Norepinephrine Dose Should Be Reported as Base Equivalence in Clinical Research Manuscripts

Haemodynamic management of septic shock

Septic shock is a significant challenge in the management of patients with burns and traumatic injuries when complicated by infection, necessitating prompt and effective haemodynamic support. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current strategies for vasopressor and fluid management in septic shock, with the aim to optimize patient outcomes. With regard to vasopressor management, we elaborate on the pharmacologic profiles and clinical applications of catecholamines, vasopressin derivatives, angiotensin II, and other vasoactive agents. Noradrenaline remains central to septic shock management. The addition of vasopressin, when sequentially added to noradrenaline, offers a non-catecholaminergic vasoactive effect with some clinical benefits and risks of adverse effects. Emerging agents such as angiotensin II and hydroxocobalamin are highlighted for their roles in catecholamine-resistant vasodilatory shock. Next, for fluid management, crystalloids are currently preferred for initial resuscitation, with balanced crystalloids showing benefits over saline. The application of albumin in septic shock warrants further research. High-quality evidence does not support large-volume fluid resuscitation, and an individualized strategy based on haemodynamic parameters, including lactate clearance and capillary refill time, is recommended. The existing knowledge suggests that early vasopressor initiation, particularly noradrenaline, may be critical in cases where fluid resuscitation takes inadequate effect. Management of refractory septic shock remains challenging, with novel agents like angiotensin II and methylene blue showing potential in recent studies. In conclusion, Further research is needed to optimize haemodynamic management of septic shock, particularly in developing novel vasopressor usage and fluid management approaches.

Norepinephrine titration in patients with sepsis-induced encephalopathy: cerebral pulsatility index compared to mean arterial pressure guided protocol: randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Although surviving sepsis campaign (SSC) guidelines are the standard for sepsis and septic shock management, outcomes are still unfavourable. Given that perfusion pressure in sepsis is heterogeneous among patients and within the same patient; we evaluated the impact of individualized hemodynamic management via the transcranial Doppler (TCD) pulsatility index (PI) on mortality and outcomes among sepsis-induced encephalopathy (SIE) patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, single-center randomized controlled study, 112 patients with SIE were randomly assigned. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and norepinephrine (NE) titration were guided via the TCD pulsatility index to achieve a pulsatility index < 1.3 in Group I, whereas the SSC guidelines were used in Group II to achieve a MAP ≥ 65 mmHg. The primary outcome was intensive care unit (ICU) mortality and the secondary outcomes were; MAP that was measured invasively and values were recorded; daily in the morning, at the end of NE infusion and the end of ICU stay, duration of ICU stay, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, norepinephrine titration and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score at discharge.

RESULTS

ICU mortality percentage wasn`t significantly different between the two groups (p value 0.174). There was a significant increase in the MAP at the end of norepinephrine infusion (mean value of 69.54 ± 10.42 and p value 0.002) and in the GCS score at ICU discharge (Median value of 15 and p value 0.014) in the TCD group, and episodes of cerebral hypoperfusion with CPP < 60 mmHg, were significantly lower in the TCD group (median value of 2 and p value 0.018). Heart rate values, number of episodes of tachycardia or bradycardia, Total norepinephrine dosing, duration of norepinephrine infusion, SOFA score, serum lactate levels, and ICU stay duration weren`t significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualizing hemodynamic management via the TCD pulsatility index in SIE patients was not associated with significant mortality reduction. However, it reduces episodes of cerebral hypoperfusion and improves GCS outcome but doesn't significantly affect heart rate values, SOFA score, serum lactate level, length of ICU stay, total NE dosing, and duration of NE infusion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The clinical trial was registered on clinucaltrials.gov under the identifier NCT05842616 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05842616?cond=NCT05842616&rank=1 on 6-May-2023 before the enrolment of the first patient.

Local Anesthetic Infiltration, Awake Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, and Airway Management for Resection of a Giant Mediastinal Cyst: A Narrative Review and Case Report

