Management of Central Vein Stenoses and Occlusions: The Critical Importance of the Costoclavicular Junction

Current concepts in clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome

The diagnosis and clinical features of thoracic outlet syndrome have long confounded clinicians, owing to heterogeneity in symptom presentation and many overlapping competing diagnoses that are "more common." Despite the advent and prevalence of high-resolution imaging, along with the increasing awareness of the syndrome itself, misdiagnoses and untimely diagnoses can result in significant patient morbidity. The authors aimed to summarize the current concepts in the clinical features and diagnosis of thoracic outlet syndrome.

Management of thoracic outlet syndrome in patients with hemodialysis access

Patients with threatened arteriovenous access are often found to have central venous stenoses at the ipsilateral costoclavicular junction, which may be resistant to endovascular intervention. Stenoses in this location may not resolve unless surgical decompression of thoracic outlet is performed to relieve the extrinsic compression on the subclavian vein. The authors reviewed the management of dialysis patients with central venous lesions at the thoracic outlet, as well as the role of surgical decompression with first-rib resection or claviculectomy for salvage of threatened, ipsilateral dialysis access.

Most complex brachiocephalic vein occlusion in hemodialysis patients can be treated with simple endovascular techniques in an office-based angiosuite

OBJECTIVE

Brachiocephalic vein (BCV) obstruction can cause dialysis access dysfunction and failure. Central vein stenosis involving the BCV may require advanced endovascular procedures. We report that most BCV occlusions can be treated using simple endovascular techniques on an outpatient basis.

METHODS

From January 2009 to January 2022, 115 hemodialysis patients underwent BCV endovascular revascularization. Seventy-three of the initial procedures were performed in an office-based angiosuite. Indications for the procedure were BCV occlusion endangering the performance of a previous arm access or making the creation of a new arm access unadvisable. We recorded and analyzed risk factors and procedural results, patency rates, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

The median age was 62 years (range, 23-91 years); 56% were female. Most prevalent associated conditions were diabetes mellitus (61%) and hypertension (68%). Fifty-six patients (48.7%) presented with severe upper extremity edema ipsilateral to the side of pre-existing functioning access. Obstruction recanalization was effective using standard catheter and wire in 106 cases (92.1%) and transseptal needle in nine cases (7.8%), that included seven using inside-out procedure. Initial management of the BCV stenosis was percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty alone in 74 patients (64.3%), stenting in 33 (28.7%), and HeRO conduit in eight cases (7%). Treatment of other central venous lesions included 49 cases (42.6%). The procedure was successful in 99.1% of patients. No intraoperative complications occurred. All 92 patients with previous arm access maintained adequate performance (100%). In 22 of 23 patients (95.6%), new upper extremity access creation was effectively performed after the venous intervention. Overall clinical success rate was 92%. The mean postoperative monitoring was 23 months, the median was 12 months, and the range was 1 to 84 months. During this monitoring period, 266 endovascular procedures, 91% in the office and 9% in the hospital, were required to preserve access performance. Eventually, 49 patients (42.6%) were stented. Eleven patients (9.56%) had infections, and six required complete access removal. Other causes of access failure included two patients with central vein thrombosis and one with massive pulmonary embolus. At the end, nine patients (7.8%) had access failure. Thirty-two patients (27.8%) died of unrelated causes during the follow-up period. Seventy-six patients (66%) have maintained functional access. Kaplan-Meier curves determined median primary patency of 9.6 months, median primary assisted patency of 56.2 months, and secondary patency of 75% at 80 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful endovascular revascularization of BCV obstruction can be treated safely, with simple endovascular techniques in an office-based context with minor complication rates and durable results.

The role of stents in hemodialysis vascular access

Vascular access is the Achilles' heel of dialysis therapy among patient with end stage kidney disease. The development of neointimal hyperplasia and subsequent stenosis is common in vascular access and is associated with significant morbidity. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using balloon inflation was the standard therapy of these lesions. However, the balloon-based approaches were associated with poor vascular access patency rate necessitating new inventions. It is within this context that different types of stents were developed in order to improve the overall dialysis vascular access functionality. In this article, we review the available literature regarding the use of stents in treating dialysis vascular access stenotic lesions. Further, we review the major clinical trials of stent use in different anatomic locations and in different clinical scenarios.

