Imaging Manifestations of Peptic Ulcer Disease on Computed Tomography

Diagnostics and Treatment of Peptic Ulcer in Adults (Clinical Guidelines of the Russian Gastroenterological Association, the Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons, the Russian Endoscopic Society and the Scientific Society for the Clinical Study of Human Microbiome)

Aim. The guidelines set out the modern methods of diagnostics and treatment of peptic ulcer and are created for gastroenterologists, primary care physicians, general practitioners, surgeons, endoscopists.

Key points. The clinical guidelines contain modern views on the etiology and pathogenesis of peptic ulcer, its clinical features, methods of laboratory and instrumental diagnostics, the main approaches to conservative and surgical treatment. They include the criteria for assessment of the quality of medical care, the algorithm of the doctor's actions, as well as information for the patient.

Conclusion. Knowledge of modern methods of diagnostics and therapy of peptic ulcers will contribute to improving the results of its treatment.

Peptic Ulcer Disease

Peptic ulcer disease is a common cause of epigastric pain typically related to Helicobacter pylori infection or NSAID use that can lead to serious consequences including upper GI bleed or perforation if undiagnosed. Diagnostic strategies vary depending on age and treatment is dependent on etiology.

Development and validation of a CT algorithm for the identification of nonperforated duodenal bulb ulcer

PURPOSE

To assess the value of multiplanar computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of nonperforated duodenal bulb ulcer (NPDBU).

METHOD

We retrospectively analyzed data from 135 patients with NPDBU (ulcer group) and 150 patients with a normal duodenal bulb (control group) who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT and were diagnosed via upper endoscopy from January 2018 to February 2022. The clinical and CT features were compared between the two groups. Independent prognostic factors for diagnosing NPDBU were determined using binary logistic regression analysis. An external validation cohort to determine the model's efficiency comprised 80 patients from another center.

RESULTS

Gastrointestinal bleeding was more frequent in patients with NPDBU than in those without (p < 0.001). No significant differences in age and sex were observed between the groups (all p > 0.05). The duodenal bulbar wall was significantly thicker in the ulcer group than in the control group, as determined using CT (p < 0.001). Irregular mucosal surface, layered enhancement, and blurred fat space around the duodenal bulb were more common in the ulcer group than in the control group (all p < 0.001). Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that gastrointestinal bleeding, wall thickness of ≥ 4.85 mm, irregular mucosal surface, and blurred peripheral fat space were the most significant variations associated with NPDBU, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.974. The external validation cohort had an AUC of 0.916.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful multiplanar CT interpretation suggests the underlying presence of NPDBU and allows timely endoscopic verification and appropriate treatment.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Epigastric Pain

Epigastric pain can have multiple etiologies including myocardial infarction, pancreatitis, acute aortic syndromes, gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, and hiatal hernia. This document focuses on the scenarios in which epigastric pain is accompanied by symptoms such as heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, nausea, vomiting, and hematemesis, which raise suspicion for gastroesophageal reflux disease, esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, duodenal ulcer disease, gastric cancer, or hiatal hernia. Although endoscopy may be the test of choice for diagnosing these entities, patients may present with nonspecific or overlapping symptoms, necessitating the use of imaging prior to or instead of endoscopy. The utility of fluoroscopic imaging, CT, MRI, and FDG-PET for these indications are discussed. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Gastrointestinal Bleeding at CT Angiography and CT Enterography: Imaging Atlas and Glossary of Terms

Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a common potentially life-threatening medical condition frequently requiring multidisciplinary collaboration to reach the proper diagnosis and guide management. GI bleeding can be overt (eg, visible hemorrhage such as hematemesis, hematochezia, or melena) or occult (eg, positive fecal occult blood test or iron deficiency anemia). Upper GI bleeding, which originates proximal to the ligament of Treitz, is more common than lower GI bleeding, which arises distal to the ligament of Treitz. Small bowel bleeding accounts for 5-10% of GI bleeding cases commonly manifesting as obscure GI bleeding, where the source remains unknown after complete GI tract endoscopic and imaging evaluation. CT can aid in identifying the location and cause of bleeding and is an important complementary tool to endoscopy, nuclear medicine, and angiography in evaluating patients with GI bleeding. For radiologists, interpreting CT scans in patients with GI bleeding can be challenging owing to the large number of images and the diverse potential causes of bleeding. The purpose of this pictorial review by the Society of Abdominal Radiology GI Bleeding Disease-Focused Panel is to provide a practical resource for radiologists interpreting GI bleeding CT studies that reviews the proper GI bleeding terminology, the most common causes of GI bleeding, key patient history and risk factors, the optimal CT imaging technique, and guidelines for case interpretation and illustrates many common causes of GI bleeding. A CT reporting template is included to help generate radiology reports that can add value to patient care. An invited commentary by Al Hawary is available online. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2021.

Protective effect of luteolin on indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer in rats

BACKGROUND

Long-term use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs can lead to gastric ulcer. However, there are many side effects associated with the commonly used therapeutic agents for gastric ulcer.

