Strategies to Minimise Need for Prosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement in Congenital Aortic Stenosis—Value of the Ross Procedure

Hereditary Thoracic Aortic Diseases

Advances in both imaging techniques and genetics have led to the recognition of a wide variety of aortic anomalies that can be grouped under the term 'hereditary thoracic aortic diseases'. The present review aims to summarize this very heterogeneous population's clinical, genetic, and imaging characteristics and to discuss the implications of the diagnosis for clinical counselling (on sports activity or pregnancy), medical therapies and surgical management.

Aortic valve repair versus the Ross procedure in children

BACKGROUND

Aortic valve repair and the Ross procedure are widely used in children; however, it is unclear which provides the best outcomes.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary aortic valve surgery from 1980 to 2018 were included. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences.

RESULTS

Of 415 children, 82.7% (343/415) underwent repair and 17.3% (72/415) underwent the Ross procedure. At 15 years, survival was higher for aortic valve repair (93.9% ± 1.8% vs 80.9% ± 6.4%, P = .04); freedom from reoperation (45.7% ± 4.9% vs 48.5% ± 9.0%, P = .29) did not differ, and freedom from aortic valve reoperation was higher in the Ross procedure group (45.7% ± 4.9% vs 70.7% ± 8.0%, P < .001). When analyzed by quality of repair, acceptable repair provided the highest survival (P = .01). Acceptable repair and the Ross procedure had similar freedom from reoperation at 15 years, whereas suboptimal repair performed worse (acceptable: 54.9% ± 6.7%; Ross procedure: 48.5% ± 9.0%; suboptimal: 27.0% ± 7.7%, P < .001). Acceptable repair and the Ross procedure had similar freedom from aortic valve reoperation at 15 years, whereas suboptimal repair showed worse results (acceptable: 54.9 ± 6.7; Ross procedure: 70.7% ± 8.0%; suboptimal: 27.0% ± 7.7%, P < .001). Propensity score matching paired 66 patients who underwent the Ross procedure with 198 patients who underwent repair. At 15 years, repair was associated with better survival (98.0% ± 1.2% vs 78.5% ± 7.2%, P = .03), whereas freedom from reoperation was similar (42.6% ± 7.6% vs 50.7% ± 9.8%, P = .50). However, the Ross procedure was associated with higher freedom from aortic valve reoperation (42.6% ± 7.6% vs 72.3% ± 8.5%, P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

Primary aortic valve repair was associated with better survival than the Ross procedure, whereas overall freedom from reoperation was similar. When an acceptable intraoperative result was achieved, outcomes of repair were favorable. However, when the intraoperative result of repair was suboptimal, the Ross procedure showed better results.

The Ross Procedure in Children: Defining the Optimal Age

BACKGROUND

It has been proposed that delaying the Ross procedure to later in childhood, allowing autograft stabilisation and placement of a larger pulmonary conduit, may improve outcomes. However, the effect of age at the time of Ross procedure on outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

All patients who underwent the Ross procedure between 1995 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients were divided into four groups: infants, age 1 to 5 years, age 5 to 10 years and age 10 to 18 years.

RESULTS

A total of 140 patients underwent the Ross procedure in the study period. Early mortality was 23.3% (7/30) for infants compared to 0% for older children (p<0.001). Survival at 15 years was significantly lower in infants (76.3%±9.9%), compared to children aged 1 to 5 years (90.9%±20.1%), 5 to 10 years (94%±13.3%), and 10 to 18 years (86.7%±10.0%), p=0.01. Freedom from autograft reoperation at 15 years was significantly lower in infants (58.4%±16.2%), compared to children aged 1 to 5 years (77.1%±14.9%), 5 to 10 years (84.2%±6.0%) and 10 to 18 years (87.8%±9.0%), p=0.01. Overall freedom from reoperation at 15 years was 13.0%±6.0% for infants, 24.2%±9.0% for children aged 1 to 5 years, 46.7%±15.8% for children aged 5 to 10 years, and 78.4%±10.4%, p<0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

The Ross procedure performed after 10 years of age appears to be associated with improved freedom from reoperation, primarily due to a reduction in reoperation on the pulmonary conduit.