Background: Mediastinal mass syndrome represents a major threat to respiratory and cardiovascular integrity, with difficult evidence-based risk stratification for interdisciplinary management. Methods: We conducted a narrative review concerning risk stratification and difficult airway management of patients presenting with a large mediastinal mass. This is supplemented by a case report illustrating our individual approach for a patient presenting with a subtotal tracheal stenosis due to a large cyst of the thyroid gland. Results: We identified numerous risk stratification grading systems and only a few case reports of regional anesthesia techniques for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients. Clinical Case: After consultation with his general physician because of exertional dyspnea and stridor, a 78-year-old patient with no history of heart failure was advised to present to a cardiology department under the suspicion of decompensated heart failure. Computed tomography imaging showed a large mediastinal mass that most likely originated from the left thyroid lobe, with subtotal obstruction of the trachea. Prior medical history included the implantation of a dual-chamber pacemaker because of a complete heart block in 2022, non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II, preterminal chronic renal failure with normal diuresis, arterial hypertension, and low-grade aortic insufficiency. After referral to our hospital, an interdisciplinary consultation including experienced cardiac anesthesiologists, thoracic surgeons, general surgeons, and cardiac surgeons decided on completing the resection via median sternotomy after awake cannulation for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation via the right internal jugular and the femoral vein under regional anesthesia. An intermediate cervical plexus block and a suprainguinal fascia iliaca compartment block were performed, followed by anesthesia induction with bronchoscopy-guided placement of the endotracheal tube over the stenosed part of the trachea. The resection was performed with minimal blood loss. After the resection, an exit blockade of the dual chamber pacemaker prompted emergency surgical revision. The veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was explanted after the operation in the operating room. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was released home in stable condition. Conclusions: Awake veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation placed under local anesthetic infiltration with regional anesthesia techniques is a feasible individualized approach for patients with high risk of airway collapse, especially if the mediastinal mass critically alters tracheal anatomy. Compressible cysts may represent a subgroup with easy passage of an endotracheal tube. Interdisciplinary collaboration during the planning stage is essential for maximum patient safety. Prospective data regarding risk stratification for veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cannulation and effectiveness of regional anesthesia is needed.

Noradrenaline dose cutoffs to characterise the severity of cardiovascular failure: Data-based development and external validation

BACKGROUND

The vasopressor dose needed is a common measure to assess the severity of cardiovascular failure, but there is no consensus on the ranges of vasopressor doses determining different levels of cardiovascular support. We aimed to identify cutoffs for determining low, intermediate and high doses of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), the primary vasopressor used in intensive care, based on association with hospital mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a binational registry study to determine cutoffs between low, intermediate and high noradrenaline doses. We required the cutoffs to be statistically rational and practical (rounded to the first decimal and easy to remember), and to result in increasing mortality with increasing doses. The highest noradrenaline dose in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was used. The cutoffs were developed using data from 8079 ICU patients treated in the ICU at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, between 2013 and 2019. Subsequently, the cutoffs were validated in the eICU database, including 39,007 ICU admissions to 29 ICUs in the United States of America in 2014-2015. The log-rank statistic, with the Contal and O'Quigley method, was used to determine the cutoffs resulting in the most significant split between the noradrenaline dose groups with regard to hospital mortality.

RESULTS

The two most prominent peaks in the log-rank statistic corresponded to noradrenaline doses 0.20 and 0.44 μg/kg/min. Accordingly, we determined three dose ranges: low (<0.2 μg/kg/min), intermediate (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and high (>0.4 μg/kg/min). Mortality increased, whereas the number of patients decreased consistently with increasing noradrenaline doses in both cohorts. In the development cohort, hospital mortality was 6.5% in the group without noradrenaline administered and 14.0%, 26.4% and 40.2%, respectively, in the low-dose, intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Compared to patients who received no noradrenaline, the hazard ratio for in-hospital death was 1.4 for the low-dose group, 4.0 for the intermediate-dose group and 7.5 for the high-dose group in the validation cohort (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The highest noradrenaline dose is a useful measure for quantifying circulatory failure. Cutoffs 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/min seem to be suitable for defining low, intermediate and high doses.

Norepinephrine Salt Formulations and Risk of Therapeutic Error: Results of a National Survey

OBJECTIVES

Norepinephrine is available commercially in solution containing its salt (eg, tartrate), but only the base form (ie, norepinephrine base) is active pharmacologically. Unfortunately, the outer label of drug packages frequently reports the dosage of norepinephrine as a salt, which can lead potentially to therapeutic errors when prescribing norepinephrine. We performed a survey to assess the level of awareness of this issue.

DESIGN

National survey.

SETTING

Acute care units of Italian hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

Acute care physicians and nurses.

INTERVENTIONS

A 15-item online survey was emailed to 305 critical care practitioners in Italy. Questions included information on the participants' background, methods of diluting norepinephrine, interpretation of recommended doses from guidelines, and a sample case related to the preparation and administration of the drug.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We collected 106 responses from 54 hospitals. All hospitals used norepinephrine bitartrate salt. Of the participants, 53% responded that the guidelines express norepinephrine dosages as a salt, 23% as the base form, and 24% were unsure or unaware about it. The simulated patient-dose calculation was resolved in 81% of cases with an incorrect calculation referring to the norepinephrine salt and only in 19% referring to the norepinephrine base.

CONCLUSIONS

There is significant variability in dosage management of norepinephrine across different hospital units, as well as a lack of knowledge regarding the salt-to-base ratio. Scientific publications (eg, guidelines) should specify whether they are referring to the base or salt form of norepinephrine. The adoption of different labeling and national standards for dilution may decrease the risk of therapeutic errors.

