European studies on breast lymphatic mapping

Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in patients with sentinel-node micrometastases (IBCSG 23-01): a phase 3 randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

For patients with breast cancer and metastases in the sentinel nodes, axillary dissection has been standard treatment. However, for patients with limited sentinel-node involvement, axillary dissection might be overtreatment. We designed IBCSG trial 23-01 to determine whether no axillary dissection was non-inferior to axillary dissection in patients with one or more micrometastatic (≤2 mm) sentinel nodes and tumour of maximum 5 cm.

METHODS

In this multicentre, randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial, patients were eligible if they had clinically non-palpable axillary lymph node(s) and a primary tumour of 5 cm or less and who, after sentinel-node biopsy, had one or more micrometastatic (≤2 mm) sentinel lymph nodes with no extracapsular extension. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to either undergo axillary dissection or not to undergo axillary dissection. Randomisation was stratified by centre and menopausal status. Treatment assignment was not masked. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival. Non-inferiority was defined as a hazard ratio (HR) of less than 1·25 for no axillary dissection versus axillary dissection. The analysis was by intention to treat. Per protocol, disease and survival information continues to be collected yearly. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00072293.

FINDINGS

Between April 1, 2001, and Feb 28, 2010, 465 patients were randomly assigned to axillary dissection and 469 to no axillary dissection. After the exclusion of three patients, 464 patients were in the axillary dissection group and 467 patients were in the no axillary dissection group. After a median follow-up of 5·0 (IQR 3·6-7·3) years, we recorded 69 disease-free survival events in the axillary dissection group and 55 events in the no axillary dissection group. Breast-cancer-related events were recorded in 48 patients in the axillary dissection group and 47 in the no axillary dissection group (ten local recurrences in the axillary dissection group and eight in the no axillary dissection group; three and nine contralateral breast cancers; one and five [corrected] regional recurrences; and 34 and 25 distant relapses). Other non-breast cancer events were recorded in 21 patients in the axillary dissection group and eight in the no axillary dissection group (20 and six second non-breast malignancies; and one and two deaths not due to a cancer event). 5-year disease-free survival was 87·8% (95% CI 84·4-91·2) in the group without axillary dissection and 84·4% (80·7-88·1) in the group with axillary dissection (log-rank p=0·16; HR for no axillary dissection vs axillary dissection was 0·78, 95% CI 0·55-1·11, non-inferiority p=0·0042). Patients with reported long-term surgical events (grade 3-4) included one sensory neuropathy (grade 3), three lymphoedema (two grade 3 and one grade 4), and three motor neuropathy (grade 3), all in the group that underwent axillary dissection, and one grade 3 motor neuropathy in the group without axillary dissection. One serious adverse event was reported, a postoperative infection in the axilla in the group with axillary dissection.

INTERPRETATION

Axillary dissection could be avoided in patients with early breast cancer and limited sentinel-node involvement, thus eliminating complications of axillary surgery with no adverse effect on survival.

FUNDING

None.

Who should have or not have an axillary node dissection with breast cancer?

There have been dramatic changes in the approach to the axilla in women with breast cancer over the last 100 years, reflecting the evolution in our understanding of the underlying tumor biology, reduced disease burden because of early detection, and advances in all breast cancer treatment modalities. The approach to the axilla needs to be individualized, much like the extent of surgery for the primary tumor. Axillary dissection remains an important intervention for patients with more locally advanced disease. However, in patients with early-stage breast cancer, in whom regional recurrence is extremely low, the added benefit of an ALND has yet to be confirmed.

Can we avoid axillary dissection in the micrometastatic sentinel node in breast cancer?

There is considerable interest in foregoing axillary dissection (AD) when the sentinel node (SN) is positive in early breast cancer, particularly when involvement is minimal (micrometastases or isolated tumor cells). To address this issue we analyzed outcomes in patients with a single micrometastatic SN who did not receive AD. We selected 377 consecutive patients treated at the European Institute of Oncology between 1999 and 2007 for invasive breast cancer. Classical and competing risks survival analyses were performed to estimate prognostic factors for axillary recurrence, first events and overall survival. Median age was 53 years (range 26-80); median follow-up was 5 years (range 1-9). Most (91.8%) patients received conservative surgery; 209 (55.4%) had only one SN (range 1-8). Five-year overall survival was 97.3%. There were 10 local events, 2 simultaneous local and axillary events, 6 axillary recurrences and 12 distant events. The cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence was 1.6% (95% CI 0.7-3.3). By multivariable analysis, tumor size and grade were significantly associated with axillary recurrence. The high five-year survival and low cumulative incidence of axillary recurrence in this cohort provide justification for the increasingly common practice of foregoing AD in women with minimal SN involvement, and suggest in particular that AD can safely be avoided in women with small, low-grade tumors. Nevertheless, a subset of patients might be at high risk of developing overt axillary disease and efforts should be made to identify such patients by ancillary analyses of the results of ongoing or recently published clinical trials.

