Spindle cell lesions of the breast – An approach to diagnosis

Nonneoplastic and neoplastic sclerosing lesions of the breast

Sclerosing lesions of the breast encompass a spectrum of benign and malignant entities and often pose a diagnostic challenge. Awareness of key morphologic features and pitfalls in the assessment of morphology and immunophenotype is essential to avoid over- or underdiagnosis and ensure optimal clinical management. This review summarizes nonneoplastic sclerosing lesions such as radial scar/complex sclerosing lesion, sclerosing adenosis, sclerosing intraductal papilloma, sclerosing variants of ductal adenoma and nipple adenoma, and fibroadenoma with extensive sclerosis, including their clinical presentation, characteristic morphology, differential diagnostic considerations, appropriate immunohistochemical work-up, when needed, and the clinical significance. In addition, atypical or neoplastic entities (such as atypical ductal hyperplasia, ductal carcinoma in situ, low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma, and fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma) that can involve these sclerosing lesions are also briefly discussed.

Mammary Spindle Cell Proliferations on Core Needle Biopsy: Is Excision Always Necessary?

Mammary spindle cell proliferations (SCPs) encompass a wide range of lesions and can be challenging to accurately diagnose on core needle biopsies (CNBs). Most SCPs are excised for definitive diagnosis. In the era of minimally invasive therapy, some SCP may be followed conservatively. We aim to examine the spectrum of SCP diagnosed on CNB and evaluate if excision of benign/indeterminate SCP is always required. We identified patients with SCP across 3 institutions. The CNB were classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant. Available excisional specimens were used to classify the lesion as benign or malignant. Clinical variables were reviewed. A total of 197 SCP met the inclusion criteria, including 100 (53%) CNB classified as benign, 52 (26%) indeterminate, and 36 (19%) malignant. Nine patients had excisions without a preceding CNB. Excision was performed in 47% of benign, 87% of indeterminate, and 86% malignant CNB. Of 123 excised SCP, 77 (63%) were benign, while 44 (36%) were malignant. Most benign lesions were not suspicious radiologically (67%), while indeterminate and malignant lesions were more likely to be suspicious (44% and 75%, respectively; P <0.001). Malignant lesions tended to present as larger, rapidly growing, masses. Most mammary SCP are benign (63% of excisions). Appropriate ancillary tests can safely exclude some malignant entities. We encourage narrowing down the differential diagnosis to pertinent entities based on clinical presentation, imaging, histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular studies, if applicable. Patients with mammary SCP may be spared surgery provided accurate pathologic diagnosis and appropriate correlation with imaging and clinical data.

[Immunohistology in breast diagnostics : Strategies for efficient diagnostics]

Immunohistological examinations are useful for the histopathological diagnosis of breast carcinoma in various clinical situations. This review article aims to summarize the different immunohistological options. A distinction is made between diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive markers. Especially when a therapeutic decision results from the immunohistological expression pattern, a quantitative, quality-controlled, and validated diagnostic approach is essential.This is relevant, for example, for the classical markers ER, PR, and HER2, but also for Ki-67 and additional markers such as PD-L1. This article provides a practice-oriented summary of the most important immunohistochemical markers in routine breast cancer diagnosis and for the distinction of malignant findings from benign alterations or precursor lesions.

Pitfalls in breast pathology

Accurate pathological diagnosis is the cornerstone of optimal clinical management for patients with breast disease. As non-operative diagnosis has now become the standard of care, histopathologists encounter the daily challenge of making definitive diagnoses on limited breast core needle biopsy (CNB) material. CNB samples are carefully evaluated using microscopic examination of haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained slides and supportive immunohistochemistry (IHC), providing the necessary information to inform the next steps in the patient care pathway. Some entities may be difficult to distinguish on small tissue samples, and if there is uncertainty a diagnostic excision biopsy should be recommended. This review discusses (1) benign breast lesions that may mimic malignancy, (2) malignant conditions that may be misinterpreted as benign, (3) malignant conditions that may be incorrectly diagnosed as primary breast carcinoma, and (4) some IHC pitfalls. The aim of the review is to raise awareness of potential pitfalls in the interpretation of breast lesions that may lead to underdiagnosis, overdiagnosis, or incorrect classification of malignancy with potential adverse outcomes for individual patients.

