Integration of Mediastinal Staging Techniques for Lung Cancer

Understanding local performance data for EBUS-TBNA: insights from an unselected case series at a high volume UK center

BACKGROUND

We reviewed the diagnostic performance of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) on an unselected large cohort of patients who underwent the procedure in our institution in the past 3 years and to compare against published standards and existing literature.

METHODS

All consecutive patients who underwent EBUS from January 2013 to December 2015 were included in the retrospective analysis, with a minimum of 6 months of clinico-radiological follow up. For assessing EBUS-TBNA performance, patients were analysed in three subgroups based on the indication for the EBUS-TBNA: in investigation of isolated mediastinal and/or hilar lymphadenopathy (IMHL), in staging of suspected or confirmed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and in making a tissue diagnosis in suspected thoracic or extrathoracic cancer. For patients subjected to EBUS-TBNA for staging in suspected lung cancer, accuracy of EBUS was measured by its ability to determine the true N2 stage.

RESULTS

A total of 1,656 lymph nodes and 138 peribronchial/peritracheal masses were sampled in 940 patients over the study period. The prevalence of reactive lymphadenopathy was 34%. The overall sensitivity to detect pathological disease was 81.6% (95% CI: 74.2-87.6%) whilst NPV was 74.8% (95% CI: 65.2-82.8%). Amongst patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA for staging purposes, the sensitivity for N2 staging was 83.7% (95% CI: 76.2-89.6%) and NPV was 81.6% (95% CI: 73.2-88.2%). The prevalence of N2 disease was 58%. In the subgroup of patients who proceeded to surgical sampling, the sensitivity was higher with the N2/N3 disease prevalence of 67.4%. The sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA to make a tissue diagnosis of thoracic or extrathoracic cancer was 88% (95% CI: 85.1-90.5%) and a NPV of 62% (95% CI: 54.7-69.0%). The disease prevalence was 83.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective study of a large volume of patients represents real life practice and provides an accurate representation of the typical cohort of patients referred in for EBUS-TBNA to the general respiratory physician in UK. Our study highlights the pitfalls in collecting and analyzing data but also demonstrates how they can be used to improve service performance.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for non-small cell lung cancer staging

Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is an established technique for invasive mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Needle-based techniques are now recommended as a first-line diagnostic modality for mediastinal staging. Accurate performance of systematic staging with EBUS-TBNA requires a detailed knowledge of mediastinal anatomy. This examination begins at the N3 lymph nodes, progressing through the N2 and N1 lymph node stations, unless a higher station lymph node is positive for malignant cells by rapid on-site cytologic examination. Objective methods of identifying EBUS-TBNA targets include sampling any lymph node station with a visible lymph node or with a lymph node greater than 5 mm in short axis. Three passes per station or the use of rapid on-site cytologic examination with identification of diagnostic material (tumor or lymphocytes) up to five passes are well-established techniques. Obtaining sufficient tissue for molecular profiling may require performing more than three passes. The operating characteristics of EBUS-TBNA are similar to mediastinoscopy. However, mediastinoscopy should be considered in the setting of a negative EBUS-TBNA and a high posterior probability of N2 or N3 involvement.

The stage classification of lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

The current Lung Cancer Stage Classification system is the seventh edition, which took effect in January 2010. This article reviews the definitions for the TNM descriptors and the stage grouping in this system.

Special treatment issues in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

BACKGROUND

This guideline updates the second edition and addresses patients with particular forms of non-small cell lung cancer that require special considerations, including Pancoast tumors, T4 N0,1 M0 tumors, additional nodules in the same lobe (T3), ipsilateral different lobe (T4) or contralateral lung (M1a), synchronous and metachronous second primary lung cancers, solitary brain and adrenal metastases, and chest wall involvement.

METHODS

The nature of these special clinical cases is such that in most cases, meta-analyses or large prospective studies of patients are not available. To ensure that these guidelines were supported by the most current data available, publications appropriate to the topics covered in this article were obtained by performing a literature search of the MEDLINE computerized database. Where possible, we also reference other consensus opinion statements. Recommendations were developed by the writing committee, graded by a standardized method, and reviewed by all members of the Lung Cancer Guidelines panel prior to approval by the Thoracic Oncology NetWork, Guidelines Oversight Committee, and the Board of Regents of the American College of Chest Physicians.

RESULTS

In patients with a Pancoast tumor, a multimodality approach appears to be optimal, involving chemoradiotherapy and surgical resection, provided that appropriate staging has been carried out. Carefully selected patients with central T4 tumors that do not have mediastinal node involvement are uncommon, but surgical resection appears to be beneficial as part of their treatment rather than definitive chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with lung cancer and an additional malignant nodule are difficult to categorize, and the current stage classification rules are ambiguous. Such patients should be evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team to determine whether the additional lesion represents a second primary lung cancer or an additional tumor nodule corresponding to the dominant cancer. Highly selected patients with a solitary focus of metastatic disease in the brain or adrenal gland appear to benefit from resection or stereotactic radiosurgery. This is particularly true in patients with a long disease-free interval. Finally, in patients with chest wall involvement, provided that the tumor can be completely resected and N2 nodal disease is absent, primary surgical resection should be considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Carefully selected patients with more uncommon presentations of lung cancer may benefit from an aggressive surgical approach.