Management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer

This article reviews the changes in management of the axilla in patients with breast cancer in the last decade. It discusses the recent advances, existing controversies and provides evidence-based guidelines for use in clinical practice.Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has replaced the more morbid axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and four node sampling for axillary nodal staging. Blue dye guided four node sampling is an acceptable alternative when radioisotope facilities are not available. ALND is reserved for patients with proven axillary lymph node involvement.Preoperative axillary ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration cytology or core biopsy of suspicious lymph nodes reliably identifies around 30% of node positive patients. Intraoperative assessment of the SLN using frozen section or real time molecular assays enables surgeons to perform one stage ALND in node positive patients. For those patients in whom intra-operative SLN assessment is negative, but whose final pathology reveals SLN metastasis, standard treatment has been to perform a completion ALND. Predictive models can be used to identify a lowrisk group of SLN-positive patients in whom routine ALND may not be necessary. In the future, completion ALND for microscopic disease will not be the standard of care but axillary radiotherapy may be an alternative with equal control and less morbidity.

Sentinel lymph node detection and evidence of axillary lymphatic integrity after transaxillary breast augmentation: a prospective study using lymphoscintography

BACKGROUND

The transaxillary breast augmentation (TBA) technique has gained popularity because of several advantages. However, the impact of the procedure on breast lymphatic drainage and sentinel node (SN) detection remains controversial. The objective of this study was to evaluate the lymphatic patterns and SN detection rates after TBA by using lymphoscintigraphy (LSG).

METHODS

Twenty patients (40 breasts) who underwent TBA were evaluated by LSG immediately after periareolar injections of phytate-99 mTc at three time points: before TBA (Pre-LSG) and approximately 30 days (Recent-Post-LSG) and 6 months after TBA (Late-Post-LSG). Statistical analysis considered p \ 0.05 significant, or p \ 0.017 when Bonferroni correction was applied.

RESULTS

All breasts drained primarily to the axillary SN. The binomial test did not show statistical differences in lymphatic drainage patterns between Pre-LSG and Recent-Post-LSG (p = 1), Pre-LSG and Late-Post-LSG (p = 0.625), and Recent-Post-LSG and Late-Post-LSG (p = 0.625). The average number of hot SN was 1.28 in Pre-LSG, 1.10 in Recent-Post-LSG, and 1.23 in Late-Post-LSG, without significant differences (p = 0.202). The average time of the first SN appearance was not significantly different (p = 0.186). Analysis of SN uptake percentage showed a significant difference between Pre-LSG and Recent-Post-LSG (p = 0.009), with a reduction of drainage magnitude in Recent-Post-LSG.

CONCLUSION

The preservation of axillary lymphatic drainage after TBA allowed for SN detection in all studied breasts. It seems that the applied surgical technique played an important role in axillary lymphatic integrity.

The sentinel node in breast cancer

Biopsy of the sentinel lymph node now forms part of routine management in many centres dealing with early stage breast cancer. This article seeks to discuss developments over the past number of years and to summarise current practice.

Linfonodo sentinela após mamoplastia de aumento pela via transaxilar: estudo prospectivo controlado por meio de linfocintilografia em 43 pacientes

OBJETIVO: Verificar se a mamoplastia de aumento pela via transaxilar apresenta potencial de prejudicar a identificação futura do linfonodo sentinela. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Estudo prospectivo controlado em que foram selecionadas 22 pacientes divididas em grupo pós-mamoplastia e grupo controle, totalizando 43 mamas (22 no grupo pós-mamoplastia e 21 no grupo controle) avaliadas por meio de linfocintilografia imediatamente após injeções periareolares de fitato-99mTc. Os testes estatísticos consideraram como diferenças significativas valores de p < 0,05. RESULTADOS: Todas as mamas do grupo pós-mamoplastia apresentaram drenagem linfática para a cadeia axilar, sem diferença com o grupo controle (p = 0,488). A média de linfonodos captantes foi de 1,27 ± 0,46 no grupo pós-mamoplastia e 1,33 ± 0,58 no grupo controle (p = 0,895). A média de tempo para visualização do primeiro linfonodo foi de 3,14 ± 4,42 minutos no grupo pós-mamoplastia e 5,48 ± 5,06 minutos no grupo controle, novamente sem diferença significativa (p = 0,136). CONCLUSÃO: A mamoplastia de aumento pela via transaxilar não acarretou prejuízo na identificação futura do linfonodo sentinela.

