Minimally Invasive Approaches to Aortic Valve Surgery: Brigham Experience

Combined cardiac surgery in a Marfan syndrome patient with severe scoliosis via lower hemisternotomy: a case report

Background

Scoliosis is one of the symptoms manifested by patients with Marfan syndrome (MFS). Deformity of the thoracic cavity due to severe scoliosis may cause difficulty during cardiac surgery in terms of the surgical approach and instrument manipulation; however, only a few reports have been available regarding the surgical case of MFS with severe scoliosis. Here, we report a case of combined aortic valve replacement and left atrial appendage closure in a patient with MFS who had severe scoliosis using lower hemisternotomy.

Case presentation

A 62-year-old female with MFS was referred to our hospital after being diagnosed with severe aortic regurgitation and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation with a history of cerebral thromboembolism. The aortic valve showed severe insufficiency due to cusp prolapse, whereas the aortic root was moderately dilated (42 mm). Echocardiography revealed severe regurgitation with reduced left ventricular ejection function (32%) and massive left ventricular diastolic dimension (88 mm). Moreover, combined aortic valve replacement and left atrial appendage closure was indicated. However, the patient had chest deformity due to severe scoliosis. Thus, conventional full sternotomy or thoracotomy was considered an inappropriate surgical approach. Lower hemisternotomy was selected on the basis of three-dimensional reconstruction imaging of the aorta, left atrial appendage, sternum, and rib. Sternal elevation and rib retraction with the costal arch folded back provided enough surgical field for the combined procedures to be safely conducted. The postoperative course was uneventful, except for predicted prolonged mechanical ventilation with the assistance of intraaortic balloon pumping. Thereafter, the patient has been free from any cardiac and cerebrovascular event.

Conclusions

Lower hemisternotomy can be useful for combined cardiac surgery in MFS with severe scoliosis.

[Minimally invasive ascending aortic replacement in patient with chronic aortic dissection type A (in Russian only)]

It is presented case report of minimally invasive surgical repair of chronic aortic dissection type A in a 61-year-old patient. Perspective minimally invasive surgical approach is suggested for this pathology in order to improve quality of life and rehabilitation after cardiac surgery. Surgical technique and features are comprehensively described.

Reversed L-type Upper Partial Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement: an Initial Experience

Introduction:

Degenerative aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent cause among aortic valve stenotic changes. Mini Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement is a replacement of aortic valve through upper partial sternotomy.

Aim:

The aim of this approach is to improve postoperative convalescence by leaving pleural spaces closed and do not compromise respiratory function, to decrease bleeding, and reduce post op ventilation time and ICU stay. All these advantages decrease cost during hospital stay by reducing ICU stay, respiration time, bleeding and using blood products, pain killers and shortening hospital stay. Esthetic effect is also considerable result of this method.

Case report:

This case report presents an initial experience with Reversed L-Type Upper Partial Sternotomy in Aortic Valve Replacement. The goal is to demonstrate that minimally invasive advanced cardiac surgery procedures can be performed in our country.

Starting out in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the UK

OBJECTIVES

Here we aim to describe in detail the logical procedure and philosophical approach to establish a minimally access aortic valve replacement programme in the current era.

METHODS

A real example of a National Health Service Trust in the United Kingdom has been described in a step-wise manner.

RESULTS

The outcomes of the new procedure established in this fashion are reported and the philosophical lessons learnt from the experiences are highlighted.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that this paper will act as a template for newly established surgeons to embark onto a mini-AVR programme. An open-minded and enthusiastic team will undoubtedly be able to facilitate the introduction of this 'new service'. A sensible approach will provide safe and sustainable outcomes.

Aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy: is it really biologically minimally invasive?

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through a right mini-thoracotomy is a procedure developed in the past few years. Currently, the main limits of this technique are longer cardiopulmonary bypass time compared with the standard approach and the need for peripheral cannulation.

