MR Imaging of the Spine: Urgent and Emergent Indications

Implementing a rapid cord compression Magnetic Resonance Imaging protocol in the emergency department: Lessons learned

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE

(1) Evaluate efficacy of an abbreviated total spine protocol in triaging emergency department (ED) patients through retrospective evaluation. (2) Describe patient outcomes following implementation of a rapid cord compression protocol.

METHODS

(1) All contrast-enhanced total spine magnetic resonance imaging studies (MRIs) performed on ED patients (n = 75) between 10/1-12/31/2022 for evaluation of cord compression were included. Two readers with 6 and 5 years of experience blindly reviewed the abbreviated protocol (comprised of sagittal T2w and axial T2w sequences) assessing presence of cord compression or severe spinal canal stenosis. Ground truth was consensus by a neuroradiology fellow and 2 attendings. (2) The implemented rapid protocol included sagittal T1w, sagittal T2w Dixon and axial T2w images. All ED patients (n = 85) who were imaged using the rapid protocol from 5/1-8/31/2023 were included. Patient outcomes and call-back rates were determined through chart review.

RESULTS

(1) Sensitivity and specificity for severe spinal canal stenosis and/or cord compression was 1.0 and 0.92, respectively, for reader 1 and 0.78 and 0.85, respectively, for reader 2. Negative predictive value was 1.0 and 0.97 for readers 1 and 2, respectively. (2) The implemented rapid cord compression protocol resulted in 60% reduction in imaging time at 1.5T. The call-back rate for additional sequences was 7%. In patients who underwent surgery, no additional MRI images were acquired in 82% of cases (9/11).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing an abbreviated non-contrast total spine protocol in the ED results in a low call-back rate with acquired MRI images proving sufficient for both triage and treatment planning in most patients.

Case Report and Literature Review: Lumbar Disc Extrusion Misdiagnosed as an Epidural Hematoma

Accurate differentiation between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc extrusion is essential due to the potential overlap in clinical presentations. We present a case report highlighting a significant challenge in which a massive lumbar disc extrusion was mistaken for an epidural hematoma. This is a case report of a 38-year-old male patient who developed cauda equina syndrome four days after experiencing an audible cracking in the lower back during weightlifting activity. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was inconclusive, unable to distinguish between an extruded nucleus pulposus and a spinal epidural hematoma. Subsequently, an urgent operation revealed a large herniated disc at the L4-L5 level, ruling out any hematoma. The patient's post-operative follow-up showed significant improvement, with almost complete recovery of motor and sensory functions. This case emphasizes the challenges faced when distinguishing between epidural hematomas and lumbar disc herniations, particularly on MRI. The lumbar disc herniation's substantial size, cranial and caudal migration on multiple levels, and signal intensity contributed to the misdiagnosis, underscoring the importance of careful interpretation and awareness of such complexities.

Polysegmental and multilevel lesions in hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: assessment of immediate and long-term results

Objective. To analyze the results of treatment of disseminated (polysegmental and multilevel) forms of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis (HVO) as compared with those of monosegmental and monovertebral lesions.

Material and Methods. A retrospective analysis of a monocenter cohort of 266 patients with hematogenous osteomyelitis of the spine for 2006 to 2019 was carried out. Patients were divided into two groups: Group A (polysegmental and multilevel lesions) included 33 (12.4 %) patients and Group B (monosegmental and monovertebral lesions) – 233 (87.6 %) patients. The main examination methods were: clinical, radiological (standardized roentgenography, CT), MRI, microbiological, histological and statistical ones.

Results. Comparison revealed that involvement of the cervical (p < 0.001) and thoracic (p = 0.014) spine was more typical for polysegmental and multilevel lesions. There was a tendency to the predominance of type A lesions according to the Pola classification in patients with local forms (p = 0.078) and to the increase in type C lesions in polysegmental and multilevel processes (p = 0.035). The number of neurological complications was higher in polysegmental and multilevel lesions (p = 0.003). There were no significant differences in the treatment results, the number of relapses and mortality rate between the compared groups.

Conclusion. Lesions of the cervical and thoracic spine and the presence of a neurological deterioration are typical for multilevel and polysegmental HVO. The formation of a multilevel lesion in different regions of the spine with a gap of 2–4 weeks or more requires a separate implementation of the diagnostic algorithm, defining of classification criteria and differentiated treatment tactics for each focus.

V, Prasad P, Leasure J, Stepansky F, Piple A, Kondrashov D. Pyogenic spinal infections warrant a total spine MRI

Study design: retrospective case series. Objective: the presenting clinical symptoms of spinal infections are often nonspecific and a delay in diagnosis can lead to adverse patient outcomes. The morbidity and mortality of patients with multifocal spinal infections is significantly higher compared to unifocal infections. The purpose of the current study was to analyse the risk factors for multifocal spinal infections. Methods: we conducted a retrospective review of all pyogenic non-tuberculous spinal infections treated surgically at a single tertiary care medical center from 2006-2020. The medical records, imaging studies, and laboratory data of 43 patients during this time period were reviewed and analysed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection. Results: 15 patients (35 %) had multifocal infections. In univariate analysis, there was a significant association with chronic kidney disease ( p = 0.040 ), gender ( p = 0.003 ), a white blood cell count ( p = 0.011 ), and cervical ( p < 0.001 ) or thoracic ( p < 0 .001) involvement. In multivariate analysis, both cervical and thoracic involvement remained statistically significant ( p = 0.001 and p < 0.001 , respectively). Conclusions: patients with infections in the thoracic or cervical region are more likely to have a multifocal infection. Multifocal pyogenic spinal infections remain a common entity and a total spine MRI should be performed to aid in prompt diagnosis.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Spine Emergencies