Spindle Cell Lesions of the Breast: A Diagnostic Algorithm

CONTEXT.—

Spindle cell lesions of the breast represent a broad spectrum of entities, ranging from nonneoplastic reactive conditions to high-grade malignant tumors. The wide range makes breast spindle cell lesions a diagnostic pitfall.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review the classification of spindle cell lesions of the breast, including clinical features, morphologic characteristics, and the role of immunohistochemistry as well as molecular tools in assisting the differential diagnosis. A diagnostic algorithm will be proposed.

DATA SOURCES.—

Literature and personal experience are the sources for this study.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Spindle cell lesions of the breast can be classified as biphasic or monophasic, with the former including both spindle cell and epithelial components, and the latter including only spindle cell elements. Each category is further subclassified as low or high grade. In the biphasic low-grade group, fibroadenoma and benign phyllodes tumor are the most common lesions. Other uncommon lesions include hamartoma, adenomyoepithelioma, and pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia. In the biphasic high-grade group, borderline/malignant phyllodes tumor and biphasic metaplastic carcinoma are the main lesions to consider. In the monophasic low-grade group, reactive spindle cell nodule, nodular fasciitis, myofibroblastoma, fibromatosis, and fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma have to be considered. In the monophasic high-grade group, the possible lesions are monophasic spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma, primary breast sarcoma, and metastases. Awareness of the clinical history and careful evaluation of any epithelial differentiation (with a large immunohistochemical panel) are crucial in the distinction.

How We Use Immunohistochemistry to Arrive at a Diagnosis in Breast Lesions

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an essential tool available to pathologists for facilitating diagnosis and as well as guiding the prognosis of breast lesions. Newer markers are increasingly being added to the pathologists' armamentarium. However, the selection and interpretation of the IHC markers should be judicious. In light of an appropriate morphological assessment, they should complement each other and produce accurate reports. We have briefly outlined here the immunohistochemical approach used in the diagnosis and management of breast cancers at our tertiary care cancer center.

GATA binding protein 3 (GATA3) as a marker for metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast

Spindle cell lesions of the breast comprise a diverse set of tumors; harboring significant histological and immunohistochemical (IHC) overlap. Accurate diagnosis and classification of spindle cell lesions in the breast remains challenging, especially in core biopsies. In the current study, we evaluated a spectrum of spindle cell lesion of the breast with a panel of IHC antibodies in an effort to differentiate metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma from its benign and malignant mimickers. Our study included 92 patients who underwent breast core biopsies or breast resections at Northwell Health who were diagnosed with benign and malignant tumor/tumor-like spindle cell lesions. Tumors subtypes in this the study included: angiosarcoma, nodular fasciitis, fibromatosis, myofibroblastoma, phyllodes tumors (benign, borderline and malignant), primary sarcomas and metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma. Our biomarker panel included high molecular weight keratin (HMWK), CAM5.2, AE1/AE3, p63, CD34 and GATA3. GATA3 expression was significantly higher in metaplastic carcinomas (88.9 % vs 4.1 %, p < 0.001), when compared to other spindle cell lesions. The sensitivity and specificity for detecting metaplastic carcinomas reached 84.2 % and 97.3 %, respectively. Regarding cytokeratin panels, none of the three individual markers were as sensitive or specific for metaplastic breast carcinoma. GATA3 is the most specific and sensitive marker forfor the identification of metaplastic spindle cell carcinoma of the breast.