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome and hemodialysis

Central venous stenotic disease is reported in 7%-40% of patients needing a central venous catheter for dialysis and in 19%-41% of hemodialysis patients who have had a prior central venous catheter. Half of these patients will be asymptomatic. Venous Thoracic Outlet syndrome in hemodialysis (hdTOS) is part of this spectrum of disease. The extrinsic mechanical compression of the subclavian vein at the costoclavicular triangle between the clavicle and 1st rib results in an area of external compression with a predisposition to intrinsic mural disease in the vein. The enhanced flow induced by the presence of a distal arteriovenous access in all patients exacerbates the subclavian vein's response to ongoing extrinsic and intrinsic injury. Repeated endovascular interventions during the maintenance of vascular access accelerates chronic untreatable occlusion of the subclavian vein in the long term. Similar to patients with central venous stenosis, patients with hdTOS can present immediately after access formation with ipsilateral edema or longitudinally with episodes of access dysfunction. hdTOS can be treated in an escalating manner with arteriovenous access flow reduction to <1,500 ml/min, endovascular management, surgical decompression by first rib resection in healthy patients and medial clavicle resection in less healthy patients followed by secondary venous interventions, or finally, a venous bypass. hdTOS represents a complex and evolving therapeutic conundrum for the dialysis community, and additional clinical investigations to establish robust algorithms are required.

Invited Review: Optimal Management of Upper Extremity DVT: Is Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome Underrecognized?

BACKGROUND

UEDVT accounts for approximately 10% of all cases of deep vein thrombosis. In the most widely referenced general review of deep vein thrombosis (DVT the American Academy of Chest Physicians essentially recommend that upper extremity DVT (UEDVT) essentially be treated identically to that of lower extremity DVT, with anticoagulation being the default therapy. Unfortunately, the medical literature does not well differentiate between DVT in the arm and the leg, and does not emphasize the effects of the costoclavicular junction (CCJ) and the lack of effect of gravity, to the point where UEDVT due to extrinsic bony compression at the CCJ is classified as "primary."

METHODS

Comprehensive literature review, beginning with both Medline and Google Scholar searches in addition to collected references, then following relevant citations within the initial manuscripts studied. Both surgical and medical journals were explored RESULTS: It is proposed that effort thrombosis be classified as a secondary cause of UEDVT, limiting the definition of primary to that which is truly idiopathic. Other causes of secondary UEDVT include catheter- and pacemaker-related thrombosis (the most common cause, but often asymptomatic), thrombosis related to malignancy and hypercoagulable conditions, and the rare case of thrombosis due to compression of the vein by a focal malignancy or other space-occupying lesion. In true primary UEDVT and in those secondary cases where no mechanical cause is present or can be corrected, anticoagulation remains the treatment of choice, usually for three months or the duration of a needed catheter. However, evidence suggests that many cases of effort thrombosis are likely missed by a too-narrow adherence to this protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

Because proper treatment of effort thrombosis drops the long-term symptomatic status rate from 50% to almost zero and these are healthy patients with a long lifespan ahead, it is proposed that a more aggressive attitude toward thrombolysis be followed in any patient who has a reasonable degree of suspicion for venous thoracic outlet syndrome.

Long-term results and patient survival after first rib resection and endovascular treatment in hemodialysis patients with subclavian vein stenosis at the thoracic outlet

OBJECTIVE

Hemodialysis patients with upper extremity vascular access and subclavian vein stenosis at the thoracic outlet can present with significant arm edema and threatened dialysis access that is frequently refractory to endovascular therapy without bone decompression. We have presented our long-term results of first rib resection, followed by endovascular therapy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of 15 consecutive hemodialysis patients with subclavian vein stenosis treated with first rib resection and endovascular therapy from 2013 to January 2021. The diagnosis was confirmed by ultrasound and venography. Bone decompression was performed with transaxillary or infraclavicular rib resection.

RESULTS

During the study period, we treated 1440 unique dialysis patients. Of these 1440 patients, 346 had undergone subclavian vein angioplasty. Of the 346 patients, 15 had undergone first rib resection and were the subject of the present report. Of the 15 patients, 10 were women and 5 were men. Their mean age was 56.4 years (range, 30-82 years). The most commonly associated medical conditions were hypertension and diabetes. The mean previous hemodialysis duration was 5.4 years (range, 1-13 years). Fourteen patients had preexisting functioning access and severe arm edema. Nine patients (60%) with subclavian vein occlusion had undergone vein recanalization before the bone decompression procedure. Of the 15 patients, 5 had undergone transaxillary and 10 had undergone infraclavicular first rib resection. In addition, nine patients had undergone simultaneous vein stenting, six had undergone vein stenting within 4 weeks, and one had undergone stenting at 13 months. A stent-graft was used in eight patients and a bare metal stent was used in seven. All preexisting dialysis access sites were used the day after the procedure. The average postoperative stay was 2.6 days (range, 1-8 days). No complications developed. The average follow-up was 35.13 months (range, 4-86 months). The freedom from any subsequent intervention was 50% at 10.5 months. The average number of endovascular procedures per patient during follow-up was 4.6. Ten patients had required access surgery during follow-up. Secondary patency was 100%. The median patient survival was 69.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic hemodialysis patients with threatened vascular access caused by subclavian vein stenosis at the thoracic outlet were safely and successfully treated with first rib resection, followed by endovascular techniques. The procedure resulted in no morbidity and preserved dialysis access function in all patients during follow-up. Our experience has confirmed that excellent secondary patency and long-term clinical success can be obtained with regular follow-up, although with multiple secondary interventions. The median survival of 69 months after the procedure suggests it is worthwhile to expend this effort to maintain the hemodialysis access function of these patients.

