Pragmatic approach to intersex, including genital ambiguity, in the newborn

El laboratorio en el diagnóstico multidisciplinar del desarrollo sexual anómalo o diferente (DSD)

Objetivos

El desarrollo de las características sexuales femeninas o masculinas acontece durante la vida fetal, determinándose el sexo genético, el gonadal y el sexo genital interno y externo (femenino o masculino). Cualquier discordancia en las etapas de diferenciación ocasiona un desarrollo sexual anómalo o diferente (DSD) que se clasifica según la composición de los cromosomas sexuales del cariotipo.

Contenido

En este capítulo se abordan la fisiología de la determinación y el desarrollo de las características sexuales femeninas o masculinas durante la vida fetal, la clasificación general de los DSD y su estudio diagnóstico clínico, bioquímico y genético que debe ser multidisciplinar. Los estudios bioquímicos deben incluir, además de las determinaciones bioquímicas generales, análisis de hormonas esteroideas y peptídicas, en condiciones basales o en pruebas funcionales de estimulación. El estudio genético debe comenzar con la determinación del cariotipo al que seguirá un estudio molecular en los cariotipos 46,XX ó 46,XY, orientado a la caracterización de un gen candidato. Además, se expondrán de manera específica los marcadores bioquímicos y genéticos en los DSD 46,XX, que incluyen el desarrollo gonadal anómalo (disgenesias, ovotestes y testes), el exceso de andrógenos de origen fetal (el más frecuente), fetoplacentario o materno y las anomalías del desarrollo de los genitales internos.

Perspectivas

El diagnóstico de un DSD requiere la contribución de un equipo multidisciplinar coordinado por un clínico y que incluya los servicios de bioquímica y genética clínica y molecular, un servicio de radiología e imagen y un servicio de anatomía patológica.

The laboratory in the multidisciplinary diagnosis of differences or disorders of sex development (DSD): III) Biochemical and genetic markers in the 46,XYIV) Proposals for the differential diagnosis of DSD

Objectives

46,XY differences/disorders of sex development (DSD) involve an abnormal gonadal and/or genital (external and/or internal) development caused by lack or incomplete intrauterine virilization, with or without the presence of Müllerian ducts remnants.

Content

Useful biochemical markers for differential diagnosis of 46,XY DSD include hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal hormones such as luteinizing and follicle-stimulating hormones (LH and FSH; in baseline or after LHRH stimulation conditions), the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), inhibin B, insulin-like 3 (INSL3), adrenal and gonadal steroid hormones (including cortisol, aldosterone, testosterone and their precursors, dihydrotestosterone and estradiol) and the pituitary ACTH hormone. Steroid hormones are measured at baseline or after stimulation with ACTH (adrenal hormones) and/or with HCG (gonadal hormones).

Summary

Different patterns of hormone profiles depend on the etiology and the severity of the underlying disorder and the age of the patient at diagnosis. Molecular diagnosis includes detection of gene dosage or copy number variations, analysis of candidate genes or high-throughput DNA sequencing of panels of candidate genes or the whole exome or genome.

Outlook

Differential diagnosis of 46,XX or 46,XY DSD requires a multidisciplinary approach, including patient history and clinical, morphological, imaging, biochemical and genetic data. We propose a diagnostic algorithm suitable for a newborn with DSD that focuses mainly on biochemical and genetic data.

The laboratory in the multidisciplinary diagnosis of differences or disorders of sex development (DSD): I) Physiology, classification, approach, and methodologyII) Biochemical and genetic markers in 46,XX DSD

Objectives

The development of female or male sex characteristics occurs during fetal life, when the genetic, gonadal, and internal and external genital sex is determined (female or male). Any discordance among sex determination and differentiation stages results in differences/disorders of sex development (DSD), which are classified based on the sex chromosomes found on the karyotype.

Content

This chapter addresses the physiological mechanisms that determine the development of female or male sex characteristics during fetal life, provides a general classification of DSD, and offers guidance for clinical, biochemical, and genetic diagnosis, which must be established by a multidisciplinary team. Biochemical studies should include general biochemistry, steroid and peptide hormone testing either at baseline or by stimulation testing. The genetic study should start with the determination of the karyotype, followed by a molecular study of the 46,XX or 46,XY karyotypes for the identification of candidate genes.

Summary

46,XX DSD include an abnormal gonadal development (dysgenesis, ovotestes, or testes), an androgen excess (the most frequent) of fetal, fetoplacental, or maternal origin and an abnormal development of the internal genitalia. Biochemical and genetic markers are specific for each group.

Outlook

Diagnosis of DSD requires the involvement of a multidisciplinary team coordinated by a clinician, including a service of biochemistry, clinical, and molecular genetic testing, radiology and imaging, and a service of pathological anatomy.