Impact of immediate versus delayed axillary node dissection on surgical outcomes in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel nodes: results from American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Trials Z0010 and Z0011

PURPOSE

Patients with breast cancer metastasis to the sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) generally undergo completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND), either concurrently with SLN biopsy or at a second procedure. The impact of the timing of cALND on pathologic results and complications in these patients has not been examined.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We examined outcomes from SLN-positive patients in American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) trials Z0010 and Z0011. Pathologic data examined included primary tumor characteristics, total number of SLNs recovered, positive SLN(s) and non-SLN(s) identified. Complications assessed included axillary seroma, paresthesia, arm morbidity and range of motion, and lymphedema.

RESULTS

A total of 1,003 assessable patients with SLN metastasis had immediate (n = 425) or delayed (n = 578) cALND. The median number of SLNs and axillary LNs removed were the same between groups. Patients who had immediate cALND more often had larger tumors, SLN metastasis identified intraoperatively, two or more positive SLNs, and higher pathologic N stage. Axillary paresthesia, seroma, and impaired extremity range of motion were more common in the immediate group during the early postoperative period, but not at later time points. There was no difference in lymphedema at any time point.

CONCLUSION

In ACOSOG trials Z0010 and Z0011, LN recovery and long-term complications were similar after either delayed or immediate cALND for patients with metastasis to SLNs. Patients who undergo immediate cALND experience more short-term morbidity. With respect to staging and complications, there is no clear detriment for patients with a positive SLN who undergo a second procedure for cALND.

Preoperative lymphatic mapping does not predict the number of axillary sentinel lymph nodes identified during surgery in breast cancer patients

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care in most centers for axillary staging in patients with early breast cancer. Multiple radioactive nodes are often identified at surgery. The finding of multiple sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) has been shown to be associated with lower rates of false-negative results in the SLNB procedure, hence the importance of removing and examining all SLNs. Often preoperative lymphatic mapping (PLM) is performed prior to surgery. In this study we examined whether the exact number of SLNs identified during surgery can be accurately predicted by PLM. During the years 2001-2004, 155 patients underwent both PLM and a SLNB in our breast unit. During surgery, an attempt was made to remove all radioactive nodes. The number of axillary radioactive foci found on PLM was compared with the number of radioactive nodes identified during surgery. The average number of sentinel nodes harvested was 2.3 (range 1-9). The average number of radioactive foci identified on PLM was 1.8 (range 0-5). Of the 155 patients, the number of sentinel nodes retrieved in surgery was greater than that found in preoperative mapping in 65 patients (41.9%), equal to that found in preoperative mapping in 60 patients (38.7%), and less than that found in preoperative mapping in 30 patients (19.4%). Thus in most patients, the number of SLNs found on PLM did not reflect the number of SLNs found intraoperatively. Therefore, even when the number of nodes identified on PLM has been reached in surgery, a meticulous search for additional nodes should still be carried out. The number of hot spots in preoperative mapping should serve as a rough indicator of the smallest number of nodes the surgeon should attempt to resect, but not the exact number of nodes expected to be found.

Morbidity in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Node Metastases Undergoing Delayed Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND) Compared with Immediate ALND

BACKGROUND

Patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases need delayed completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) if intraoperative assessment of SLN is not employed. This study was designed to compare morbidity in patients undergoing complete ALND in the first (and only) operation versus those undergoing the two-step procedure (SLN biopsy followed by delayed completion ALND).

METHODS

Secondary analysis of the Axillary Lymphatic Mapping Against Nodal Axillary Clearance (ALMANAC) randomized trial compared 83 patients with SLN metastases who proceeded to delayed completion ALND (two-step ALND) with 96 node-positive patients who underwent ALND as the only axillary procedure (one-step ALND). Outcome variables were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The 83 SLN-positive patients undergoing completion ALND were younger (p = 0.038) compared with the one-step ALND group. There was no difference in lymphedema, sensory loss, intercostobrachial (ICB) nerve division rates, impairment of shoulder movement, infection rate, or time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery between the two groups. Median axillary operative time for completion ALND in the two-step group was significantly higher than one-step ALND (33 min vs. 25 min, p = 0.004). The median hospital stay for the second surgery in the two-step group was similar to one-step ALND (6 days). The total median hospital stay (first and second surgery) was significantly higher for the two-stage procedure (10 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

A two-stage axillary node dissection procedure in patients with SLN metastases has similar arm morbidity to one-stage ALND. The second surgery is associated with increased axillary operative time and total hospital stay.