Bicuspid Aortic Valve in Children and Adolescents: A Comprehensive Review

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect. Prevalence of isolated BAV in the general pediatric population is about 0.8%, but it has been reported to be as high as 85% in patients with aortic coarctation. A genetic basis has been recognized, with great heterogeneity. Standard BAV terminology, recently proposed on the basis of morpho-functional assessment by transthoracic echocardiography, may be applied also to the pediatric population. Apart from neonatal stenotic BAV, progression of valve dysfunction and/or of the associated aortic dilation seems to be slow during pediatric age and complications are reported to be much rarer in comparison with adults. When required, because of severe BAV dysfunction, surgery is most often the therapeutic choice; however, the ideal initial approach to treat severe aortic stenosis in children or adolescents is not completely defined yet, and a percutaneous approach may be considered in selected cases as a palliative option in order to postpone surgery. A comprehensive and tailored evaluation is needed to define the right intervals for cardiologic evaluation, indications for sport activity and the right timing for intervention.

Current-Era Outcomes of Balloon Aortic Valvotomy in Neonates and Infants

Background

The optimal initial treatment pathway for aortic valve stenosis remains debated.

Objectives

The objective of this study was to review current outcomes of balloon aortic valvotomy (BAV) in neonates and infants.

Methods

Neonates and infants with a biventricular circulation treated with BAV between 2004 and 2019 were reviewed.

Results

One hundred thirty-nine infants (48% neonates) with median (Q1, Q3) age of 33(7, 84) days and weight 4.0 (3.4, 5.1) kg were followed up for 7.1 (3.3, 11.0) years. BAV reduced peak-to-peak gradient from mean (SD) 52 (16) mmHg to 18 (12) mmHg; P < 0.001. Aortic regurgitation (AI) increased with time after BAV. Three children died during follow-up. Fifty-one reinterventions (26 BAV, 19 aortic valve replacements [AVRs], and 6 surgical valvotomies) were performed on 40 children. Freedom from AVR (95% CI) was 96% (93%-99%) at 1, 91% (86%-96%) at 5, and 86% (79%-93%) at 10 years. The predictors of AVR were a unicommissural valve (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]: 3.7 [1.4-9.6]; P = 0.007) and moderate to severe AI after index BAV (HR [95% CI]: 3.3 [1.1-9.7]; P = 0.029). Freedom from reintervention was 84% (78%-90%) at 1, 76% (69%-83%) at 5, and 69% (60-78%) at 10 years. Main predictors of reintervention were age below 1 month (HR [95% CI]: 2.1 [1.1-4.1]; P = 0.032) and postdilation peak-to-peak gradient (per 10-mmHg increase; HR [95% CI]: 1.36 [1.02-1.79]; P = 0.032).

Conclusions

BAV is a safe and effective treatment for aortic valve stenosis in neonates and infants. Outcomes are competitive with contemporary published data on aortic valve repair in relation to mortality, gradient relief, long-term AVR, and reintervention rates. In the absence of significant AI, surgery can be reserved for those with gradients resistant to valve dilation.

Small and borderline left ventricular outflow tract - a perplexing maladie

The left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) comprises of the subvalvular area, the aortic valve, and the supravalvular region. Obstructive lesion of LVOT is a spectrum with varying levels and degree of obstruction with or without associated hypoplasia of the left ventricle. Decision-making in small and borderline LVOT can be challenging. Imaging modalities such as echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging and scores based on imaging aid in the decision making in truly borderline cases. Newer treatment strategies like staged left ventricular rehabilitation and hybrid procedure have come to the fore in the past decade or so. Although these do not address small LVOT per se, they delay the decision-making to a more appropriate age. The goal of management in these cases is to achieve a biventricular repair whenever feasible. Several surgical techniques could be employed to achieve this goal. However, it is important to be cognizant of the fact that an overzealous approach to achieve a biventricular repair might be counterproductive. A univentricular palliation could be a safer alternative; especially considering the possibility of a future transplant candidacy.