1
|
Rholl E, Leuthner SR. Role of palliative care in centers performing maternal-fetal interventions. Front Pediatr 2023; 11:1223710. [PMID: 37484772 PMCID: PMC10360186 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2023.1223710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2023] [Indexed: 07/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Advancements in maternal-fetal interventions have allowed for direct fetal access, shifting the focus of interventions from maternal health for fetal health to a focus on sole fetal/neonatal benefit. Given that access to the fetus can only be obtained through the mother, there are ethical considerations important to consider when counseling the maternal-fetal dyad. The goals of maternal-fetal interventions range from improved fetal/neonatal survival to decreased long-term morbidities and improved quality of life. However, interventions to improve quality of life may not always achieve their desired result. Additionally, maternal-fetal interventions have risks such as premature birth and other complications that should be heavily considered as they may offset the potential benefits of the procedure. While some families elect for a maternal-fetal intervention, doing every potential postnatal intervention may not be in alignment with their goals depending on the outcome of the intervention. Given the complex, value-laden decision-making that is crucial to counseling parents about decisions surrounding maternal-fetal interventions and subsequent neonatal care, palliative care specialists should be utilized in fetal centers. Palliative care specialists are trained to assist with complex, goal concordant decision-making and can guide families and medical teams through the decision points that arise during the treatment journey.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Rholl
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Steven R. Leuthner
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gallagher K, Crombag N, Prashar K, Deprest J, Ourselin S, David AL, Marlow N. Global Policy and Practice for Intrauterine Fetal Resuscitation During Fetal Surgery for Open Spina Bifida Repair. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e239855. [PMID: 37097634 PMCID: PMC10130943 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.9855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Globally accepted recommendations suggest that a woman should be between 19 weeks and 25 weeks plus 6 days of pregnancy to be considered eligible for fetal closure of open spina bifida. A fetus requiring emergency delivery during surgery is therefore potentially considered viable and thus eligible for resuscitation. There is little evidence, however, to support how this scenario is addressed in clinical practice. Objective To explore current policy and practice for fetal resuscitation during fetal surgery for open spina bifida in centers undertaking fetal surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants An online survey was designed to identify current policies and practices in place to support fetal surgery for open spina bifida, exploring experiences and management of emergency fetal delivery and fetal death during surgery. The survey was emailed to 47 fetal surgery centers in 11 countries where fetal spina bifida repair is currently performed. These centers were identified through the literature, the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis center repository, and an internet search. Centers were contacted between January 15 and May 31, 2021. Individuals volunteered participation through choosing to complete the survey. Main Outcomes and Measures The survey comprised 33 questions of mixed multiple choice, option selection, and open-ended formats. Questions explored policy and practice supporting fetal and neonatal resuscitation during fetal surgery for open spina bifida. Results Responses were obtained from 28 of 47 centers (60%) in 11 countries. Twenty cases of fetal resuscitation during fetal surgery during the last 5 years were reported across 10 centers. Four cases of emergency delivery during fetal surgery after maternal and/or fetal complications during the last 5 years were reported across 3 centers. Fewer than half the 28 centers (n = 12 [43%]) had policies in place to support practice in the event of either imminent fetal death (during or after fetal surgery) or the need for emergency fetal delivery during fetal surgery. Twenty of 24 centers (83%) reported preoperative parental counseling on the potential need for fetal resuscitation prior to fetal surgery. The gestational age at which centers would attempt neonatal resuscitation after emergency delivery varied from 22 weeks and 0 days to more than 28 weeks. Conclusions In this global survey study of 28 fetal surgical centers, there was no standard practice about how fetal resuscitation or subsequent neonatal resuscitation was managed during open spina bifida repair. Further collaboration between professionals and parents is required to ensure sharing of information to support knowledge development in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katie Gallagher
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neeltje Crombag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kavita Prashar
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jan Deprest
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sebastien Ourselin
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anna L David
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Fetal Medicine Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Neil Marlow
- UCL Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yasar BN, Terzioglu F. Parents' Needs and Their Perceived Obstacles With Team Members in Perinatal Palliative Care: A Qualitative Phenomenological Study. J Hosp Palliat Nurs 2022; 24:00129191-990000000-00034. [PMID: 35881685 DOI: 10.1097/njh.0000000000000894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Advances in prenatal diagnosis have made medical, psychological, and ethical issues regarding the diagnosis of fetal anomalies a crucial topic of research. This study identified the needs of parents of unborn babies with fetal anomalies and their views regarding the services of interdisciplinary team members in charge of assisting them. The sample consisted of 30 parents and 40 team members from a women's health education and research hospital. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews and were qualitatively analyzed using the phenomenological method of interpretation. The results showed that parents' physical, psychological, social, and spiritual needs during pregnancy, childbirth, and postpartum were not fully met after their unborn babies were diagnosed with fetal anomalies. The results also showed that team members needed a structured program, legal regulations, and training to provide holistic care.
