Pharmacotherapy Before and After Revascularization: Anticoagulation, Antiplatelet Agents, and Statins

Nurse-led intervention in the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases: a brief literature review

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is one among the major causes of mortality in patients all around the globe. It has been reported by the World Health Organization (WHO) that approximately 80% of cardiovascular diseases could be prevented through lifestyle modifications. Management of CAD involves the prevention and control of cardiovascular risk factors, invasive and non-invasive treatments including coronary revascularizations, adherence to proper medications and regular outpatient follow-ups. Nurse-led clinics were intended to mainly provide supportive, educational, preventive measures and psychological support to the patients, which were completely different from therapeutic clinics. Our review focuses on the involvement and implication of nurses in the primary and secondary prevention and management of cardiovascular diseases. Nurses have a vital role in Interventional cardiology. They also have major roles during the management of cardiac complications including congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation and heart transplantation. Today, the implementation of a nurse-led tele-consultation strategy is also gaining positive views. Therefore, a nurse-led intervention for the management of patients with cardiovascular diseases should be implemented in clinical practice. Based on advances in therapy, more research should be carried out to further investigate the effect of nurse-led clinics during the long-term treatment and management of patients with cardiovascular diseases.

Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Revascularisation of the Femoropopliteal Arterial Segment in Patients with Anticoagulant versus Antiplatelet Therapy: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

To prevent atherothrombotic events, patients with peripheral arterial disease are typically prescribed antiplatelet therapy (APT). However, some of them receive anticoagulant therapy (ACT) due to comorbidities. Our aim was to determine possible differences in the effectiveness and safety of both treatments in patients after endovascular femoropopliteal revascularisation. We retrospectively analysed 1247 patients after successful femoropopliteal revascularisation performed in a single tertiary medical centre and classified them into the ACT or APT group, based on their prescribed treatment. The groups were characterised by descriptive statistics, and their characteristics were adjusted for confounders by propensity score matching. Effectiveness and safety outcomes were assessed within one year after revascularisation. The odds ratio for the composite outcome of all-cause death, PAD exacerbation, and major amputation due to vascular causes with ACT versus APT was 1.21 (95% CI 0.53–2.21; p = 0.484). The odds ratio for major bleeding as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis with ACT versus APT was 0.77 (95% CI 0.13–3.84; p = 0.251). We found no statistically significant difference in the effectiveness and safety of ACT, when compared to APT in patients with similar cardiovascular risk factors and other baseline characteristics. Further prospective research is warranted.

Effect of Rivaroxaban and Aspirin in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Undergoing Surgical Revascularization: Insights from the VOYAGER PAD Trial

Background: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) requiring lower extremity revascularization (LER) are at high risk of adverse limb and cardiovascular events. VOYAGER PAD demonstrated that rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk. The efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban has not been described in patients who underwent surgical LER. Methods: The VOYAGER PAD trial randomized patients with PAD after surgical and endovascular LER to rivaroxaban 2.5mg twice daily plus aspirin or matching placebo plus aspirin and followed for a median of 28 months. The primary endpoint was a composite of acute limb ischemia, major vascular amputation, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death. The principal safety outcome was Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) major bleeding. International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) bleeding was a secondary safety outcome. All efficacy and safety outcomes were adjudicated by a blinded independent committee. Results: Of the 6564 randomized, 2185 (33%) underwent surgical LER and 4379 (67%) endovascular. Compared to placebo, rivaroxaban reduced the primary endpoint consistently regardless of LER method (p-interaction 0.43). Following surgical LER, the primary efficacy outcome occurred in 199 (18.4%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 242 (22.0%) patients in the placebo group with a cumulative incidence at 3 years of 19.7% and 23.9%, respectively (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 - 0.98; p=0.026). In the overall trial, TIMI major bleeding and ISTH major bleeding were increased with rivaroxaban. There was no heterogeneity for TIMI major bleeding (p-interaction 0.17) or ISTH major bleeding (p-interaction 0.73) based on LER approach. Following surgical LER, the principal safety outcome occurred in 11 (1.0%) patients in the rivaroxaban group and 13 (1.2%) patients in the placebo group; 3-year cumulative incidence 1.3% and 1.4% respectively (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.39-1.95; p=0.75) Among surgical patients, the composite of fatal bleeding or intracranial hemorrhage (p=0.95) and postprocedural bleeding requiring intervention (p=0.93) were not significantly increased. Conclusions: The efficacy of rivaroxaban is associated with a benefit in surgical LER patients. While bleeding was increased with rivaroxaban plus aspirin, the incidence was low, with no significant increase in fatal bleeding, intracranial hemorrhage or postprocedural bleeds requiring intervention. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT02504216.

Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetes Mellitus: Focus on Novel Treatment Options

Diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral artery disease (PAD) are two clinical entities closely associated. They share many pathophysiological pathways such as inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress and pro-coagulative unbalance. Emerging data focusing on agents targeting these pathways may be promising. Moreover, due to the increased cardiovascular risk, there is a growing interest in cardiovascular and "pleiotropic" effects of novel glucose lowering drugs. This review summarizes the main clinical features of PAD in patients, the diagnostic process and current medical/interventional approaches, ranging from "classical treatment" to novel agents.

Quercetin inhibits human microvascular endothelial cells viability, migration and tube-formation in vitro through restraining microRNA-216a

Background: Quercetin belongs to the flavonoids family, which has been proven to have extensive pharmacological effects. Nevertheless, the function of quercetin in peripheral arterial disease (PAD) has not yet been reported. In the research, we purposed to disclose the effectiveness of quercetin in the pathogenesis of PAD.Methods: HMEC-1 cells were cultivated in Matrigel for 24 h to observe the tube-formation. Detections of cell viability, migration and apoptosis were through implementing CCK-8, Transwell and flow cytometry methods. Western blot was utilised for measuring angiogenesis-, migration- and apoptosis-correlative factors. MiR-216a expression was examined via qRT-PCR, and its functions in HMEC-1 cells were uncovered after miR-216a mimic transfection. Assessment of JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT pathways was via implementing western blot.Results: HMEC-1 cells were spontaneously vascularised under Matrigel condition. Quercetin predominantly repressed cell viability, migration, VEGF expression and facilitated apoptosis in HMEC-1 cells. Additionally, suppression of miR-216a was discovered in HMEC-1 cells after quercetin stimulation, meanwhile miR-216a overexpression annulled the functions of quercetin in HMEC-1 cells. Besides, quercetin deactivated PI3K/AKT and JAK/STAT pathways through adjusting miR-216a.Conclusion: The above-mentioned consequences exhibited that quercetin suppressed HMEC-1 cell viability, migration and tube-formation through hindering JAK2/STAT3 and PI3K/AKT pathway via declination of miR-216a.

Inhibition of platelet function with clopidogrel is associated with a reduction of inflammation in patients with peripheral artery disease

BACKGROUND

The reactivity of platelets is increased in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). RANTES and sCD40L are chemokines which are stored in the alpha-granules of platelets. Clopidogrel inhibits and thus reduces platelet reactivity. Whether a treatment with clopidogrel is associated with an inhibition of systemic inflammation in patients with PAD has not been thoroughly explored. This study examined the effect of clopidogrel on platelet reactivation and the release of inflammatory chemokines in patients with PAD.

METHODS

40 patients with PAD were randomized into two groups. In the first group A the patients were treated with 100mg acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and additional placebo for 4weeks. The patients in group B received 75mg/d clopidogrel in addition to ASA 100mg for 4weeks. After obtaining blood at days 0, 7 and 28 the platelet activation was determined by measuring the surface protein expression of CD63, CD62p and thrombospondin (TSP) after stimulation with TRAP and ADP. The release of the chemokines RANTES and sCD40L from platelets was analyzed by ELISA.

RESULTS

Platelet activation markers (CD62p and CD63) and chemokine RANTES were significantly reduced in patients with PAD after 7 and 28days after treatment with clopidogrel. No alterations were found in TSP expression and sCD40L during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The treatment with clopidogrel leads to a reduction of platelet reactivity and release of RANTES from the platelets of patients with PAD.

Perioperative statin therapy for improving outcomes during and after noncardiac vascular surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing vascular surgery are a high-risk population with widespread atherosclerosis, an adverse cardiovascular risk profile and often multiple co-morbidities. Postoperative cardiovascular complications, including myocardial infarct (MI), are common. Statins are the medical treatment of choice to reduce high cholesterol levels. Evidence is accumulating that patients taking statins at the time of surgery are protected against a range of perioperative complications, but the specific benefits for patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery are not clear.

