Biomechanical considerations for total distalization of the mandibular dentition in the treatment of Class III malocclusion

Comparison of posttreatment stability after total mandibular arch distalization with mini-implants and mandibular setback surgery

OBJECTIVES

To compare posttreatment stability in skeletal Class III patients between those treated by total mandibular arch distalization (TMAD) with buccal mini-implants and those by mandibular setback surgery (MSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The samples included 40 Class III adults, 20 treated by TMAD using buccal interradicular mini-implants and 20 treated with MSS. Lateral cephalograms were taken at pretreatment, posttreatment, and at least 1-year follow-up, and 24 variables were compared using statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Mandibular first molars moved distally 1.9 mm with intrusion of 1.1 mm after treatment in the TMAD group. The mandibular incisors moved distally by 2.3 mm. The MSS group exhibited a significant skeletal change of the mandible, whereas the TMAD group did not. During retention, there were no skeletal or dental changes other than 0.6 mm labial movement of the mandibular incisors (P < .05) in the MSS group. There was 1.4° of mesial tipping (P < .01) and 0.4 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular molars and 1.9° of labial tipping (P < .001) and 0.8 mm of mesial movement of the mandibular incisors in the TMAD group. These dental changes were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The TMAD group showed a slightly decreased overjet with labial tipping of the mandibular incisors and mesial tipping of the first molars during retention. Posttreatment stability of the mandibular dentition was not significantly different between the groups. It can be useful to plan camouflage treatment by TMAD with mini-implants in mild-to-moderate Class III patients.

A 3-dimensional evaluation of available retromolar space for the application of ramal plates

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to evaluate the available retromolar space for ramal plates in patients with Class I and III malocclusions and compare that space with and without third molars using cone-beam computed tomography.

METHODS

Cone-beam computed tomography images of 30 patients (17 males, 13 females; mean age, 22.2 ± 4.5 years) with Class III malocclusion and 29 subjects (18 males, 11 females; mean age, 24.3 ± 3.7 years) with Class I malocclusion were analyzed. Available retromolar space at 4 axial levels of the second molar root and the volume of the retromolar bone were evaluated. Two-way repeated measures analysis of covariance (repeated measures analysis of covariance) was applied to compare the variables between Class I and III malocclusions and the presence of third molars.

RESULTS

Patients with Class I and III relationships showed up to 12.7 mm of available retromolar space at 2 mm apical from the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). At 8 mm apical from CEJ, patients with Class III malocclusion had 11.1 mm of space, whereas those with a Class I relationship showed 9.8 mm of available space. When patients had third molars, the amount of available retromolar space was significantly greater in patients with a Class I and III relationship. However, patients with Class III malocclusion exhibited greater available retromolar space than those with a Class I relationship (P = 0.028). In addition, the bone volume was significantly greater in patients with Class III malocclusion than in patients with a Class I relationship and those with third molars than in those without them (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Class I and III groups showed the availability of at least 10.0 mm of retromolar space 2 mm apical to the CEJ for molar distalization. Based on this information, it is suggested that clinicians consider available retromolar space for molar distalization in diagnosing and planning treatment for patients with Class I and III malocclusion.

Computed Tomographic Evaluation of Buccal Shelf Dimensions in South Indian Patients With Sagittal Skeletal Class III Malocclusion: A Retrospective Study

Background Computed tomographic evaluation of mandibular buccal shelf region in skeletal class III malocclusion cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) studies have been reported to have great alteration in the thickness of mandibular buccal shelf region owing to the different growth patterns and ethnic variations. The aim of this study was to determine the total and cortical bone thickness in the mandibular buccal shelf (MBS) region for extra-alveolar mini-screw placement in South Indian patients with sagittal skeletal class III malocclusion. Material and methods This retrospective computed tomographic study consisted of archived files of the Dravidian population with class III skeletal base that met the eligibility criteria. The total bone and cortical bone thickness of the buccal shelf regions were evaluated in relation to three anatomical sites at various depths and angulations. One-way ANOVA and Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis. Pearson correlation coefficient was performed to compare if any relation existed between bone thickness and the growth pattern. Results The maximum bone thickness in the buccal shelf region in our study was found at the distal portion of the second molar root, 8-12 mm from its cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and at 30-45 ° angulation (p-value<0.005). There was a positive correlation between the hypo-divergent growth pattern and the thickness of the bone. Conclusion Based on the sites recorded, the preferred site for mini screw placement in Class III patients is the distobuccal cusp region with respect to the second molar at a depth of 8-12 mm and at angulation of 30-45 °. There was a moderate correlation with hypo-divergent growth patterns, suggestive of a wider and thicker mandibular buccal shelf region in these subjects.

CBCT comparison of buccal shelf bone thickness in adult Dravidian population at various sites, depths and angulation - A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

It is important to understand the variations in the bone thickness of the buccal shelf region among different ethnic groups, as these variations will influence the placement and success of the buccal shelf mini-screw.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to analyse the total buccal bone and cortical bone thickness of the mandibular buccal shelf region (MBS) at various depths, mesiodistal positions and angulations in Dravidian population and to find the best site for insertion of buccal shelf mini-implant.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a retrospective study done on 30 cone-beam computed tomography samples collected from 30 subjects, aged 16 to 25 years and of Dravidian origin, who reported for orthodontic treatment. The total bone and cortical bone thicknesses of the buccal shelf regions were evaluated in relation to the Disto-Buccal cusp of 1st Molar (DB1M), Mesio-Buccal cusp of 1st Molar (MB1M), and Disto-Buccal cusp of 2nd Molar (DB2M) at the depths of 4mm, 8mm and 12mm from cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The total bone thickness and the clearance from the root and cortical bone thickness were assessed at angulations of 30, 45 and 60 degrees from 5mm below the root apex. ANOVA and Post Hoc tests were done to compare the bone thickness measurements. Kappa statistics was done to assess the intraobserver reliability. Pearson's correlation test was done to find the correlation between growth pattern and thickness of the bone.

RESULTS

The mean age group of the included sample was 20.5 years. Maximum total bone thickness was observed at a depth of 8mm in relation to the MB2M (6.41±0.29mm) and 12mm in relation to the DB2M 6.56±0.28mm and the P value was 0.000. Maximum bone thickness was present in the DB2M at 30° followed by DB2M 45° of 11.42±0.35mm and 10.89±0.3mm and the P value was 0.000. The maximum clearance from the root was observed at 30° and 45° in the DB2M with 5.35±0.2mm and 5.18±0.27mm, the P value was 0.014 when comparing angulation 30 and 45°. The DB2M had a cortical bone thickness of 2.97±0.15mm and 2.8±0.2mm at 45° and 60° and was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The insertion site with optimal bone quantity was observed in relation to the buccal aspect of distobuccal cusp of 2nd molar at depth of 8mm or greater with a preferred angulation of 30-45° to have adequate clearance from the molar tooth roots and to penetrate a region of cortical bone of minimum 2mm.