Diagnostic use of immunohistochemistry in uterine mesenchymal tumors

Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) and the accuracy of proposed classification systems in predicting the malignant versus non-malignant behavior

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of available classification systems (Folpe, modified Folpe, Bennet, and Schoolmester) in predicting the behavior of uterine Perivascular Epithelioid Cell tumors (PEComas).

METHODS

We reviewed the pathology registry to identify all uterine PEComas treated at our center. We conducted a systematic literature review searching electronic databases from inception to November 2023. We included all references reporting at least one case of uterine PEComa; cases associated with tuberous sclerosis complex were excluded. Patient-level data were extracted by identified records. Survival analysis was used to assess the accuracy of all proposed classification systems to classify uterine PEComas as malignant versus non-malignant.

RESULTS

Six uterine PEComas were treated at our center. The literature search identified 101 uterine PEComas from 32 studies. Eighty-five out of 107 PEComas (28 studies and our series) reported enough follow-up data and details to apply all four classifications. The modified Folpe classification demonstrated the highest hazard ratio (HR) for relapse (HR:8.63; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.06-36.1) and death due to PEComa (HR:6.8, 95%CI:0.89-51.6) for malignant versus non-malignant PEComas. Changing the cut-off of PEComa size to ≥8 cm and mitotic figures per 50 high power fields to ≥5, the HR for recurrence lowered (HR:6.26; 95% CI 2.20-17.80), but HR for death increased (HR:10.3; 95% CI 1.35-77.80).

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Folpe classification was the most accurate in predicting the PEComa behavior. Changing the cut-off of PEComa size and number of mitotic figures may improve the accuracy in predicting death due to disease.

A case report of lymphangioleiomyomatosis with retroperitoneal masses in pregnancy

Background

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare, gradually advancing tumor of unknown origin. It is distinguished by the anomalous proliferation of pulmonary smooth muscle cells and predominantly manifests in women of childbearing age. In this study, we aim to present a noteworthy case of LAM accompanied by lymphangioleiomyoma in the retroperitoneal space during pregnancy, a scenario susceptible to misdiagnosis.

Case presentation

A 31-year-old woman, facing an unintended pregnancy, presented during the 13th week with a cystic-solid mass exhibiting abundant blood signals in the pelvic cavity, as revealed by routine obstetrical ultrasound. Concurrently, her chest CT disclosed diffuse thin-walled cavities in both lungs. Despite the absence of clinical symptoms, the patient abandoned pregnancy and underwent a complete curettage. However, 24 days post-operation, she was readmitted for further assessment, revealing an enlargement of the mass encompassing the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava, along with compression on the middle and lower segments of the ureter. After a multi-disciplinary discussion and patient explanation, an exploratory laparotomy was performed, resulting in the complete removal of the tumor. Intraoperative pathological examination and immunohistochemical staining indicated a retroperitoneal mass devoid of malignant evidence. The comprehensive morphologic and immunophenotypic features substantiated the diagnosis of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. The postoperative course was uneventful, culminating in the patient's discharge.

Conclusion

The consideration of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) with a retroperitoneal tumor is crucial in the differential diagnosis of pelvic and abdominal masses. The preoperative diagnosis of this tumor poses a challenge, as ultrasound or CT scans may not yield definitive results. Accurate diagnosis necessitates not only a pathological examination of the retroperitoneal mass but also the correlation with the patient's chest High-Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) findings and corresponding clinical manifestations. Optimal management involves radical surgery, with surgeons comprehensively factoring in both fetal and maternal conditions when formulating a treatment plan.

A case of ovarian endometrial stromal sarcoma: Radiological and histopathological findings

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is an uncommon uterine mesenchymal neoplasm. The primary extra-uterine location of ESS is a very rare occurrence. We present a case of a 39-year-old woman presented with severe abdominal pain, MRI showed bilateral ovarian tumors with heterogeneous intensity on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), with restricted diffusion, including hyperintense areas on T1WI, not erased on T1-weighted fat-suppressed imaging, hypointense on T2WI, and not enhanced after contrast. This mass extended to the Douglas and invaded the uterine and the rectum serosa suggesting an underlying endometriosis. No abnormalities were suspected in the endometrium. The exploration revealed a friable mass arising from ovaries associated with nodules in the small intestine and sigmoid. The patient underwent bilateral adnexectomy and the anatomopathological study revealed a low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma. This is one of the few reports covering the radiological features of low-grade extra-uterine ESS in the ovary which is probably secondary to degeneration of endometriosis with no evidence of primary uterine ESS.

