What's new in consolidation therapy in AML?

m6A RNA methylation regulators predict prognosis and indicate characteristics of tumour microenvironment infiltration in acute myeloid leukaemia

Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) have poor prognoses and low overall survival (OS) rates owing to its heterogeneity and the complexity of its tumour microenvironment (TME). N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) modification plays a key role in the initiation and progression of haematopoietic malignancies. However, the underlying function of m⁶A regulators in AML remains elusive. This study thoroughly analysed the m⁶A modification features of 177 AML patients based on 22 m⁶A regulators. Utilizing unsupervised clustering, we determined three distinct m⁶A modification patterns related to different biological functions, TME cell-infiltrating characteristics and clinical outcomes. Additionally, a risk score was constructed based on six m⁶A regulators-associated prognostic signatures and was validated as an independent and valuable prognostic factor for AML. Patients with a low-risk score exhibited better survival than those with a high-risk score. Many m⁶A regulators were aberrantly expressed in AML, among which METTL14, YTHDC2, ZC3H13 and RBM15 were observed to be associated with the OS of AML. In addition, these four m⁶A regulators were found to be noticeably related to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatments. Finally, we verified the expression levels of these four m⁶A regulators in AML and healthy samples and three groups of AML patients with different risk categories. Collectively, our study indicates that the m⁶A modification pattern is involved in TME immune-infiltrating characteristics and prognosis in AML. A better understanding of the m⁶A modification pattern will help enhance our knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of AML and develop potential prognosis prediction indicators and more effective immunotherapeutic strategies.

Harnessing the power of sphingolipids: Prospects for acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive, heterogenous malignancy characterized by clonal expansion of bone marrow-derived myeloid progenitor cells. While our current understanding of the molecular and genomic landscape of AML has evolved dramatically and opened avenues for molecularly targeted therapeutics to improve upon standard intensive induction chemotherapy, curative treatments are elusive, particularly in older patients. Responses to current AML treatments are transient and incomplete, necessitating the development of novel treatment strategies to improve outcomes. To this end, harnessing the power of bioactive sphingolipids to treat cancer shows great promise. Sphingolipids are involved in many hallmarks of cancer of paramount importance in AML. Leukemic blast survival is influenced by cellular levels of ceramide, a bona fide pro-death molecule, and its conversion to signaling molecules such as sphingosine-1-phosphate and glycosphingolipids. Preclinical studies demonstrate the efficacy of therapeutics that target dysregulated sphingolipid metabolism as well as their combinatorial synergy with clinically-relevant therapeutics. Thus, increased understanding of sphingolipid dysregulation may be exploited to improve AML patient care and outcomes. This review summarizes the current knowledge of dysregulated sphingolipid metabolism in AML, evaluates how pro-survival sphingolipids promote AML pathogenesis, and discusses the therapeutic potential of targeting these dysregulated sphingolipid pathways.

The pyroptosis-related gene signature predicts prognosis and reveals characterization of the tumor immune microenvironment in acute myeloid leukemia

Background: Pyroptosis is a novel inflammatory form of programmed cell death and a prospective target for cancer therapy. Nevertheless, little is known about the association between pyroptosis-related genes (PRGs) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) prognosis. Herein, we systematically investigated the specific functions and clinical prognostic value of multiple PRGs in AML.

Methods: Univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses based on TCGA and GTEx databases were used to generate the PRG signature, whose predictive efficacy of survival was evaluated using survival analysis, ROC, univariate and multivariate Cox analyses as well as subgroup analysis. The BeatAML cohort was used for data validation. The association between risk score and immune cell infiltration, HLA, immune checkpoints, cancer stem cell (CSC), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and therapeutic drug sensitivity were also analyzed.

Results: Six -PRG signatures, namely, CASP3, ELANE, GSDMA, NOD1, PYCARD, and VDR were generated. The high-risk score represented a poorer prognosis and the PRG risk score was also validated as an independent predictor of prognosis. A nomogram including the cytogenetic risk, age, and risk score was constructed for accurate prediction of 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival probabilities. Meanwhile, this risk score was significantly associated with the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). A high-risk score is characterized by high immune cell infiltration, HLA, and immune checkpoints, as well as low CSC and TMB. In addition, patients with low-risk scores presented significantly lower IC50 values for ATRA, cytarabine, midostaurin, doxorubicin, and etoposide.

