Patch Augmentation and Patch Extension for Complex Rotator Cuff Tears

Mini-Open Fascia Lata Interposition Graft Results In Superior 2-Year Clinical Outcomes When Compared to Arthroscopic Partial Repair for Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tear: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate and compare the results of surgical treatment for irreparable rotator cuff tear (IRCT) by the mini-open interposition procedure using fascia lata autograft against outcomes of the arthroscopic partial repair technique.

METHODS

An interventional, prospective, controlled, randomized, single-blinded study involving 2 study groups was conducted. The graft group (n = 20) underwent the mini-open interposition procedure using fascia lata autograft. The control group (n = 22) underwent arthroscopic partial repair. Patients were evaluated using the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder scale, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the Constant-Murley (Constant) score, the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, active range of motion, frontal flexion strength, retear rates evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging analysis, occurrence of complications, and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

The graft group had better UCLA (31.5 vs 28.18, P = .035) (100% exceeded the MCID for the graft group and 95% for the control group), ASES (88.62 vs 77.06, P = .016) (100% exceeded the MCID for both groups), Constant (78.85 vs 61.68, P < .001), and VAS (0.95 vs 2.59, P = .01) scores at the 24-month follow-up. For active forward elevation range, both groups showed no statistically significant differences (168.5 vs 164.54, P = .538). The results for active external and internal rotation were better in the graft group (60.25 vs 40, and 9.1 vs 6.9, P < .001), as was frontal flexion strength (4.24 vs 2.67, P = .005). The graft group also had lower retear rates (15% vs 45.5%, P = .033). No complications were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of surgeries for IRCT by the mini-open interposition procedure using fascia lata autograft and by the arthroscopic partial repair technique showed good results in both groups over time and exceeded the MCID. However, most comparative outcomes between groups showed better results for the interposition procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Natural, synthetic and commercially-available biopolymers used to regenerate tendons and ligaments

Tendon and ligament (TL) injuries affect millions of people annually. Biopolymers play a significant role in TL tissue repair, whether the treatment relies on tissue engineering strategies or using artificial tendon grafts. The biopolymer governs the mechanical properties, biocompatibility, degradation, and fabrication method of the TL scaffold. Many natural, synthetic and hybrid biopolymers have been studied in TL regeneration, often combined with therapeutic agents and minerals to engineer novel scaffold systems. However, most of the advanced biopolymers have not advanced to clinical use yet. Here, we aim to review recent biopolymers and discuss their features for TL tissue engineering. After introducing the properties of the native tissue, we discuss different types of natural, synthetic and hybrid biopolymers used in TL tissue engineering. Then, we review biopolymers used in commercial absorbable and non-absorbable TL grafts. Finally, we explain the challenges and future directions for the development of novel biopolymers in TL regenerative treatment.

•

Both natural and synthetic biopolymers are reviewed for regeneration of TL and their interface tissues.

•

Advances on hybrid-composite biopolymers to fabricate TL scaffolds were reviewed.

•

The current biopolymers used in commercial TL grafts are discussed.

•

The challenges and emerging strategies for biopolymer development are presented.

Biofabrication and Signaling Strategies for Tendon/Ligament Interfacial Tissue Engineering

Tendons and ligaments (TL) have poor healing capability, and for serious injuries like tears or ruptures, surgical intervention employing autografts or allografts is usually required. Current tissue replacements are nonideal and can lead to future problems such as high retear rates, poor tissue integration, or heterotopic ossification. Alternatively, tissue engineering strategies are being pursued using biodegradable scaffolds. As tendons connect muscle and bone and ligaments attach bones, the interface of TL with other tissues represent complex structures, and this intricacy must be considered in tissue engineered approaches. In this paper, we review recent biofabrication and signaling strategies for biodegradable polymeric scaffolds for TL interfacial tissue engineering. First, we discuss biodegradable polymeric scaffolds based on the fabrication techniques as well as the target tissue application. Next, we consider the effect of signaling factors, including cell culture, growth factors, and biophysical stimulation. Then, we discuss human clinical studies on TL tissue healing using commercial synthetic scaffolds that have occurred over the past decade. Finally, we highlight the challenges and future directions for biodegradable scaffolds in the field of TL and interface tissue engineering.