Role of the Immunohistochemical ZEB1 Expression in Uterine Mesenchymal Neoplasms

The distinction of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus is a frequent diagnostic challenge in gynecologic pathology. Especially, distinguishing low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) from leiomyoma or distinguishing low-grade ESS from high-grade ESS can be difficult. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a physiological and pathological process in which epithelial cells lose their morphological features, become elongated and acquire mesenchymal traits. The signaling pathway of Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) is one of the most significant pathways involved in the EMT process and it has a crucial role in cancer progression, metastasis, and therapy resistance. We studied a series of 69 uterine mesenchymal neoplasms including 18 endometrial stromal sarcomas (10 cases of low grade and 8 cases of high grade endometrial stromal sarcomas), 26 leiomyosarcomas (8 cases of grade 1 and 19 cases of grade 2-3 leiomyosarcomas), 15 leiomyomas, and 10 rhabdomyosarcomas, using an antibody ZEB1. We graded the leiomyosarcomas depending on the FNCLCC grading system. It was observed that leiomyosarcoma was more intensely stained with ZEB1 than leiomyoma (P < 0.001) and high-grade ESS was significantly more intensely stained with ZEB1 protein than low-grade ESS (P < 0.004). It also was observed that high-grade leiomyosarcoma was significantly more intensely stained with ZEB1 protein than low-grade leiomyosarcoma (P < 0.000). Our data suggest that Zeb1 can be used to differentiate high-grade sarcomas from their low-grade counterparts as well as benign and malignant smooth muscle tumors of the uterus.

A Retrospective Case Study of 13 Uterine Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasm (PEComa) Patients

Introduction and Hypothesis

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are rare mesenchymal tumors that originate from perivascular epithelioid cells. The uterus is the second most common organ to be affected by PEComa. Most PEComas are benign and the prognosis is usually good. Surgery is the main treatment at present, and adjuvant therapy is mainly used for malignant cases. However, because of the lack of described cases, the best diagnosis and treatment of these tumors cannot be determined.

Methods

From 2009 to 2020, 13 patients from Shengjing Hospital (China Medical University), with uterine PEComa, who met the inclusion criteria and appropriate pathological diagnosis were enrolled in this study. Clinical, pathological, and therapeutic features were retrospectively analyzed to determine the best approach towards diagnosis and treatment.

Results

All the enrolled patients underwent surgical treatment; four of them had a malignant PEComa. Three of the malignant patients received chemotherapy after surgery; among them, one died, another showed no obvious recurrence after regular re-examination, and the third did not undergo any further treatment despite short-term recurrence. However, upon regular re-examination, no progress was observed. The fourth malignant patient did not receive chemotherapy after surgery and showed no obvious recurrence during regular reviews.

Conclusion

The preoperative diagnosis of uterine PEComa lacks specificity and therefore is often confused with uterine leiomyoma or leiomyosarcoma. We conclude that uterine PEComa can be diagnosed by combined analysis of immunohistochemistry and post-operative pathology. Though surgical resection is still the main treatment, high-risk patients can be given adjuvant treatment to strengthen disease control.

Uterine PEComas: A Morphologic, Immunohistochemical, and Molecular Analysis of 32 Tumors

Uterine perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComas) are rare neoplasms that may show overlapping morphology and immunohistochemistry with uterine smooth muscle tumors. In this study, we evaluated the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features of 32 PEComas, including 11 with aggressive behavior. Two distinct morphologies were observed: classic (n=30) and those with a lymphangioleiomyomatosis appearance (n=2). In the former, patients ranged from 32 to 77 (mean: 51) years and 13% had tuberous sclerosis. Tumors ranged from 0.2 to 17 (mean: 5.5) cm with 77% arising in the corpus. Epithelioid cells were present in 100% and a spindled component was seen in 37%. Nuclear atypia was low (53%), intermediate (17%), or high (30%). Mitoses ranged from 0 to 36 (mean: 6) and 0 to 133 (mean: 19) per 10 and 50 high-power fields, with atypical mitoses present in 30%. Thin and delicate vessels were noted in 100%, clear/eosinophilic and granular cytoplasm in 93%, stromal hyalinization in 73%, necrosis in 30%, and lymphovascular invasion in 10%. All tumors were positive for HMB-45, cathepsin K, and at least one muscle marker, with most expressing melan-A (77%) and/or MiTF (79%). A PSF-TFE3 fusion was identified in one while another showed a RAD51B-OPHN1 fusion. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 175 (mean: 41) months, with 63% of patients alive and well, 20% dead of disease, 13% alive with disease, and 3% dead from other causes. In the latter group (n=2), patients were 39 and 49 years old, one had tuberous sclerosis, while the other had pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Both tumors expressed HMB-45, cathepsin K, and muscle markers, but lacked TFE3 and RAD51B rearrangements. The 2 patients are currently alive and well. Application of gynecologic-specific criteria (≥4 features required for malignancy: size ≥5 cm, high-grade atypia, mitoses >1/50 high-power fields, necrosis, and lymphovascular invasion) for predicting outcome misclassified 36% (4/11) of aggressive tumors; thus, a modified algorithm with a threshold of 3 of these features is recommended to classify a PEComa as malignant.

