Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A Useful Option for Recalcitrant Symptomatic Patellofemoral Arthritis

Surgical technique in patellofemoral arthroplasty

Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has seen its role validated over the last decade as a treatment for severe Iwano III or IV patellofemoral osteoarthritis (PFOA). The ideal indication is PFOA with femoral trochlear dysplasia. The accumulation of data on factors influencing the likelihood of PFA failure or success when using first- or second-generation implants has led to design changes, which have been incorporated into modern third-generation implants. These implants are positioned using anatomic cuts, with instrumentation kits that ensure accurate and reproducible alignment. Their design corrects the femoral trochlear dysplasia. Refinements in the indications of PFA, together with advances in prosthetic kinematics and improved understanding of the surgical technique, have strengthened the role for PFA. Although either a lateral or a medial approach can be used, the lateral approach deserves preference. Proper orientation of the femoral and patellar implants is crucial and can be achieved in an accurate and reproducible manner. Orientation of the coronal femoral cut is the only modifiable variable. The cut should be performed with the knee in neutral rotation to minimise both the tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance and the amount of extensor apparatus valgus. In the coronal plane, the femoral component must be positioned in valgus, to align the distal part of the trochlear implant with the lateral condylar cartilage. Medial positioning of the patellar component finalises the match between the femur and the patella. This coronal alignment of the two components promotes patellar engagement at the beginning of knee flexion. Thus, the technique brings the trochlea towards the patella and the patella towards the trochlea, thereby ensuring optimal patellofemoral tracking and ensuring a good final outcome. When these requirements are met, the functional and radiographic outcomes are predictable, of good quality, and sustained over time, provided the patient remains free of tibio-femoral osteoarthritis.

Chondral Injury in Patellofemoral Instability

OBJECTIVE

Patellofemoral instability is common and affects a predominantly young age group. Chondral injury occurs in up to 95%, and includes osteochondral fractures and loose bodies acutely and secondary degenerative changes in recurrent cases. Biomechanical abnormalities, such as trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, predispose to both recurrent dislocations and patellofemoral arthrosis.

DESIGN

In this article, we review the mechanisms of chondral injury in patellofemoral instability, diagnostic modalities, the distribution of lesions seen in acute and episodic dislocation, and treatments for articular cartilage lesions of the patellofemoral joint.

RESULTS

Little specific evidence exists for cartilage treatments in patellofemoral instability. In general, the results of reparative and restorative procedures in the patellofemoral joint are inferior to those observed in other compartments of the knee.

CONCLUSION

Given the increased severity of chondral lesions and progression to osteoarthritis seen with recurrent dislocations, careful consideration should be given to early stabilisation in patients with predisposing factors.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty

Patellofemoral arthroplasty remains controversial, primarily due to the high failure rates reported with early implants. Several case series have been published over the years, which describe the results with various first- and second-generation implants. The purpose of this work was to summarize results published up to now and identify common themes for implants, surgical techniques, and indications. First-generation resurfacing implants had relatively high failure rates in the medium term. Second-generation implants, with femoral cuts based on TKA designs, have yielded more promising medium-term results. The surgical indications are quite specific and must be chosen carefully to minimize poor results. Short-term complications are generally related to patellar maltracking, while long-term complications are generally related to progression of osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral joint. Implant loosening and polyethylene wear are rare. Overall, recent improvements in implant design and surgical techniques have resulted in better short- and medium-term results. But more work is required to assess the long-term outcomes of modern implant designs.

Patellofemoral joint replacement, an evolving concept

Isolated patellofemoral arthritis is a rare disease, whose management is challenging and controversial. Patellofemoral joint replacement can be an effective treatment for this condition. The very concept of a patellofemoral implant has evolved throughout the years, resulting in more anatomic designs and reproducible surgical techniques. The clinical outcomes of this procedure are strictly related to surgical indications, implant design and appropriate surgical technique.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

PURPOSE

Patellofemoral arthroplasty remains controversial, primarily due to the high failure rates reported with early implants. Numerous case series have been published over the years detailing results of various first- and second-generation implants. The purpose of this work is to summarize results published to date and identify common themes regarding implants, surgical techniques, and indications in order to maximize results of future procedures.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of the MEDLINE database was carried out to identify all clinical studies related to patellofemoral arthroplasty.

RESULTS

First-generation resurfacing implants were associated with relatively high failure rates in the medium term. Second-generation implants, with femoral cuts based on TKA designs have yielded more promising medium-term results. Surgical indications are specific and must be carefully followed to minimize poor results. Short-term complications are generally related to patellar maltracking, while long-term complications are generally related to progression of osteoarthritis in the tibiofemoral joint. Implant loosening and polyethylene wear are rarely reported. Short-term results are favourable for new technology including custom implants and computer navigated surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, recent improvements in implant design and surgical techniques have resulted in improvements in short- and medium-term results. More work is required to assess the long-term outcomes of modern implant designs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.