Imaging requirements in the practice of pulmonary metastasectomy

The primary imaging modality for the detection of pulmonary metastases is computed tomography (CT). Ideally, a helical CT scan with 3- to 5-mm reconstruction thickness or a volumetric thin section scanning should be performed within 4 weeks of pulmonary metastasectomy. A period of observation to see whether further metastases develop does not seem to allow better patient selection. If positron emission tomography is available, it may identify the extrathoracic metastatic sites in 10 to 15% of patients. Despite helical CT scan, palpation identifies the metastases not detected by imaging in 20 to 25% of patients and remains the standard. No data define the optimal interval for follow-up surveillance imaging.

[Progress of lymphadenectomy on lung cancer surgery]

淋巴道转移是肺癌最主要的转移途径，也是影响肺癌患者预后的主要因素之一。目前，淋巴结清扫已成为标准肺癌手术的重要组成部分。但是到目前为止，对于不同病理类型、不同病理分期、不同肺叶的肺癌而言，术中淋巴结的清扫方式及范围仍存在一定的争议。本文拟就目前肺癌手术中淋巴结清扫的临床意义、清扫方式、清扫范围的研究新进展进行综述。

Survival after surgery following chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer

A retrospective study was carried out on 74 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (52 in stage IIIA, 22 in stage IIIB) who received platinum-based induction chemotherapy in doublets and triplets, followed by tumor resection. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 5.4% (4 patients); 5 patients in stage IIIB and 17 in stage IIIA did not respond, but the other 47 (63.5%) were downstaged to < IIIA (26 were downstaged to stage I, 20 to stage II, and 1 had complete remission). There was no change in T factor in 22 (30%) patients, nor in N factor in 21 (28%). The actuarial 5-year survival rate for patients in postoperative stages IIIA and IIIB was 0.496; survival was significantly longer in patients who responded to therapy. Parallel improvement in both T and N status predicted worse survival than a multistage regression in any single factor. N status was found to be a stronger survival indicator than T status. Cell type did not influence the response rate or outcome. Induction chemotherapy significantly improved survival in patients who responded, despite a poor prognosis.

Coping with the unexpected at surgery

In lung cancer surgery, it is best to avoid surprises; this requires knowledge of the reliability of preoperative assessment and careful planning. If this has been done, most of the more common situations should be manageable. If there is limited chest wall, mediastinal or N2 node involvement, one should proceed with resection. Unanticipated T4 tumors or bulky pN2 disease should not come as a surprise, and such patients should be sent to a more experienced center. One has to be careful to practice within the scope of one's knowledge and abilities as well as the sophistication of the institution. It only makes a mistake worse if an intraoperative surprise prompts one to embark on an operation that is beyond the means at hand. Collaborative organization via multidisciplinary tumor boards or inter-institutional interaction allows collective wisdom to promote better outcomes for all.

[Detection of lymph node involvement and surgical treatment of pulmonary neoplastic processes. Current state of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures]

An analysis is made of different publications associated with the surgical staging and treatment of primary and metastasic pulmonary neoplastic processes. A suitable treatment program is essential to determine lymph node involvement in patients with bronchogenic carcinoma. The indication and sequence of the procedure to use (CT-PET, transbronchial puncture, videomediastinoscopic ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration) is evaluated in accordance to the sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of the different methods. Another interesting challenge is to define the criteria for indicating a sublobar resection in certain tumours and patients. Different factors, age, lung function, tumour location and type of sublobar resection, are analysed. Levels of evidence and recommendations of the procedure are also considered. Surgical resection is an accepted therapeutic option in the treatment of colorectal cancer lung metastases. Its indication is based on acceptable survival rates and knowledge of the impact of various factors (interval free of disease, number of metastases, presence of liver metastasis, presence of lymph node involvement, or increased pre-operative levels of carcinoembryonic antigen), is analysed in detail.

Minimally invasive staging of N2 disease: endobronchial ultrasound/transesophageal endoscopic ultrasound, mediastinoscopy, and thoracoscopy

In 2005 the American College of Surgeons conducted a survey examining lung cancer practice patterns at 729 hospitals in the United States. In 11,668 surgically treated patients, 92% received a preoperative chest CT. Only 27% of these patients underwent mediastinoscopy, and lymph node material was sampled in less than half of these patients. At the time of surgical resection, additional mediastinal lymph nodes were sampled in only 58% of patients. In the remaining 42% only the lymph node material attached to the surgical specimen (N1 nodes) was sampled. Although this article discusses the finer points of the minimally invasive evaluation of the N2 lymph nodes, any procedure to evaluate these nodes is better than simply ignoring them.

Management algorithms for stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer with N2 node involvement

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with N2 node involvement (IIIA[N2]) is a complex area characterized by much confusion and controversy, because data derived from a particular subgroup of IIIA(N2) often are inappropriately applied to another subgroup. The problem is not so much that stage IIIA(N2) encompasses a spectrum of disease, which is true in each stage of NSCLC. Rather, our ability to describe a patient cohort has been limited, and it is therefore often difficult to determine how and when to apply data from published studies. A simple, pragmatic approach is taken in this article to define algorithms for the management of these patients.