Extra-uterine low grade endometrioid stromal sarcoma arising from ovarian endometriosis: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Endometrial stromal sarcoma (ESS) is a rare neoplasm accounting for only 0.2% of female genital tract tumors. The primary extra-uterine location of ESS is an extremely uncommon occurrence.

Case presentation

We present a case of a 64-year-old woman presenting with abdominopelvic and bilateral ovarian tumors with misleading clinical presentation and diagnostic challenge. The histopathological examination of the resected specimens disclosed the diagnosis of primary extra-uterine ESS arising from ovarian endometriosis. Adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor drug was prescribed for the patient, and she is still alive with no evidence of disease 7 months after surgery.

Conclusion

The awareness of the potential extra-uterine location of ESS should lead to correct diagnosis as this tumor has histopathological features and clinical behavior similar to its uterine counterpart.

MVP immunohistochemistry is a useful adjunct in distinguishing leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma and leiomyoma with bizarre nuclei

Morphologically, distinguishing between leiomyoma (LM) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is not always straightforward, especially with benign variants such as bizarre leiomyoma (BLM). To identify potential markers of malignancy in uterine smooth muscle tumors, proteomic studies were performed followed by assessment of protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues from tumors (n = 23) diagnosed as LM, BLM, and LMS (using published criteria) were selected for the study. Sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry was applied to pooled samples of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded LM and LMS tumor tissue to assay the relative protein quantities and look for expression patterns differentiating the 2 tumor types. A total of 592 proteins were quantified, and 10 proteins were differentially expressed between LM and LMS. Select proteins were chosen for evaluation by immunohistochemistry (IHC) based on antibody availability and biologic relevance in the literature. IHC was performed on a tissue microarray, and intensity was evaluated using imaging software. Major vault protein (MVP) and catechol O-methyltransferase had 3.05 and 13.94 times higher expression in LMS relative to LM by sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra mass spectrometry, respectively. By IHC, MVP (clone 1014; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX) was found to be 50% sensitive and 100% specific when comparing LMS to LM. Catechol O-methyltransferase (clone FL-271; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) had a sensitivity of 38% and a specificity of 88%. Six of 7 BLM had expression of MVP similar to LM. Immunohistochemical staining for MVP is a useful adjunct in distinguishing LMS from LM and BLM in difficult cases.

Uterine Adenosarcoma: a Review

Adenosarcomas are rare malignancies of the female genital tract, accounting for approximately 5 % of uterine sarcomas. Occasionally, adenosarcoma occurs in the ovaries or in extra-uterine tissue, which may be related to endometriosis. These tumors are characterized by benign epithelial elements and a malignant mesenchymal component. Pathologic diagnosis is dependent on the identification of the characteristic morphologic features. The most common immunohistochemical markers for adenosarcoma are CD10 and WT1, but these are not specific. The most frequent presenting symptom is abnormal uterine bleeding. The majority of patients present with stage I disease, with a 5-year overall survival of 60 to 80 %. Survival is influenced by the presence of myometrial invasion, sarcomatous overgrowth, lymphovascular invasion, necrosis, and the presence of heterologous elements including rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Patients with sarcomatous overgrowth have significantly increased risk of recurrence 23 versus 77 % and decreased 5-year overall survival 50 to 60 %. Standard of care treatment is total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy without lymphadenectomy, as the incidence of lymph node metastasis is rare. Retrospective data does not support the use of adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy in uterine adenosarcomas as no survival benefit is seen. Insufficient data exists to recommend routinely neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy for uterine adenosarcomas. Limited evidence exists for the role of hormonal therapy in uterine adenosarcomas. The PIK3/AKT/PTEN pathway is mutated in ∼70 % of adenosarcomas, and this may represent a possible therapeutic target. This article reviews the current state of knowledge concerning uterine adenosarcoma and discusses the management of this rare tumor.

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) of the uterus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasm (PEComa) is a rare mesenchymal tumor. Gynecological PEComas account for just over one-fourth of the overall PEComa cases reported in the literature. Surgery is the most recommended primary treatment while adjuvant therapy is generally reserved for high-risk cases. However, the best management of this neoplasia has not been well established, primarily because of the paucity of cases described to date.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this systematic review is to summarize what is known thus far regarding the etiopathogenesis, clinical and pathologic features of PEComas, focusing also on the most valid treatment options for uterine cases.

DATA SOURCES

Pubmed articles on PEComas published in various journals over the past 70 years were analyzed.

CONCLUSIONS AND KEY FINDINGS

Although the optimal treatment of gynecological PEComas is controversial, surgical resection remains the cornerstone. The use of adjuvant treatment is warranted in high risk patients to increase disease control. A multidisciplinary approach should be key in treatment decision-making regarding gynecological PEComas.