Anatomic fixation in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

"Anatomic" anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of surgical techniques and reporting of surgical data

PURPOSE

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate studies published on anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

METHODS

A systematic electronic search was performed by use of the Medline and Embase databases. Studies that were published from January 1995 to April 2009 were included. The selection criteria were studies that reported on a surgical technique for "anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction" on skeletally mature living human subjects and were written in English. Data collected and analyzed included a variety of surgical data. Tables were created to provide an overview of surgical techniques for anatomic ACL reconstruction.

RESULTS

Seventy-four studies were included in this review. Some surgical factors were adequately reported in the majority of the articles: visualizing the native ACL insertion sites, placing the tunnels in the footprint, graft type, and fixation method. However; ACL insertion site measurement, femoral intercondylar notch measurement, individualization of surgery, and intraoperative/postoperative imaging were poorly reported. The most variety was seen in knee flexion angle during femoral tunnel drilling and tensioning pattern of the grafts.

CONCLUSIONS

For most surgical data, there was a gross under-reporting of specific operative technique data. We believe that the details of an "anatomic" operative technique are crucial for the valid interpretations of the outcomes. Thus we encourage authors to report their surgical technique in a specific and standardized fashion.

The double-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic overview

In traditional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a subset of patients complaining of knee instability, especially rotational instability, and athletes not able to return to their preinjury level of sports activity. Currently, controversy exists over the usefulness of the double bundle technique (DBT) in addressing these problems. In order to evaluate the DBT, we completed a literature review from 1969 to February 2006 focusing on anatomy, magnetic resonance imaging, graft incorporation, biomechanics, kinematics, surgical techniques, complications and outcome. The DBT is not a standardized technique, which makes it difficult to compare results. Cadaver studies have proven biomechanical advantages with respect to ap-stability, but assessing the rotational stability remains difficult. There is a lack of available outcome studies with sufficient follow-up to demonstrate the potential advantages of DBT. The theoretical advantages of DBT require careful evaluation with outcome, biomechanical and kinematic studies. In addition, studies are needed to address issues such as graft incorporation and complications. An advantage offered by DBT is the possibility to identify rupture patterns that can lead to surgical preservation of an intact and augmentation of an injured bundle. The approach of augmentating a single bundle technique reconstruction with adequate anterior-posterior but poor rotational stability is promising.

Arthroscopic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using autogenous quadriceps tendon

Recently, the interest in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with double-bundle technique has increased so as to reproduce the original load distribution and kinematics of the knee. We developed an arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction technique using autogenous quadriceps tendon with 2 split grafts and a patellar bone plug. The anteromedial bundle and posterolateral bundle of the ACL are replicated with each split graft of quadriceps tendon and fixed with biodegradable interference screws on the 2 femoral tunnels. The patellar bone plug of the quadriceps tendon is fixed with a biodegradable interference screw within the 1 tibial tunnel. We suggest that our technique using quadriceps tendon may be an alternative in arthroscopic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction after valgus high tibial osteotomy: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Although anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction can successfully restore normal knee biomechanics for knees with typical varus-valgus alignment, the efficacy of the same reconstruction method for knees after a valgus high tibial osteotomy is unclear.

HYPOTHESIS

Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction for valgus knees after a high tibial osteotomy cannot restore normal knee kinematics and can result in abnormally high in situ forces in the ligament graft.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric knees were subjected to valgus high tibial osteotomy followed by an anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. The valgus knees were tested using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor system before and after the ligament reconstruction. The knee kinematics in response to anterior tibial load and combined rotatory loads, as well as the corresponding in situ forces of the anterior cruciate ligament bundles and grafts, were compared between the ligament-intact and ligament-reconstructed valgus knees.

RESULTS

After reconstruction, the anterior tibial translation and internal tibial rotation for the valgus knee decreased approximately 2 mm and 2 degrees , respectively, at low flexion angles compared with those of the anterior cruciate ligament-intact knee (P < .05). The in situ forces in the posterolateral graft became 56% to 200% higher than those in the posterolateral bundle of the intact anterior cruciate ligament (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Performing an anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on knees after valgus high tibial osteotomy may overconstrain the knee and result in high forces in the posterolateral graft, which could predispose it to failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Modifications of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures to reduce posterolateral graft force may be needed for valgus knees after a high tibial osteotomy.