Collapse
|
4
|
Baschat AA, Blackwell SB, Chatterjee D, Cummings JJ, Emery SP, Hirose S, Hollier LM, Johnson A, Kilpatrick SJ, Luks FI, Menard MK, McCullough LB, Moldenhauer JS, Moon-Grady AJ, Mychaliska GB, Narvey M, Norton ME, Rollins MD, Skarsgard ED, Tsao K, Warner BB, Wilpers A, Ryan G. Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 139:1027-1042. [PMID: 35675600 PMCID: PMC9202072 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Fetal therapies undertaken to improve fetal outcome or to optimize transition to neonate life often entail some level of maternal, fetal, or neonatal risk. A fetal therapy center needs access to resources to carry out such therapies and to manage maternal, fetal, and neonatal complications that might arise, either related to the therapy per se or as part of the underlying fetal or maternal condition. Accordingly, a fetal therapy center requires a dedicated operational infrastructure and necessary resources to allow for appropriate oversight and monitoring of clinical performance and to facilitate multidisciplinary collaboration between the relevant specialties. Three care levels for fetal therapy centers are proposed to match the anticipated care complexity, with appropriate resources to achieve an optimal outcome at an institutional and regional level. A level I fetal therapy center should be capable of offering fetal interventions that may be associated with obstetric risks of preterm birth or membrane rupture but that would be very unlikely to require maternal medical subspecialty or intensive care, with neonatal risks not exceeding those of moderate prematurity. A level II center should have the incremental capacity to provide maternal intensive care and to manage extreme neonatal prematurity. A level III therapy center should offer the full range of fetal interventions (including open fetal surgery) and be able manage any of the associated maternal complications and comorbidities, as well as have access to neonatal and pediatric surgical intervention including indicated surgery for neonates with congenital anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmet A. Baschat
- Johns Hopkins Center for Fetal Therapy, Department of Gynecology &Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University
| | - Sean B Blackwell
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas, Mc Govern Medical School
| | - Debnath Chatterjee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Children’s Hospital Colorado/Colorado Fetal Care Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine
| | | | - Stephen P. Emery
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine
| | - Shinjiro Hirose
- Division of Pediatric, General, Thoracic and Fetal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center
| | - Lisa M. Hollier
- Division of Maternal-Fetal; Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine
| | - Anthony Johnson
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Texas, Mc Govern Medical School
| | | | - Francois I Luks
- Department of Surgery, Alpert Medical School of Brown University and Hasbro Children’s Hospital
| | - M. Kathryn Menard
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill
| | | | - Julie S. Moldenhauer
- Center for Fetal Diagnosis and Treatment, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
| | - Anita J. Moon-Grady
- Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Clinical Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
| | - George B. Mychaliska
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, University of Michigan
| | - Michael Narvey
- Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Manitoba
| | - Mary E. Norton
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
| | | | - Eric D. Skarsgard
- Centre for Surgical Research, Department of Surgery, BC Children’s Hospital, University of British Columbia
| | - KuoJen Tsao
- Division of Pediatric General and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas, Mc Govern Medical School
| | - Barbara B. Warner
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | - Greg Ryan
- Ontario Fetal Care Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the advance of maternal--fetal surgery, the research of stem cell transplantation and tissue engineering in prenatal management of fetal meningomyelocele (fMMC). RECENT FINDINGS Advance in the imaging study provides more accurate assessment of fMMC in utero. Prenatal maternal--fetal surgery in fMMC demonstrates favourable postnatal outcome. Minimally invasive fetal surgery minimizes uterine wall disruption. Endoscopic fetal surgery is performed via laparotomy-assisted or entirely percutaneous approach. The postnatal outcome for open and endoscopic fetal surgery shares no difference. Single layer closure during repair of fMMC is preferred to reduce postnatal surgical intervention. All maternal--fetal surgeries impose anesthetic and obstetric risk to pregnant woman. Ruptured of membrane and preterm delivery are common complications. Trans-amniotic stem cell therapy (TRASCET) showed potential tissue regeneration in animal models. Fetal tissue engineering with growth factors and dura substitutes with biosynthetic materials promote spinal cord regeneration. This will overcome the challenge of closure in large fMMC. Planning of the maternal--fetal surgery should adhere to ethical framework to minimize morbidity to both fetus and mother. SUMMARY Combination of endoscopic fetal surgery with TRASCET or tissue engineering will be a new vision to achieve to improve the outcome of prenatal intervention in fMMC.