El laboratorio en el diagnóstico multidisciplinar del desarrollo sexual anómalo o diferente (DSD): III) Marcadores bioquímicos y genéticos en los 46,XY IV) Propuestas para el diagnóstico diferencial de los DSD

Objetivos

El desarrollo sexual anómalo o diferente (DSD) con cariotipo 46,XY incluye anomalías en el desarrollo gonadal y/o genital (externo y/o interno).

Contenido

Los marcadores bioquímicos útiles para el diagnóstico diferencial de los DSD con cariotipo 46,XY incluyen las hormonas del eje hipotálamo-hipófiso gonadal como son las gonadotropinas LH y FSH (en condiciones basales o tras la estimulación con LHRH), la hormona anti-Mülleriana, la inhibina B, el factor insulinoide tipo 3 y las hormonas esteroideas de origen suprarrenal (se incluirá la hormona hipofisaria ACTH) y testicular (cortisol, aldosterona y sus precursores, testosterona y sus precursores, dihidrotestosterona y estradiol). Las hormonas esteroideas se analizarán en condiciones basales o tras la estimulación con ACTH (hormonas adrenales) y/o con HCG (hormonas testiculares). Los patrones de variación de las distintas hormonas dependerán de la causa y la edad de cada paciente. El diagnóstico molecular debe incluir el análisis de un gen candidato, un panel de genes o el análisis de un exoma completo.

Perspectivas

El diagnóstico diferencial de los DSD con cariotipos 46,XX ó 46,XY debe ser multidisciplinar, incluyendo los antecedentes clínicos, morfológicos, de imagen, bioquímicos y genéticos. Se han elaborado numerosos algoritmos diagnósticos.

Under-reported aspects of diagnosis and treatment addressed in the Dutch-Flemish guideline for comprehensive diagnostics in disorders/differences of sex development

We present key points from the updated Dutch-Flemish guideline on comprehensive diagnostics in disorders/differences of sex development (DSD) that have not been widely addressed in the current (inter)national literature. These points are of interest to physicians working in DSD (expert) centres and to professionals who come across persons with a DSD but have no (or limited) experience in this area. The Dutch-Flemish guideline is based on internationally accepted principles. Recent initiatives striving for uniform high-quality care across Europe, and beyond, such as the completed COST action 1303 and the European Reference Network for rare endocrine conditions (EndoERN), have generated several excellent papers covering nearly all aspects of DSD. The Dutch-Flemish guideline follows these international consensus papers and covers a number of other topics relevant to daily practice. For instance, although next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based molecular diagnostics are becoming the gold standard for genetic evaluation, it can be difficult to prove variant causality or relate the genotype to the clinical presentation. Network formation and centralisation are essential to promote functional studies that assess the effects of genetic variants and to the correct histological assessment of gonadal material from DSD patients, as well as allowing for maximisation of expertise and possible cost reductions. The Dutch-Flemish guidelines uniquely address three aspects of DSD. First, we propose an algorithm for counselling and diagnostic evaluation when a DSD is suspected prenatally, a clinical situation that is becoming more common. Referral to ultrasound sonographers and obstetricians who are part of a DSD team is increasingly important here. Second, we pay special attention to healthcare professionals not working within a DSD centre as they are often the first to diagnose or suspect a DSD, but are not regularly exposed to DSDs and may have limited experience. Their thoughtful communication to patients, carers and colleagues, and the accessibility of protocols for first-line management and efficient referral are essential. Careful communication in the prenatal to neonatal period and the adolescent to adult transition are equally important and relatively under-reported in the literature. Third, we discuss the timing of (NGS-based) molecular diagnostics in the initial workup of new patients and in people with a diagnosis made solely on clinical grounds or those who had earlier genetic testing that is not compatible with current state-of-the-art diagnostics.

The External Genitalia Score (EGS): A European Multicenter Validation Study

CONTEXT

Standardized description of external genitalia is needed in the assessment of children with atypical genitalia.

OBJECTIVES

To validate the External Genitalia Score (EGS), to present reference values for preterm and term babies up to 24 months and correlate obtained scores with anogenital distances (AGDs).

DESIGN, SETTING

A European multicenter (n = 8) validation study was conducted from July 2016 to July 2018.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

EGS is based on the external masculinization score but uses a gradual scale from female to male (range, 0-12) and terminology appropriate for both sexes. The reliability of EGS and AGDs was determined by the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Cross-sectional data were obtained in 686 term babies (0-24 months) and 181 preterm babies, and 111 babies with atypical genitalia.

RESULTS

The ICC of EGS in typical and atypical genitalia is excellent and good, respectively. Median EGS (10th to 90th centile) in males < 28 weeks gestation is 10 (8.6-11.5); in males 28-32 weeks 11.5 (9.2-12); in males 33-36 weeks 11.5 (10.5-12) and in full-term males 12 (10.5-12). In all female babies, EGS is 0 (0-0). The mean (SD) lower/upper AGD ratio (AGDl/u) is 0.45 (0.1), with significant difference between AGDl/u in males 0.49 (0.1) and females 0.39 (0.1) and intermediate values in differences of sex development (DSDs) 0.43 (0.1). The AGDl/u correlates with EGS in males with typical genitalia and in atypical genitalia.

