Practical molecular diagnostics in neuropathology: making a tough job a little easier

Survival Associations Using Perfusion and Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Histologic and Genetic Defined Diffuse Glioma World Health Organization Grades II and III

OBJECTIVE

According to the new World Health Organization 2016 classification for tumors of the central nervous system, 1p/19q codeletion defines the genetic hallmark that differentiates oligodendrogliomas from diffuse astrocytomas. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) histogram analysis can stratify survival in adult patients with genetic defined diffuse glioma grades II and III.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with untreated diffuse gliomas World Health Organization grades II and III and known 1p/19q codeletion status were included retrospectively and analyzed using ADC and rCBV maps based on whole-tumor volume histograms. Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed by using Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses adjusted for known survival predictors.

RESULTS

Significant longer PFS was associated with homogeneous rCBV distribution-higher rCBVpeak (median, 37 vs 26 months; hazard ratio [HR], 3.2; P = 0.02) in patients with astrocytomas, and heterogeneous rCBV distribution-lower rCBVpeak (median, 46 vs 37 months; HR, 5.3; P < 0.001) and higher rCBVmean (median, 44 vs 39 months; HR, 7.9; P = 0.003) in patients with oligodendrogliomas. Apparent diffusion coefficient parameters (ADCpeak, ADCmean) did not stratify PFS and overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumors with heterogeneous perfusion signatures and high average values were associated with longer PFS in patients with oligodendrogliomas. On the contrary, heterogeneous perfusion distribution was associated with poor outcome in patients with diffuse astrocytomas.

Combination genetic signature stratifies lower-grade gliomas better than histological grade

We studied if combination genetic signature potentially stratifies lower-grade gliomas better than histology by investigating 214 lower-grade gliomas for IDH1/2 and TERTp mutations, 1p/19q codeletion and EGFR amplification as to their impact on prognostication. Prognostic association of grading was independent of other prognostic variables including age, histological type, IDH1/2, 1p/19q and TERTp status. No single marker, including IDH1/2, superseded grading in prognostication, indicating grading was still a very important tool. Prognosis was most favorable in 31.7% of patients with IDH1/2 mutation and either 1p/19q codeletion or TERTp mutation (IDHmut-OT), intermediate in 45.8% of patients with IDH1/2 mutation only (IDHmut) and 16.9% of patients without any of the alterations (IDHwt), and poorest in 5.6% of patients with wild-type IDH1/2 and either TERTp mutation or EGFR amplification (IDHwt-ET). Our results suggested not all IDH1/2 wild-type lower-grade gliomas are aggressive and additional biomarkers are required to identify glioblastoma-equivalent tumors. Multivariate analysis revealed independent prognostic values of grading and genetic signature. Grade II IDHwt-ET gliomas exhibited shorter survival than IDH1/2 mutated grade III gliomas, suggesting combination genetic signature potentially superseded grading in prognostication. In summary, biomarker-based stratification is useful in the diagnosis and prognostication of lower-grade gliomas, and should be used together with grading.

1p/19q testing has no significance in the workup of glioblastomas

AIMS

To determine whether testing for isolated 1p or 19q losses, or as a codeletion, has any significance in the workup of glioblastomas (GBMs).

METHODS

Upfront 1p/19q testing by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based loss of heterozygosity (LOH) was done in 491 gliomas that were histologically diagnosed as GBMs. Outcomes were determined and measured against 1p/19q results.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight showed apparent 1p/19q codeletion by either FISH and/or PCR-based LOH, but only 1/26 showed codeletion by both tests. Over 90% of tumours with apparent codeletion by either FISH or LOH also had 10q LOH and/or EGFR amplification, features inversely related to true whole-arm 1p/19q codeletion. Furthermore, only 1/28 tumours demonstrated an R132H IDH1 mutation. Neither 1p/19q codeletion by FISH nor LOH had an impact on GBM survival. Isolated losses of 1p or 19q also had no impact on survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that (i) 1p/19q testing is not useful on gliomas that are histologically GBMs; (ii) codeletion testing should be reserved only for cases with compatible morphology; and (iii) EGFR, 10q, and IDH1 testing can help act as safeguards against a false-positive 1p/19q result.