Influencing factors for regional lymph node recurrence of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

We investigated whether the risk of developing regional lymph node recurrence was dependant on the number of lymph nodes removed.

OBJECT

We followed 2,961 patients of whom 50 (1.69%) developed regional recurrent disease during a median period of 73 months (4-192 months).

RESULT

For those women who had involved lymph nodes at initial surgery we were able to establish an inverse correlation between the development of local recurrence and the number of lymph nodes removed in multivariate analysis. For women who had no affected lymph nodes, the number of lymph nodes removed did not influence the incidence of local recurrence.

CONCLUSION

We conclude from these data that women who have negative nodal status at surgical staging do not benefit from further systematic axillary resection with regard to regional lymph node recurrence. For those women, however, who have confirmed axillary metastasis, systematic axillary resection lowers the risk of regional lymph node recurrence depending on the number of lymph nodes removed.

[Sentinel node biopsy in invasive breast cancer in 2007]

Sentinel lymph node (SN) biopsy for breast cancer has been introduced in the mid-1990s and it has now been performed on thousands of patients. This procedure has been rapidly adopted around the world by surgical specialists in clinical practice as a diagnostic procedure instead of the axillary lymph node dissection. The diffusion of the SN mapping in routine must be careful by respecting some principles of methodology and especially of training, in order to maintain its irreversible development. However, the advent of this mini-invasive technique revealed new questions, which the concept of the SN procedure raises: can we increase the current indications? Could axillary lymph node dissection be avoided in patients with metastatic SN? What is the morbidity of the biopsy of the SN? Which is the prognostic value of micrometastatis discovered by the diffusion of the ultra-stadification of the SNs? The GS procedure is a diagnostic method the reliability of which is now on accepted in its usual indications (tumours in place, small size breast tumour without palpable adenopathy). The value of the axillary dissection after metastatic SN is the subject of debates and controversies although axillary dissection remains recommended. So the use of scores or predictive nomograms is currently developed to select the patients being able not to justify of complementary axillary dissection, and seems promising.

[Sentinel node detection applied to breast cancer: 2007 update]

The technique of detection and resection of the sentinel lymph node applied to early breast cancer management aims to spare the patient with a low risk of lymph node involvement an unnecessary axillary lymphadenectomy. This innovating technique lies on the double hypothesis of an accuracy to predict non sentinel lymph node status and to induce a lower morbidity when compared with axillary lymphadenectomy. This multidisciplinary technique depends on surgeons, nuclear physicians and pathologists. In practice sentinel lymph nodes are detected thanks to two types of tracers, the Blue and the colloids marked with technetium, harvested by the surgeon guided by the blue lymphatic channel and the use of a gamma probe detection, analyzed by the pathologist according to a particular procedure with the concept of serial slices, and possibly immuno histo chemistry. The objectives of this review are to specify the state of knowledge concerning the different steps: detection, surgical resection and the pathological analysis of the sentinels lymph nodes and to focus on validated and controversial indications, and on the main ongoing trials.

Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial

BACKGROUND

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with operable breast cancer is routinely used in some countries for staging the axilla despite limited data from randomized trials on morbidity and mortality outcomes. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to compare quality-of-life outcomes between patients with clinically node-negative invasive breast cancer who received sentinel lymph node biopsy and patients who received standard axillary treatment.

METHODS

The primary outcome measures were arm and shoulder morbidity and quality of life. From November 1999 to October 2003, 1031 patients were randomly assigned to undergo sentinel lymph node biopsy (n = 515) or standard axillary surgery (n = 516). Patients with sentinel lymph node metastases proceeded to delayed axillary clearance or received axillary radiotherapy (depending on the protocol at the treating institution). Intention-to-treat analyses of data at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are presented. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

The relative risks of any lymphedema and sensory loss for the sentinel lymph node biopsy group compared with the standard axillary treatment group at 12 months were 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23 to 0.60; absolute rates: 5% versus 13%) and 0.37 (95% CI = 0.27 to 0.50; absolute rates: 11% versus 31%), respectively. Drain usage, length of hospital stay, and time to resumption of normal day-to-day activities after surgery were statistically significantly lower in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (all P < .001), and axillary operative time was reduced (P = .055). Overall patient-recorded quality of life and arm functioning scores were statistically significantly better in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group throughout (all P < or = .003). These benefits were seen with no increase in anxiety levels in the sentinel lymph node biopsy group (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is associated with reduced arm morbidity and better quality of life than standard axillary treatment and should be the treatment of choice for patients who have early-stage breast cancer with clinically negative nodes.

