How I Manage the Multiple-Ligament Injured Knee

The Influence of Graft Tensioning Sequence on Tibiofemoral Orientation During Bicruciate and Posterolateral Corner Knee Ligament Reconstruction: A Biomechanical Study

BACKGROUND

During multiple knee ligament reconstructions, the graft tensioning order may influence the final tibiofemoral orientation and corresponding knee kinematics. Nonanatomic tibiofemoral orientation may result in residual knee instability, altered joint loading, and an increased propensity for graft failure.

PURPOSE

To biomechanically evaluate the effect of different graft tensioning sequences on knee tibiofemoral orientation after multiple knee ligament reconstructions in a bicruciate ligament (anterior cruciate ligament [ACL] and posterior cruciate ligament [PCL]) with a posterolateral corner (PLC)-injured knee.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Ten nonpaired, fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were utilized for this study. After reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments and the PLC and proximal graft fixation, each knee was randomly assigned to each of 4 graft tensioning order groups: (1) PCL → ACL → PLC, (2) PCL → PLC → ACL, (3) PLC → ACL → PCL, and (4) ACL → PCL → PLC. Tibiofemoral orientation after graft tensioning was measured and compared with the intact state.

RESULTS

Tensioning the ACL first (tensioning order 4) resulted in posterior displacement of the tibia at 0° by 1.7 ± 1.3 mm compared with the intact state ( P = .002). All tensioning orders resulted in significantly increased tibial anterior translation compared with the intact state at higher flexion angles ranging from 2.7 mm to 3.2 mm at 60° and from 3.1 mm to 3.4 mm at 90° for tensioning orders 1 and 2, respectively (all P < .001). There was no significant difference in tibiofemoral orientation in the sagittal plane between the tensioning orders at higher flexion angles. All tensioning orders resulted in increased tibial internal rotation (all P < .001). Tensioning and fixing the PLC first (tensioning order 3) resulted in the most increases in internal rotation of the tibia: 2.4° ± 1.9°, 2.7° ± 1.8°, and 2.0° ± 2.0° at 0°, 30°, and 60°, respectively.

CONCLUSION

None of the tensioning orders restored intact knee tibiofemoral orientation. Tensioning the PLC first should be avoided in bicruciate knee ligament reconstruction with concurrent PLC reconstruction because it significantly increased tibial internal rotation. We recommend that the PCL be tensioned first, followed by the ACL, to avoid posterior translation of the tibia in extension where the knee is primarily loaded during most activities. The PLC should be tensioned last.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study will help guide surgeons in decision making for the graft tensioning order during multiple knee ligament reconstructions.

The timing of surgical treatment of knee dislocations: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Traumatic knee dislocations (KDs) are unusual yet limb-threatening injuries; the timing of surgical intervention is still debated. A systematic review was performed to determine the optimal timing of surgery with respect to injury pattern.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed for studies published between 1 January 1974 and 20 April 2014 on the surgical management of "knee dislocation" and "multiligament knee injuries". Surgical timing was classified as acute, chronic, or staged. A systematic review was performed for patients with KD-III according to Schenck's classification using individual patient data.

RESULTS

Twelve studies including 150 patients (153 knees) with KDs fulfilled the study requirements. Sixty-nine cases with KD-IIIM and 84 cases with KD-IIIL were identified. Excellent or good results were demonstrated in 79.1 % (34 cases) of cases managed with staged treatment versus 58.4 % (45 cases) of cases undergoing acute surgery (p = 0.02), and versus 45.5 % (15 cases) of cases undergoing chronic surgery (p = 0.002). No statistically significant difference was found in the percentage of excellent or good results between the acute and chronic surgery groups (n.s.), or between the KD-IIIM and KD-IIIL groups (n.s.).

CONCLUSION

Staged treatment yields the best clinical results for patients with KD-III. No statistically significant difference was shown in the clinical results between acute surgery and chronic surgery groups.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Surgical management of the multiple-ligament injured knee: a case series from Chongqing, China and review of published reports

OBJECTIVE

The correct management of multiple-ligament injured knees (MLIKs) remains controversial. This study aimed to summarize the epidemiological features and short-term results of patients treated in our department.

METHODS

Sixty-six patients diagnosed with MLIKs from 2009 to 2011 were enrolled. Relevant patient characteristics and clinical variables were analyzed to characterize the epidemiology. A surgical algorithm based on a knee dislocation classification system and postoperative rating scales, including Lysholm and Tegner rating, as well as joint mobility, stability and radiography were collected for functional evaluation at 2.5-year follow-up.

RESULTS

The epidemiological profile demonstrated that 30- to 50-year-old men were at the highest risk. The primary causes were vehicle accidents and falls and most common injury type cruciate combined collateral ligament injuries. Final follow-up analysis comparing operative versus conservative management and surgically treated mild versus severe MLIKs showed significant differences in Lysholm and Tegner scale scores, as well as knee mobility and stability.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic outcome of MLIKs depends on various clinical variables and a surgical algorithm. Satisfactory restoration of function was acquired in the majority of our surgically treated MLIK cases; however, most patients had not achieved their pre-injury activity levels by the follow-up endpoint.