AIM

To investigate the protective effect of luteolin (Lut) on indomethacin (IND)-induced gastric ulcer in rats and the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

Forty male Wistar rats were randomly divided into a control group, a model group, and low-, medium-, and high-dose Lut groups, with eight rats in each group. A rat gastric ulcer model was established by intragastric administration of IND (40 mg/kg) for 14 d. The low-, medium-, and high-dose Lut groups were given 1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 100 mg/kg Lut by gavage for 14 d. The control group was given the same volume of carboxymethylcellulose. The macroscopic morphology of the gastric mucosa was observed visually. The pathological changes of the gastric mucosa were examined by HE staining. Apoptosis in the gastric mucosa was detected with the ApopTag Peroxidase In Situ Apoptosis Detection Kit. The levels of superoxide dismutase (SOD), reduced glutathione (GSH), and malondialdehyde (MDA) in the gastric mucosa were determined with commercial kits.

RESULTS

Lut administration could reduce IND-induced gastric ulcer in a dose-dependent manner, improve the pathological morphology of gastric mucosal tissues, reduce the apoptosis of gastric mucosal epithelial cells, increase the levels of SOD and GSH in gastric mucosal tissues, and decrease the level of MDA.

CONCLUSION

Lut can alleviate IND-induced gastric ulcer in rats, and the mechanism may be related to the inhibition of gastric epithelial cell apoptosis and antioxidant stress.

Computed tomography findings of acute gastric peptic ulcer

PURPOSE

To report the computed tomography (CT) findings of acute peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and to evaluate the usefulness of contrast media for diagnosis.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 51 patients diagnosed with acute gastric peptic ulcer by endoscopy. Using a κ analysis, two radiologists independently reviewed contrast-enhanced emergency CTs performed within 24 h of endoscopy. Evaluation findings included low-attenuation wall thickening, focal wall thickening, focal luminal outpouching, perigastric fat stranding, ascites, adjacent lymphadenopathy, and high-density gastric contents. Of the 51 patients, 48 underwent both non-contrast-enhanced and contrast-enhanced CT, and two radiologists also evaluated the presence or absence of these findings on a non-contrast-enhanced CT. McNemar's test was used to evaluate the contrast media's usefulness.

RESULTS

Interobserver variability of perigastric fat stranding revealed substantial agreement between evaluators, and other findings had almost perfect agreement. High-density gastric contents were the most recognized findings (60%). Low-attenuation focal wall thickening and focal luminal outpouching were observed in relatively large numbers (~50%) of the cases on contrast-enhanced CT. The CT examinations using contrast media provided significantly higher detectability of low-attenuation wall thickening and focal luminal outpouching than CT examinations without using contrast media.

CONCLUSION

Acute PUD can be suspected in patients with nonspecific abdominal symptoms in whom emergency CT shows high-density gastric contents, focal low-attenuation wall thickening, and/or focal luminal outpouching. Our study showed that contrast media are useful for diagnosis.

Gastrointestinal perforation: clinical and MDCT clues for identification of aetiology

Gastrointestinal tract (GIT) perforation is a common medical emergency associated with considerable mortality, ranging from 30 to 50%. Clinical presentation varies: oesophageal perforations can present with acute chest pain, odynophagia and vomiting, gastroduodenal perforations with acute severe abdominal pain, while colonic perforations tend to follow a slower progression course with secondary bacterial peritonitis or localised abscesses. A subset of patients may present with delayed symptoms, abscess mimicking an abdominal mass, or with sepsis.

Direct multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings support the diagnosis and localise the perforation site while ancillary findings may suggest underlying conditions that need further investigation following primary repair of ruptured bowel. MDCT findings include extraluminal gas, visible bowel wall discontinuity, extraluminal contrast, bowel wall thickening, abnormal mural enhancement, localised fat stranding and/or free fluid, as well as localised phlegmon or abscess in contained perforations.

The purpose of this article is to review the spectrum of MDCT findings encountered in GIT perforation and emphasise the MDCT and clinical clues suggestive of the underlying aetiology and localisation of perforation site.

Ingestible Contrast Agents for Gastrointestinal Imaging

Gastrointestinal (GI) ailments cover a wide variety of diseases involving the esophagus, stomach, small intestine, large intestine, and rectum. They bring about many inconveniences in daily life in chronic diseases and can even be life threatening in acute cases. Rapid and safe detection approaches are essential for early diagnosis and timely management. Contrast agents for GI imaging can enhance contrast to distinguish abnormal lesions from normal structures. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are two important diagnostic tools for the evaluation of GI conditions. This review mainly involves several common GI diseases, including inflammatory diseases, intestinal tumors, diarrhea, constipation, and gastroesophageal reflux diseases. Selected contrast agents, such as barium sulfate, iodine-based agents, gadolinium-based agents, and others, are summarized. Going forward, continued endeavors are being made to develop more emerging contrast agents for other imaging modalities.