Post-treatment surveillance imaging in lymphoma

Imaging Surveillance of Limited-stage Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients After PET-CT-documented First Remission

INTRODUCTION

Early stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ESHL) is highly curable; however, 10% to 15% of patients experience relapse. We examined the utilization of follow-up imaging for patients with ESHL who achieved a metabolic complete response after upfront therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The records of adult patients treated at a single institution between 2003 and 2014 were reviewed. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) and CT scan frequency was quantified during the 2 years following treatment and subsequent visits beyond 2 years.

RESULTS

The study cohort contained 179 patients. The median age was 31 years; bulky disease was present in 30%. ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) or AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) was given in 97%; 75% received radiation therapy. At a median follow-up of 6.9 years, the 5-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 93.7% and 98.1%, respectively. Relapse occurred in 5% (n = 9) of patients at a median of 9.1 months (range, 4.6-27.2 months) from therapy. Two patients presented with symptoms prompting imaging in follow-up. Within 2 years after therapy, 376 PET-CT scans and 3325 CT scans were performed, yielding an average of 2.1 PET-CTs and 18.6 CTs per patient. Of the initial 179 patients, 113 had follow-up conducted beyond 2 years post-therapy; an average of 2.7 PET-CTs and 33.2 CTs were performed. In the 2-year post-therapy period, 463 scans were performed per relapse detected.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of patients with ESHL who responded completely to frontline therapy, the relapse rate was low. Routine imaging surveillance lacks clinical benefit in this patient population.

Evidence-Based Follow-up for Adults With Cancer

BACKGROUND

The objectives of follow-up care for cancer patients include psycho- social assistance and the detection of health problems. The concept of follow-up care rests on the assumption that the early detection of cancer recurrences and disease- or treatment-related complications is beneficial to patients. In this article, we provide an overview of the scientific evidence supporting current recommen- dations for the follow-up care of patients with colorectal cancer, lung cancer, and lymphoma.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, supplemented by the authors' own experience in patient care and guideline creation.

RESULTS

As recurrences usually arise soon after initial treatment, the recommended follow-up interval is shorter in the first two years (3-6 months) and longer thereafter (6-12 months). The question of which particular follow-up studies should be per- formed has only been systematically analyzed in a few cases. For patients with colorectal cancer, colonoscopy is the most important study. Intensive follow-up care is associated with a statistically non-significant increase in the survival rate compared to minimal follow-up care (77.5% versus 75.8%). Intensive diagnostic follow-up studies have been found to lead to a doubling of the frequency of operations for recurrence with curative intent, yet without any effect on the average survival time. The findings in lung cancer are similar. However, after tumor resection with curative intent, regularly repeated CT scanning leads to a survival advantage. In lymphoma patients, the longer the interval from primary treatment, the greater the likelihood of treatment-related secondary illnesses. It is not yet known how follow-up care should be provided to these patients in order to help them best.

CONCLUSION

The evidence supporting the efficacy of currently recommended modalities of follow-up care for cancer patients is weak. Until more data from clinical studies become available, the current guidelines should be followed.