How to Interpret Data from the Superficial Femoral Artery Stenting Trials and Registries

Clinical Outcomes after Endovascular Treatment Failure in Patients with Femoropopliteal Occlusive Disease

BACKGROUND

To analyze the clinical impact derived from endovascular treatment failure on patients with femoropopliteal occlusive disease (FPOD) regarding their preoperative clinical stage.

METHODS

Retrospective review for primary endovascular procedures for FPOD from 2008 to 2013. Primary end point included clinical deterioration defined as acute limb ischemia (ALI) or clinical worsening by, at least, one Rutherford's classification category, related to procedure's failure (restenosis >70% or occlusion).

RESULTS

Ninety procedures were analyzed in 85 patients, 87.8% operated due to critical limb ischemia. The lesion treated was classified as Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC)-A/B in 76.7%, with a mean length of 98.5 ± 54 mm. Covered stent graft (SG) was used in 31.1% of the cases. Median follow-up was 14.5 months and treatment failure occurred in 33.3% of cases (n = 30, 9 restenosis and 21 occlusions). Clinical worsening was assessed in 40% of treatment failures and 6 of 21 (28.6%) presented as ALI. Twenty-two major adverse limb events (MALEs) were recorded and 8 major amputations. Regarding the type of stent, more occlusions were recorded on patients treated with SG compared with bare metal stent (39.3% vs. 16%; P = 0.02). However, no differences were found between groups regarding clinical worsening attributable to treatment failure (HR, 1.33; CI 95%, 0.5-3.5; P = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, TASC-C/D lesions (HR, 5.5; CI 95%, 2.3-13.3; P < 0.001) and female sex (HR, 4.9; CI 95%, 1.9-12.5; P = 0.001) behaved as significant predictors for failure and dual-antiplatelet therapy as a protective factor (HR, 0.3; CI 95%, 0.3-0.13; P = 0.03). No predictors were obtained regarding clinical worsening and occurrence of MALEs in our series.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with failure of endovascular procedures on FPOD appeared with clinical worsening in a no negligible number of cases in our sample regarding their preoperative clinical situation. Thus, we believe that endovascular treatment should be carefully deliberated.

Stenting of femoropopliteal lesions using interwoven nitinol stents

OBJECTIVE

The Supera stent (Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Park, Ill) has a unique biomimetic design allowing axial and longitudinal flexibility and fracture resistance. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the midterm patency of Supera stents used to treat patients with superficial femoral and popliteal arterial disease by a single practice.

METHODS

From April 2010 to December 2011, 53 patients and 59 limbs with symptomatic femoropopliteal lesions underwent angioplasty and stenting with the Supera stent. Five patients had no follow-up and were excluded. Demographics of the patients, radiographic images, morphologic features of the lesions, procedural reports, reinterventions, and follow-up clinical visit notes were reviewed. Primary patency was defined as clinical resolution of symptoms with no secondary interventions. Primary and secondary patency rates at 12, 24, and 36 months were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 48 patients (42 men, six women; 54 limbs; mean age, 64.3 years [range, 51-87]) received Supera stents and had at least one follow-up visit as part of their treatment for femoropopliteal disease. Primary indications for intervention included claudication, rest pain, and tissue loss, at rates of 54% (29 of 54), 26% (14 of 54), and 20% (11 of 54), respectively; 22% of lesions were TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus type A or B and 78% were type C or D. Mean lesion length was 24.0 cm (range, 3-51). Mean follow-up was 27.5 months (range, 1-45). The ankle-brachial index increased from 0.58 ± 0.20 preoperatively to 0.77 ± 0.18 postoperatively (P = .00004). Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency rates at latest follow-up were 79.6%, 88.9%, and 92.3%, respectively. Cumulative primary patency rates by Kaplan-Meier analysis at 12, 24, and 36 months were 85.6%, 83.1%, and 76.7%, respectively. Secondary patency rates by Kaplan-Meier estimates at 12, 24, and 36 months were 93.8%, 93.8%, and 89.3%, respectively. No stent fractures were found at the time of any reinterventions. Long lesions >30 cm (n = 18) showed equivalent patency to lesions of 1 to 15 cm (n = 18) and lesions 15 to 30 cm in length (n = 18).