METHODS

From January 2010 to March 2014, 206 patients underwent an aortic valve replacement using a minimally invasive technique through a right mini-thoracotomy. Mean age was 71.4 ± 12.0 years, and 129 (62.6%) were male. In the first series of 42 patients, the vacuum-assisted venous drainage was obtained percutaneously through the groin. A totally central arterial and venous cannulation was adopted in the subsequent 164 patients. Two hundred patients (97.1%) received a bioprosthesis implanted with three 2-0 Prolene running sutures; a mechanical valve was implanted in six patients. One patient required reoperation.

RESULTS

Aortic valve replacement was performed through a 4-6-cm skin incision at the third intercostal space. Overall cardiopulmonary bypass was 64.8 ± 17.2 min, and aortic cross clamping was 51.8 ± 14.9 min. In-hospital mortality was 1.5% (3/206).

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial series confirms that aortic valve replacement performed through a right mini-thoracotomy is a safe procedure. When using running sutures, it is possible to obtain cardiopulmonary bypass and cross-clamping times comparable to those for the standard approach. A central cannulation can be performed easily to avoid groin incisions. In conclusion, we believe that this kind of surgery could really be a biologically minimally invasive approach, rather than just an aesthetic choice.

A 16-year experience in minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: context for the changing management of aortic valve disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate short- and long-term morbidity and mortality in patients with aortic valve disease who had minimally invasive aortic valve replacement (AVR) through upper hemisternotomy.

METHODS

From July 1996 to June 2012, a total of 1639 patients underwent minimally invasive aortic valve surgery (AVR). Patient data were extracted from hospital electronic records after institutional review board approval. Outcomes of interest included postoperative complication rates, perioperative mortality, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

The mean age was 67 years (SD, 14 years; range, 22-95 years). Of the total cohort, 211 (13%) underwent reoperative AVR. Postoperatively, 2.3% (37/1639) had reoperations to correct bleeding, 2.7% (44/1639) had strokes, 20.4% (334/1639) had new-onset atrial fibrillation, and 1.5% (24/1639) required permanent pacemakers. Only 34% (571/1639) of the patients received packed red blood cells. The median discharge was on day 6 (5-8), and 72.2% of the patients (1184/1639) were discharged home. Operative mortality was 2.9% (48/1639), and long-term survival at 1, 5, 10, and 15 years was 96%, 93%, 92%, and 92%, respectively. Operative mortality was 5.7% (12/208) for the reoperative patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The upper hemisternotomy approach for AVR is safe and reliable, especially for patients undergoing reoperations and those older than 80 years.

Aortic valve replacement through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy

The introduction of minimally invasive techniques in general surgery, in the late 1980s, influenced cardiac surgery as well. This led to the emergence of several minimal access approaches for aortic valve replacement (AVR). Currently, the upper partial sternotomy with unilateral J-shaped extension to the right through the fourth intercostal space is the most popular minimal access approach. This approach offers the comfort factor of sternotomy, improved cosmetic result, preserved respiratory mechanics, and last but not the least cost saving as no new equipment is required. On the other hand, inability to visualize the whole heart, adequately de-air the left heart, and failure to apply epicardial pacing wires are some of the perceived disadvantages of this approach. This article provides a comprehensive review of the indications, contraindications, technical aspects, outcomes, advantages and disadvantages of AVR through J-shaped partial upper sternotomy.

