Similarities and Differences in Follicular Cell-Derived Thyroid Cancer Management Guidelines Used in Europe and the United States

Treatment strategies for low-risk papillary thyroid carcinoma: a position statement from the Thyroid Department of the Brazilian Society of Endocrinology and Metabolism (SBEM)

Increasingly sensitive diagnostic methods, better understanding of molecular pathophysiology, and well-conducted prospective studies have changed the current approach to patients with thyroid cancer, requiring the implementation of individualized management. Most patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) are currently considered to have a low risk of mortality and disease persistence/recurrence. Consequently, current treatment recommendations for these patients include less invasive or intensive therapies. We used the most recent evidence to prepare a position statement providing guidance for decisions regarding the management of patients with low-risk PTC (LRPTC). This document summarizes the criteria defining LRPTC (including considerations regarding changes in the TNM staging system), indications and contraindications for active surveillance, and recommendations for follow-up and surgery. Active surveillance may be an appropriate initial choice in selected patients, and the criteria to recommend this approach are detailed. A section is dedicated to the current evidence regarding lobectomy versus total thyroidectomy and the potential pitfalls of each approach, considering the challenges during long-term follow-up. Indications for radioiodine (RAI) therapy are also addressed, along with the benefits and risks associated with this treatment, patient preparation, and dosage. Finally, this statement presents the best follow-up strategies for LRPTC after lobectomy and total thyroidectomy with or without RAI.

Clinical Assessment and Risk Stratification in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Thyroid cancer management is rapidly evolving to a personalized management approach. Risk stratification systems are designed to assist in personalized management. Differentiating patients who may benefit from aggressive therapy and intense follow-up as opposed to those who can be successfully treated with minimalized initial management options and follow-up is crucial to the development of the right treatment plan for the right patient in order to optimize initial therapy and follow-up testing. This article aims to describe and discuss the risk stratification systems currently recommended for differentiated thyroid cancer.

Same thyroid cancer, different national practice guidelines: When discordant American Thyroid Association and National Comprehensive Cancer Network surgery recommendations are associated with compromised patient outcome

BACKGROUND

The American Thyroid Association (ATA) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines have discordant recommendations for managing patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). We hypothesized that physician adherence to either of the 2009 extent of surgery guidelines of the ATA or NCCN was associated with improved survival, and that practice is most standardized nationally when guidelines are concordant.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing surgery for DTC were included from the National Cancer Database. Multivariable modeling was used to identify factors associated with nonadherence to the 2009 ATA or NCCN guidelines (2010-2011) and hypothetically examine the association of retrospective adherence to guidelines with survival (1998-2006).

RESULTS

A total of 39,687 patients with DTC were included; 2,249 were not treated in accordance with ATA or NCCN guidelines. Factors independently associated with nonadherence were discordance between ATA and NCCN recommendations, black race, and treatment at nonacademic centers (P < .01). After adjustment, care not in accordance with either set of guidelines was associated with compromised survival (hazard ratio 1.16, P = .02).

CONCLUSION

A minority of patients received surgery for DTC not aligned with guidelines; nonadherent care was associated with compromised survival. Discordance in recommendations between guidelines is associated with reduction in adherent care, suggesting that standardizing guidelines could decrease confusion, increase adherence, and thereby may improve outcomes.

Bone Indices in Thyroidectomized Patients on Long-Term Substitution Therapy with Levothyroxine Assessed by DXA and HR-pQCT

Background. Studies on bone effects of long-term substitution therapy with levothyroxine (LT4) have shown discrepant results. Previous studies have, however, not evaluated volumetric bone mineral densities (vBMD), bone structure, and strength using high resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and finite element analysis (FEA). Using a cross-sectional design, we aimed to determine whether BMD, structure, and strength are affected in hypothyroid patients on LT4 substitution therapy. Methods. We compared 49 patients with well-substituted hypothyroidism with 49 age- and gender-matched population based controls. Areal BMD was assessed by DXA, vBMD and bone geometry by HR-pQCT, and bone strength by FEA. Results. Patients had been thyroidectomized due to thyroid cancer (10%) and nontoxic (33%) or toxic goiter (57%). 82% were women. TSH levels did not differ between groups, but patients had significantly higher levels of T4 (p < 0.001) and lower levels of T3 (p < 0.01). Compared to controls, patients had higher levels of magnesium (p < 0.05), whereas ionized calcium and PTH were lower (p < 0.05). Bone scans did not reveal any differences in BMD, bone geometry, or strength. Conclusion. If patients with hypothyroidism are well-substituted with LT4, the disease does not affect bone indices to any major degree.

Outcomes of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer risk-stratified according to the American thyroid association and Latin American thyroid society risk of recurrence classification systems

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to validate the proposed Latin American Thyroid Society (LATS) risk of recurrence stratification system and to compare the findings with those of the American Thyroid Association (ATA) risk of recurrence stratification system.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective review of papillary thyroid cancer patients treated with total thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine at a single experienced thyroid cancer center and followed according to the LATS management guidelines. Each patient was risk-stratified using both the LATS and ATA staging systems. The primary endpoints were (i) the best response to initial therapy defined as either remission (stimulated thyroglobulin [Tg] <1 ng/mL, negative ultrasonography) or persistent disease (biochemical and/or structural), and (ii) clinical status at final follow-up defined as no evidence of disease (suppressed Tg <1 ng/mL, negative ultrasonography), biochemical persistent disease (suppressed Tg >1 ng/mL in the absence of structural disease), structural persistent disease (locoregional or distant metastases), or recurrence (biochemical or structural disease identified after a period of no evidence of disease).

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-one papillary thyroid cancer patients were included (mean age 45 ± 16 years, followed for a median of 4 years after initial treatment). Both the ATA and LATS risk stratification systems provided clinically meaningful graded estimates with regard to (i) the likelihood of achieving remission in response to initial therapy, (ii) the likelihood of having persistent structural disease in response to initial therapy and at final follow-up, (iii) the likely locations of the persistent structural disease (locoregional vs. distant metastases), (iv) the likelihood of recurrence, and (v) the likelihood of being no evidence of disease at final follow-up. The likelihood of having persistent biochemical evidence of disease was not significantly different across the staging categories.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the ATA and LATS risk of recurrence systems effectively risk-stratify patients with regard to multiple important clinical outcomes. When used in conjunction with a staging system that predicts disease-specific mortality, either of these systems can be used to guide risk-adapted individualized initial management recommendations.