Cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using a direct anterior approach

Cemented Femoral Fixation in a High-Risk Cohort Diminishes Risk of Early Postoperative Periprosthetic Fracture

BACKGROUND

Early periprosthetic fractures (PPFx) following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) create significant morbidity. Established risk factors for early PPFx include age, gender, body mass index, surgical approach, and implant fixation. We investigated the role of femoral fixation on early PPFx (<90 days postoperatively) in a high-risk cohort undergoing direct anterior approach (DAA) THA.

METHODS

The final cohort comprised 344 consecutive patients (390 hips) with risk factors for PPFx (age >68 years and body mass index <25 kg/m2) who underwent primary DAA THA between May 4, 2009 and December 31, 2019 and had 90-day follow-up. Noncemented fixation was used in 229-hips, while cemented fixation was used in 161 hips. The primary outcome was early PPFx. Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables, while t-tests were used to compare continuous variables.

RESULTS

We observed 8 early PPFx (2.1%), all fractures occurring in the noncemented group. Baseline demographics were similar but not equal, with the cemented group being older (78.0 versus 76.3 years; P = .004) with a greater proportion of females (91.9% versus 69.4%; P < .001). The rate of early PPFx was significantly higher with noncemented fixation compared to cemented fixation (3.5% versus 0.0%; P = .023). A post hoc power analysis confirmed sufficient power (1-β = 0.81).

CONCLUSION

Although baseline risk factors for early PPFx are not easily modifiable, surgical factors can be modified. Cemented fixation has the potential to markedly reduce the risk of early PPFx in high-risk patients undergoing DAA THA.

Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship of Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Anterior Approach

INTRODUCTION

There is growing evidence that cemented femoral stems have lower complication rates in the elderly due to lower rates of periprosthetic fracture. The main objective of this study was to analyze the survival rate of a hybrid total hip arthroplasty (THA) construct utilizing a taper-slip femoral stem implanted through the anterior approach (AA). Secondary outcome measures were the complication rate, the rate of aseptic loosening, coronal plane alignment of the stem, and the grade of the cement mantle.

METHODS

Patients who underwent AA hybrid THA from 2013 to 2020 were included. Indications for a cemented stem were age over 70 or patients with poor bone quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated for patient characteristics. Serial radiographs were reviewed for component alignment and for evidence of implant loosening. The survival of the femoral stem was recorded, with failure defined as femoral stem revision for any reason or radiographic evidence of implant loosening.

RESULTS

A total of 473 hybrid THA in 426 patients were identified, with a mean age of 76 years. Mean follow-up was 38 months. Femoral stem survival was 99.2%. There were no cases of aseptic loosening of the femoral component. Mean coronal stem alignment was 0.2 degrees varus, and all were within 5 degrees of neutral. Cement mantle grade was either A or B in 94% of cases.

CONCLUSION

AA hybrid THA is an excellent option in elderly patients, or patients with poor bone quality, with a femoral stem survival rate of 99.2% and a 0% rate of aseptic loosening.

Cemented femoral stem fixation through the anterior approach has fewer early complications than cementless fixation

AIMS

To achieve the functional benefits of the direct anterior (DA) approach and the fixation benefits of cemented replacement, this study combined the two techniques posing the following questions: does the limited access of the DA approach adversely affect the cement technique?; and does such a cementing technique reduce the incidence of cementless complications?

METHODS

A consecutive series of 341 patients (360 hips) receiving the DA approach between 2016 and 2018 were reviewed. There were 203 cementless stems and 157 cemented stems. Mean age was 75 years (70 to 86) in the cementless group and 76 years (52 to 94) in the cemented group, with 239 (70%) females in the whole series. Femoral complications were compared between the two groups. Mean follow-up was 1.5 years (0.1 to 4.4) for patients in the cementless group and 1.3 years (0.0 to 3.9) for patients in the cemented group.

RESULTS

The cementless group had a higher rate of femoral complications (8 vs 0; p = 0.011). There were two loose stems and six fractures, all requiring revision. Fractures occurred a mean 14.5 days (2 to 31) postoperatively and loosening at 189 days and 422 days postoperatively. Femoral cementing can be done using the DA approach safely and reduces the number of complications compared with a contemporary cementless series.

CONCLUSION

A higher rate of early fractures and loosening occurred with cementless stems. This was not observed in our cemented stem cohort and cementing was safely accomplished through the DA approach. The modern femoral cementing process with the DA approach does not add to surgical complexity or time, has fewer early complications, and is a safer option for older patients compared to cementless femoral arthroplasties. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(7 Supple B):33-37.

Femoral Stem Cementation in Hip Arthroplasty: The Know-How of a "Lost" Art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the (1) indications, (2) preoperative precautions, and (3) stepwise technical details of modern femoral stem cemented fixation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Femoral stem cementation provides excellent implant longevity with a low periprosthetic fracture rate among patients with compromised bone quality or aberrant anatomy. Unfamiliarity with the details of modern cementation techniques among trainees who may lack frequent exposure to cementing femoral stems may preclude them from offering this viable option to suitable patients in later stages of their careers. As such, maximizing benefit from cemented femoral stem fixation among suitable candidates is contingent upon the meticulous use of modern cementation techniques. In addition to proper patient selection, modern cementation techniques emphasize the use of (1) pulsatile lavage of the femoral canal, (2) utilization of epinephrine-soaked swabs, (3) vacuum cement mixing, (4) retrograde cement introduction, (5) cement pressurization, and (6) the use of stem centralizers. Furthermore, identifying and optimizing the preoperative status of at-risk patients with pre-existing cardiopulmonary compromise, in addition to intraoperative vigilance, are essential for mitigating the risk of developing bone cement implantation syndrome. Further research is required to assess the utility of cemented femoral stem fixation among younger patients.