This article is devoted to the MR imaging evaluation of spine emergencies, defined as spinal pathologic conditions that pose an immediate risk of significant morbidity or mortality to the patient if not diagnosed and treated in a timely manner. MR imaging plays a central role in the timely diagnosis of spine emergencies. A summary of MR imaging indications and MR imaging protocols tailored for a variety of spinal emergencies will be presented followed by a review of key imaging findings for the most-encountered emergent spine pathologic conditions. Pathologic conditions will be broadly grouped into traumatic and atraumatic pathologic conditions. For traumatic injuries, a practical and algorithmic diagnostic approach based on the AO Spine injury classification system will be presented focused on subaxial spine trauma. Atraumatic spinal emergencies will be dichotomized into compressive and noncompressive subtypes. The location of external compressive disease with respect to the thecal sac is fundamental to establishing a differential diagnosis for compressive emergencies, whereas specific patterns of spinal cord involvement on MR imaging will guide the discussion of inflammatory and noninflammatory causes of noncompressive myelopathy.

Spine MRI: A Review of Commonly Encountered Emergent Conditions

Over the last 2 decades, the proliferation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) availability and continuous improvements in acquisition speeds have led to significantly increased MRI utilization across the health care system, and MRI studies are increasingly ordered in the emergent setting. Depending on the clinical presentation, MRI can yield vital diagnostic information not detectable with other imaging modalities. The aim of this text is to report on the up-to-date indications for MRI of the spine in the ED, and review the various MRI appearances of commonly encountered acute spine pathology, including traumatic injuries, acute non traumatic myelopathy, infection, neoplasia, degenerative disc disease, and postoperative complications. Imaging review will focus on the aspects of the disease process that are not readily resolved with other modalities.

Major Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Total Spine MRI Performed in the Emergency Department at a Major Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Total spine MRIs are requested by the emergency department when focused imaging can not be ordered on the basis of history or clinical findings. However, their efficacy is not known. We assessed the following: 1) major radiologic and clinical outcomes of total spine MR imaging performed by the emergency department, and 2) whether the presence of a high-risk clinical profile and/or neurologic findings impacts the clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Total spine MRIs requested by the emergency department during a 28-month period were evaluated for major radiologic (cord compression, cauda equina compression, and other significant findings) and major clinical outcomes (hospital admission during the visit followed by an operation, radiation therapy, or intravenous antibiotics or steroids). Associations between a high-risk clinical profile (cancer, infection, coagulopathy) and/or the presence of neurologic findings and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

After we excluded trauma or nondiagnostic studies, 321/2047 (15.7%) MRIs ordered during study period were total spine MR imaging; 117/321 (36.4%) had major radiologic and 60/321 (18.6%) had major clinical outcomes (34/60 in <24 hours); and 58/117(49.6%) with major radiologic outcome were treated compared with 2/205 (1.0%) without (OR = 99, P < .001). The presence of both a high-risk clinical profile and neurologic findings concurrently in a patient (142/321) increased the likelihood of major clinical outcomes during the same visit (OR = 3.1, P < .001) and in <24-hours (OR = 2.6, P = .01) compared with those with either a high-risk clinical profile or neurologic findings alone (179/321).

CONCLUSIONS

Total spine MR imaging ordered by our emergency department has a high radiologic and significant clinical yield. When a high-risk clinical profile and neurologic findings are both present in a patient, they should be prioritized for emergent total spine MR imaging, given the increased likelihood of clinical impact.

High Prevalence of Multifocal Spine Infections Involving the Cervical and Thoracic Regions: A Case for Imaging the Entire Spine

Objective

Pyogenic spinal infections account for 2%–4% of orthopaedic infections. They are often difficult to diagnose, resulting in a delay in diagnosis. Risk factors for orthopaedic and spinal infection are well-documented in the literature, yet there is a paucity of studies examining risk factors specifically for multifocal spinal infections. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of multifocal spinal infections in comparison to unifocal spinal infections.

Methods

The medical records, imaging studies, and bacteriology data of 20 patients treated surgically for pyogenic spinal infection over 6 years at a tertiary referral center were reviewed and analyzed after receiving Institutional Review Board approval. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a multifocal spinal infection.

Results

Seven patients (35%) had multifocal infections. Three were bifocal, and 4 were trifocal. Patients with surgically treated cervical or thoracic spinal infections had a high rate of concomitant multifocal spinal infections (71% and 83%, respectively). Other potential predictors (e.g., patient age, body mass index, magnetic resonance image findings, etc.) did not reach statistical significance. Each of the multifocal infections involved the lumbar spine.

Conclusion

In this study, the spinal region was the only statistically significant risk factor for multifocal infection. Patients who are diagnosed with a spinal infection that requires operative treatment should have their entire spine evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging to detect multifocal involvement promptly.