1
|
Vijayan RC, Han R, Wu P, Sheth NM, Ketcha MD, Vagdargi P, Vogt S, Kleinszig G, Osgood GM, Siewerdsen JH, Uneri A. Development of a fluoroscopically guided robotic assistant for instrument placement in pelvic trauma surgery. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2021; 8:035001. [PMID: 34124283 PMCID: PMC8189698 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.8.3.035001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: A method for fluoroscopic guidance of a robotic assistant is presented for instrument placement in pelvic trauma surgery. The solution uses fluoroscopic images acquired in standard clinical workflow and helps avoid repeat fluoroscopy commonly performed during implant guidance. Approach: Images acquired from a mobile C-arm are used to perform 3D-2D registration of both the patient (via patient CT) and the robot (via CAD model of a surgical instrument attached to its end effector, e.g; a drill guide), guiding the robot to target trajectories defined in the patient CT. The proposed approach avoids C-arm gantry motion, instead manipulating the robot to acquire disparate views of the instrument. Phantom and cadaver studies were performed to determine operating parameters and assess the accuracy of the proposed approach in aligning a standard drill guide instrument. Results: The proposed approach achieved average drill guide tip placement accuracy of 1.57 ± 0.47 mm and angular alignment of 0.35 ± 0.32 deg in phantom studies. The errors remained within 2 mm and 1 deg in cadaver experiments, comparable to the margins of errors provided by surgical trackers (but operating without the need for external tracking). Conclusions: By operating at a fixed fluoroscopic perspective and eliminating the need for encoded C-arm gantry movement, the proposed approach simplifies and expedites the registration of image-guided robotic assistants and can be used with simple, non-calibrated, non-encoded, and non-isocentric C-arm systems to accurately guide a robotic device in a manner that is compatible with the surgical workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rohan C. Vijayan
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Runze Han
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Pengwei Wu
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Niral M. Sheth
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Michael D. Ketcha
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Prasad Vagdargi
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | | | | | - Greg M. Osgood
- Johns Hopkins Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Jeffrey H. Siewerdsen
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Computer Science, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Ali Uneri
- Johns Hopkins University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Thilak J, Thadi M, Mane PP, Sharma A, Mohan V, Babu BC. Accuracy of tibial component positioning in the robotic arm assisted versus conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Orthop 2020; 22:367-371. [PMID: 32952328 PMCID: PMC7486415 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.08.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 08/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our study aims to determine the planned accuracy of the tibial component placement in robotic arm assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) versus the conventional jig based UKA of the initial cases done in India for the first time with this particular robotic system.Materials & Methods: Study group 1 consisted of patients who underwent robotic arm (MAKO, Stryker, USA) assisted UKA. Group 2 consists of patients who underwent a standard conventional jig based (Oxford knee, Biomet, UK). Post-operative radiographs were taken to determine the Tibial Implant position and orientation which were compared to their preoperative plan respectively by two independent observers. The mean error value was obtained for both study groups respectively and compared to determine the accuracy of the post-operative tibial implant placement. RESULTS In the Robotic arm assisted UKA, the deviation of post-operative varus angle from preoperative planned angle was about 0.43° and post-operative Tibial slope alignment differed from preoperative plan was 0.41°. In the Conventional UKA group post-operative varus angle differed from preoperative planned angle by about 2.12° and post-operative Tibial slope alignment deviation from preoperative plan was 2.47°. CONCLUSIONS Robotic arm assisted system was more accurate compared to the conventional jig-based technique in achieving the planned orientation and alignment of the tibial implant in the initial learning phase of this particular Robotic System used for the first time in India. MESH TERMS partial knee replacement, robotic assisted surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jai Thilak
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Mohan Thadi
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | | | - Anubhav Sharma
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Vipin Mohan
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| | - Balu C. Babu
- Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences, Kochi, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang M, Li D, Shang X, Wang J. A review of computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems. Int J Med Robot 2020; 16:1-28. [PMID: 32362063 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems have great potential, but no review has focused on computer-assisted surgery systems for the spine, hip, and knee. METHODS A systematic search was performed in Web of Science and PubMed. We searched the literature on computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems from 2008 to the present and focused on three aspects of systems: training, planning, and intraoperative navigation. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION In this review study, we reviewed 34 surgical training systems, 31 surgical planning systems, and 41 surgical navigation systems. The functions and characteristics of the surgical systems were compared and analysed, and the current concerns about and the impact of the surgical systems on doctors and surgery were clarified. CONCLUSION Computer-assisted orthopaedic surgery systems are still in the development stage. Future surgical training systems should include synthetic models with patient anatomy. Surgical planning systems with automatic planning should be developed, and surgical navigation systems with multimodal fusion, robotic assistance and imaging should be developed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monan Wang