Conclusion: Our findings might contribute to further understanding of PRGs in the prognosis and development of AML and provide novel and reliable biomarkers for its precise prevention and treatment.

m6A Regulator-Mediated Methylation Modification Patterns and Tumor Microenvironment Infiltration Characterization in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Recent studies have demonstrated epigenetic regulation of immune responses. Nevertheless, the underlying effect of RNA N6-methyladenosine (m6A) modifications on tumor microenvironment cell infiltration remains elusive. In this study, we thoroughly assessed m6A modification patterns of 255 myeloid leukemia specimens based on 23 m6A regulators. Consensus clustering of the 23 m6A regulators was performed to determine three distinct m6A modification patterns that were remarkably consistent with three immunophenotypes of tumors: immunorejection, immune activation, and immune inertness. Further evaluation and prognostic analysis of the m6A modification patterns of individual tumors revealed that low m6A score was characterized by increased mutational burden, immune activation, and survival rates, whereas high m6A score was characterized by poorer survival rates and the absence of effective immune infiltration. In addition, this study investigated the association between m6A regulators and antitumor immune responses and discovered higher expression of the immune regulators PD-L1, PD-L2, MRP1, and MRP2 in low m6A scores. Generally, the expression pattern of m6A regulators was remarkably associated with prognostic results and antitumor immune responses in acute myeloid leukemia and may be an underlying target and biological marker for immune therapies.

Rationale and design of the 2 by 2 factorial design GnG-trial: a randomized phase-III study to compare two schedules of gemtuzumab ozogamicin as adjunct to intensive induction therapy and to compare double-blinded intensive postremission therapy with or without glasdegib in older patients with newly diagnosed AML

BACKGROUND

Overall survival remains poor in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with less than 10% being alive after 5 years. In recent studies, a significant improvement in event-free, relapse-free and overall survival was shown by adding gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a humanized antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD33, to intensive induction therapy once or in a sequential dosing schedule. Glasdegib, the small-molecule inhibitor of smoothened (SMO), also showed improved overall survival in patients not eligible for intensive chemotherapy when combined with low-dose cytarabine compared to low-dose cytarabine alone. These findings warrant further investigations in the phase III GnG trial.

METHODS/DESIGN

This is a randomized phase III trial with measurable residual disease (MRD) after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS) as primary endpoints. The two research questions are addressed in a 2 by 2 factorial design. Patients age 60 years and older are upfront randomized 1:1 in one of the two induction arms: GO administered to intensive induction therapy on days 1,4, and 7 versus GO administered once on day 1 (GO-147 versus GO-1), and double-blinded 1:1 in one of the subsequent treatment arms glasdegib vs. placebo as adjunct to consolidation therapy and as single-agent maintenance therapy for six months. Chemotherapy backbone for induction therapy consists of standard 7 + 3 schedule with cytarabine 200 mg/m² continuously days 1 to 7, daunorubicin 60 mg/m² days 1, 2, and 3 and high-dose cytarabine (1 g/m², bi-daily, days 1, 2, and 3) for consolidation therapy. Addressing two primary endpoints, MRD-negativity after induction therapy and event-free survival (EFS), 252 evaluable patients are needed to reject each of the two null hypotheses at a two-sided significance level of 2.5% with a power of at least 85%.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval and approvals from the local and federal competent authorities were granted. Trial results will be reported via peer-reviewed journals and presented at conferences and scientific meetings.

TRIAL STATUS

Protocol version: 1st version 20.10.2020, no amendments yet. Study initiation on February 16, 2021. First patient was recruited on April 1st.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04093505 ; EudraCT 2019-003913-32. Registered on October 30, 2018.

Post-Induction Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Something Change?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Until recently, improvement in terms of survival for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) was achieved mostly in younger patients with dose intensification of conventional chemotherapy and a broadening use of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) whereas the results remained dismal and very stable in patients older than 60 years. The current review highlights the recent developments in standard intensive post-remission chemotherapy, evidence for the use of recently approved agents, and discusses the relevance of measurable residual disease (MRD) measurement in treatment adaptation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current approvals of midostaurin, venetoclax, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, VYXEOS, ivosidenib, enasidenib, glasdegib, and CC-486 have changed the structure, aim, and schedule of consolidation therapy, and new, well-tolerated agents are being evaluated as maintenance therapies. Furthermore, MRD assessment has been implemented to guide the duration and type of consolidation and maintenance therapy as well as indicate the optimal timing of allo-HCT. Novel therapies have changed the structure and perspective of post-remission therapy in AML for both young and elderly patients. In addition, MRD assessment could guide the type, duration, and intensity of consolidation and maintenance therapy.

