Computed Tomographic Cardiovascular Imaging

Sex-related differences in coronary and carotid vessel geometry, plaque composition and shear stress obtained from imaging

Atherosclerosis manifests itself differently in men and women with respect to plaque initiation, progression and plaque composition. The observed delay in plaque progression in women is thought to be related to the hormonal status of women. Also features associated with the vulnerability of plaques to rupture seem to be less frequently present in women compared to men. Current invasive and non-invasive imaging modalities allow for visualization of plaque size, composition and high risk vulnerable plaque features. Moreover, image based modeling gives access to local shear stress and shear stress-related plaque growth. In this review, current knowledge on sex-related differences in plaque size, composition, high risk plaque features and shear stress related plaque growth in carotid and coronary arteries obtained from imaging are summarized.

Advances in Multimodality Carotid Plaque Imaging: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review

Contemporary imaging methods provide detailed visualization of carotid athero-sclerotic plaque, enabling a major evolution of in vivo carotid plaque imaging evaluation. The degree of luminal stenosis in the carotid artery bifurcation, as assessed by ultrasound, has historically served as the primary imaging feature for determining ischemic stroke risk and the potential need for surgery. However, stroke risk may be more strongly driven by the presence of specific characteristics of vulnerable plaque, as visualized on CT and MRI, than by traditional ultrasound-based assessment of luminal narrowing. This review highlights six promising imaging-based plaque characteristics that harbor unique information regarding plaque vulnerability: maximum plaque thickness and volume, calcification, ulceration, intraplaque hemorrhage, lipid-rich necrotic core, and thin or ruptured fibrous cap. Increasing evidence supports the association of these plaque characteristics with risk of ischemic stroke, although these characteristics have varying suitability for clinical implementation. Key aspects of CT and MRI protocols for carotid plaque imaging are also considered. Practical next steps and hurdles are explored for implementing routine imaging assessment of these plaque characteristics in addition to, or even as replacement for, traditional assessment of the degree of vascular stenosis on ultrasound, in the identification of individuals at high risk of ischemic stroke.

Quantifying the impact of using Coronary Artery Calcium Score for risk categorization instead of Framingham Score or European Heart SCORE in lipid lowering algorithms in a Middle Eastern population

Background

The use of the Coronary Artery Calcium Score (CACS) for risk categorization instead of the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) or European Heart SCORE (EHS) to improve classification of individuals is well documented. However, the impact of reclassifying individuals using CACS on initiating lipid lowering therapy is not well understood. We aimed to determine the percentage of individuals not requiring lipid lowering therapy as per the FRS and EHS models but are found to require it using CACS and vice versa; and to determine the level of agreement between CACS, FRS and EHS based models.

Methods

Data was collected for 500 consecutive patients who had already undergone CACS. However, only 242 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Risk stratification comparisons were conducted according to CACS, FRS, and EHS, and the agreement (Kappa) between them was calculated.

Results

In accordance with the models, 79.7% to 81.5% of high-risk individuals were down-classified by CACS, while 6.8% to 7.6% of individuals at intermediate risk were up-classified to high risk by CACS, with slight to moderate agreement. Moreover, CACS recommended treatment to 5.7% and 5.8% of subjects untreated according to European and Canadian guidelines, respectively; whereas 75.2% to 81.2% of those treated in line with the guidelines would not be treated based on CACS.

Conclusion

In this simulation, using CACS for risk categorization warrants lipid lowering treatment for 5–6% and spares 70–80% from treatment in accordance with the guidelines. Current strong evidence from double randomized clinical trials is in support of guideline recommendations. Our results call for a prospective trial to explore the benefits/risks of a CACS-based approach before any recommendations can be made.