- Mechanical & Power Engineering College , Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Donghui Li
- Mechanical & Power Engineering College , Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Xiping Shang
- Mechanical & Power Engineering College , Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| | - Jian Wang
- Mechanical & Power Engineering College , Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Casper M, Mitra R, Khare R, Jaramaz B, Hamlin B, McGinley B, Mayman D, Headrick J, Urish K, Gittins M, Incavo S, Neginhal V. Accuracy assessment of a novel image-free handheld robot for Total Knee Arthroplasty in a cadaveric study. Comput Assist Surg (Abingdon) 2019; 23:14-20. [PMID: 30307763 DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2018.1519038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical navigation has been shown to improve the accuracy of bone preparation and limb alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Previous work has shown the effectiveness of various types of navigation systems. Here, for the first time, we assessed the accuracy of a novel imageless semiautonomous handheld robotic sculpting system in performing bone resection and preparation in TKA using cadaveric specimens. In this study, we compared the planned and final implant placement in 18 cadaveric specimens undergoing TKA using the new tool. Eight surgeons carried out the procedures using three types of implant designs. A quantitative analysis was performed to determine the translational, angular, and rotational differences between the planned and achieved positions of the implants. The mean femoral flexion, varus/valgus, and rotational error was -2.0°, -0.1°, and -0.5°, respectively. The mean tibial posterior slope, and varus/valgus error was -0.2°, and -0.2°, respectively. We obtained higher flexion errors for the femoral implant when using cut-guides as compared to using a bur for cutting the bones. The image-free robotic sculpting tool achieved accurate implementation of the surgical plan with small errors in implant placement. Future studies will focus on determining how well the accurate implant placement translates into a clinical and functional benefit for the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Rahul Khare
- a Smith & Nephew Inc. , Pittsburgh , PA , USA
| | | | - Brian Hamlin
- b Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , The Bone and Joint Center, Magee Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh , PA , USA
| | - Brian McGinley
- c John T. Mather Memorial hospital , Port Jefferson , NY , USA
| | - David Mayman
- d Orthopaedic Surgery , Hospital for Special Surgery , New York , NY , USA
| | - Jeff Headrick
- e Orthopedic Surgeon , The Center for Orthopedic Surgery , Lubbock , TX , USA
| | - Kenneth Urish
- f Arthritis and Arthroplasty Design Group , The Bone and Joint Center, Magee Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.,g Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Bioengineering, and Clinical and Translational Science Institute , University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , PA , USA.,h Department of Biomedical Engineering , Carnegie Mellon University, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh , PA , USA
| | | | - Stephen Incavo
- j Adult Reconstructive Surgery , Houston Methodist Hospital Center for Orthopaedic Surgery , Houston , TX , USA.,k Houston Methodist Hospital , Houston , TX , USA
| | - Vivek Neginhal
- l Orthopedic Surgeon, Scott Orthopedic Center , Huntington , WV , USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Establishing Age-Specific Cost-Effective Annual Revision Rates for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis. J Arthroplasty 2017; 32:326-335. [PMID: 27692825 DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Revised: 08/13/2016] [Accepted: 08/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved survivorship has contributed to the increased use of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. However, heterogeneity among cost-effectiveness analysis studies comparing UKA to TKA has prevented the derivation of discrete implant survivorship targets. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the age-stratified annual revision rate (ARR) threshold for UKA to become consistently cost-effective for unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. METHODS A systematic search was performed for cost-effectiveness analysis studies of UKA vs TKA. Selected publications were rated by evidence level and assessed for methodological quality. Target UKA survivorship values determined by sensitivity analysis were retrieved, converted to ARR, and combined by age category (<65, 65-74, and ≥75 years) to estimate age-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds. RESULTS Four studies met all inclusion criteria. All publications were evidence level I-B, with high methodological quality. Combined data indicated median threshold cost-effective ARR of 1.471% (interquartile range [IQR], 1.415-1.833; age <65), 1.135% (IQR, 1.011-1.260; age 65-74), and 1.760% (IQR, 1.660-2.880; age ≥75). Current revision rates are already below the cost-effective threshold for patients aged ≥75, but exceed recommended values in younger patients. CONCLUSION The findings indicate that implant survivorship is a limiting factor toward achieving cost-effective UKA in patients aged <65. Strategies to improve UKA survivorship, such as shifting procedures to high-volume centers, may render UKA cost-effective in younger patients. This presents an opportunity for resource reallocation within health systems to achieve cost-effective utilization of UKA across a broader population segment.
Collapse
|