The significance of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) expression in spindle cell lesions of the breast

Spindle cell lesions of the breast are rare entities and pose a diagnostic challenge for pathologists due to overlapping morphologic and immunohistochemical features. We evaluated EZH2 expression in various benign (fibromatosis (n = 8), myofibroblastoma (n = 7), neurofibroma (n = 1), nodular fasciitis (n = 5), benign phyllodes tumor (n = 18)) and malignant (malignant phyllodes tumor (n = 8), metaplastic breast carcinoma (n = 16) and angiosarcoma (n = 8)) spindle cell lesions as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic marker. The EZH2 expression was evaluated semi-quantitatively to categorize the cases as 'low' and 'high' expression. All benign lesions showed low EZH2 expression, whereas high EZH2 expression was observed in the majority (28/32; 88%) of malignant lesions. The study results suggest that EZH2 may be used both as an additional diagnostic tool to reach an accurate diagnosis of the spindle cell lesions of the breast and as a therapeutic target for the malignant lesions.

Best Practice (Efficient) Immunohistologic Panel for Diagnosing Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) plays a key role in the diagnosis of metaplastic breast carcinomas (MBCs), particularly the spindle cell variant. The most efficient immunopanel has yet to be developed. We studied the immunoprofile of 45 MBCs including 23 matrix-producing MBCs, 11 squamous cell carcinomas, 6 spindle cell carcinomas, and 5 mixed-subtypes (2 cases including spindle cell components). Representative sections from mastectomy or core biopsy specimens were subject to IHC using a list of antibodies including OSCAR, a recently developed antibody against pooled cytokeratins. The staining was interpreted as positive when >1% of tumor cells demonstrated unequivocal staining. As a result, OSCAR showed similar sensitivity to AE1/AE3 and CAM 5.2 (89.1% vs. 89.4% vs. 89.4%) for MBCs, but the former showed more diffuse pattern of staining, particularly in spindle cell carcinomas. High molecular weight cytokeratin CK14, CK5, and CK17 were positive in 91.3%, 87.2%, and 73.3% of MBCs, respectively. CK7 was much less likely to be positive in spindle cell carcinomas (37.5%) than in other variants of MBCs (97.4%). P63 and CK14 were the most useful markers for spindle cell carcinomas, positive in 87.5% and 85.7% of cases, respectively. GATA 3 was positive in 63% MBCs, and nonspecific staining for vimentin and smooth muscle actin were common. Random combination of up to 3 antibodies against keratins including p63 showed sensitivities ranging from 80.9% to 97.9%. Our results suggested the combination of OSCAR, CK14 and p63 is the most efficient panel (sensitivity 97.9%) for diagnosing MBCs.

Practical approach to diagnosis of bland-looking spindle cell lesions of the breast

The diagnosis of bland-looking spindle cell lesions of the breast is often challenging because there is a close morphological and immunohistochemical overlap among the different entities. The present review will discuss reactive spindle cell nodule/exuberant scar, nodular fasciitis, inflammatory pseudotumor, myofibroblastoma (classic type), lipomatous myofibroblastoma, palisaded myofibroblastoma, benign fibroblastic spindle cell tumor, spindle cell lipoma, fibroma, leiomyoma, solitary fibrous tumor, myxoma, schwannoma/neurofibroma, desmoid-type fibromatosis, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, low-grade fibromatosis-like spindle cell carcinoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor and low-grade myofibroblastic sarcoma arising in the breast parenchyma. The pathologist should be aware of each single lesion to achieve a correct diagnosis to ensure patient a correct prognostic information and therapy. Accordingly representative illustrations and morphological/immunohistochemical diagnostic clues will be provided.

Fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma: a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

We report an unusual case of low-grade fibromatosis-like metaplastic carcinoma (LG-FLMC) of the breast. This exceedingly rare epithelial breast malignancy has been reported only 68 times in the past 20 years, and is classified as a subtype of metaplastic breast carcinoma (MBC). It is a locally aggressive tumor with a low potential for lymph node and distant metastases, but with a tendency to recur after excision. Here we describe a less common presentation of LG-FLMC, provide its molecular characterization, discuss the major differential diagnosis and bring a short review of the literature.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 65-year-old woman presented with a self-palpated breast lump that had discordant radio-pathological features. While imaging results were compatible with an infiltrative malignancy, on core needle biopsy (CNB) a sharply delineated lesion composed by a bland-looking population of spindle cells was observed; excision was recommended for final diagnosis. Histology of the resection specimen showed small areas of epithelial differentiation and foci of peripheral invasion. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a co-immunoreactivity for epithelial and myoepithelial markers in the spindle cell component. Mutation analysis with a capture-based next generation sequencing method revealed pathogenic mutations in GNAS, TERT-promotor and PIK3R1 genes. A diagnosis of LG-FLMC was rendered.