The “Sentinel Chain”: a new concept for prediction of axillary node status in breast cancer patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

More than half the breast cancer patients with positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) do not harbor additional metastases in non-sentinel nodes (NSN). The aim of this study was to identify a subgroup of patients with positive SLNs and negative NSNs, on the basis of tumor involvement patterns in multiple radioactive nodes.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2004, 290 patients with primary invasive breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes had a SLN biopsy in our breast unit. Radiotracer was identified intraoperatively in the axilla. All radioactive nodes were removed and radioactivity was measured in each node extracorporeally. Nodes were ranked according to radioactivity, constituting a "Sentinel Chain", and the histopathological status of each node was reported. The different metastatic involvement patterns of the Sentinel Chain were correlated with the metastatic status of the NSNs after axillary dissection. Information was charted in a prospective database.

RESULTS

Of 290 patients, 216 (74.5%) had multiple radioactive nodes. Ninety patients (31%) had SLN metastases. Fifty patients had multiple ranked radioactive nodes and positive SLNs. Twenty-five of these patients had a sequential involvement pattern, with tumor-bearing high radioactivity nodes, and uninvolved low-radioactivity nodes. In the 23 of these 25 patients who had axillary dissection, NSN involvement was detected in only one patient (4.3%), whereas in 24 patients with other involvement patterns of the Sentinel Chain, NSN involvement reached 54.2% (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor-free status of NSN may be predicted using the Sentinel Chain concept in some breast cancer patients with positive SLNs.

Multimarker RT-PCR assay for the detection of minimal residual disease in sentinel lymph nodes of breast cancer patients

The presence of metastases in lymph nodes is the most powerful prognostic factor in breast cancer patients. Routine histological examination of lymph nodes has limited sensitivity for the detection of breast cancer metastases. The aim of the present study was to develop a multimarker reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay for the detection of minimal residual disease in sentinel nodes of breast cancer patients. RNA was extracted from 30 sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) obtained from 28 patients, three primary breast cancers (positive controls), three lymph nodes from patients with benign diseases, and peripheral blood lymphocytes of 10 healthy volunteers (negative controls). RT-PCR was performed using the following markers; cytokeratin (CK)-19, NY-BR-1 and mammaglobin B. RT-PCR results were compared to enhanced histopathologic examination and immunohistochemistry (IHC). All three positive controls showed strong PCR amplification for all three markers. None of the 13 negative controls was amplified by any of the three markers. Among the 30 SLN analysed, breast cancer metastases were detected in six SLNs by routine histology, in eight by IHC and in 15 by RT-PCR. We conclude that a multimarker RT-PCR assay probing for NY-BR-1, mammaglobin-B, and CK-19 is more sensitive compared to enhanced pathologic examination. This method may prove to be of value in breast cancer staging and prognosis evaluation.

A four node axillary sampling trial on breast cancer patients

The surgical management of axillary lymph nodes in early breast cancer remains controversial, although several maneuvers have been developed such as axillary node clearance (ANC), four node axillary sampling (4NAS), and sentinel node biopsy. A total of 237 cases of primary breast cancer at stages I and II were studied prospectively to elucidate the correlation between 4NAS and ANC. All calculated values by 4NAS showed high sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy as follows in this study: 92.9%, 100% and 98.5% for stage I, and 93.8%, 100% and 98.3% for stage II. Likewise, the false negative (FN) rates were 7.1% for stage I, 6.3% for stage II, 6.7% for T1, 6.4% for T2, 7.4% for N0, 0% for N1, and 6.5% for all cases. These rates were very low, although 7.4% for N0 and 0% for N1 were quite clearly different. This implies that all FN cases were N0, and were caused by micrometastases with normal consistency and size. 4NAS may be as accurate a procedure as ANC in assessing axillary nodal stage.

Factors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer--results of the ALMANAC validation phase

BACKGROUND

Despite the widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early stage breast cancer, there is a wide variation in reported test performance characteristics. A major aim of this prospective multicentre validation study was to quantify detection and false-negative rates of SLNB and evaluate factors influencing them.

METHODS

Eight-hundred and fourty-two patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer underwent SLNB according to a standardised protocol that used a combination of radiopharmaceutical 99mTc-albumin colloid and Patent Blue V dye. SLNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation in all patients.