Evaluation and Management of Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome

Venous thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is uncommon but occurs in young, healthy patients, typically presenting as subclavian vein (SCV) effort thrombosis. Venous TOS arises through chronic repetitive compression injury of the SCV in the costoclavicular space with progressive venous scarring, focal stenosis, and eventual thrombosis. Diagnosis is evident on clinical presentation with sudden spontaneous upper extremity swelling and cyanotic discoloration. Initial treatment includes anticoagulation, venography, and pharmacomechanical thrombolysis. Surgical management using paraclavicular decompression can result in relief from arm swelling, freedom from long-term anticoagulation, and a return to unrestricted upper extremity activity in more than 90% of patients.

Left Brachiocephalic Vein Stenosis due to the Insertion of a Temporal Right Subclavian Hemodialysis Catheter

Central vein stenosis/occlusion is a common well-described sequel to the placement of hemodialysis catheters in the central venous system. The precise mechanisms by which central vein stenosis occurs are not well known. Current concepts in central vein stenosis pathophysiology focus on the response to vessel injury model, emphasizing the process of trauma. A case of left brachiocephalic vein stenosis due to the insertion and function of a temporary right subclavian hemodialysis catheter is presented. The purpose of the manuscript is to emphasize that, with the introduction of a temporary subclavian hemodialysis catheter via the right subclavian vein apart from causing concurrent stenosis/infarction of the right subclavian and right brachiocephalic vein, it is also possible to cause stenosis of the left brachiocephalic vein (close to its contribution to the superior vena cava) although the catheter tip is placed in the correct anatomical position in the superior vena cava.

Venous Thoracic Outlet Syndrome as a Cause of Intractable Migraines

Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) refers to the compression of the neurovascular bundle within the thoracic outlet. Cases are classified by primary etiology-arterial, neurogenic, or venous. In addition to the typical symptoms of arm swelling and paresthesias, headaches have been reported as a potential symptom of TOS. In this report, we describe a patient with debilitating migraines, which were consistently preceded by unilateral arm swelling. Resolution of symptoms occurred only after thoracic outlet decompression. Patients with migraines and concomitant swelling and/or paresthesias, especially related to provocative arm maneuvers, should be considered a possible atypical presentation of TOS and evaluated in more detail.

Transposition of cephalic vein to rescue hemodialysis access arteriovenous fistula and treat symptomatic central venous obstruction

It is known that stenosis or central venous obstruction affects 20 to 50% of patients who undergo placement of catheters in central veins. For patients who are given hemodialysis via upper limbs, this problem causes debilitating symptoms and increases the risk of loss of hemodialysis access. We report an atypical case of treatment of a dialysis patient with multiple comorbidities, severe swelling and pain in the right upper limb (RUL), few alternative sites for hemodialysis vascular access, a functioning brachiobasilic fistula in the RUL and severe venous hypertension in the same limb, secondary to central vein occlusion of the internal jugular vein and right brachiocephalic trunk. The alternative surgical treatment chosen was to transpose the RUL cephalic vein, forming a venous necklace at the anterior cervical region, bypassing the site of venous occlusion. In order to achieve this, we dissected the cephalic vein in the right arm to its junction with the axillary vein, devalved the cephalic vein and anastomosed it to the contralateral external jugular vein, providing venous drainage to the RUL, alleviating symptoms of venous hypertension and preserving function of the brachiobasilic fistula.

Central vein stenosis

Central vein stenosis (CVS) is commonly seen in patients receiving hemodialysis through an arteriovenous access, threatening the usability of arteriovenous access for dialysis. Subclavian and internal jugular catheters are prime reasons for the development of CVS, especially in the setting of long-term use of multiple catheters. CVS related to cardiac rhythm devices also is seen frequently. Idiopathic CVS can be encountered, although it is less common. Clinical features ultimately become sufficiently prominent to prompt angiographic evaluation. CVS should be evaluated carefully because management must be individualized. The primary method for treatment of CVS is endovascular intervention, including angioplasty and stent placement, whereas surgical options should be pursued in only refractory cases due to the invasiveness of the intervention. Early referral of patients for chronic kidney disease care; timely discussion of kidney replacement modality choices, including nonhemodialysis options such as peritoneal dialysis and kidney transplantation; placement of arteriovenous access prior to the onset of dialysis; and avoidance of catheters and other central vein instrumentation will prevent the development of CVS in most patients with kidney disease.