OBJECTIVES

We examined whether short-term statin therapy, commenced before or on the day of noncardiac vascular surgery and continuing for at least 48 hours afterwards, improves patient outcomes including the risk of complications, pain, quality of life and length of hospital stay. We also examined whether the effect of statin therapy on these outcomes changes depending on the dose of statin received.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 7), MEDLINE via Ovid SP (1966 to August 2012), EMBASE via Ovid SP (1966 to August 2012), CINAHL via EBSCO host (1966 to August 2012) and ISI Web of Science (1946 to July 2012) without any language restriction. We used a combination of free text search and controlled vocabulary search. The results were limited to randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). We conducted forwards and backwards citation of key articles and searched two clinical trial Websites for ongoing trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov and http://www.controlled-trials.com).

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs that had compared short-term statin therapy, either commenced de novo or with existing users randomly assigned to different dosages, in adult participants undergoing elective and emergency noncardiac arterial surgery, including both open and endovascular procedures. We defined short-term as commencing before or on the day of surgery and continuing for at least 48 hours afterwards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data, including information on adverse events. We contacted study authors for additional information. We performed separate analyses for the comparisons of statin with placebo/no treatment and between different doses of statin. We presented results as pooled risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on random-effects models (inverse variance method). We employed the Chi(2) test and calculated the I(2) statistic to investigate study heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six eligible studies in total. The six Included studies were generally of high quality, but the largest eligible study was excluded because of concerns about its validity. Study populations were statin naive, which led to a considerable loss of eligible participants.Five RCTs compared statin use with placebo or standard care. We pooled results from three studies, with a total of 178 participants, for mortality and non-fatal event outcomes. In the statin group, 7/105 (6.7%) participants died within 30 days of surgery, as did 10/73 (13.7%) participants in the control group. Only one death in each group was from cardiovascular causes, with an incidence of 0.95% in statin participants and 1.4% in control participants, respectively. All deaths occurred in a single study population, and so effect estimates were derived from one study only. The risk ratio (RR) of all-cause mortality in statin users showed a non-significant decrease in risk (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.31 to 1.75). For cardiovascular death, the risk ratio was 1.05 (95% CI 0.07 to 16.20). Non-fatal MI within 30 days of surgery was reported in three studies and occurred in 4/105 (3.8%) participants in the statin group and 8/73 (11.0%) participants receiving placebo, for a non-significant decrease in risk (RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.15 to 1.52). Several studies reported muscle enzyme levels as safety measures, but only three (with a total of 188 participants) reported explicitly on clinical muscle syndromes, with seven events reported and no significant difference found between statin users and controls (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.24 to 3.63). The only participant-reported outcome was nausea in one small study,with no significant difference in risk between groups.Two studies compared different doses of atorvastatin, with a total of 145 participants, but reported data were not sufficient to allow us to determine the effect of higher doses on any outcome.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence was insufficient to allow review authors to conclude that statin use resulted in either a reduction or an increase in any of the outcomes examined. The existing body of evidence leaves questions about the benefits of perioperative use of statins for vascular surgery unanswered. Widespread use of statins in the target population means that it may now be difficult for researchers to undertake the large RCTs needed to demonstrate any effect on the incidence of postoperative cardiovascular events. However, participant-reported outcomes have been neglected and warrant further study.

[Surgical treatment of atherosclerosis in the lower limbs]

BACKGROUND

Walking exercise, smoking cessation and best medical therapy are cornerstones in all treatment of atherosclerosis. For patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia, endovascular therapy (which has developed substantially during the last decade) has become the first line treatment (when feasible). The aim of this article is to provide an overview of options for surgical treatment of peripheral atherosclerosis in the lower limbs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The article is based on literature identified through a non-systematic search in PubMed, vascular textbooks and the authors' own clinical experience.

RESULTS

When endovascular therapy has failed or is not feasible, open surgical techniques are used, such as endarterectomy and bypass surgery to the popliteal or distal arteries. Hybrid procedures, with femoral endarterectomy and distal or proximal endovascular intervention, are often used. Increased use of endovascular treatment reduces the procedural time, length of hospital stay and the rate of complications. In patients with extreme disease progression, primary amputation may still be the treatment of choice.

INTERPRETATION

Surgical treatment of peripheral artery disease requires competence both within radiological intervention and open surgical treatment modalities.