RESULTS

Sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were identified in 803 (96.1%) of 836 evaluable cases. The median number of SLNs removed per patient was 2 (range 1-9). There were 19 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 263/282 (93.3%) and accuracy 782/803 (97.6%). SLNs were successfully identified by blue dye in 698 (85.6%), by isotope in 698 (85.6%), and by the combination of blue dye and isotope in 782 (96.0%) of 815 patients. Among 276 node positive patients, one or more positive SLNs were identified by blue dye in 251 (90.9%), by isotope in 246 (89.1%) and by the combination of blue dye and gamma probe in 258 (93.5%). Obesity, tumor location other than upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of SLNs on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan were significantly associated with failed localisation (p<0.001, p=0.008, p<0.001, respectively). The false-negative rate in patients with grade 3 tumors was 9.6%, compared with 4.7% in those with grade 2 tumors (p=0.022). The false-negative rate in patients who had one SLN harvested was 10.1%, compared with 1.1% in those who had multiple SLNs (three or more) removed (p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

SLNB can accurately determine whether axillary metastases are present in patients with early stage breast cancer with clinically negative axillary nodes. Both success and accuracy of SLNB are optimised by the combined use of blue dye and isotope. SLNB success decreases with increasing body mass, tumor location other than the upper outer quadrant and non-visualisation of hot nodes on the pre-operative lymphoscintiscan. This study demonstrates reduction in the predictive value of a negative SLNB in grade 3 tumors.

The sentinel node in breast cancer: an update

There has been rapid acceptance of sentinel lymph node biopsy into the management of breast cancer over the past 10 years. This article seeks to highlight the controversies and to summarise its current status.

Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer

This study is the first large prospective RCT of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) compared with standard axillary treatment (level I-III axillary lymph node dissection or four node sampling), which includes comprehensive and repeated quality of life (QOL) assessments over 18 months. Patients (n = 829) completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast (FACT-B+4) and the Spielberger State/Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) at baseline (pre-surgery) and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months post-surgery. There were significant differences between treatment groups favouring the SNB group throughout the 18 months assessment. Patients in the standard treatment group showed a greater decline in Trial Outcome Index (TOI) scores (physical well-being, functional well-being and breast cancer concerns subscales in FACT-B+4) and recovered more slowly than patients in the SNB group (p < 0.01). The change in total FACT-B+4 scores (measuring global QOL) closely resembled the TOI results. 18 months post-surgery approximately twice as many patients in the standard group compared with the SNB group reported substantial arm swelling (14% versus 7%) (p = 0.002) or numbness (19% versus 8.7%) (p < 0.001). Despite the uncertainty about undergoing a relatively new procedure and the possible need for further surgery, there was no evidence of increased anxiety amongst patients randomised to SNB (p > 0.05). For 6 months post-surgery younger patients reported less favourable QOL scores (p < 0.001) and greater levels of anxiety (p < 0.01). In view of the benefits regarding arm functioning and quality of life, the data from this randomised study support the use of SNB in patients with clinically node negative breast cancer.

Effect of lymphatic tumor burden on sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer

Distal obstruction of the lymphatics by tumor and extensive tumor infiltration of the draining lymph nodes may prevent migration of the tracer to the sentinel lymph node (SLN), adversely affecting SLN identification. Rerouting of lymphatic drainage may divert flow to internal mammary nodes and cause an alternative nonsentinel node to become "sentinel," increasing the risk of a false-negative result. A total of 618 breast cancer patients underwent SLN biopsy using 99mTc albumin colloid and patent blue V injected peritumorally. This was followed by standard axillary node clearance in all patients at the same operation. The overall SLN identification and false-negative rates were 96% (593/618) and 7.6% (17/223), respectively. There was no difference in the SLN identification rate and the false-negative rate with increasing axillary tumor burden (as determined by the total number of positive nodes in the axilla). Further detailed analyses are based on the 64 patients from one center (Cardiff) who had at least one positive SLN and proceeded to axillary clearance. A total of 83 positive SLNs were removed from 64 patients. Tumor burden in the positive SLN was assessed by measuring the size of the metastasis and percentage replacement of the SLN by tumor, and by documenting extranodal invasion. Increasing tumor burden in the SLN (as determined by percentage replacement of SLN by tumor and presence of extranodal invasion) was associated with decreased radioisotope uptake (p = 0.005 and p < 0.0001, respectively). There was no correlation between radioisotope uptake and the size of the metastasis in the SLN. There was no correlation between blue dye uptake, internal mammary drainage on lymphoscintiscan, and tumor burden in the positive SLN. In conclusion, increased axillary lymphatic tumor burden is not associated with failure to identify a SLN or false-negative results when both blue dye and radioisotope are used for SLN biopsy. In an individual SLN, the percentage replacement by tumor, but not the absolute size of the metastatic deposit is associated with reduced radioisotope uptake. Extranodal invasion in the SLN is a marker of lymphatic obstruction and is significantly associated with reduced radioisotope uptake. The lymphatic tumor burden does not seem to affect blue dye uptake or internal mammary drainage.