The role of esmolol in sepsis: a meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is associated with a high incidence and mortality and poses a significant challenge to the treatment. Although esmolol has shown promise in sepsis treatment, its efficacy and safety remain contentious. This meta-analysis aims to clarify the role of esmolol in sepsis management.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane library, clinicaltrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry were searched and references of relevant reviews and meta-analysis were also screened for appropriate studies. Keywords and free words of 'sepsis', 'esmolol' and 'randomized controlled trials' were used for search. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies involving 1100 patients were included. Compared with the control group, patients receiving esmolol exhibited significantly decreased 28-day mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.81; P < 0.0001), heart rate (HR) (SMD, -1.15; 95% CI, -1.34 to -0.96; P < 0.0001), cardiac troponin I levels (cTnI) (SMD, -0.88; 95% CI, -1.13 to -0.64; P < 0.0001), length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay (SMD, -0.46; 95% CI, -0.62 to -0.3; P < 0.0001) and duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.48 to -0.09; P = 0.004) and significantly increased central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) (SMD, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88; P < 0.0001).While, esmolol had no significant influence on norepinephrine dosage (SMD, 0.08; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.29; P = 0.46), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (SMD, 0.17; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.4; P = 0.16), central venous pressure (CVP) (SMD, 0.16; 95% CI, -0.04 to 0.35; P = 0.11) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (SMD, 0.21; 95% CI, -2.9 to 0.7; P = 0.41).

CONCLUSION

Esmolol reduces 28-day mortality, length of ICU stay and duration of mechanical ventilation in sepsis patients. Furthermore, esmolol improves oxygen metabolism, mitigates myocardial injury and decreases heart rate without significantly affecting hemodynamic parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered on the PROSPERO website (registration number: CRD42023484884).

The impact of norepinephrine dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in septic shock patients

BACKGROUND

Norepinephrine (NE) is a cornerstone drug in the management of septic shock, with its dose being used clinically as a marker of disease severity and as mortality predictor. However, variations in NE dose reporting either as salt formulations or base molecule may lead to misinterpretation of mortality risks and hinder the process of care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the MIMIC-IV database to assess the impact of NE dose reporting heterogeneity on mortality prediction in a cohort of septic shock patients. NE doses were converted from the base molecule to equivalent salt doses, and their ability to predict 28-day mortality at common severity dose cut-offs was compared.

RESULTS

4086 eligible patients with septic shock were identified, with a median age of 68 [57-78] years, an admission SOFA score of 7 [6-10], and lactate at diagnosis of 3.2 [2.4-5.1] mmol/L. Median peak NE dose at day 1 was 0.24 [0.12-0.42] μg/kg/min, with a 28-day mortality of 39.3%. The NE dose showed significant heterogeneity in mortality prediction depending on which formulation was reported, with doses reported as bitartrate and tartrate presenting 65 (95% CI 79-43)% and 67 (95% CI 80-47)% lower ORs than base molecule, respectively. This divergence in prediction widened at increasing NE doses. When using a 1 μg/kg/min threshold, predicted mortality was 54 (95% CI 52-56)% and 83 (95% CI 80-87)% for tartrate formulation and base molecule, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Heterogeneous reporting of NE doses significantly affects mortality prediction in septic shock. Standardizing NE dose reporting as base molecule could enhance risk stratification and improve processes of care. These findings underscore the importance of consistent NE dose reporting practices in critical care settings.

Boosting the Beat: A Critical Showdown of Levosimendan and Milrinone in Surgical and Non-Surgical Scenarios: A Narrative Review

Acute heart failure, advanced cardiac failure, cardiac surgery, and sepsis are conditions that require simultaneous treatment to stimulate contractility and/or reduce systemic vascular resistance, with levosimendan and milrinone being treatment options. This research's aim is to review the current indications and evidence for these medications across various scenarios. Evidence suggests that levosimendan is a non-inferior alternative to dobutamine and superior to milrinone in treating low cardiac output syndrome following cardiac surgery. In cases of septic shock, levosimendan has been linked to lower mortality rates compared to placebo, while milrinone's efficacy remains inconclusive. Furthermore, postoperative patients undergoing correction for congenital heart disease have shown reduced mechanical ventilation time and intensive care unit stays when treated with levosimendan, although differences exist between the populations assigned to each intervention. In conclusion, levosimendan, compared to milrinone, appears to offer better hemodynamic favorability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However, additional research is necessary to further understand its impact on hemodynamic outcomes, mortality, intensive care unit, and hospital stays in patients with cardiogenic shock of both ischemic and non-ischemic etiologies, as well as septic shock.