong Lei
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Anaesthesia and Perioperative Organ Protection, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China
| | - Yantong Wan
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Proteomics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Peng Dong
- College of Anesthesiology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yingbin Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Hospital & Clinical Medical School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Kexuan Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Anaesthesia and Perioperative Organ Protection, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
| | - Xiyang Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Anaesthesia and Perioperative Organ Protection, 1838 Guangzhou Avenue North, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alfaras-Melainis K, Fernando RJ, Boisen ML, Hoffman PJ, Rosenkrans DJ, Teeter E, Cardi AI, Laney J, Reagan A, Rao VK, Anderson M, Luke CB, Subramani S, Schisler T, Ritchie PJ, Gelzinis TA. The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights from 2022. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2024; 38:29-56. [PMID: 37802689 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/08/2023]
Abstract
This article reviews research highlights in the field of thoracic anesthesia. The highlights of this year included new developments in the preoperative assessment and prehabilitation of patients requiring thoracic surgery, updates on the use of devices for one-lung ventilation (OLV) in adults and children, updates on the anesthetic and postoperative management of these patients, including protective OLV ventilation, the use of opioid-sparing techniques and regional anesthesia, and outcomes using enhanced recovery after surgery, as well as the use of expanding indications for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, specialized anesthetic techniques for airway surgery, and nonintubated video-assisted thoracic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rohesh J Fernando
- Cardiothoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Michael L Boisen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Paul J Hoffman
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Emily Teeter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alessandra I Cardi
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jeremy Laney
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Aaron Reagan
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX
| | - Vidya K Rao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Michael Anderson
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, NY
| | - Charles B Luke
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Sudhakar Subramani
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, IA
| | - Travis Schisler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
| | - Peter J Ritchie
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Theresa A Gelzinis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Feray S, Lemoine A, Aveline C, Quesnel C. Pain management after thoracic surgery or chest trauma. Minerva Anestesiol 2023; 89:1022-1033. [PMID: 37671536 DOI: 10.23736/s0375-9393.23.17291-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
Accidental or surgically induced thoracic trauma is responsible for significant pain that can impact patient outcomes. One of the main objectives of its pain management is to promote effective coughing and early mobilization to reduce atelectasis and ventilation disorders induced by pulmonary contusion. The incidence of chronic pain can affect more than 35% of patients after both thoracotomy and thoracoscopy as well as after chest trauma. As the severity of acute pain is associated with the incidence of chronic pain, early and effective pain management is very important. In this narrative review, we propose to detail systemic and regional analgesia techniques to minimize postoperative pain, while reducing transitional pain, surgical stress response and opioid side effects. We provide the reader with practical recommendations based on both literature and clinical practice experience in a referral level III thoracic trauma center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Feray
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France -
| | - Adrien Lemoine
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Aveline
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Sévigné Hospital, Cesson Sévigné, France
| | - Christophe Quesnel
- Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Hôpital Tenon, APHP, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Opioid-sparing anesthesia and patient-reported outcomes after open gynecologic surgery: a historical cohort study. Can J Anaesth 2022; 69:1477-1492. [PMID: 36224506 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-022-02336-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2022] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Dexmedetomidine and ketamine may be administered intraoperatively as continuous infusions to provide opioid-sparing anesthesia. Recent evidence has yielded controversial results regarding the impact of opioid-free anesthesia on postoperative complications, and there is a gap in knowledge regarding patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This study aimed to determine the impact of opioid-sparing anesthesia and opioid-based anesthesia on PROs among gynecologic patients within an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program. METHODS We formed a single-center historical cohort from patients enrolled in another study who underwent open gynecologic surgery on an ERAS program from November 2014 to December 2020 (n = 2,095). We identified two cohorts based on the type of balanced anesthesia administered: 1) opioid-sparing anesthesia defined as the continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine and ketamine (adjuvants) during surgery or 2) opioid-based anesthesia (no adjuvants). We measured the quality of postoperative recovery using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI), a 29-item validated tool that was administered preoperatively, daily while admitted, and weekly after discharge until week 6. The primary outcome was interference with walking. We matched both cohorts and used a multilevel linear mixed-effect model to evaluate the effect of opioid-sparing anesthesia on the primary outcome. RESULTS In total, 498 patients were eligible (159 in the opioid-sparing anesthesia cohort and 339 in the opioid-based anesthesia cohort), of whom 149 matched pairs were included in the final analysis. Longitudinal assessment showed no significant or clinically important difference in interference with walking (P = 0.99), general activity (P = 0.99), or other PROs between cohorts. Median [interquartile range (IQR)] intraoperative opioid administration (expressed as morphine milligram equivalents [MME]) among matched patients in the opioid-sparing anesthesia cohort was 30 [25-55] mg vs 58 [8-70] mg in the opioid-based anesthesia cohort (P < 0.01). Patients in the opioid-sparing anesthesia cohort had a lower opioid consumption in the postanesthesia care unit than those in the opioid-based anesthesia cohort (MME, 3 [0-10] mg vs 5 [0-15] mg; P < 0.01), but there was no significant difference between cohorts in total postoperative opioid consumption (MME, 23 [0-94] mg vs 35 [13-95] mg P = 0.053). CONCLUSIONS In this single-center historical cohort study, opioid-sparing anesthesia had no significant or clinically important effects on interference with walking or other PROs in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery compared with opioid-based anesthesia. Opioid-sparing anesthesia was associated with less short-term opioid consumption than opioid-based anesthesia.
Collapse
|
5
|
Boisen ML, Fernando RJ, Alfaras-Melainis K, Hoffmann PJ, Kolarczyk LM, Teeter E, Schisler T, Ritchie PJ, La Colla L, Rao VK, Gelzinis TA. The Year in Thoracic Anesthesia: Selected Highlights From 2021. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2022; 36:4252-4265. [PMID: 36220681 DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2022.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L Boisen
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Rohesh J Fernando
- Cardiothoracic Section, Department of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Paul J Hoffmann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Emily Teeter
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Travis Schisler
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter J Ritchie
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Luca La Colla
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Vidya K Rao
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Theresa A Gelzinis
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195628. [PMID: 36233497 PMCID: PMC9572852 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.
Collapse
|