Renal-Resistive Index and Acute Kidney Injury in Aortic Surgery: An Observational Pilot Study

Influence of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on renal blood perfusion

PURPOSE

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is accompanied with an increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). Whether AKI is induced by chemotoxicity or hyperthermia-related changes in renal perfusion remains controversial. The influence of HIPEC on renal perfusion has not been evaluated in patients yet.

METHODS

Renal blood perfusion was assessed in ten patients treated with HIPEC by intraoperative renal Doppler pulse-wave ultrasound. Ultrasound (US) examinations were performed pre-, intra-, and postoperative with analyses of time-velocity curves. Patient demographics, surgical details, and data regarding renal function were recorded perioperatively. For evaluation of renal Doppler US to predict AKI, patients were divided in two groups with (AKI +) and without (AKI -) kidney injury.

RESULTS

Throughout HIPEC perfusion, neither significant nor consistent changes in renal perfusion could be observed. Postoperative AKI occurred in 6 of 10 participating patients. Intraoperative renal resistive index (RRI) values > 0.8 were observed in one patient developing stage 3 AKI according KDIGO criteria. At 30 min in perfusion, RRI values were significantly higher in AKI + patients.

CONCLUSION

AKI is a common and frequent complication after HIPEC, but underlying pathophysiology remains elusive. High intraoperative RRI values may indicate an increased risk of postoperative AKI. Present data challenges the relevance of hyperthermia-derived hypothesis of renal hypoperfusion with prerenal injury during HIPEC. More attention should be drawn towards chemotoxic-induced hypothesis of HIPEC-induced AKI and caution applying regimens containing nephrotoxic agents in patients. Further confirmatory and complementary studies on renal perfusion as well as pharmacokinetic HIPEC studies are required.

Current Insights into the Significance of the Renal Resistive Index in Kidney and Cardiovascular Disease

Initially, the renal resistive index (RRI) was investigated with the aim of improving diagnosis in kidney diseases, but this goal was not met. Recently, many papers have highlighted the prognostic significance of the RRI in chronic kidney disease: specifically, in estimating the revascularization success of renal artery stenoses or the evolution of the graft and the recipients in renal transplantation. Moreover, the RRI has become significant in the prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients. Studies in renal pathology have revealed correlations of this index with parameters of systemic circulation. The theoretical and experimental premises of this connection were then reconsidered, and studies analyzing the link between RRI and arterial stiffness, central and peripheral pressure, and left ventricular flow were conducted with this purpose. Many data currently indicate that RRI is influenced more by pulse pressure and vascular compliance than by renal vascular resistance-assuming that RRI reflects the complex interplay between systemic circulation and renal microcirculation and should be considered a marker of systemic cardiovascular risk beyond its prognostic relevance for kidney disease. In this review, we overview the clinical research that reveals the implications of RRI in renal and cardiovascular disease.