CONCLUSIONS

EGS is a reliable and valid tool to describe external genitalia in premature and term babies up to 24 months. EGS correlates with AGDl/u in males. It facilitates standardized assessment, clinical decision-making and multicenter research.

Outcome of feminizing genital reconstruction in female sex assigned disorder of sex development in a low-income country

BACKGROUND

In patients with disorders of sex development (DSD), surgical/medical treatments are undertaken after sex assignment to ensure congruent bodily appearance and function. Genital reconstruction in these patients can be daunting with varied outcome. Understanding these outcomes is imperative, more especially in a developing country where added challenges exist.

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the outcome of genital surgery in patients with DSD assigned female sex.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 25 cases of female sex assigned DSD managed in two tertiary centers in southeast Nigeria was performed. Data of these cases were collected from the case notes, discharge summaries, and theater records. IBM SPSS Statistics Data Editor, version 21, was used for data entry and analysis.

RESULTS

The patients presented at median age of 12 months (range 2 days-30 years), with 15 (60%) cases reared as female and 10 (40%) reared as male before presentation. The predominant phenotype was phallus with empty fused/unfused labioscrotum and urethra opening in the labioscrotum or perineum in 21 (84%) patients. Evaluation revealed features suggestive of 46XX DSD in 21 (84%) patients, ovotesticular DSD in two (8%), and androgen insensitivity in two (8%). A total of 10 cases required sex reassignment after evaluation. Overall, 24 of the 25 cases had feminizing genital procedures. After a median follow-up period of 2 years (range 2 months-8 years), six (25%) cases developed procedure-related complications, three (12.5%) had social maladjustment, and two (8.3%) patients reported features of gender dysphoria.

DISCUSSION

The procedures of feminizing genitoplasty in this study did not differ from the established procedure. However, as a result of challenges of delayed presentation, inadequate early management, sociocultural factors, and a lack of facilities for full evaluation, some cases may require sex reassignment and more daunting reconstructive procedures. This may give rise to less than optimal outcome. The study was limited by the retrospective nature, small number of cases, and the short duration of follow-up of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Feminizing genital procedures for DSD in our setting may be associated with procedure-related complications and non-surgical complications. Improving surgical technique and addressing the challenges of delayed presentation and fixation on male gender may improve overall outcome.

Diagnostic and therapeutic approach in newborns with ambiguous genitale with disorder of sex development: consensus report of Turkish Neonatal and Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes Societies

Disorders of sex development are defined as conditions in which the chromosomal, gonadal, and anatomic sex is discordant. Patients usually present with atypical appearing genitalia. In the assessment of neonates with disorders of sex development, first, it is important to determine whether this situation requires prompt evaluation, and then the karyotype, hormone levels, and underlying etiology should be determined as soon as possible. All these procedures should be performed in the guidance of a multidisciplinary team in reference centers. As the physical examination of the infant is extremely important, the physcian should suspect and then perform a detailed history and physical examinationi and lastly plan the required laboratory and imaging procedures for the definite diagnosis. It is important not to be hurried in the choice of sex. The aim of this article, which includes the diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in infants with ambiguous genitalia, was to provide a common practice for all pediatricians.

[Differences of Sex Development (DSD): Controversies and Challenges]

DSD for "Differences of Sex Development" or "Sexual Differences Development" refers to situations where chromosomal, gonadal or anatomical sex is atypical. DSD 46,XX are mainly represented by congenital adrenal hyperplasia (HCS) and are not a diagnostic issue. DSD 46,XY involve genes for the determination and differenciation of the bipotential gonad, making sometimes difficult the choice of sex at birth. They remain without diagnosis in about half of the cases, despite the new genetic techniques (exome, NGS). The management of DSD is complex as well as are the long-term consequences, particularly in terms of options for medical or surgical treatments, fertility and quality of life of patients that should be discussed. This review describes the main causes of DSD and the recent issues of their clinical management. It addresses the difficult question of identity of these patients, in a society that leaves no place for difference.

Disorders/differences of sex development (DSDs) for primary care: the approach to the infant with ambiguous genitalia

The initial management of the neonate with ambiguous genitalia can be a very stressful and anxious time for families, as well as for the general practitioner or neonatologist. A timely approach must be sensitive and attend to the psychosocial needs of the family. In addition, it must also effectively address the diagnostic dilemma that is frequently seen in the care of patients with disorders of sex development (DSDs). One great challenge is assigning a sex of rearing, which must take into account a variety of factors including the clinical, biochemical and radiologic clues as to the etiology of the atypical genitalia (AG). However, other important aspects cannot be overlooked, and these include parental and cultural views, as well as the future outlook in terms of surgery and fertility potential. Achieving optimal outcomes requires open and transparent dialogue with the family and caregivers, and should harness the resources of a multidisciplinary team. The multiple facets of this approach are outlined in this review.