Fallacies of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in detecting sentinel node in breast cancer

Background

Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy is one of the three methods of evaluating sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer; however, it has been reported to have a high false negative rate.

Case presentations

We report here two cases where the preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was found to be fallacious. A 44-year-old female with T2N0 breast cancer underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with Tc⁹⁹ sulfur colloid which failed to show any uptake in axilla or internal mammary chain. Intraoperative scintigraphy with blue dye and hand held gamma probe identified sentinel lymph node in axilla. Another patient with T2N0 lesion underwent preoperative lymphoscintigraphy which showed a sentinel lymph node in axilla and another in supraclevicular fossa. Intraoperative scintigraphy failed to show supraclevicular node however axillary node was correctly identified.

Conclusion

These two cases further strengthen the need to carry out triple test in identification of sentinel lymph node in patients with breast cancer. It also demonstrates the fallacies of preoperative lymphoscintigraphy.

Update on detection of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

Sentinel lymph node biopsy is now the practice of choice for the management of many patients with breast cancer. This was not true in the early 1990s, when the first such procedures were performed and protocols for such were refined often. This was also not true in the first years of the 21st century, when a decade of collective experience and information acquired from numerous clinical investigations dictated additional subtle and not-so-subtle refinements of the procedures. However, it is true today; reports of the latest round of clinical investigations indicate that there are several breast cancer sentinel node procedures that result in successful identification of potential sentinel nodes in nearly all patients who are eligible for such procedures. A significant component of many of these successful sentinel node procedures is a detection and localization protocol that involves radiotracer methodologies, including radiopharmaceutical administration, preoperative nuclear medicine imaging, and intraoperative gamma counting. The present state and roles of nuclear medicine protocols used in breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy procedures is reviewed with emphasis on discussion of recent results, unresolved issues, and future considerations. Included are brief reviews of present radiotracer and blue-dye techniques for node localization, including remarks about injection strategies, counting probe technology, and radiation safety. Included also are discussions of on-going investigations of the implications of the presence of micrometastases; of the management value of detection, localization, and excision of extra-axillary nodes such as internal mammary nodes; and of the broad range of recurrence rates presently being reported. Remarks on the present and possible near- and long-term roles for nuclear medicine in the staging of breast cancer patients including comments on positron emission tomography and intraoperative imaging conclude the article.

Clinical relevance of multiple sentinel nodes in patients with breast cancer

Background

Indiscriminate removal of axillary nodes may not be justified as it may potentially worsen the morbidity of the sentinel lymph node biopsy (SNB) procedure. This study examined the factors associated with removal of multiple sentinel lymph nodes and determined whether there was an upper threshold for the number of sentinel nodes that should be removed.

Methods

A total of 803 patients with breast cancer underwent successful SNB using peritumoral injection of 99mTc-labelled albumin colloid and Patent Blue V dye. SNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation in all patients.

Results

The mean number of sentinel nodes removed per procedure was 2·2 (range 1–9). Multiple sentinel nodes (mean 2·9, range 2–9) were found in 501 patients (62·4 per cent). The false-negative rate in patients who had one sentinel node harvested was 10 per cent, compared with 1 per cent in patients who had three or more nodes removed (P = 0·010). Factors associated with finding multiple sentinel nodes were age less than 50 years (P = 0·004), low body mass index (P &lt; 0·001), tumour in the outer half of the breast (P = 0·013), sentinel node visualization on lymphoscintigraphy (P &lt; 0·001) and an interval of 12 h or less between radioisotope injection and SNB (P = 0·014). For 99·6 per cent of node-positive tumours, metastasis was detected within the first four sentinel nodes removed.

Conclusion

The identification of multiple sentinel nodes, when present, reduced the false-negative rate. These data suggested that removal of more than four nodes was unnecessary.