Optimum Induction Chemotherapy for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Experience From A Developing Country

OBJECTIVES

Treatment outcome in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has improved in the developed world but remains poor in developing countries. We assessed the role of etoposide in induction chemotherapy in pediatric AML.

METHODS

This analysis retrospectively compared 2 induction chemotherapy regimens consisting of daunorubicin and cytarabine with etoposide (ADE) and without etoposide (AD). All newly diagnosed cases of AML younger than 18 years from January 1, 2012, onwards who completed their treatment before January 31, 2019, were included. Data of 186 cases, including 117 males (62.9%) and 69 females (37.1%), were analyzed. Demographic, initial presentation blood counts, and AML subtypes were almost identical in both groups.

RESULTS

Complete remission rates were almost identical for the ADE versus the AD group (78.8% vs 80.0%, p = 0.980). Treatment-related mortality was higher, albeit not significantly, in the ADE (25 of 105; 23.8%) versus the AD (16 of 81; 19.8%) group (p = 0.508). Overall survival was 32 of 105 (30.5%) in the ADE and 43 of 81 (53.1%) in the AD group (p = 0.079), and disease-free survival was 29 of 105 (27.6%) and 39 of 81 (48.1%) in ADE and AD groups (p = 0.056), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Etoposide in induction treatment of pediatric AML is associated with increased episodes of bacterial and fungal infections and high treatment-related mortality. Moreover, it does not offer any survival benefit. In low- and middle-income countries like Pakistan, it should not be used in the induction treatment protocol.

Is There Still a Role for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia?

After intensive induction chemotherapy and complete remission achievement, patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are candidates to receive either high-dose cytarabine-based regimens, or autologous (ASCT) or allogeneic (allo-SCT) hematopoietic stem cell transplantations as consolidation treatment. Pretreatment risk classification represents a determinant key of type and intensity of post-remission therapy. Current evidence indicates that allo-SCT represents the treatment of choice for high and intermediate risk patients if clinically eligible, and its use is favored by increasing availability of unrelated or haploidentical donors. On the contrary, the adoption of ASCT is progressively declining, although numerous studies indicate that in favorable risk AML the relapse rate is lower after ASCT than chemotherapy. In addition, the burden of supportive therapy and hospitalization favors ASCT. In this review, we summarize current indications (if any) to ASCT on the basis of molecular genetics at diagnosis and minimal residual disease evaluation after induction/consolidation phase. Finally, we critically discuss the role of ASCT in older patients with AML and acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in NPM1-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Early Results From the Prospective Randomized AMLSG 09-09 Phase III Study

PURPOSE

High CD33 expression in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with mutated NPM1 provides a rationale for the evaluation of gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in this AML entity. We conducted a randomized trial to evaluate GO in combination with intensive induction and consolidation therapy in NPM1-mutated AML.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between May 2010 and September 2017, patients ≥ 18 years old and considered eligible for intensive therapy were randomly assigned up front for induction therapy with idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide, and all-trans-retinoic acid with or without GO. The early (P = .02) primary end point of event-free survival (EFS) was evaluated 6 months after completion of patient recruitment.

RESULTS

Five hundred eighty-eight patients were randomly assigned (standard arm, n = 296; GO arm, n = 292). EFS in the GO arm was not significantly different compared with that in the standard arm (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.04; P = .10). The early death rate during induction therapy was 10.3% in the GO arm and 5.7% in the standard arm (P = .05). Causes of death in both arms were mainly infections. The cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) in patients achieving a complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was significantly reduced in the GO arm compared with the standard arm (P = .005), with no difference in the cumulative incidence of death (P = .80). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant beneficial effect of GO in female, younger (≤ 70 years), and FLT3 internal tandem duplication-negative patients with respect to EFS and CIR.

CONCLUSION

The trial did not meet its early primary end point of EFS, mainly as a result of a higher early death rate in the GO arm. However, in patients achieving CR/CRi after induction therapy, significantly fewer relapses occurred in the GO compared with the standard arm.