Norepinephrine Dose Should Be Reported as Base Equivalence in Clinical Research Manuscripts

Norepinephrine Salt Formulations and Risk of Therapeutic Error: Results of a National Survey

OBJECTIVES

Norepinephrine is available commercially in solution containing its salt (eg, tartrate), but only the base form (ie, norepinephrine base) is active pharmacologically. Unfortunately, the outer label of drug packages frequently reports the dosage of norepinephrine as a salt, which can lead potentially to therapeutic errors when prescribing norepinephrine. We performed a survey to assess the level of awareness of this issue.

DESIGN

National survey.

SETTING

Acute care units of Italian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Acute care physicians and nurses.

INTERVENTIONS

A 15-item online survey was emailed to 305 critical care practitioners in Italy. Questions included information on the participants' background, methods of diluting norepinephrine, interpretation of recommended doses from guidelines, and a sample case related to the preparation and administration of the drug.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We collected 106 responses from 54 hospitals. All hospitals used norepinephrine bitartrate salt. Of the participants, 53% responded that the guidelines express norepinephrine dosages as a salt, 23% as the base form, and 24% were unsure or unaware about it. The simulated patient-dose calculation was resolved in 81% of cases with an incorrect calculation referring to the norepinephrine salt and only in 19% referring to the norepinephrine base.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in dosage management of norepinephrine across different hospital units, as well as a lack of knowledge regarding the salt-to-base ratio. Scientific publications (eg, guidelines) should specify whether they are referring to the base or salt form of norepinephrine. The adoption of different labeling and national standards for dilution may decrease the risk of therapeutic errors.

Noradrenaline dose cutoffs to characterise the severity of cardiovascular failure: Data-based development and external validation

BACKGROUND

The vasopressor dose needed is a common measure to assess the severity of cardiovascular failure, but there is no consensus on the ranges of vasopressor doses determining different levels of cardiovascular support. We aimed to identify cutoffs for determining low, intermediate and high doses of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), the primary vasopressor used in intensive care, based on association with hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a binational registry study to determine cutoffs between low, intermediate and high noradrenaline doses. We required the cutoffs to be statistically rational and practical (rounded to the first decimal and easy to remember), and to result in increasing mortality with increasing doses. The highest noradrenaline dose in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was used. The cutoffs were developed using data from 8079 ICU patients treated in the ICU at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, between 2013 and 2019. Subsequently, the cutoffs were validated in the eICU database, including 39,007 ICU admissions to 29 ICUs in the United States of America in 2014-2015. The log-rank statistic, with the Contal and O'Quigley method, was used to determine the cutoffs resulting in the most significant split between the noradrenaline dose groups with regard to hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The two most prominent peaks in the log-rank statistic corresponded to noradrenaline doses 0.20 and 0.44 μg/kg/min. Accordingly, we determined three dose ranges: low (<0.2 μg/kg/min), intermediate (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and high (>0.4 μg/kg/min). Mortality increased, whereas the number of patients decreased consistently with increasing noradrenaline doses in both cohorts. In the development cohort, hospital mortality was 6.5% in the group without noradrenaline administered and 14.0%, 26.4% and 40.2%, respectively, in the low-dose, intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Compared to patients who received no noradrenaline, the hazard ratio for in-hospital death was 1.4 for the low-dose group, 4.0 for the intermediate-dose group and 7.5 for the high-dose group in the validation cohort (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The highest noradrenaline dose is a useful measure for quantifying circulatory failure. Cutoffs 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/min seem to be suitable for defining low, intermediate and high doses.

The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with a high incidence and mortality and poses a significant challenge to the treatment. Although esmolol has shown promise in sepsis treatment, its efficacy and safety remain contentious. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the role of esmolol in sepsis management.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched and references of relevant reviews and meta-analysis were also screened for appropriate studies. Keywords and free words of 'sepsis', 'esmolol' and 'randomized controlled trials' were used for search. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 1100 patients were included. Compared with the control group, patients receiving esmolol exhibited significantly decreased 28-day mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81; P < 0.0001), heart rate (HR) (SMD, -1.15; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.96; P < 0.0001), cardiac troponin I levels (cTnI) (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.64; P < 0.0001), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.3; P < 0.0001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.09; P = 0.004) and significantly increased central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; P < 0.0001).While, esmolol had no significant influence on norepinephrine dosage (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.29; P = 0.46), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.4; P = 0.16), central venous pressure (CVP) (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.11) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.7; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Esmolol reduces 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in sepsis patients. Furthermore, esmolol improves oxygen metabolism, mitigates myocardial injury and decreases heart rate without significantly affecting hemodynamic parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number: CRD42023484884).

The impact of norepinephrine dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in septic shock patients

BACKGROUND

Norepinephrine (NE) is a cornerstone drug in the management of septic shock, with its dose being used clinically as a marker of disease severity and as mortality predictor. However, variations in NE dose reporting either as salt formulations or base molecule may lead to misinterpretation of mortality risks and hinder the process of care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to assess the impact of NE dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in a cohort of septic shock patients. NE doses were converted from the base molecule to equivalent salt doses, and their ability to predict 28-day mortality at common severity dose cut-offs was compared.

RESULTS

4086 eligible patients with septic shock were identified, with a median age of 68 [57-78] years, an admission SOFA score of 7 [6-10], and lactate at diagnosis of 3.2 [2.4-5.1] mmol/L. Median peak NE dose at day 1 was 0.24 [0.12-0.42] μg/kg/min, with a 28-day mortality of 39.3%. The NE dose showed significant heterogeneity in mortality prediction depending on which formulation was reported, with doses reported as bitartrate and tartrate presenting 65 (95% CI 79-43)% and 67 (95% CI 80-47)% lower ORs than base molecule, respectively. This divergence in prediction widened at increasing NE doses. When using a 1 μg/kg/min threshold, predicted mortality was 54 (95% CI 52-56)% and 83 (95% CI 80-87)% for tartrate formulation and base molecule, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneous reporting of NE doses significantly affects mortality prediction in septic shock. Standardizing NE dose reporting as base molecule could enhance risk stratification and improve processes of care. These findings underscore the importance of consistent NE dose reporting practices in critical care settings.