How molecular testing can help (and hurt) in the workup of gliomas

Advances in genetics research have greatly expanded our ability to accurately diagnose gliomas and provide more useful prognostic information. Herein specific examples are used to show how high-yield targets such as EGFR, 1p/19q, IDH1/2, MGMT, and BRAF can expand the power of the surgical neuropathologist. To avoid errors, however, the significance and controversies associated with each test must be thoroughly understood.

Something old and something new about molecular diagnostics in gliomas

Progress in our understanding of the molecular biology of neoplasms has been driven by remarkable improvements in molecular biology techniques. This has created a rapidly moving field in which even subspecialists struggle to keep abreast of the current literature. Nowhere is this more clearly demonstrated than in neuro-oncology, wherein molecular diagnostics can now wring more clinically useful information out of very small biopsies than ever before. Herein the biologic and practical aspects of four key molecular biomarkers in gliomas are discussed, including two that have been known for some time (1p/19q codeletion and EGFR amplification) as well as two whose relevance was discovered via advanced whole-genome assays (IDH1/2 mutations and BRAF alterations).

The importance of 10q status in an outcomes-based comparison between 1p/19q fluorescence in situ hybridization and polymerase chain reaction-based microsatellite loss of heterozygosity analysis of oligodendrogliomas

1p/19q codeletion is a favorable prognostic marker of oligodendrogliomas. Although fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and microsatellite-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) are common methods to test for 1p/19q codeletion, it is unclear which test is better at prognostic stratification. This study analyzed outcomes of 111 oligodendrogliomas with both 1p/19q FISH and LOH done at the time of diagnosis. Overall concordance between the 2 assays was 81.1%. In grade III oligodendrogliomas, LOH was better than FISH at survival stratification (p < 0.0001 for LOH vs p = 0.02 for FISH), although increasing the stringency of FISH interpretation criteria improved concordance and prognostic power. Oligodendrogliomas that were 1p/19q-codeleted by FISH but also had 10q LOH were negative for 1p/19q codeletion by PCR analysis in more than 70% of cases, with very poor survival in the grade III subset. Thus, although PCR-based LOH is a better stratifier of 1p/19q status, FISH still has clinical and prognostic utility, especially if 10q data can be incorporated.

EGFR expression stratifies oligodendroglioma behavior

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression and signaling contribute to glioma biological features and, thus, are a target for new drug development. The role, if any, of EGFR in routine surgical neuropathological diagnostics is less clear. Herein, we describe prospective EGFR IHC analysis in an adult cohort comprising 750 infiltrative gliomas. EGFR expression increased with World Health Organization grade but did not significantly differ between grade-matched astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors. Survival did not significantly differ by EGFR expression among astrocytic tumors adjusted for World Health Organization grade. However, grade II oligodendrogliomas with strong EGFR expression and 1p/19q codeletion showed reduced survival, compared with their codeleted counterparts with weaker EGFR expression. Surprisingly, an inverse phenomenon was found with grade III anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, in which stronger EGFR expression was a favorable marker for survival. Among all gliomas, the likelihood of EGFR amplification, as viewed by fluorescence in situ hybridization, increased with the strength of EGFR expression, and <1% of cases with weak or no EGFR immunostaining showed amplification. These data suggest that EGFR IHC is useful in certain circumstances (ie, it may help supplement 1p/19q prognostic information in oligodendroglial tumors and screen out cases that would not benefit from more costly EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis).

Gone FISHing: clinical lessons learned in brain tumor molecular diagnostics over the last decade

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is a powerful, morphology-based technique to assess targeted copy number alterations or gene rearrangements in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. It has a wide range of applications in routine clinical contexts to identify cytogenetic biomarkers for more accurate diagnosis and prognostic stratification. This review and update addresses practical uses of FISH as a molecular diagnostic tool in the setting of brain tumors, including gliomas, embryonal neoplasms, ependymomas and meningiomas, focusing on key genetic biomarkers, such as 1p19q codeletion, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification, BRAF rearrangement and many others. Also discussed are lessons learned over the past decade, including common technical issues to consider when implementing and interpreting FISH results in a clinical setting.