The Ross Procedure in Children: The Gold Standard?

Long-Term Outcomes of Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement in Children

When the options of aortic valve repair or the Ross procedure are not feasible or have been exhausted, mechanical aortic valve replacement (AVR) may provide a reliable and structurally durable alternative, but with the limitations of long-term anticoagulation, thrombosis risk and lack of valve growth potential. In this article, we review the longitudinal outcomes of mechanical AVR in children in our institution and compare them to those recently reported by others. From 1978 to 2020, 62 patients underwent mechanical AVR at a median age of 12.4 years (interquartile range (IQR): 8.6-16.8 years). The most common underlying diagnoses were: conotruncal anomalies (40%, 25/62), congenital aortic stenosis (16%, 10/62), rheumatic valve disease (16%, 10/62), connective tissue disease (8.1%, 5/62) and infective endocarditis (6.5%, 4/62). Thirty-two patients (52%, 32/62) had at least 1 prior aortic valve surgery prior to mechanical AVR. Early death was 3.2% (2/62). Median follow-up was 14.4 years (IQR: 8.4-28.2 years). Kaplan-Meier survival was 96.8%, 91.9%, 86.3%, and 81.9% at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years. On competing risk analysis, the proportion of patients alive without aortic valve reoperation at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years was 95.2%, 87.0%, 75.5% and 55.4%, respectively, while the proportion of patients that had aortic valve reoperation (with death as a competing event) at 1, 5, 10, and 20 years was 1.6%, 4.9%, 12.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. In conclusion, when the options of aortic valve repair or the Ross procedure are not feasible in children, mechanical AVR is an alternative, yet the long-term rates of mortality and need for aortic valve reoperation are of concern.

Ross Procedure in the era of Handmade-Valved Conduits for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction in Children: Short-Term Surgical Outcomes

Objective

Ross procedure is considered as the “gold standard” for aortic valve replacement, but the conduits used for right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction, such as homografts and bovine jugular vein (BJV) conduits, are of limited availability in China. Handmade expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-valved conduits (HVCs) have been used recently as the alternative for RVOT reconstruction, but their specific experience in Ross procedure is limited in the literature.

Methods

This was a retrospective review of 27 children who underwent Ross procedure in our center from January 2018 to January 2022.

Results

Mean age at surgery was 8.0 ± 3.8 years. During the study period, BJV conduits were used for RVOT reconstruction in 6 patients (22%), and HVCs were used in 21 patients (78%). Median conduit size was 20 mm (range, 16–24 mm), and mean conduit Z-score was +0.8 ± 0.9. Median time for cardiopulmonary bypass was 158 min (range, 109–275 min), and mean time for aortic crossclamping was 110 ± 21 min. There was no early mortality. During a median follow-up time of 1.4 years (range, 0.1–3.7 years), 3 patients (11%) with BJV conduits had peak conduit velocity of > 3.5 m/s; 3 patients (11%) with HVCs developed moderate conduit insufficiency; no patients had more than moderate conduit insufficiency. Three patients with BJV conduits had 5 reinterventions, and all received conduit replacement with HVCs.

Conclusion

HVC is an appealing alternative to BJV conduit for RVOT construction for children undergoing Ross procedure, with favorable short-term outcomes.