Role of routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy in sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer

Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is rapidly emerging as the preferred technique for nodal staging in breast cancer. When radioactive colloid is used, a preoperative lymphoscintiscan is obtained to ease sentinel lymph node (SN) identification. This study evaluates whether preoperative lymphoscintigraphy adds diagnostic accuracy to offset the additional time and cost required. 823 breast cancer patients underwent SNB based on lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative gamma probe detection, and blue dye mapping using 99 mTc-nanocolloid and Patent Blue V injected peritumourally. The SNB was followed by standard axillary treatment at the same operation. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed around 3 h after the radioisotope injection. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy revealed SNs in 593 (72%) of the 823 patients imaged. SN visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy was less successful in large tumours and tumours involving the upper outer quadrant of the breast (P=0.046, P<0.001, respectively). Lymphoscintigraphy showed internal mammary sentinel nodes in 9% (62/707) patients. The SN was identified intraoperatively in 98% (581) patients who had SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, with a false-negative rate of 7%. In patients who did not have SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, the SN was identified at operation in 90% (204) patients, with a false-negative rate of 7%. The SN identification rate was significantly higher in patients with SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy (P<0.001). SN identification rate intraoperatively using the gamma probe was significantly higher in the SN visualised group compared with the SN non-visualised group (95% vs. 68%; chi square (1 degrees of freedom (df)) P<0.001. There was no statistically significant difference in the false-negative rate and the operative time between the two groups. A mean of 2.3 (standard deviation (SD) 1.3) SNs per patient were removed in patients with SN visualised on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy compared with 1.8 (SD 1.2) in patients with no SN visualised on lymphoscintigraphy (P<0.001). Although SN visualisation on preoperative lymphoscintigraphy significantly improved the intraoperative SN localisation rate, SN was successfully identified in 90% of patients with no SN visualisation on lymphoscintigraphy. Given the time and cost required to perform routine preoperative lymphoscintigraphy, these data suggest that it may not be necessary in all cases. It may be valuable for surgeons in the learning phase to shorten the learning curve and in patients who have increased risk of intraoperative failed localisation (obese or old patients). A negative preoperative lymphoscintiscan predicts the inability to localise with the hand-held gamma probe. Therefore, if the SN is not visualised on lymphoscintigraphy then the addition of intraoperative blue dye is recommended to increase the likelihood of SN identification.

Internal Mammary Node Drainage and its Role in Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: The Initial ALMANAC Experience

This study was designed to identify the frequency of internal mammary drainage in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node (SLN) lymphoscintigraphy in a controlled clinical trial. The practicability and relevance of internal mammary SLN biopsy as a method to improve nodal staging and treatment in breast cancer were investigated. A total of 707 evaluable patients with invasive breast cancer underwent SLN biopsy based on lymphoscintigraphy, intraoperative g probe detection, and blue dye mapping using technetium Tc 99m albumin colloid and Patent Blue V injected peritumorally. This was followed by standard axillary treatment in the same operation in all patients. Lymphoscintigraphy showed internal mammary sentinel nodes in 62 patients (9%), and internal mammary drainage was identified perioperatively in an additional 7 patients (1%) using g probe detection. Sampling of the internal mammary basin, based on the results of lymphoscintigraphy and g probe detection, was done in 31 of 69 patients (45%). One patient had a pneumothorax and 2 experienced bleeding during internal mammary sampling. Internal mammary metastases were detected in 4 of 31 patients (13%). In 2 of the patients (6%), internal mammary nodes (IMNs) showed metastatic involvement without accompanying axillary metastases. One of these 2 patients would have received adjuvant endocrine systemic therapy because of the characteristics of the tumor, but may not have been recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Sampling of the internal mammary basin led to a change of management in these 2 patients, ie, institution of adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, a change in management occurred in only 2 of the 69 patients in our series, but 38 patients with unbiopsied "hot" IMNs remained with unknown internal mammary status. Biopsy of IMNs alters staging in few patients, and the impact on indication for adjuvant treatment was low. Internal mammary SLN biopsy may be associated with some additional morbidity. Current evidence suggests that internal mammary SLN biopsy is still a research tool.

Current status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in solid malignancies

Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy were first reported in 1977 by Cabanas for penile cancer. Since that time, the technique has become rapidly assimilated into clinical practice. The sentinel node concept has been validated in cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer. However, follow-up data of patients from randomised trials is needed to establish the clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy before accepting the procedure as a standard of care. This technique has the potential to be utilised in all solid tumours like colon, gastric, oesophageal, lung, gynaecologic, and head and neck cancer. This paper reviews the current status of sentinel lymph node biopsy in solid tumours.