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wan A, Weingarten K, Rapoport A. Palliative Care?! But This Child's Not Dying: The Burgeoning Partnership Between Pediatric Cardiology and Palliative Care. Can J Cardiol 2020; 36:1041-1049. [PMID: 32437731 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The field of pediatric cardiology has witnessed major changes over the past few decades that have considerably altered patient outcomes, including decreasing mortality rates for many previously untreatable conditions. Despite this, some pediatric cardiology programs are increasingly choosing to partner with their institutional palliative care teams. Why is this? The field of palliative care also has experienced significant shifts over a similar period of time. Today's palliative care is focused on improving quality of life for any patient with a serious or life-threatening condition, regardless of where they might be on their disease trajectory. Research has clearly demonstrated that improved outcomes can be achieved for a variety of patient cohorts through early integration of palliative care; recent evidence suggests that the same may be true in pediatric cardiology. All pediatric cardiologists need to be aware of what pediatric palliative care has to offer their patients, especially those who are not actively dying. This manuscript reviews the evolution of palliative care and provides a rationale for its integration into the care of children with advanced heart disease. Readers will gain a sense of how and when to introduce palliative care to their families, as well as insight into what pediatric palliative care teams have to offer. Additional research is required to better delineate optimal partnerships between palliative care and pediatric cardiology so that we may promote maximal quality of life for patients concurrently with continued efforts to push the boundaries of quantity of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Wan
- Division of Cardiology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kevin Weingarten
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Paediatric Advanced Care Team, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | - Adam Rapoport
- Paediatric Advanced Care Team, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada; Emily's House Children's Hospice, Toronto, Canada; Departments of Paediatrics and Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Fetal surgery and fetal therapy involve surgical interventions on the fetus in utero to correct or ameliorate congenital abnormalities and give a developing fetus the best chance at a healthy life. Historical use of biomaterials in fetal surgery has been limited, and most biomaterials used in fetal surgeries today were originally developed for adult or pediatric patients. However, as the field of fetal surgery moves from open surgeries to minimally invasive procedures, many opportunities exist for innovative biomaterials engineers to create materials designed specifically for the unique challenges and opportunities of maternal-fetal surgery. Here, we review biomaterials currently used in clinical fetal surgery as well as promising biomaterials in development for eventual clinical translation. We also highlight unmet challenges in fetal surgery that could particularly benefit from novel biomaterials, including fetal membrane sealing and minimally invasive myelomeningocele defect repair. Finally, we conclude with a discussion of the underdeveloped fetal immune system and opportunities for exploitation with novel immunomodulating biomaterials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally M Winkler
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. and University of California, Berkeley-University of California, San Francisco Graduate Program in Bioengineering, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Michael R Harrison
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Phillip B Messersmith
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA. and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA and Materials Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|