CONCLUSION

This case highlights the importance of a broad differential diagnosis, exhaustive sampling and the use of a broad immunohistochemical panel whenever dealing with a low-grade spindle cell lesion in the breast, and provides further insights into the molecular background of LG-FLMC.

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans - the use of neoadjuvant imatinib for treatment of an uncommon breast malignancy: a case report

BACKGROUND

Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is a rare soft tissue malignancy that, if left untreated, can be locally destructive and life-threatening. Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans is uncommon in the breast, and the similarity of its morphologic features with other spindle cell malignancies can make correct identification difficult. Immunohistochemistry and molecular testing can aid in the correct diagnosis when there is diagnostic uncertainty. Imatinib, a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been used for adjuvant treatment of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans following surgical resection. When used as a neoadjuvant treatment, imatinib offers the opportunity to decrease tumor size prior to surgery to lessen the chance for disfigurement.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a Caucasian woman who was 46-year-old when she first noted a mass in her right breast in 2015; she was initially diagnosed as having metaplastic breast carcinoma. Mastectomy and systemic chemotherapy were planned; however, after review of pathology at a referral center, the diagnosis was changed to dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. She was treated with 4 months of neoadjuvant imatinib with adequate tumor shrinkage to perform breast conservation.

CONCLUSION

This patient's case stresses the importance of correctly diagnosing this rare breast tumor through the histopathologic appearance of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, molecular pathogenesis, and immunohistochemistry. These techniques can help differentiate dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans from metaplastic breast carcinoma and other spindle cell lesions of the breast. This is critical, as the treatment options for metaplastic breast carcinoma significantly differ from treatment options for dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans. This case describes the use of imatinib as a neoadjuvant option to reduce preoperative tumor size and improve surgical outcomes.

MED12, TERT and RARA in fibroepithelial tumours of the breast

Fibroepithelial tumours are biphasic neoplasms of the breast comprising the common benign fibroadenomas and the less common phyllodes tumours (PTs), which have recurrent potential. PTs are classified into benign, borderline or malignant, based on five histopathological criteria, with malignant PTs having the highest metastatic capability. Accurate diagnosis can be challenging due to the subjective assessment of histopathological parameters. Fibroadenomas bear morphological similarities to benign PTs, while borderline and malignant PTs can sometimes be difficult to distinguish from other spindle cell tumours of the breast. From clonality studies to whole-genome sequencing, much research has been conducted to elucidate the molecular pathogenesis of fibroepithelial tumours, which, in turn, have allowed leveraging the findings for diagnostic applications, including grading of PTs. The most noteworthy discovery was of recurrent MED12 mutations in both fibroadenomas and PTs. Subsequent studies also uncovered relatively frequent genetic mutations in TERT promoter and RARA. A customised panel of 16 most frequently mutated genes in fibroepithelial tissues has been compiled previously and has contributed to resolving a few diagnostic dilemmas. This review will introduce the 16 genes and focus on the top three that are most frequently mutated in fibroepithelial tumours: MED12, TERT, and RARA.