CONCLUSIONS

Our midterm results show that Supera stents are durable in treating femoropopliteal lesions, with notably high patency rates in patients with long lesion lengths.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty versus primary stenting in infrapopliteal arterial disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and primary stenting are commonly used endovascular therapeutic procedures for the treatment of infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. However, which procedure is more beneficial for patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a meta-analysis, searching PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Knowledge, and relevant websites without language or publication date restrictions for randomized trials that compared primary stenting with PTA in patients with infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. The keywords were "stents," "angioplasty," "infrapopliteal," "tibial arteries," and "below knee." We selected immediate technical success, primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and patient survival as the outcomes of this meta-analysis. On the basis of the inclusion criteria, we identified six prospective randomized trials. One-year outcomes did not show any significant differences between the PTA and primary stenting groups, respectively: technical success (93.3% vs 96.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-1.47; P = .25), primary patency (57.1% vs 65.7%; OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.35-2.58; P = .92), secondary patency (73.5% vs 57.6%; OR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.81-5.34; P = .13), limb salvage (82.2% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.29-1.41; P = .27), and patient survival (84.0% vs 87.5%; OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.40-1.55; P = .49).

CONCLUSIONS

For infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease, primary stenting has the same 1-year benefits as PTA. There is insufficient evidence to support the superiority of either method. Primary stenting is associated with a trend toward higher primary patency and lower secondary patency. Further large-scale prospective randomized trials should produce more reliable results.

An overview of optimal endovascular strategy in treating the femoropopliteal artery: mechanical, biological, and procedural factors

Treatment of the femoropopliteal (FP) artery remains a challenge to the endovascular specialist. Long-term patency is low with a high rate of target lesion revascularization. The true patency rate varies considerably between studies partly because there is a lack of uniform performance criteria and reporting standards in peripheral arterial interventions. Literature review supports three principles that emerge as important components of an optimal strategy in treating the FP artery: (1) improving vessel compliance and subsequently less dissections and bailout stenting, (2) reducing smooth muscle cell proliferation, and (3) protecting outflow vessels from distal embolization. In this overview, we examine current data that support the validity of this strategy.

SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass: SUPERB-trial; Heparin-bonded endoluminal versus surgical femoro-popliteal bypass: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Endovascular treatment options for the superficial femoral artery are evolving rapidly. For long lesions, the venous femoropopliteal bypass considered to be superior above the prosthetic bypass. An endoluminal bypass, however, may provide equal patency rates compared to the prosthetic above knee bypass. The introduction of heparin-bonded endografts may further improve patency rates. The SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass (SuperB) study is designed to assess whether a heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass provides equal patency rates compared to the venous bypass and to prove that it is associated with improved quality of life, related to a decreased complication rate, or not.

Methods/design

Two-hundred-twenty-two patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, category 3-6 according to Rutherford, will be randomized in two treatment arms; 1. the surgical femoro-popliteal bypass, venous whenever possible, and 2. the heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass. The power analysis was based on a non-inferiority principle, with an effect size of 90% and 10% margins (alpha 5%, power 80%). Patients will be recruited from 5 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands during a 2-year period. The primary endpoint is primary patency and quality of life evaluated by the RAND-36 questionnaire and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire. Secondary endpoints include secondary patency, freedom-from-TLR and complications.

Discussion

The SuperB trial is a multicentre randomized controlled trial designed to show non-inferiority in patency rates of the heparin-bonded endograft compared to the surgical bypass for treatment of long SFA lesions, and to prove a better quality of life using the heparin bonded-endograft compared to surgically treatment, related to a reduction in complications.