Clinical impact of incidental diagnosis of disease on non-contrast-enhanced helical CT for acute ureteral colic

Evaluation of the frequency of incidental findings and their clinical significance in multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging examination

Purpose

Conventional diagnostic methods have limitations in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa); therefore, the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in PCa has become widespread. We aimed to determine the frequency of IF detected in the mpMRI examination according to organ distribution and clinical significance.

Material and methods

mpMRI examinations performed between January 2015 and 2020 based on the diagnosis or suspicion of PCa were retrospectively evaluated. IFs were divided into 2 groups, as genitourinary system and non- genitourinary system findings. In addition, IFs were also evaluated in 2 groups, as clinically significant and clinically non-significant. The patient population was divided into age ranges, and the frequency of IFs in these age ranges and their clinical significance were recorded.

Results

The mpMRI examinations of 426 patients revealed a total of 321 Ifs, comprising 212 (49.8%) genitourinary (41.1%) and 189 (58.9%) extragenitourinary findings. The mean age of the patients was 63.53 ± 7.89 years. As the age increased, the rate of IFs increased (p = 0.001). However, there was no increase for the 75-year-old group compared to the 65-74-year-old age range (p = 0.853). There were a total of 22 (6.9%) clinically significant Ifs – 4 associated with the genitourinary system and 18 extragenitourinary.

Conclusions

Although the rate of clinically significant IF was only 6.9%, this rate was high in patients, especially in those over the age of 65 years. It should be kept in mind that the early detection of these findings in the asymptomatic period will increase the survival and successful treatment of patients.

That liver lesion on MDCT in the oncology patient: is it important?

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) has become the primary imaging test for the staging and follow-up of most malignancies that originate outside of the central nervous system. Technical advances in this imaging technique have led to significant improvement in the detection of metastatic disease to the liver. An unintended by-product of this improving diagnostic acumen is the discovery of incidental hepatic lesions in oncology patients that in the past remained undetected. These ubiquitous, incidentally identified hepatic lesions have created a management dilemma for both clinicians and radiologists: are these lesions benign or do they represent metastases? Naturally, the answer to this question has profound prognostic and therapeutic implications. In this review, guidelines concerning the diagnosis and management of some of the more common hepatic incidental lesions detected in patients with extrahepatic malignancies are presented.

Hepatic incidentalomas

Recent advances in multidetector-row computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasonography have led to the detection of incidental hepatic lesions in both the oncology and nononcology patient population that in the past remained undiscovered. These incidental hepatic lesions have created a management dilemma for both clinicians and radiologists. In this review, guidelines concerning the diagnosis and management of some of the more common hepatic incidentalomas are presented.

Prevalence of extravascular collateral findings during 64-slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower limbs

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of extravascular collateral findings during 64-slice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta (AA-CTA) and lower limbs (LL-CTA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The images of 536 AA-CTA and LL-CTA examinations performed for suspected aortic and peripheral vascular disease in 500 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists evaluated the 5-mm axial images independently using appropriate window settings for the area under investigation. Collateral findings were divided according to their clinical significance into significant, nonsignificant and meriting further investigation.

RESULTS

No collateral findings were identified in 97/500 patients (19.4%). In the remaining patients, 821 collateral findings were detected, of which 43 (5.24%) were classified as significant, 135 (16.44%) as meriting further investigation and 643 (78.32%) as nonsignificant. The findings indicative of the presence of a malignant lesion totalled 36 (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

AA-CTA and LL-CTA demonstrate a nonnegligible prevalence of collateral findings, many of them major. It therefore appears that the evaluation should focus not only on the image reconstructions to identify vascular disease, but also on the native axial images to detect incidental findings.

Unexpected changes in clinical diagnosis: early abdomino-pelvic computed tomography compared with clinical evaluation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the value of early computed tomography (CT) on identifying clinically "unexpected" diagnosis in patients presenting with "non specific" acute abdominal pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients presenting to on-call surgeons with acute abdominal pain were eligible study participants. Patients were randomised to CT within one hour of admission or supine abdominal and erect chest radiography. Ninety-nine patients randomized to CT arm were reviewed for the purpose of this study. The number and severity of unexpected and/or incidental diagnoses detected on the CT were assessed.

RESULTS

In 20 of the 99 patients CT revealed primary or secondary diagnoses, which were unexpected following the initial clinical examination and led to completely different therapeutic options. In 15 of those 20 patients CT revealed clinically unexpected conditions, whereas in two patients severe complications of the clinically suspected diagnosis were detected on CT. Five patients had significant incidental findings in addition to their primary diagnosis on CT. In two of these patient CT also revealed clinically unexpected diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Early CT has the advantage of detecting unexpected clinically significant primary and secondary diagnoses in patients presenting with acute abdominal pain and best guides the surgeon to the appropriate patient management.

Extravascular incidental findings at multislice CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity arteries: a retrospective review study

PURPOSE

To assess the frequency and clinical impact of extravascular incidental findings on routine CT angiography of abdominal aorta or lower extremity arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 2002 to July 2004, a total of 692 patients underwent CT angiography of abdominal aorta and lower extremity arteries. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed by consensus cross-sectional images for the presence and clinical impact definition of extravascular findings. The revision of hospital charts, medical records, and all procedures' reports performed before and after CT angiography represented the standard of reference (SOR).

RESULTS

Only 373 out of 605 patients in whom extravascular findings were found had a SOR; in these patients CT angiography obtained a true-positive incidental rate of 98.9% (369/373). For the clinical impact definition of CT-angiography incidental findings, a concordance with SOR was obtained in 56.3% of patients, whereas a subsequent investigation was required in 183 patients (183/369, 49.6%). Among clinically relevant incidental findings, a total of 35 malignancies (35/894, 3.9%) were detected in 20 patients (20/423, 4.7%); in 15 patients (15/423, 3.5%) malignancy was unknown before CT-angiography exam.

CONCLUSIONS

A careful observation of cross-sectional images, even if "time consuming", is mandatory not only to assess vascular findings but also to avoid a misdiagnosis of clinical relevant extravascular findings.

Alternate or Additional Findings to Stone Disease on Unenhanced Computerized Tomography for Acute Flank Pain Can Impact Management

PURPOSE

We evaluated the incidence and clinical relevance of alternate or additional findings on unenhanced CT in patients with acute flank pain and suspected urinary calculi.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A consecutive series of 1,500 patients underwent unenhanced CT due to acute flank pain. The absence or presence of urinary tract calculi and their localization were recorded. Alternate or additional CT findings were classified according to whether they required immediate or deferred treatment, or were of little or no clinical importance.

RESULTS

Of the 1,500 patients 1,035 (69%) had urinary tract calculi, including 309 (30%) with nephrolithiasis, 377 (36%) with ureterolithiasis and 349 (34%) with the 2 conditions. Urolithiasis alone was found in 331 of these patients (32%) and additional pathological conditions were noted in 704 (68%). Of all patients 1,064 (71%) had other or additional CT findings. Of all patients 207 (14%) had nonstone related CT findings requiring immediate or deferred treatment, 464 (31%) had pathological conditions of little clinical importance and 393 (26%) had pathological conditions of no clinical relevance. CT was normal in 105 of all patients (7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Unenhanced CT in patients with acute flank pain allows the accurate diagnosis of urinary stone disease and it can also provide further important information leading to emergency or deferred treatment in a substantial number of patients.