Controversies in nutritional support for critically ill children

Application effect of initiation of enteral nutrition at different time periods after surgery in neonates with complex congenital heart disease: A retrospective analysis

Early enteral nutrition (EN) promotes the recovery of critically ill patients, but the initiation time for EN in neonates after cardiac surgery remains unclear.This study aimed to investigate the effect of initiation time of EN after cardiac surgery in neonates with complex congenital heart disease (CHD).Neonates with complex CHD admitted to the CICU from January 2015 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the 24-hour Group (initiated at 24 hours after surgery in 2015) (n = 32) and 6-hour Group (initiated at 6 hours after surgery in 2016 and 2017) (n = 66). Data on the postoperative feeding intolerance, nutrition-related laboratory tests (albumin, prealbumin, retinol binding protein), and clinical outcomes (including duration of mechanical ventilation, CICU stay, and postoperative hospital stay) were collected.The incidence of feeding intolerance was 56.3% in 24-hour Group and 39.4%, respectively (P = .116). As compared to 24-hour Group, prealbumin and retinol binding protein levels were higher (160.7 ± 64.3 vs 135.2 ± 28.9 mg/L, P = .043 for prealbumin; 30.7 ± 17.7 vs 23.0 ± 14.1 g/L P = .054 for retinol-binding protein). The duration of CICU stay (9.4 ± 4.5 vs 13.3 ± 10.4 day, P = .049) and hospital stay (11.6 ± 3.0 vs 15.8 ± 10.3 day, P = .028) were shorter in 6-hour Group.Early EN improves nutritional status and clinical outcomes in neonates with complex CHD undergoing cardiac surgery, without significant feeding intolerance.

Evaluation of nutritional care of hospitalized children in a tertiary pediatric hospital

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Hospitalized children are at risk of malnutrition. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a clinical practice in a tertiary hospital. The nutritional team developed a specific software for screening of malnutrition and risk of malnutrition (Evalnut) that provides also recommendations for the nutritional management of the patient. The data recorded into this program and the tool itself were analyzed and optimizations are highlighted.

METHODS

A retrospective study analyzed the data collected in 2015 during 4931 consecutive hospitalizations (3984 children) at the University Children's Hospital Queen Fabiola. Pivot tables analysis (Excel) of the database of the screening tool was compared with the clinical practice of the dietitians. First data processing excluded records with abnormal or missing values. Impact of nutritional care analysis needs at least 2 evaluations and a positive patient's height trend. In case of height equality, only length of hospital stays less than 2 weeks were kept.

RESULTS

This study highlighted inaccurate database records related to imperfections of the computer program, missing or erroneous measures and incomplete encoding. First analysis on 3219 valid hospitalizations showed statistical correlations. Prevalence of malnutrition on admission was 33%, split into 14,5% acute malnutrition, 15% chronic malnutrition and 3,5% mixed malnutrition. Overall, 30,3% of the children were categorized at risk of developing malnutrition during their stay. Positive impact of nutritional management on the resulting nutritional status was demonstrated on the second data selection (352 hospitalizations): WFH median (interquartile range) increased from 96,1% (87,1-106,4) on admission to 96,9% (89,1-106,1) (p < 0,01) on discharge. An optimization of the existing software was finally proposed.

CONCLUSION

In our hospital, the dietitians are the most aware on the importance of nutritional assessment and management during hospitalization. Encouraging results are obtained. Inclusion of a nutritional program in the medical file is useful to raise interest amongst caregivers and is particularly valuable for the nutritional follow up of the patients by the nutrition team.

When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?

Parenteral nutrition (PN) represents one of the most notable achievements of modern medicine, serving as a therapeutic modality for all age groups across the healthcare continuum. PN offers a life-sustaining option when intestinal failure prevents adequate oral or enteral nutrition. However, providing nutrients by vein is an expensive form of nutrition support, and serious adverse events can occur. In an effort to provide clinical guidance regarding PN therapy, the Board of Directors of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) convened a task force to develop consensus recommendations regarding appropriate PN use. The recommendations contained in this document aim to delineate appropriate PN use and promote clinical benefits while minimizing the risks associated with the therapy. These consensus recommendations build on previous ASPEN clinical guidelines and consensus recommendations for PN safety. They are intended to guide evidence-based decisions regarding appropriate PN use for organizations and individual professionals, including physicians, nurses, dietitians, pharmacists, and other clinicians involved in providing PN. They not only support decisions related to initiating and managing PN but also serve as a guide for developing quality monitoring tools for PN and for identifying areas for further research. Finally, the recommendations contained within the document are also designed to inform decisions made by additional stakeholders, such as policy makers and third-party payers, by providing current perspectives regarding the use of PN in a variety of healthcare settings.