Geriatric cardiac surgery: chronology vs. biology

Cardiac surgery is increasingly performed in elderly patients, and whilst the incidence of common risk factors associated with poorer outcome increases with age, recent studies suggest that outcomes in this population may be better than is widely appreciated. As such, in this review we have examined the current evidence for common cardiac surgical procedures in patients aged over 70 years. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the elderly has similar early safety to percutaneous intervention, though repeat revascularisation is lower. Totally avoiding instrumentation of the ascending aorta with off-pump techniques may also reduce the incidence of neurological injury. Aortic valve replacement (AVR) significantly improves quality of life and provides excellent short- and long-term outcomes. Combined AVR and CABG carries higher risk but late survival is still excellent. Mini-sternotomy AVR in the elderly can provide comparable survival to full-sternotomy AVR. More accurate risk stratification systems are needed to appropriately select patients for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Mitral valve repair is superior to replacement in the elderly, although choosing the most effective method is important for achieving maximal quality of life. Minimally-invasive mitral valve surgery in the elderly has similar postoperative outcomes to sternotomy-based surgery, but reduces hospital length of stay and return to activity. In operative candidates, surgical repair is superior to percutaneous repair. Current evidence indicates that advanced age alone is not a predictor of mortality or morbidity in cardiac surgery. Thus surgery should not be overlooked or denied to the elderly solely on the basis of their "chronological age", without considering the patient's true "biological age".

Minimally invasive surgery for aortic stenosis in the geriatric patient: where are we now?

Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery has evolved with time and become the routine approach for aortic surgery in select surgical centers. The success of these procedures in the nonelderly has led some to embark on using minimal access techniques in the geriatric population as well. With the geriatric community often inflicted with the greatest disease burden, suffering not only from a valvular process but also cumulative comorbidities, geriatric patients may be the patients most likely to derive benefit from a minimally invasive approach. Alternative therapies for symptomatic aortic stenosis include conventional full-sternotomy aortic valve replacement in addition to transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Each option has its advantages and disadvantages. The role of minimal access aortic valve surgery and its impact on the progressively aging population in the face of conventional surgery and transcatheter technology is discussed.

Surgical Management of Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Operations

Although there is still a role for conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement, minimally invasive techniques are increasing in popularity and may benefit the patient with shorter postoperative course, less morbidity, and decreased overall cost. Additionally, transcatheter procedures have recently shown promising results in high-risk patients. This article provides an overview of the development of minimally invasive aortic valve operations, including a brief history of minimally invasive approaches, surgical considerations during minimally invasive aortic valve replacement, and the technical approach to performing a hemisternotomy with aortic valve replacement. In addition, the authors review transcatheter techniques, including aortic valve replacement via a sheath placed in the apex of the left ventricle or through a sheath placed in the femoral vessels. Finally, the exciting results of the PARTNER trial and the effect of these results on the future of aortic valve surgery are discussed.

[Ministernotomy: a preliminary experience in heart valve surgery]

BACKGROUND/AIM

The last decade of the 20th century brought up a significant development in the field of minimally invasive approaches to the valvular heart surgery. Potential benefits of this method are: good esthetic appearance, reduced pain, reduction of postoperative hemorrhage and incidence of surgical site infection, shorter postoperative intensive care units (ICU) period and overall in-hospital period. Partial upper median stemotomy currently presents as a state-of-the art method for minimally invasive surgery of cardiac valves. The aim of this study was to report on initial experience in application of this surgical method in the surgery of mitral and aortic valves.

METHODS

The study was designed and conducted in a prospective manner and included all the patients who underwent minimally invasive cardiac valve surgery through the partial upper median stemotomy during the period November 2008 - August 2009. We analyzed the data on mean age of patients, mean extubation time, mean postoperative drainage, mean duration of hospital stay, as well as on occurance of postoperative complications (postoperative bleeding, surgical site infection and cerebrovascular insult).

RESULTS

During the observed period, in the Institute for Cardiovascular Diseases of Vojvodina, Clinic for Cardiovascular Surgery, 17 ministernotomies were performed, with 14 aortic valve replacements (82.35%) and 3 mitral valve replacements (17.65%). Mean age of the patients was 60.78 +/- 12.99 years (64.71% males, 35.29% females). Mean extubation time was 12.53 +/- 8.87 hours with 23.5% of the patients extubated in less than 8 hours. Mean duration of hospital stay was 12.35 +/- 10.17 days (in 29.4% of the patients less than 8 days). Mean postoperative drainage was 547.06 +/- 335.2 mL. Postoperative complications included: bleeding (5.88%) and cerebrovascular insult (5.88%). One patient (5.88%) required conversion to full stemotomy.

CONCLUSION

Partial upper median sternotomy represents the optimal surgical method for the interventions on the whole ascendant aorta (including aortic valve) and mitral valve through the roof of the left atrium, with a few significant advantages compared to the full stemotomy surgical approach.

Transapical off-pump removal of the native aortic valve: a proof-of-concept animal study

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the feasibility of off-pump native aortic valve removal in preparation for transapical aortic valve replacement. Off-pump aortic valve replacement is performed by balloon predilatation of the native valve followed by insertion of a stented prosthesis. In patients with calcified annuli and cusps, particulate embolization, suboptimal prosthesis sizing, and perivalvular leaks may occur. Therefore, native valve removal may improve outcomes after transapical aortic valve replacement.

METHODS

The aortic cusps were sequentially removed from 10 pigs in an off-pump procedure. A temporary valve was inserted percutaneously into the ascending aorta to prevent aortic regurgitation. The electrocardiogram, coronary blood flow, and arterial, left atrial, and ventricular pressures were continuously monitored.

RESULTS

Removal of the aortic cusps caused a drop in diastolic arterial pressure and its equalization with left ventricular diastolic pressure. Systolic pressure decreased by 13.5%. Left atrial pressure increased by 86.0%. Coronary blood flow decreased by 39.9% and its pattern changed from mostly diastolic to mostly systolic. Electrocardiographic signs of ischemia appeared almost immediately. Percutaneous insertion of a temporary valve in the ascending aorta increased diastolic pressure and caused a tendency toward echocardiographic normalization.

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic valve removal in a healthy beating heart causes acute massive aortic regurgitation, hemodynamic instability, and the rapid onset of myocardial ischemia. Reduction of left ventricular volume overload, by placement of a temporary valve in the ascending aorta, mitigates myocardial distress, helps stabilize hemodynamic parameters, and may be a useful tool to allow surgical manipulations of the aortic valve and annulus during transapical aortic valve replacement procedures.

Versatility of hemisternotomy for cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Hemisternotomy has been suggested as a way to reduce morbidity by limiting the invasiveness of surgical interventions but it is often limited to aortic valve disease. This study reviews the experience of one center employing hemisternotomy and compares patient outcomes, both in-hospital and post-discharge, with a matched group of full sternotomy patients.

METHODS

Propensity scores were used to match all hemisternotomy valve cases (Hemi) to full sternotomy valve cases (Full) (1:2). An in-hospital composite outcome (COMP) was defined as mortality, stroke, deep sternal wound infection, sepsis, or return to operating room (OR) for bleeding or valve dysfunction. Provincial administrative health databases were used to determine freedom from mortality and hospital readmission for cardiac cause.

RESULTS

During the study period, 70 patients received hemisternotomy for various cardiac surgical interventions with only 38 patients undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. Examining valve surgery exclusively, 65 Hemi were matched to 130 Full. In-hospital complications were low in both groups, with 1.0% mortality and a non-significant trend toward COMP in the Full group (Hemi=4.6%; Full=8.5%; p=0.39). Ventilation time was significantly decreased in Hemi (median four vs. six hours; p=0.002). At two years follow-up, survival was excellent for both (Hemi=95.0%; Full=93.6%) and freedom from cardiac morbidity (Hemi=76.8%, Full=73.2%) was comparable.

CONCLUSION

Hemisternotomy appears to be a safe, effective, and versatile alternative for many cardiac surgical interventions. With a median follow-up of four years, this study represents the longest cardiac morbidity follow-up for hemisternotomy patients. However, we were unable to conclusively show a morbidity benefit with this incision.