Immunohistochemistry for diagnosis and prognosis of breast cancer: a review

Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignant tumor and main oncologic cause of mortality in women. Although most diagnosis of breast pathology is accomplished using hematoxylin and eosin stained sections, some cases require immunohistochemistry for proper evaluation. We investigated the latter cases including distinctions between ductal and lobular carcinoma, in situ and invasive carcinoma, typical ductal hyperplasia and atypical ductal hyperplasia/ductal carcinoma in situ, papillary and spindle cell lesion assessment, metastasis evaluation, and assessment of prognostic and therapy markers. E-cadherin is used to differentiate ductal and lobular carcinoma; 34βE12, CK8, p120 catenin and β-catenin also produce consistent results. Myoepithelial cell (MEC) stains are used to evaluate in situ and invasive carcinoma; calponin, smooth muscle myosin heavy chain and p63 are sensitive/specific markers. 34βE12 and CK5/6 are positive in ductal hyperplasia, which enables its differentiation from atypical ductal hyperplasia and ductal carcinoma in situ. CK 5/6, ER and MEC markers are consistent options for evaluating papillary lesions. Spindle cell lesions can be assessed using β-catenin, SMA, CD34, p63, CKs and hormone receptors. It is important to differentiate primary carcinomas from metastases; the most commonly used markers to identify breast origin include mammaglobin, GCDFP-15, GATA3 and ER, although none of these is completely sensitive or specific. Immunohistochemistry can be used to evaluate central prognostic and predictive factors including molecular subtypes, HER2, hormone receptors, proliferation markers (Ki-67) and lymph-vascular invasion markers including ERG, CD31, CD34, factor VIII and podoplanin. Owing to the complexity of mammary lesions, diagnosis also depends on each particular situation, evaluation of cytological characteristics revealed by immunochemistry and correlation with histological findings.

Mammary mesenchymal and fibroepithelial lesions: An illustrated cytomorphologic update with differential diagnoses

The Uniform Approach to Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy was put forward by a learned group of breast physicians in 1997. This landmark manuscript focused predominantly on diagnosis and reporting of mammary epithelial lesions. Today, most American practitioners turn initially to core biopsy rather than aspiration biopsy for the first line diagnosis of solid breast lesions; however, recent efforts from the International Academy of Cytology have produced a system called the Standardized Reporting of Breast Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy Cytology (colloquially labeled in 2017 as the "Yokohama System"), suggesting a new interest in breast fine needle aspiration (FNA), especially in resource limited settings or clinical practice settings with experienced breast cytopathologists. Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast comprise a heterogeneous group of biphasic tumors with epithelial and stromal elements. Mesenchymal lesions of the breast include a variety of neoplasms of fibroblastic, myofibroblastic, endothelial, neural, adipocytic, muscular, and osteo-cartilaginous derivations. The cytology of mesenchymal breast lesions is infrequently described in the literature and is mainly limited to case reports and small series. This illustrated review highlights the cytologic features of fibroepithelial and mesenchymal mammary proliferations and discusses differential diagnoses and histomorphologic correlates.

Spindle Cell Lesions of the Breast on Fine-Needle Aspiration Biopsy: A Miscellany of Masses

A variety of primary breast and metastatic lesions to the breast can present with spindle cell cytomorphology. These lesions may range from benign reactive or inflammatory lesions to high-grade malignancies. Spindle cell lesions of the breast are not often seen on fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) but need to be correctly managed when they are encountered. While mesenchymal lesions of the breast have a spindle morphology, lesions derived from the epithelium and myoepithelium can be spindled as well. By assessing if the lesion comprises spindle cells only or if other components such as epithelial cells are apparent and then determining whether the spindle cells appear bland or pleomorphic, together with close clinicoradiologic correlation and prudent use of ancillary tests, a variety of lesions can be diagnosed on FNAB. However, core needle biopsy or excision biopsy may be required in some patients. The cytomorphology, ancillary studies, and clinicoradiologic findings of a range of spindle cell lesions of the breast are further discussed.

Differential Diagnosis of Benign Spindle Cell Lesions

Spindle cell lesions of the breast cover a wide spectrum of diseases ranging from reactive tumor-like lesions to high-grade malignant tumors. The recognition of the benign spindle cell tumor-like lesions (nodular fasciitis; reactive spindle cell nodule after biopsy, inflammatory pseudotumor/inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor; fascicular variant of pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia) and tumors (myofibroblastoma, benign fibroblastic spindle cell tumor, leiomyoma, schwannoma, spindle cell lipoma, solitary fibrous tumor, myxoma) is crucial to avoid confusion with morphologically similar but more aggressive bland-appearing spindle cell tumors, such as desmoid-type fibromatosis, low-grade (fibromatosis-like) spindle cell carcinoma, low-grade fibrosarcoma/myofibroblastic sarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans.